Creating two special characters
In a paper I'm writing, there are words using the alphabet ${{sf D,R}}$. It will be very convenient to add ornated versions as in the picture below, but I have no idea how to create something that is scalable and can be used in text (as opposed to being an included image); hence, no included code.
The little circles can be bullets, and are about flush with the top/bottom of their respective letters, and could be larger than shown.
symbols characters
add a comment |
In a paper I'm writing, there are words using the alphabet ${{sf D,R}}$. It will be very convenient to add ornated versions as in the picture below, but I have no idea how to create something that is scalable and can be used in text (as opposed to being an included image); hence, no included code.
The little circles can be bullets, and are about flush with the top/bottom of their respective letters, and could be larger than shown.
symbols characters
The commandsf
has been deprecated for more than 20 years. Usemathsf{R}
.
– egreg
57 mins ago
add a comment |
In a paper I'm writing, there are words using the alphabet ${{sf D,R}}$. It will be very convenient to add ornated versions as in the picture below, but I have no idea how to create something that is scalable and can be used in text (as opposed to being an included image); hence, no included code.
The little circles can be bullets, and are about flush with the top/bottom of their respective letters, and could be larger than shown.
symbols characters
In a paper I'm writing, there are words using the alphabet ${{sf D,R}}$. It will be very convenient to add ornated versions as in the picture below, but I have no idea how to create something that is scalable and can be used in text (as opposed to being an included image); hence, no included code.
The little circles can be bullets, and are about flush with the top/bottom of their respective letters, and could be larger than shown.
symbols characters
symbols characters
asked 5 hours ago
yrodroyrodro
243138
243138
The commandsf
has been deprecated for more than 20 years. Usemathsf{R}
.
– egreg
57 mins ago
add a comment |
The commandsf
has been deprecated for more than 20 years. Usemathsf{R}
.
– egreg
57 mins ago
The command
sf
has been deprecated for more than 20 years. Use mathsf{R}
.– egreg
57 mins ago
The command
sf
has been deprecated for more than 20 years. Use mathsf{R}
.– egreg
57 mins ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}kern0.075em}
newcommanddotD{kern.06emstackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
end{document}
I added kerning to account for the extra width. However, if you prefer the original kerning of R and D,
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}}
newcommanddotD{stackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
sffamily RD{Large RD}
end{document}
add a comment |
Here is an option using ooalign
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
newcommandRR{{ooalign{textsf{R}kern.107emcrhfil.cr}}}
newcommandDD{reflectbox{rotatebox[origin=c]{180}{ooalign{kern.04emtextsf{D}cr.hfilcr}}}}
begin{document}
RRDD {LargeRRDD} {HugeRRDD}
end{document}
Not sure what's the point aboutooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code forRR
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoidooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?
– Sandy G
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You can always patch things together.
documentclass{article}
newcommand{OrnatedD}{raisebox{1.35ex}{.}hspace*{-0.22em}textsf{D}}
newcommand{OrnatedR}{textsf{R}hspace*{-0.15em}.}
begin{document}
OrnatedD~OrnatedR {Large OrnatedD~OrnatedR}
end{document}
add a comment |
I prefer letting TeX doing the calculations. ;-)
Just the kerning needs optical adjustment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
% a general purpose macro
newcommand{xmathpalette}[2]{mathchoice
{#1displaystyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1textstyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptstylescriptfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptscriptstylescriptscriptfont{#2}}%
}
makeatletter
newcommand{Ro}{mathsf{R}mkern-1.7mu{xmathpaletteR@orelax}}
newcommand{Do}{mathsf{xmathpaletteD@orelaxmkern-2.7mu D}}
newcommand{R@o}[3]{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{dimexprheight-2fontdimen22#22}{%
$m@th#1bullet$%
}%
}%
}
newcommand{D@o}[3]{%
raisebox{fontcharht#2fam`D}{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{-height}{$m@th#1bullet$}%
}%
}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$Ro+Do_{Ro+Do}$
{Large $Ro$ $Do$}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480737%2fcreating-two-special-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}kern0.075em}
newcommanddotD{kern.06emstackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
end{document}
I added kerning to account for the extra width. However, if you prefer the original kerning of R and D,
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}}
newcommanddotD{stackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
sffamily RD{Large RD}
end{document}
add a comment |
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}kern0.075em}
