Can the Locate Object spell be used to determine if an NPC has a heart?
$begingroup$
My party (lvl 7) is investigating a demon portal, and we try to obtain as much info as possible before entering it. We learned that it is kept open by the magical force of something or someone, and it will probably close when we destroy that person or object.
We've come to believe that the object might be the heart of an NPC. To make a long story short, she was cursed to do stuff for an evil God, and probably summoned some demons right before we broke the curse. Those demons opened the gate, but the NPC doesn't remember specifics of the time she was cursed, probably to repress all the horrible things she did with undead and stuff.
We felt her pulse, and she has none. But still, my party is in doubt - it might be because she has no heart, or it might be that she has a heart but it is just not beating.
If our dwarf cleric uses her locate object spell to locate the nearest human heart, that should be able to determine whether the NPC has a heart if she is the closest human, right? Or would the cleric have to have seen an actual human heart?
dnd-5e spells
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My party (lvl 7) is investigating a demon portal, and we try to obtain as much info as possible before entering it. We learned that it is kept open by the magical force of something or someone, and it will probably close when we destroy that person or object.
We've come to believe that the object might be the heart of an NPC. To make a long story short, she was cursed to do stuff for an evil God, and probably summoned some demons right before we broke the curse. Those demons opened the gate, but the NPC doesn't remember specifics of the time she was cursed, probably to repress all the horrible things she did with undead and stuff.
We felt her pulse, and she has none. But still, my party is in doubt - it might be because she has no heart, or it might be that she has a heart but it is just not beating.
If our dwarf cleric uses her locate object spell to locate the nearest human heart, that should be able to determine whether the NPC has a heart if she is the closest human, right? Or would the cleric have to have seen an actual human heart?
dnd-5e spells
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome! You can take the tour to learn more about the site. I changed the title to be more in line with what I believe you are asking, feel free to revert it or edit if you don't like the change. Happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I tried to let the title reflect the intent of what I want to know, but you are right that in the end the question is really about the spell. I am open to other suggestions though. And yes, we have opted the 'we could just cut her open', but not everyone is a fan ;-)
$endgroup$
– Hans Wouters
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My party (lvl 7) is investigating a demon portal, and we try to obtain as much info as possible before entering it. We learned that it is kept open by the magical force of something or someone, and it will probably close when we destroy that person or object.
We've come to believe that the object might be the heart of an NPC. To make a long story short, she was cursed to do stuff for an evil God, and probably summoned some demons right before we broke the curse. Those demons opened the gate, but the NPC doesn't remember specifics of the time she was cursed, probably to repress all the horrible things she did with undead and stuff.
We felt her pulse, and she has none. But still, my party is in doubt - it might be because she has no heart, or it might be that she has a heart but it is just not beating.
If our dwarf cleric uses her locate object spell to locate the nearest human heart, that should be able to determine whether the NPC has a heart if she is the closest human, right? Or would the cleric have to have seen an actual human heart?
dnd-5e spells
New contributor
$endgroup$
My party (lvl 7) is investigating a demon portal, and we try to obtain as much info as possible before entering it. We learned that it is kept open by the magical force of something or someone, and it will probably close when we destroy that person or object.
We've come to believe that the object might be the heart of an NPC. To make a long story short, she was cursed to do stuff for an evil God, and probably summoned some demons right before we broke the curse. Those demons opened the gate, but the NPC doesn't remember specifics of the time she was cursed, probably to repress all the horrible things she did with undead and stuff.
We felt her pulse, and she has none. But still, my party is in doubt - it might be because she has no heart, or it might be that she has a heart but it is just not beating.
