Too much vertical space above xrightarrow












3















I currently have the following shortcut in my LaTeX document for an isomorphism arrow:



usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}



newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{sim}}


This works fine, except for the fact that there is a bit too much vertical space below the sim.

In particular, if the arrow happens to appear below any other inline maths, then things seem a little bit too squished.

How can I lower the sim to be closer to my xrightarrow?



Here is how things look at the moment:



current situation






spacing symbols stacking-symbols







share|improve this question

























  • See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231785/…, tex.stackexchange.com/questions/419965/…

    – Steven B. Segletes
    14 hours ago


















3















I currently have the following shortcut in my LaTeX document for an isomorphism arrow:



usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}



newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{sim}}


This works fine, except for the fact that there is a bit too much vertical space below the sim.

In particular, if the arrow happens to appear below any other inline maths, then things seem a little bit too squished.

How can I lower the sim to be closer to my xrightarrow?



Here is how things look at the moment:



current situation






spacing symbols stacking-symbols







share|improve this question

























  • See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231785/…, tex.stackexchange.com/questions/419965/…

    – Steven B. Segletes
    14 hours ago
















3












3








3


0






I currently have the following shortcut in my LaTeX document for an isomorphism arrow:



usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}



newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{sim}}


This works fine, except for the fact that there is a bit too much vertical space below the sim.

In particular, if the arrow happens to appear below any other inline maths, then things seem a little bit too squished.

How can I lower the sim to be closer to my xrightarrow?



Here is how things look at the moment:



current situation






spacing symbols stacking-symbols







share|improve this question
















I currently have the following shortcut in my LaTeX document for an isomorphism arrow:



usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}



newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{sim}}


This works fine, except for the fact that there is a bit too much vertical space below the sim.

In particular, if the arrow happens to appear below any other inline maths, then things seem a little bit too squished.

How can I lower the sim to be closer to my xrightarrow?



Here is how things look at the moment:



current situation






spacing symbols stacking-symbols




spacing symbols stacking-symbols






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago









CarLaTeX

33.4k551137




33.4k551137










asked 14 hours ago









TimTim

1908




1908













  • See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231785/…, tex.stackexchange.com/questions/419965/…

    – Steven B. Segletes
    14 hours ago





















  • See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231785/…, tex.stackexchange.com/questions/419965/…

    – Steven B. Segletes
    14 hours ago



















See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231785/…, tex.stackexchange.com/questions/419965/…

– Steven B. Segletes
14 hours ago







See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/231785/…, tex.stackexchange.com/questions/419965/…

– Steven B. Segletes
14 hours ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














If you don't need it in scriptstyle (though I think xrightarrow only comes in textstyle), then



documentclass{article}

usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}

newcommand{congto}{altxrightarrow{sim}}

usepackage{stackengine,amsmath}

newcommandaltxrightarrow[2][0pt]{mathrel{ensurestackMath{stackengine%

  {dimexpr#1-7.5pt}{xrightarrow{phantom{#2}}}{scriptstyle!#2,}%

  {O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}}}

begin{document}

$Acongto B$



$Aaltxrightarrow{equiv} B$



$Aaltxrightarrow[-2pt]{mathrm{wth}} B$

end{document}


enter image description here



altxrightarrow thrown in for free.






share|improve this answer

































    2














    Following the links in a comment, I just used



    newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{raisebox{-1ex}[0ex][0ex]{$sim$}}}


    which worked great:



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479322%2ftoo-much-vertical-space-above-xrightarrow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      If you don't need it in scriptstyle (though I think xrightarrow only comes in textstyle), then



      documentclass{article}
      
usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}
      
newcommand{congto}{altxrightarrow{sim}}
      
usepackage{stackengine,amsmath}
      
newcommandaltxrightarrow[2][0pt]{mathrel{ensurestackMath{stackengine%
      
  {dimexpr#1-7.5pt}{xrightarrow{phantom{#2}}}{scriptstyle!#2,}%
      
  {O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}}}
      
begin{document}
      
$Acongto B$
      

      
$Aaltxrightarrow{equiv} B$
      

      
$Aaltxrightarrow[-2pt]{mathrm{wth}} B$
      
end{document}


      enter image description here



      altxrightarrow thrown in for free.






