Logic Puzzle: Solve and Provide Explanation [on hold]
$begingroup$
Please solve the logic puzzle above and provide an explanation for your reasoning.
pattern number-sequence
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by Gareth McCaughan♦ 7 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This looks like a puzzle you found elsewhere. For content you did not create yourself, proper attribution is required. If you have permission to repost this, please edit to include (at minimum) where it came from, then vote to reopen. Posts which use someone else's content without attribution are generally deleted." – Gareth McCaughan
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please solve the logic puzzle above and provide an explanation for your reasoning.
pattern number-sequence
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by Gareth McCaughan♦ 7 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This looks like a puzzle you found elsewhere. For content you did not create yourself, proper attribution is required. If you have permission to repost this, please edit to include (at minimum) where it came from, then vote to reopen. Posts which use someone else's content without attribution are generally deleted." – Gareth McCaughan
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
4
$begingroup$
Hi Rahul, welcome to PSE! What is the source of this puzzle?
$endgroup$
– Greg
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Please solve the logic puzzle above and provide an explanation for your reasoning.
pattern number-sequence
New contributor
$endgroup$
Please solve the logic puzzle above and provide an explanation for your reasoning.
pattern number-sequence
pattern number-sequence
New contributor
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
Hugh
1,5391717
1,5391717
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
Rahul SinhaRahul Sinha
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Gareth McCaughan♦ 7 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This looks like a puzzle you found elsewhere. For content you did not create yourself, proper attribution is required. If you have permission to repost this, please edit to include (at minimum) where it came from, then vote to reopen. Posts which use someone else's content without attribution are generally deleted." – Gareth McCaughan
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Gareth McCaughan♦ 7 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This looks like a puzzle you found elsewhere. For content you did not create yourself, proper attribution is required. If you have permission to repost this, please edit to include (at minimum) where it came from, then vote to reopen. Posts which use someone else's content without attribution are generally deleted." – Gareth McCaughan
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
4
$begingroup$
Hi Rahul, welcome to PSE! What is the source of this puzzle?
$endgroup$
– Greg
9 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Hi Rahul, welcome to PSE! What is the source of this puzzle?
$endgroup$
– Greg
9 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Hi Rahul, welcome to PSE! What is the source of this puzzle?
$endgroup$
– Greg
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hi Rahul, welcome to PSE! What is the source of this puzzle?
$endgroup$
– Greg
9 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pretty sure I've seen this style before I believe it's:
3
Because:
Using bottom 2 circles only look at the top/left segment of both. The 1st upper circle is addition. 2nd upper circle is multiplication. 3rd upper circle is subtraction. So 2+6 =8, 2x6 = 12 and 6-2 = 4. Doing this for ? Fits the number 3.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pretty sure I've seen this style before I believe it's:
3
Because:
Using bottom 2 circles only look at the top/left segment of both. The 1st upper circle is addition. 2nd upper circle is multiplication. 3rd upper circle is subtraction. So 2+6 =8, 2x6 = 12 and 6-2 = 4. Doing this for ? Fits the number 3.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pretty sure I've seen this style before I believe it's:
3
Because:
Using bottom 2 circles only look at the top/left segment of both. The 1st upper circle is addition. 2nd upper circle is multiplication. 3rd upper circle is subtraction. So 2+6 =8, 2x6 = 12 and 6-2 = 4. Doing this for ? Fits the number 3.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pretty sure I've seen this style before I believe it's:
3
Because:
Using bottom 2 circles only look at the top/left segment of both. The 1st upper circle is addition. 2nd upper circle is multiplication. 3rd upper circle is subtraction. So 2+6 =8, 2x6 = 12 and 6-2 = 4. Doing this for ? Fits the number 3.
$endgroup$
Pretty sure I've seen this style before I believe it's:
3
Because:
Using bottom 2 circles only look at the top/left segment of both. The 1st upper circle is addition. 2nd upper circle is multiplication. 3rd upper circle is subtraction. So 2+6 =8, 2x6 = 12 and 6-2 = 4. Doing this for ? Fits the number 3.
answered 8 hours ago
RobinchwanRobinchwan
3464
3464
add a comment |
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Hi Rahul, welcome to PSE! What is the source of this puzzle?
$endgroup$
– Greg
9 hours ago