If our dwarf cleric uses her locate object spell to locate the nearest human heart, that should be able to determine whether the NPC has a heart if she is the closest human, right? Or would the cleric have to have seen an actual human heart?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
New contributor
New contributor
edited 19 mins ago
KorvinStarmast
76.3k18238415
76.3k18238415
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Hans WoutersHans Wouters
261
261
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome! You can take the tour to learn more about the site. I changed the title to be more in line with what I believe you are asking, feel free to revert it or edit if you don't like the change. Happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I tried to let the title reflect the intent of what I want to know, but you are right that in the end the question is really about the spell. I am open to other suggestions though. And yes, we have opted the 'we could just cut her open', but not everyone is a fan ;-)
$endgroup$
– Hans Wouters
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome! You can take the tour to learn more about the site. I changed the title to be more in line with what I believe you are asking, feel free to revert it or edit if you don't like the change. Happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I tried to let the title reflect the intent of what I want to know, but you are right that in the end the question is really about the spell. I am open to other suggestions though. And yes, we have opted the 'we could just cut her open', but not everyone is a fan ;-)
$endgroup$
– Hans Wouters
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome! You can take the tour to learn more about the site. I changed the title to be more in line with what I believe you are asking, feel free to revert it or edit if you don't like the change. Happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome! You can take the tour to learn more about the site. I changed the title to be more in line with what I believe you are asking, feel free to revert it or edit if you don't like the change. Happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I tried to let the title reflect the intent of what I want to know, but you are right that in the end the question is really about the spell. I am open to other suggestions though. And yes, we have opted the 'we could just cut her open', but not everyone is a fan ;-)
$endgroup$
– Hans Wouters
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. I tried to let the title reflect the intent of what I want to know, but you are right that in the end the question is really about the spell. I am open to other suggestions though. And yes, we have opted the 'we could just cut her open', but not everyone is a fan ;-)
$endgroup$
– Hans Wouters
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's not that easy to use the locate object for this purpose, but it might just work.
The spell can be used in two ways:
The spell can locate a specific object known to you, as long as you have seen it up close—within 30 feet—at least once. Alternatively, the spell can locate the nearest object of a particular kind, such as a certain kind of apparel, jewelry, furniture, tool, or weapon.
Since you haven't seen that specific heart up close, you are limited to the second use case, i. e. finding the nearest object of a kind. There can be some discussion on how exact can you be with specififying the kind but for this to work best, you would want to go with something like "find the closest [NPC's name] heart". But I don't think that's a reasonable kind of object.
What would be a useful (and reasonable) kind of object for this purpose? Exactly what you suggest – [NPC's race] heart (a human heart). For this to work, the person casting the spell would have to be of a different race (in this case non-human, otherwise the heart found would just be the caster's one). So the dwarf is a good choice here. For best results, have another member of the same race (the NPC's race, so a human) close by, but in other direction (unless you actually expect that the heart is kept nearby and could be located with the same casting of the spell).
Is human heart even an object, though? This is tricky. If you view the heart (as your DM might) as an inseparable part of a living thing, it is probably not a valid target for the spell. This may especially be the case if you compare locate object with locate creature (thanks Carcer for mentioning this), as using locate object (a 2nd level spell) to locate a heart (or brain or whatever else) of a specific creature would allow it to entirely replace a 4th level spell. So ask your DM to be sure.
But not all is lost. If a human heart is not a valid target while in a living human, it might certainly be a valid target if it's kept separately. So in your case, if the heart is kept somewhere for the purposes of gatekeeping, you will find it (in fact it's probably going to be the only targetable exemplar of human heart). But only if it is within 1000 feet (and not on the other side of your demon portal).
Keep in mind that your efforts can still be foiled with a even thin sheet of lead.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Hans Wouters is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139716%2fcan-the-locate-object-spell-be-used-to-determine-if-an-npc-has-a-heart%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's not that easy to use the locate object for this purpose, but it might just work.
The spell can be used in two ways:
The spell can locate a specific object known to you, as long as you have seen it up close—within 30 feet—at least once. Alternatively, the spell can locate the nearest object of a particular kind, such as a certain kind of apparel, jewelry, furniture, tool, or weapon.
Since you haven't seen that specific heart up close, you are limited to the second use case, i. e. finding the nearest object of a kind. There can be some discussion on how exact can you be with specififying the kind but for this to work best, you would want to go with something like "find the closest [NPC's name] heart". But I don't think that's a reasonable kind of object.
What would be a useful (and reasonable) kind of object for this purpose? Exactly what you suggest – [NPC's race] heart (a human heart). For this to work, the person casting the spell would have to be of a different race (in this case non-human, otherwise the heart found would just be the caster's one). So the dwarf is a good choice here. For best results, have another member of the same race (the NPC's race, so a human) close by, but in other direction (unless you actually expect that the heart is kept nearby and could be located with the same casting of the spell).
Is human heart even an object, though? This is tricky. If you view the heart (as your DM might) as an inseparable part of a living thing, it is probably not a valid target for the spell. This may especially be the case if you compare locate object with locate creature (thanks Carcer for mentioning this), as using locate object (a 2nd level spell) to locate a heart (or brain or whatever else) of a specific creature would allow it to entirely replace a 4th level spell. So ask your DM to be sure.
But not all is lost. If a human heart is not a valid target while in a living human, it might certainly be a valid target if it's kept separately. So in your case, if the heart is kept somewhere for the purposes of gatekeeping, you will find it (in fact it's probably going to be the only targetable exemplar of human heart). But only if it is within 1000 feet (and not on the other side of your demon portal).
Keep in mind that your efforts can still be foiled with a even thin sheet of lead.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's not that easy to use the locate object for this purpose, but it might just work.
The spell can be used in two ways:
The spell can locate a specific object known to you, as long as you have seen it up close—within 30 feet—at least once. Alternatively, the spell can locate the nearest object of a particular kind, such as a certain kind of apparel, jewelry, furniture, tool, or weapon.
Since you haven't seen that specific heart up close, you are limited to the second use case, i. e. finding the nearest object of a kind. There can be some discussion on how exact can you be with specififying the kind but for this to work best, you would want to go with something like "find the closest [NPC's name] heart". But I don't think that's a reasonable kind of object.
What would be a useful (and reasonable) kind of object for this purpose? Exactly what you suggest – [NPC's race] heart (a human heart). For this to work, the person casting the spell would have to be of a different race (in this case non-human, otherwise the heart found would just be the caster's one). So the dwarf is a good choice here. For best results, have another member of the same race (the NPC's race, so a human) close by, but in other direction (unless you actually expect that the heart is kept nearby and could be located with the same casting of the spell).
Is human heart even an object, though? This is tricky. If you view the heart (as your DM might) as an inseparable part of a living thing, it is probably not a valid target for the spell. This may especially be the case if you compare locate object with locate creature (thanks Carcer for mentioning this), as using locate object (a 2nd level spell) to locate a heart (or brain or whatever else) of a specific creature would allow it to entirely replace a 4th level spell. So ask your DM to be sure.
But not all is lost. If a human heart is not a valid target while in a living human, it might certainly be a valid target if it's kept separately. So in your case, if the heart is kept somewhere for the purposes of gatekeeping, you will find it (in fact it's probably going to be the only targetable exemplar of human heart). But only if it is within 1000 feet (and not on the other side of your demon portal).
Keep in mind that your efforts can still be foiled with a even thin sheet of lead.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's not that easy to use the locate object for this purpose, but it might just work.
The spell can be used in two ways:
The spell can locate a specific object known to you, as long as you have seen it up close—within 30 feet—at least once. Alternatively, the spell can locate the nearest object of a particular kind, such as a certain kind of apparel, jewelry, furniture, tool, or weapon.
Since you haven't seen that specific heart up close, you are limited to the second use case, i. e. finding the nearest object of a kind. There can be some discussion on how exact can you be with specififying the kind but for this to work best, you would want to go with something like "find the closest [NPC's name] heart". But I don't think that's a reasonable kind of object.
What would be a useful (and reasonable) kind of object for this purpose? Exactly what you suggest – [NPC's race] heart (a human heart). For this to work, the person casting the spell would have to be of a different race (in this case non-human, otherwise the heart found would just be the caster's one). So the dwarf is a good choice here. For best results, have another member of the same race (the NPC's race, so a human) close by, but in other direction (unless you actually expect that the heart is kept nearby and could be located with the same casting of the spell).
Is human heart even an object, though? This is tricky. If you view the heart (as your DM might) as an inseparable part of a living thing, it is probably not a valid target for the spell. This may especially be the case if you compare locate object with locate creature (thanks Carcer for mentioning this), as using locate object (a 2nd level spell) to locate a heart (or brain or whatever else) of a specific creature would allow it to entirely replace a 4th level spell. So ask your DM to be sure.
