Htydjtk

My wife and I are very frugal. We've been living abroad for several years and saved a decent amount of our salaries. We've decided to move back to the US this year.

We've found a modest home that needs some work, but has good bones and is livable. We could buy the house outright in cash with our savings, but that would leave us with only a few thousand in savings. With that money we would also need to find transportation (maybe a car loan - yuck), buy used appliances and furniture and live on until we find gainful employment. It would be the most broke either of us have been since we were in college. We don't have any credit card debt, so we could rely on credit in an emergency, but neither of us like the idea of that. We'd also have to put off any repairs or updates to the house. The house is VERY low on taxes - $390/year. However, it's in a small town which will likely be a 1-hour commute from where I will probably find work. My wife could probably find work much closer.

The other option would be to rent a place. We could obviously rely on our savings until we find employment and not have to rely on credit for emergencies or buying reliable transportation. It just seems like throwing money away. On the other hand, it would be a very low-stress situation.

This decision has been so hard for us. Any advice would be appreciated.

Because you don't have the jobs lined up, it makes more sense to rent for a few months for a couple of reasons:

A: You should never deplete your emergency fund of 3 to 6 months for non-emergencies

B: Once you land a job, you can make a better judgement as to where to live for the commute.

C: Car loans and credit cards are expensive forms of debt that should be avoided if you want to build wealth (the fact you have neither of these consumer debts is awesome, don't wreck that by putting your financial future at risk).

With rent, you're buying patience. There's a house on every corner so don't get house fever over this one property. Renting will provide you with the least risk and most options until you can get your feet under you after the move. Spend a year getting to know the neighborhoods, find employment and building up more savings for a larger down payment. If you find a home a year later you can buy for cash (over and above your emergency fund) even better!

Financial Expert, Dave Ramsey, has this to say about renting vs buying: https://www.daveramsey.com/blog/buy-vs-rent-myths-busted

The link covers what's mentioned above.

Keep up the great work!

@Adam Klump gave the advice I would personally follow, but I want to give a third possibility.

I'm not from the US, but it seems to me that you don't have to buy the house outright in cash, you still have the possibility to take a loan. You'll still be able to pay it off whenever you want, and may be able to negotiate low interest rate and have the money to pay it off in only 10 years instead of 15/20/25... It should enable you to minimize total interest.

You would be able to keep a big part of your savings while still owning your home. The difference to be aware of between my solution and @Adam Klump's is whether it is cheaper to rent for a few months/years than to pay interest on a loan. That, and the difference in mobility, of course.

You are overlooking the real cost of automobiles

People have a strong tendency to wildly delude themselves about the true, total costs of automobiles. About 15 years ago, AAA tallied up the total, real ownership cost of a reasonably recent car. It came out to $7000/year. And those costs haven't exactly gone down.

You didn't say where you aim to live. But I am guessing the under $400/year property tax doesn't fund a robust public transit system that makes life without a car workable as it might be in Brooklyn, West Hollywood, Little Five Points, city center Detroit, Jefferson City, Santa Cruz, etc.

Notably none of these places are an hour away from where all the jobs are. So you have plainly identified a location in rural or exurban America. It doesn't havetransit. It may not even have Über. It may be very nice in other ways, and you may have family support there. But you need to deal with the "car" thing.

The old AAA $7000/year presumed normal 10,000-12,000 mile/year use. A job an hour away - 2 hours driving a day - that means 60-120 miles a day, 15,000 to 30,000 additional miles a year to your car, with higher vehicle costs. Including insurance - the insurer cares when you drive a lot of miles.

Given your financial status, I gather you would pursue a used car, which means you will run afoul of Harper's Law: Never owe money on a car that's out of warranty. Because then you are really sunk: a broken car is worth nothing so your note is upside down (and they may call the note when they see the tracker stop moving), and you need another car ASAP.

This kind of overextension is exactly how people enter the death spiral that leads to 470 credit, payday loans and being unbanked.

The cost of transport must be factored as part of the cost of home ownership.

