When at first you don't succede try and Try again












0












$begingroup$


Sherlock had just arrived to work one day when he happened to overhear a conversation between some coworkers on the way in. The conversation went like this:




Bob: Did you hear they just came back with a verdict on the murder trial? They jury found her not guilty.



Alice: That's insane, Everyone knows she's guilty. She practically admitted to it before her lawyer forced her to plead the fifth! Just because she's a celebrity and got some fancy expensive lawyer to make up stories about police misconduct and fabricated conspiracies doesn't change the fact that all the evidence shows she clearly shot that poor man. This is a travesty of justice!



Bob: Yeah so far all the news I see agrees with you that she should have been found guilty. But look on the bright side, she could still be found guilty for that murder in another trial, after all legally she could be tried for murder up to 6 more times for shooting him.



Eve: More, if you count civil suits.




Sherlock hurried on to his office to start his day of work, missing the rest of the conversation. He was never one to kept up with the News, so this is the first he had heard about the trial his coworkers were discussing, but it seemed interesting enough that he was tempted to look it up during his lunch break. He would have thought they would have video cameras or other witnesses at such an important location as where the murder must have happened, something to help identify the killer easier.



Where does Sherlock think the murder happened, and why?



Note that while the murder could have taken place at a number of locations given convoluted enough circumstances, I think one location makes the most sense to be the one Sherlock is presuming, given his thought process.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is the (mis)spelling in the title intentional?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:18
















0












$begingroup$


Sherlock had just arrived to work one day when he happened to overhear a conversation between some coworkers on the way in. The conversation went like this:




Bob: Did you hear they just came back with a verdict on the murder trial? They jury found her not guilty.



Alice: That's insane, Everyone knows she's guilty. She practically admitted to it before her lawyer forced her to plead the fifth! Just because she's a celebrity and got some fancy expensive lawyer to make up stories about police misconduct and fabricated conspiracies doesn't change the fact that all the evidence shows she clearly shot that poor man. This is a travesty of justice!



Bob: Yeah so far all the news I see agrees with you that she should have been found guilty. But look on the bright side, she could still be found guilty for that murder in another trial, after all legally she could be tried for murder up to 6 more times for shooting him.



Eve: More, if you count civil suits.




Sherlock hurried on to his office to start his day of work, missing the rest of the conversation. He was never one to kept up with the News, so this is the first he had heard about the trial his coworkers were discussing, but it seemed interesting enough that he was tempted to look it up during his lunch break. He would have thought they would have video cameras or other witnesses at such an important location as where the murder must have happened, something to help identify the killer easier.



Where does Sherlock think the murder happened, and why?



Note that while the murder could have taken place at a number of locations given convoluted enough circumstances, I think one location makes the most sense to be the one Sherlock is presuming, given his thought process.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is the (mis)spelling in the title intentional?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:18














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Sherlock had just arrived to work one day when he happened to overhear a conversation between some coworkers on the way in. The conversation went like this:




Bob: Did you hear they just came back with a verdict on the murder trial? They jury found her not guilty.



Alice: That's insane, Everyone knows she's guilty. She practically admitted to it before her lawyer forced her to plead the fifth! Just because she's a celebrity and got some fancy expensive lawyer to make up stories about police misconduct and fabricated conspiracies doesn't change the fact that all the evidence shows she clearly shot that poor man. This is a travesty of justice!



Bob: Yeah so far all the news I see agrees with you that she should have been found guilty. But look on the bright side, she could still be found guilty for that murder in another trial, after all legally she could be tried for murder up to 6 more times for shooting him.



Eve: More, if you count civil suits.




Sherlock hurried on to his office to start his day of work, missing the rest of the conversation. He was never one to kept up with the News, so this is the first he had heard about the trial his coworkers were discussing, but it seemed interesting enough that he was tempted to look it up during his lunch break. He would have thought they would have video cameras or other witnesses at such an important location as where the murder must have happened, something to help identify the killer easier.



Where does Sherlock think the murder happened, and why?