newcommanddotD{kern.06emstackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
end{document}
I added kerning to account for the extra width. However, if you prefer the original kerning of R and D,
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}}
newcommanddotD{stackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
sffamily RD{Large RD}
end{document}
add a comment |
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}kern0.075em}
newcommanddotD{kern.06emstackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
end{document}
I added kerning to account for the extra width. However, if you prefer the original kerning of R and D,
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}}
newcommanddotD{stackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
sffamily RD{Large RD}
end{document}
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}kern0.075em}
newcommanddotD{kern.06emstackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
end{document}
I added kerning to account for the extra width. However, if you prefer the original kerning of R and D,
documentclass{article}
usepackage{stackengine}
newcommanddotR{stackinset{r}{-.11em}{b}{}{.}{textsf{R}}}
newcommanddotD{stackinset{l}{-0.06em}{t}{}{.}{textsf{D}}}
begin{document}
dotRdotD {LargedotRdotD}
sffamily RD{Large RD}
end{document}
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
159k9204411
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here is an option using ooalign
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
newcommandRR{{ooalign{textsf{R}kern.107emcrhfil.cr}}}
newcommandDD{reflectbox{rotatebox[origin=c]{180}{ooalign{kern.04emtextsf{D}cr.hfilcr}}}}
begin{document}
RRDD {LargeRRDD} {HugeRRDD}
end{document}
Not sure what's the point aboutooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code forRR
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoidooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?
– Sandy G
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Here is an option using ooalign
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
newcommandRR{{ooalign{textsf{R}kern.107emcrhfil.cr}}}
newcommandDD{reflectbox{rotatebox[origin=c]{180}{ooalign{kern.04emtextsf{D}cr.hfilcr}}}}
begin{document}
RRDD {LargeRRDD} {HugeRRDD}
end{document}
Not sure what's the point aboutooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code forRR
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoidooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?
– Sandy G
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Here is an option using ooalign
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
newcommandRR{{ooalign{textsf{R}kern.107emcrhfil.cr}}}
newcommandDD{reflectbox{rotatebox[origin=c]{180}{ooalign{kern.04emtextsf{D}cr.hfilcr}}}}
begin{document}
RRDD {LargeRRDD} {HugeRRDD}
end{document}
Here is an option using ooalign
.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
newcommandRR{{ooalign{textsf{R}kern.107emcrhfil.cr}}}
newcommandDD{reflectbox{rotatebox[origin=c]{180}{ooalign{kern.04emtextsf{D}cr.hfilcr}}}}
begin{document}
RRDD {LargeRRDD} {HugeRRDD}
end{document}
edited 1 hour ago
answered 3 hours ago
Sandy GSandy G
3,7271429
3,7271429
Not sure what's the point aboutooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code forRR
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoidooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?
– Sandy G
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Not sure what's the point aboutooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code forRR
.
– egreg
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoidooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?
– Sandy G
1 hour ago
Not sure what's the point about
ooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code for RR
.– egreg
1 hour ago
Not sure what's the point about
ooalign
. Anyway, you've better add a pair of braces around the code for RR
.– egreg
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoid
ooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?– Sandy G
1 hour ago
Thanks for the reminder @egreg. Just putting another option out there. @Steven already did it a more intuitive way. Is there a reason to avoid
ooalign
? Or just no compelling reason to use it in this case?– Sandy G
1 hour ago
add a comment |
You can always patch things together.
documentclass{article}
newcommand{OrnatedD}{raisebox{1.35ex}{.}hspace*{-0.22em}textsf{D}}
newcommand{OrnatedR}{textsf{R}hspace*{-0.15em}.}
begin{document}
OrnatedD~OrnatedR {Large OrnatedD~OrnatedR}
end{document}
add a comment |
You can always patch things together.
documentclass{article}
newcommand{OrnatedD}{raisebox{1.35ex}{.}hspace*{-0.22em}textsf{D}}
newcommand{OrnatedR}{textsf{R}hspace*{-0.15em}.}
begin{document}
OrnatedD~OrnatedR {Large OrnatedD~OrnatedR}
end{document}
add a comment |
You can always patch things together.
documentclass{article}
newcommand{OrnatedD}{raisebox{1.35ex}{.}hspace*{-0.22em}textsf{D}}
newcommand{OrnatedR}{textsf{R}hspace*{-0.15em}.}
begin{document}
OrnatedD~OrnatedR {Large OrnatedD~OrnatedR}
end{document}
You can always patch things together.
