Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
$begingroup$
A methalox engine is fed from two cryogenic fuel tanks. Why can't the methane and oxygen be mixed as gases, in the desired proportions, and then chilled to a temp that liquefies both? From a single tank a single turbo pump could then feed this into the combustion chamber (part of flow going thru the nozzle cooling channels). Yes, a bit of same mix would be tapped off to power the turbo pump.
Saves the weight of tank bulkheads, separate plumbing, reduces turbo pump complexities. Must be a reason or the rocket scientists would already be doing this, but would like to know what it is.
fuel
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A methalox engine is fed from two cryogenic fuel tanks. Why can't the methane and oxygen be mixed as gases, in the desired proportions, and then chilled to a temp that liquefies both? From a single tank a single turbo pump could then feed this into the combustion chamber (part of flow going thru the nozzle cooling channels). Yes, a bit of same mix would be tapped off to power the turbo pump.
Saves the weight of tank bulkheads, separate plumbing, reduces turbo pump complexities. Must be a reason or the rocket scientists would already be doing this, but would like to know what it is.
fuel
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A methalox engine is fed from two cryogenic fuel tanks. Why can't the methane and oxygen be mixed as gases, in the desired proportions, and then chilled to a temp that liquefies both? From a single tank a single turbo pump could then feed this into the combustion chamber (part of flow going thru the nozzle cooling channels). Yes, a bit of same mix would be tapped off to power the turbo pump.
Saves the weight of tank bulkheads, separate plumbing, reduces turbo pump complexities. Must be a reason or the rocket scientists would already be doing this, but would like to know what it is.
fuel
$endgroup$
A methalox engine is fed from two cryogenic fuel tanks. Why can't the methane and oxygen be mixed as gases, in the desired proportions, and then chilled to a temp that liquefies both? From a single tank a single turbo pump could then feed this into the combustion chamber (part of flow going thru the nozzle cooling channels). Yes, a bit of same mix would be tapped off to power the turbo pump.
Saves the weight of tank bulkheads, separate plumbing, reduces turbo pump complexities. Must be a reason or the rocket scientists would already be doing this, but would like to know what it is.
fuel
fuel
asked 2 hours ago
SpaceInMyHeadSpaceInMyHead
9116
9116
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They would stratify.
Think of oil and water.
Liquid oxygen is much denser than liquid hydrogen, with 1.141 g/cm3 for LOX vs. 0.07099 g/cm3 for LH.
Thus, you need to install equipment to ensure proper mixing of the two liquids. This adds not only complexity to an already complex machinery, it also adds weight.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to what the other answer said, it would take very little provocation for such a situation to turn into a good way to test the blast resistance of nearby facilities.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the static fire test of AMOS-6 it is believed that the oxygen and RP1 fuel combined together due to a failed bulkhead. In this condition, only a small spark is required to cause a large explosion, as seen in the below video.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34973%2fpre-mixing-cryogenic-fuels-and-using-only-one-fuel-tank%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They would stratify.
Think of oil and water.
Liquid oxygen is much denser than liquid hydrogen, with 1.141 g/cm3 for LOX vs. 0.07099 g/cm3 for LH.
Thus, you need to install equipment to ensure proper mixing of the two liquids. This adds not only complexity to an already complex machinery, it also adds weight.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They would stratify.
Think of oil and water.
Liquid oxygen is much denser than liquid hydrogen, with 1.141 g/cm3 for LOX vs. 0.07099 g/cm3 for LH.
Thus, you need to install equipment to ensure proper mixing of the two liquids. This adds not only complexity to an already complex machinery, it also adds weight.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They would stratify.
Think of oil and water.
Liquid oxygen is much denser than liquid hydrogen, with 1.141 g/cm3 for LOX vs. 0.07099 g/cm3 for LH.
Thus, you need to install equipment to ensure proper mixing of the two liquids. This adds not only complexity to an already complex machinery, it also adds weight.
$endgroup$
They would stratify.
Think of oil and water.
Liquid oxygen is much denser than liquid hydrogen, with 1.141 g/cm3 for LOX vs. 0.07099 g/cm3 for LH.
Thus, you need to install equipment to ensure proper mixing of the two liquids. This adds not only complexity to an already complex machinery, it also adds weight.
answered 2 hours ago
Dohn JoeDohn Joe
43128
43128
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Good answer! This is the engineering reason. "Because it won't work!"
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
The question is about methalox. Would the same apply? Also, the mass cost/complexity of mixing needs to be balanced against the mass cost/complexity to two tanks and plumbing.
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
This document shows that the densities of liquid methane and liquid oxygen are greatly different, so yes, the same applies. engineeringtoolbox.com/cryogenic-fluids-d_492.html Oxygen is more than twice as dense as methane.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
49 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to what the other answer said, it would take very little provocation for such a situation to turn into a good way to test the blast resistance of nearby facilities.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to what the other answer said, it would take very little provocation for such a situation to turn into a good way to test the blast resistance of nearby facilities.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In addition to what the other answer said, it would take very little provocation for such a situation to turn into a good way to test the blast resistance of nearby facilities.
$endgroup$
In addition to what the other answer said, it would take very little provocation for such a situation to turn into a good way to test the blast resistance of nearby facilities.
answered 2 hours ago
TristanTristan
10.7k13755
10.7k13755
2
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Put another way: If there exists a tank of premixed liquid CH4 and LOX, I desire to be as far away as physically possible.
$endgroup$
– Tristan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the static fire test of AMOS-6 it is believed that the oxygen and RP1 fuel combined together due to a failed bulkhead. In this condition, only a small spark is required to cause a large explosion, as seen in the below video.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the static fire test of AMOS-6 it is believed that the oxygen and RP1 fuel combined together due to a failed bulkhead. In this condition, only a small spark is required to cause a large explosion, as seen in the below video.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the static fire test of AMOS-6 it is believed that the oxygen and RP1 fuel combined together due to a failed bulkhead. In this condition, only a small spark is required to cause a large explosion, as seen in the below video.
$endgroup$
For the static fire test of AMOS-6 it is believed that the oxygen and RP1 fuel combined together due to a failed bulkhead. In this condition, only a small spark is required to cause a large explosion, as seen in the below video.
answered 2 hours ago
PearsonArtPhoto♦PearsonArtPhoto
83.3k16239454
83.3k16239454
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but it was only an anomaly. :-)
$endgroup$
– SpaceInMyHead
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Now imagine that happening orders of magnitude faster due to premixing. It’s essentially a fuel-air explosive enhanced by a factor of several thousand.
$endgroup$
– Bob Jacobsen
41 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34973%2fpre-mixing-cryogenic-fuels-and-using-only-one-fuel-tank%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown