Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







5












$begingroup$


Assuming I cast the appropriate levels of spells to keep them under my control, could my undead that have already been reanimated stay in a portable hole as they don’t need to breathe or sleep?



I don’t see any reason that they can’t, but this seems like a extremely easy work around to what is normally a large problem.






dnd-5e magic-items undead







share|improve this question











$endgroup$



















    5












    $begingroup$


    Assuming I cast the appropriate levels of spells to keep them under my control, could my undead that have already been reanimated stay in a portable hole as they don’t need to breathe or sleep?



    I don’t see any reason that they can’t, but this seems like a extremely easy work around to what is normally a large problem.






    dnd-5e magic-items undead







    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      Assuming I cast the appropriate levels of spells to keep them under my control, could my undead that have already been reanimated stay in a portable hole as they don’t need to breathe or sleep?



      I don’t see any reason that they can’t, but this seems like a extremely easy work around to what is normally a large problem.






      dnd-5e magic-items undead







      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Assuming I cast the appropriate levels of spells to keep them under my control, could my undead that have already been reanimated stay in a portable hole as they don’t need to breathe or sleep?



      I don’t see any reason that they can’t, but this seems like a extremely easy work around to what is normally a large problem.






      dnd-5e magic-items undead




      dnd-5e magic-items undead






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      V2Blast

      26.9k594164




      26.9k594164










      asked 8 hours ago









      BloodySprinklesBloodySprinkles

      36011




      36011






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          Yes, that's fine. The reason every necromancer doesn't use it all the time is that most wizards don't own a portable hole.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            7 hours ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145139%2fcan-undead-you-have-reanimated-wait-inside-a-portable-hole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9












          $begingroup$

          Yes, that's fine. The reason every necromancer doesn't use it all the time is that most wizards don't own a portable hole.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            7 hours ago
















          9












          $begingroup$

          Yes, that's fine. The reason every necromancer doesn't use it all the time is that most wizards don't own a portable hole.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            7 hours ago














          9












          9








          9





          $begingroup$

          Yes, that's fine. The reason every necromancer doesn't use it all the time is that most wizards don't own a portable hole.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Yes, that's fine. The reason every necromancer doesn't use it all the time is that most wizards don't own a portable hole.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago









          SevenSidedDie

          210k33672955




          210k33672955










          answered 7 hours ago









          Dan BDan B

          39.3k878149




          39.3k878149








          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            7 hours ago














          • 5




            $begingroup$
            I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
            $endgroup$
            – Ifusaso
            7 hours ago








          5




          5




          $begingroup$
          I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
          $endgroup$
          – Ifusaso
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I would guess the reason is that not many wizards are necromancers...
          $endgroup$
          – Ifusaso
          7 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145139%2fcan-undead-you-have-reanimated-wait-inside-a-portable-hole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to label and detect the document text images

          Image
          1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
          Read more

          Vallis Paradisi

          Image
          Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
          Read more

          Tabula Rosettana

          Image
          Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
          Read more