Note that while the murder could have taken place at a number of locations given convoluted enough circumstances, I think one location makes the most sense to be the one Sherlock is presuming, given his thought process.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Sherlock had just arrived to work one day when he happened to overhear a conversation between some coworkers on the way in. The conversation went like this:




Bob: Did you hear they just came back with a verdict on the murder trial? They jury found her not guilty.



Alice: That's insane, Everyone knows she's guilty. She practically admitted to it before her lawyer forced her to plead the fifth! Just because she's a celebrity and got some fancy expensive lawyer to make up stories about police misconduct and fabricated conspiracies doesn't change the fact that all the evidence shows she clearly shot that poor man. This is a travesty of justice!



Bob: Yeah so far all the news I see agrees with you that she should have been found guilty. But look on the bright side, she could still be found guilty for that murder in another trial, after all legally she could be tried for murder up to 6 more times for shooting him.



Eve: More, if you count civil suits.




Sherlock hurried on to his office to start his day of work, missing the rest of the conversation. He was never one to kept up with the News, so this is the first he had heard about the trial his coworkers were discussing, but it seemed interesting enough that he was tempted to look it up during his lunch break. He would have thought they would have video cameras or other witnesses at such an important location as where the murder must have happened, something to help identify the killer easier.



Where does Sherlock think the murder happened, and why?



Note that while the murder could have taken place at a number of locations given convoluted enough circumstances, I think one location makes the most sense to be the one Sherlock is presuming, given his thought process.







lateral-thinking knowledge






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 31 '18 at 17:20









Rubio

30.4k567188




30.4k567188










asked Aug 31 '18 at 16:55









dsollendsollen

801719




801719








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is the (mis)spelling in the title intentional?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:18














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Is the (mis)spelling in the title intentional?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:18








3




3




$begingroup$
Is the (mis)spelling in the title intentional?
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Aug 31 '18 at 17:18




$begingroup$
Is the (mis)spelling in the title intentional?
$endgroup$
– Rubio
Aug 31 '18 at 17:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The murder must be in




The United States.




This is because




The defendant was able to plead the Fifth Amendment.




That said,




I believe the Fifth Amendment protects against retrials when the Defendant is found not guilty. (If the jury was hung, that’s a different story.) This is true for federal trials only.




Specifically,




The woman is a Navajo tribesperson who shot a man from the Hopi tribe at Four Corners, in Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona.




Although the woman




Cannot be tried again in federal court, she may be tried again in state courts; at this precise location she committed a crime in 4 different states and so 4 states may prosecute her. The tribes are important because she may also be tried by the justice systems of the two tribes.




Alternatively,




The woman in killing him committed a war crime and crime against humanity, and so would also be able to be prosecuted in The Hague and in Geneva or Nuremberg for the last two trials.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:08










  • $begingroup$
    Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:16



















0












$begingroup$

Is this question dead?



Seems like @El-Guest has the location correct:




4 Corners




Because you could be tried 6 times:




4 states + Navajo Sovereign + Federal Gov't







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71162%2fwhen-at-first-you-dont-succede-try-and-try-again%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The murder must be in




    The United States.




    This is because




    The defendant was able to plead the Fifth Amendment.




    That said,




    I believe the Fifth Amendment protects against retrials when the Defendant is found not guilty. (If the jury was hung, that’s a different story.) This is true for federal trials only.




    Specifically,




    The woman is a Navajo tribesperson who shot a man from the Hopi tribe at Four Corners, in Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona.




    Although the woman




    Cannot be tried again in federal court, she may be tried again in state courts; at this precise location she committed a crime in 4 different states and so 4 states may prosecute her. The tribes are important because she may also be tried by the justice systems of the two tribes.




    Alternatively,




    The woman in killing him committed a war crime and crime against humanity, and so would also be able to be prosecuted in The Hague and in Geneva or Nuremberg for the last two trials.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
      $endgroup$
      – dsollen
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:08










    • $begingroup$
      Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:16
















    2












    $begingroup$

    The murder must be in




    The United States.




    This is because




    The defendant was able to plead the Fifth Amendment.




    That said,




    I believe the Fifth Amendment protects against retrials when the Defendant is found not guilty. (If the jury was hung, that’s a different story.) This is true for federal trials only.




    Specifically,




    The woman is a Navajo tribesperson who shot a man from the Hopi tribe at Four Corners, in Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona.




    Although the woman




    Cannot be tried again in federal court, she may be tried again in state courts; at this precise location she committed a crime in 4 different states and so 4 states may prosecute her. The tribes are important because she may also be tried by the justice systems of the two tribes.




    Alternatively,




    The woman in killing him committed a war crime and crime against humanity, and so would also be able to be prosecuted in The Hague and in Geneva or Nuremberg for the last two trials.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
      $endgroup$
      – dsollen
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:08










    • $begingroup$
      Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:16














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    The murder must be in




    The United States.




    This is because




    The defendant was able to plead the Fifth Amendment.




    That said,




    I believe the Fifth Amendment protects against retrials when the Defendant is found not guilty. (If the jury was hung, that’s a different story.) This is true for federal trials only.




    Specifically,




    The woman is a Navajo tribesperson who shot a man from the Hopi tribe at Four Corners, in Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona.




    Although the woman




    Cannot be tried again in federal court, she may be tried again in state courts; at this precise location she committed a crime in 4 different states and so 4 states may prosecute her. The tribes are important because she may also be tried by the justice systems of the two tribes.




    Alternatively,




    The woman in killing him committed a war crime and crime against humanity, and so would also be able to be prosecuted in The Hague and in Geneva or Nuremberg for the last two trials.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The murder must be in




    The United States.




    This is because




    The defendant was able to plead the Fifth Amendment.




    That said,




    I believe the Fifth Amendment protects against retrials when the Defendant is found not guilty. (If the jury was hung, that’s a different story.) This is true for federal trials only.




    Specifically,




    The woman is a Navajo tribesperson who shot a man from the Hopi tribe at Four Corners, in Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona.




    Although the woman




    Cannot be tried again in federal court, she may be tried again in state courts; at this precise location she committed a crime in 4 different states and so 4 states may prosecute her. The tribes are important because she may also be tried by the justice systems of the two tribes.




    Alternatively,




    The woman in killing him committed a war crime and crime against humanity, and so would also be able to be prosecuted in The Hague and in Geneva or Nuremberg for the last two trials.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Aug 31 '18 at 17:21

























    answered Aug 31 '18 at 16:59









    El-GuestEl-Guest

    20.8k24791




    20.8k24791








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
      $endgroup$
      – dsollen
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:08










    • $begingroup$
      Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:16














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
      $endgroup$
      – dsollen
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:08










    • $begingroup$
      Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      Aug 31 '18 at 17:16








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:08




    $begingroup$
    I was looking for something more exact then just the country. And I also stand by the question exactly as written, despite your last comment :P
    $endgroup$
    – dsollen
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:08












    $begingroup$
    Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:16




    $begingroup$
    Well I’ve got a meme answer then...
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    Aug 31 '18 at 17:16











    0












    $begingroup$

    Is this question dead?



    Seems like @El-Guest has the location correct:




    4 Corners




    Because you could be tried 6 times:




    4 states + Navajo Sovereign + Federal Gov't







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Is this question dead?



      Seems like @El-Guest has the location correct:




      4 Corners




      Because you could be tried 6 times:




      4 states + Navajo Sovereign + Federal Gov't







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Is this question dead?



        Seems like @El-Guest has the location correct:




        4 Corners




        Because you could be tried 6 times:




        4 states + Navajo Sovereign + Federal Gov't







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Is this question dead?



        Seems like @El-Guest has the location correct:




        4 Corners




        Because you could be tried 6 times:




        4 states + Navajo Sovereign + Federal Gov't








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 23 mins ago









        arbitrahjarbitrahj

        43419




        43419






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f71162%2fwhen-at-first-you-dont-succede-try-and-try-again%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Vallis Paradisi

            Tabula Rosettana