documentclass{article}
newcommand{OrnatedD}{raisebox{1.35ex}{.}hspace*{-0.22em}textsf{D}}
newcommand{OrnatedR}{textsf{R}hspace*{-0.15em}.}
begin{document}
OrnatedD~OrnatedR {Large OrnatedD~OrnatedR}
end{document}
answered 5 hours ago
marmotmarmot
110k5137256
110k5137256
add a comment |
add a comment |
I prefer letting TeX doing the calculations. ;-)
Just the kerning needs optical adjustment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
% a general purpose macro
newcommand{xmathpalette}[2]{mathchoice
{#1displaystyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1textstyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptstylescriptfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptscriptstylescriptscriptfont{#2}}%
}
makeatletter
newcommand{Ro}{mathsf{R}mkern-1.7mu{xmathpaletteR@orelax}}
newcommand{Do}{mathsf{xmathpaletteD@orelaxmkern-2.7mu D}}
newcommand{R@o}[3]{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{dimexprheight-2fontdimen22#22}{%
$m@th#1bullet$%
}%
}%
}
newcommand{D@o}[3]{%
raisebox{fontcharht#2fam`D}{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{-height}{$m@th#1bullet$}%
}%
}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$Ro+Do_{Ro+Do}$
{Large $Ro$ $Do$}
end{document}
add a comment |
I prefer letting TeX doing the calculations. ;-)
Just the kerning needs optical adjustment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
% a general purpose macro
newcommand{xmathpalette}[2]{mathchoice
{#1displaystyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1textstyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptstylescriptfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptscriptstylescriptscriptfont{#2}}%
}
makeatletter
newcommand{Ro}{mathsf{R}mkern-1.7mu{xmathpaletteR@orelax}}
newcommand{Do}{mathsf{xmathpaletteD@orelaxmkern-2.7mu D}}
newcommand{R@o}[3]{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{dimexprheight-2fontdimen22#22}{%
$m@th#1bullet$%
}%
}%
}
newcommand{D@o}[3]{%
raisebox{fontcharht#2fam`D}{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{-height}{$m@th#1bullet$}%
}%
}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$Ro+Do_{Ro+Do}$
{Large $Ro$ $Do$}
end{document}
add a comment |
I prefer letting TeX doing the calculations. ;-)
Just the kerning needs optical adjustment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
% a general purpose macro
newcommand{xmathpalette}[2]{mathchoice
{#1displaystyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1textstyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptstylescriptfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptscriptstylescriptscriptfont{#2}}%
}
makeatletter
newcommand{Ro}{mathsf{R}mkern-1.7mu{xmathpaletteR@orelax}}
newcommand{Do}{mathsf{xmathpaletteD@orelaxmkern-2.7mu D}}
newcommand{R@o}[3]{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{dimexprheight-2fontdimen22#22}{%
$m@th#1bullet$%
}%
}%
}
newcommand{D@o}[3]{%
raisebox{fontcharht#2fam`D}{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{-height}{$m@th#1bullet$}%
}%
}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$Ro+Do_{Ro+Do}$
{Large $Ro$ $Do$}
end{document}
I prefer letting TeX doing the calculations. ;-)
Just the kerning needs optical adjustment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{graphicx}
% a general purpose macro
newcommand{xmathpalette}[2]{mathchoice
{#1displaystyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1textstyletextfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptstylescriptfont{#2}}%
{#1scriptscriptstylescriptscriptfont{#2}}%
}
makeatletter
newcommand{Ro}{mathsf{R}mkern-1.7mu{xmathpaletteR@orelax}}
newcommand{Do}{mathsf{xmathpaletteD@orelaxmkern-2.7mu D}}
newcommand{R@o}[3]{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{dimexprheight-2fontdimen22#22}{%
$m@th#1bullet$%
}%
}%
}
newcommand{D@o}[3]{%
raisebox{fontcharht#2fam`D}{%
scalebox{0.3}{%
raisebox{-height}{$m@th#1bullet$}%
}%
}%
}
makeatother
begin{document}
$Ro+Do_{Ro+Do}$
{Large $Ro$ $Do$}
end{document}
answered 58 mins ago
egregegreg
728k8819233233
728k8819233233
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480737%2fcreating-two-special-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The command
sf
has been deprecated for more than 20 years. Usemathsf{R}
.– egreg
57 mins ago