But not all is lost. If a human heart is not a valid target while in a living human, it might certainly be a valid target if it's kept separately. So in your case, if the heart is kept somewhere for the purposes of gatekeeping, you will find it (in fact it's probably going to be the only targetable exemplar of human heart). But only if it is within 1000 feet (and not on the other side of your demon portal).
Keep in mind that your efforts can still be foiled with a even thin sheet of lead.
$endgroup$
It's not that easy to use the locate object for this purpose, but it might just work.
The spell can be used in two ways:
The spell can locate a specific object known to you, as long as you have seen it up close—within 30 feet—at least once. Alternatively, the spell can locate the nearest object of a particular kind, such as a certain kind of apparel, jewelry, furniture, tool, or weapon.
Since you haven't seen that specific heart up close, you are limited to the second use case, i. e. finding the nearest object of a kind. There can be some discussion on how exact can you be with specififying the kind but for this to work best, you would want to go with something like "find the closest [NPC's name] heart". But I don't think that's a reasonable kind of object.
What would be a useful (and reasonable) kind of object for this purpose? Exactly what you suggest – [NPC's race] heart (a human heart). For this to work, the person casting the spell would have to be of a different race (in this case non-human, otherwise the heart found would just be the caster's one). So the dwarf is a good choice here. For best results, have another member of the same race (the NPC's race, so a human) close by, but in other direction (unless you actually expect that the heart is kept nearby and could be located with the same casting of the spell).
Is human heart even an object, though? This is tricky. If you view the heart (as your DM might) as an inseparable part of a living thing, it is probably not a valid target for the spell. This may especially be the case if you compare locate object with locate creature (thanks Carcer for mentioning this), as using locate object (a 2nd level spell) to locate a heart (or brain or whatever else) of a specific creature would allow it to entirely replace a 4th level spell. So ask your DM to be sure.
But not all is lost. If a human heart is not a valid target while in a living human, it might certainly be a valid target if it's kept separately. So in your case, if the heart is kept somewhere for the purposes of gatekeeping, you will find it (in fact it's probably going to be the only targetable exemplar of human heart). But only if it is within 1000 feet (and not on the other side of your demon portal).
Keep in mind that your efforts can still be foiled with a even thin sheet of lead.
edited 48 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
J.EJ.E
3,9131036
3,9131036
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You would interpret a heart as being a discrete object, targeted separately from the creature it is part of?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer For this spell yes. As long as there is a discernible object that is well defined, I would consider it a valid target. I'd say a heart is discrete enough (sure it is connected to other things, but that does not seem important).
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer And actually in this specific situation, where the heart might exist outside of it's original human, it would definitely count as a discrete separate object in that case and would definitely be the nearest – and the only – (discrete, separate) object of the kind (human heart), if you wouldn't allow it as targetable while inside a human.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I would definitely agree that if the heart has been removed at that point it counts as an object. I think that defining the heart as an object when it is still part of a living creature will be more contentious - that way lies shenanigans which let you basically replicate Locate Creature (4th) using Locate Object (2nd).
$endgroup$
– Carcer
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Carcer I see your point and probably will at least mention this in the answer. I absolutely forgot about locate creature. On the other hand, this will always be a shady area. Is brick an object? Sure. Is it still an object when it is a part of a house? Maybe not. Is it an object when it's just a brick covered with wet mortar? Eh...? Somewhere in there, there should be a line to draw, but it's going to be fuzzy and faded and hard to see.
$endgroup$
– J.E
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Hans Wouters is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hans Wouters is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hans Wouters is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hans Wouters is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f139716%2fcan-the-locate-object-spell-be-used-to-determine-if-an-npc-has-a-heart%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome! You can take the tour to learn more about the site. I changed the title to be more in line with what I believe you are asking, feel free to revert it or edit if you don't like the change. Happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Thanks. I tried to let the title reflect the intent of what I want to know, but you are right that in the end the question is really about the spell. I am open to other suggestions though. And yes, we have opted the 'we could just cut her open', but not everyone is a fan ;-)
$endgroup$
– Hans Wouters
2 hours ago