      share|improve this answer






























        3














        If you don't need it in scriptstyle (though I think xrightarrow only comes in textstyle), then



        documentclass{article}
        
usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}
        
newcommand{congto}{altxrightarrow{sim}}
        
usepackage{stackengine,amsmath}
        
newcommandaltxrightarrow[2][0pt]{mathrel{ensurestackMath{stackengine%
        
  {dimexpr#1-7.5pt}{xrightarrow{phantom{#2}}}{scriptstyle!#2,}%
        
  {O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}}}
        
begin{document}
        
$Acongto B$
        

        
$Aaltxrightarrow{equiv} B$
        

        
$Aaltxrightarrow[-2pt]{mathrm{wth}} B$
        
end{document}


        enter image description here



        altxrightarrow thrown in for free.






        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          If you don't need it in scriptstyle (though I think xrightarrow only comes in textstyle), then



          documentclass{article}
          
usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}
          
newcommand{congto}{altxrightarrow{sim}}
          
usepackage{stackengine,amsmath}
          
newcommandaltxrightarrow[2][0pt]{mathrel{ensurestackMath{stackengine%
          
  {dimexpr#1-7.5pt}{xrightarrow{phantom{#2}}}{scriptstyle!#2,}%
          
  {O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}}}
          
begin{document}
          
$Acongto B$
          

          
$Aaltxrightarrow{equiv} B$
          

          
$Aaltxrightarrow[-2pt]{mathrm{wth}} B$
          
end{document}


          enter image description here



          altxrightarrow thrown in for free.






          share|improve this answer















          If you don't need it in scriptstyle (though I think xrightarrow only comes in textstyle), then



          documentclass{article}
          
usepackage{kpfonts,Baskervaldx,mathrsfs,calligra}
          
newcommand{congto}{altxrightarrow{sim}}
          
usepackage{stackengine,amsmath}
          
newcommandaltxrightarrow[2][0pt]{mathrel{ensurestackMath{stackengine%
          
  {dimexpr#1-7.5pt}{xrightarrow{phantom{#2}}}{scriptstyle!#2,}%
          
  {O}{c}{F}{F}{S}}}}
          
begin{document}
          
$Acongto B$
          

          
$Aaltxrightarrow{equiv} B$
          

          
$Aaltxrightarrow[-2pt]{mathrm{wth}} B$
          
end{document}


          enter image description here



          altxrightarrow thrown in for free.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 13 hours ago

























          answered 13 hours ago









          Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

          158k9204411




          158k9204411























              2














              Following the links in a comment, I just used



              newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{raisebox{-1ex}[0ex][0ex]{$sim$}}}


              which worked great:



              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer






























                2














                Following the links in a comment, I just used



                newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{raisebox{-1ex}[0ex][0ex]{$sim$}}}


                which worked great:



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer




























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  Following the links in a comment, I just used



                  newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{raisebox{-1ex}[0ex][0ex]{$sim$}}}


                  which worked great:



                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer















                  Following the links in a comment, I just used



                  newcommand{congto}{xrightarrow{raisebox{-1ex}[0ex][0ex]{$sim$}}}


                  which worked great:



                  enter image description here







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 13 hours ago









                  CarLaTeX

                  33.4k551137




                  33.4k551137










                  answered 13 hours ago









                  TimTim

                  1908




                  1908






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479322%2ftoo-much-vertical-space-above-xrightarrow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to label and detect the document text images

                      Image
                      1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
                      Read more

                      Vallis Paradisi

                      Image
                      Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
                      Read more

                      Tabula Rosettana

                      Image
                      Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
                      Read more