Especially if this is a "fixer", you will need to regularly transport building materials. I'm not saying "run out and buy an F150" because then, fuel costs alone on the 1-hour commute will murder you. You would need to rent a truck or pay for the building supply to deliver, so there's that cost too.

All this points out how wealth isn't cash, it's situation

Wealth is when your life and your assets are set up to work in your favor and save/make you money.

Simply having a pile of cash isn't wealth. Simply saving money isn't wealth, especially when the money-saving strategy causes difficult-to-contain expenses.

So for instance, I would not want to see you moving into a deteriorating trailer home that you can keep holding together. I would want to see you move into a good flipper candidate, so you can use your own skill assets to multiply sweat equity, yielding a property that is worth a lot, which you then sell and do again.

Even buying for cash is over-rated. I would much rather see you take a mortgage to buy a triplex where transit does work, close to jobs, and where the rental on the other two units mostly pays the mortgage. Rents go up, mortgage payments do not.

The point is to engineer wealth into your life.

My advice is to cost-compare buying vs renting before making the plunge to buy a home. Where I live, it's much more cost-effective to rent. Brother and I thought about buying a house. Even if we bought the house out-right with cash, we'd still have insurance and taxes to pay (not to mention any home repairs that might come up). The taxes + insurance alone was more then the cost of renting. Plus, the houses we could afford were located in inconvenient places where we work (the commute would be bad).

We live in a very mobile economy these days. The idea of buying a house is still part of that American Dream that people hold on to from the past, when people would get employed by a company and work there until retirement. (EG: people working at the same steel mill all their lives, or for the same headquarters corporate office all their lives).

Companies come and go based on global demands (eg: taxes lower in one country, they shift their headquarters to it. Labor is cheaper in another country, they shift all their manufacturing to it).

Being anchored to a house can prevent you from being mobile and taking advantage of the mobile world economy.

Also, some people still have it in their heads that houses appreciate with age (ie: gain value). This isn't always the case. Neighborhoods age. If they age gracefully, then the property value may go up. But, where we live, a lot of neighborhoods are just getting run down. A $200k house in a neighborhood back when is now valued at $150k, simply because the neighborhood is older, the houses are older, and the neighborhoods are becoming more run down. Instead of sticking around and fixing up old houses, people are moving to new houses and the neighborhoods run down. The commercial / businesses around the area are also changing. There used to be nice businesses. But, when the businesses near a neighborhood turn into pawn shops and pay-day loans.. the neighborhood has run down.

When renting, you're just locked in until your lease is up, and the landlord is responsible for all repairs. If rent goes up, or you get a job some place else, you just move.

If you have a house, you have to worry about a longer commute if your job moves. You can't jump on jobs that are across the country / globe, because you have a house to get rid of. You can try to turn the house into a rental property, but that can be an extra headache. In a buy'ers market, you will either have to sit on the house or sell it for a loss.

A house can just be a headache. But, it all depends on what your long-term goals are and the market you live in. For folks wanting to start a family, a house can be great. But, for one or two adults, renting may still be the better way to go.

So, you should consider why you want to buy a house. If you're chasing the American Dream (ie: everyone says you should), you should look around and see how that American Dream is working out. There are home owners that are stuck with mortgages, or with houses they've paid off that are in rundown neighborhoods where the home has lost value. (A house is not an investment. It's a tangible good that can depreciate in value.) The American Dream of owning your own home and retiring is becoming more and more unobtainable and/or impractical for most folks. I did the math a long time ago, and figured out I could either have kids and own a home.. and work the rest of my life. Or, rent, save my money, not have kids, and retire one day comfortable. I decided retirement sounds better.

So, you really need to map out your long-term goals, and compare them with current market values and estimated future markets to see what meshes with what you want.

Since my brother and I looked a while back, I have since settle down with a wife, but even we're sitting here renting, because it simply makes more sense to rent right now. We eventually want to get a home, but the city we live in is a massive metroplex, and the "sweet spot" locations in the middle of the metroplex are insanely expensive. Everyone is moving to the burbs, and the burbs keep pushing out furhter and further with urban sprawl, but that would put us at 2 hour commutes both ways to get to jobs. We decided renting and living near our jobs was much less stressful, and we spend less money, too.