Classifying Car Data By Year
$begingroup$
I have huge car photos.
I want to predict car's "brand-model-body type and production year"
First, I splitted data into train and validation, and I categorized them like this.
Every category has about 1000 train and 900 validation images.
My plan was: I train my keras model with these categories after training, model can predict labels like below:
audi a3 sedan 2008 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2009 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2010 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2011 => %25
And I can tell user that: "This car is Audi A3 Sedan 2008-2011"
My problem is, some of these categories have very similar photos. For example: audi a3 2009 and audi a3 2010 have same body type and there is not much difference between photos (No difference in reality).
Because of that, train accuracy has improved to about 0.9 but validation accuracy hasn't improved above 0.55
When I try some predictions, it usually gives same label, "Ford Focus sedan 2009" :)
Here is my output:
epoch, acc, loss, val_acc, val_loss
27, 0.7965514530544776, 0.56618134500483, 0.5192149643316993, 1.729015349846447
28, 0.8058803490480816, 0.5408204138258657, 0.5176764522193236, 1.778763979018732
29, 0.8167710489770164, 0.5116128672937693, 0.523258489762041, 1.7806432932022545
30, 0.8256544639818643, 0.4872381848016096, 0.5207534764479939, 1.8059904007678271
31, 0.8355546238309248, 0.4629556378035959, 0.5237253032663666, 1.8191414148756815
32, 0.8424464767701014, 0.4444190686917562, 0.5242512903147193, 1.8496954914466912
33, 0.8508739288802705, 0.422022156655134, 0.5303593149032422, 1.8565427863780883
34, 0.8576819265745635, 0.40545297008116027, 0.5262894901236571, 1.909881308499735
My train code is here:
Image_width, Image_height = 224, 224
num_epoch = 5000
batch_size = 16
learning_rate = 0.0001
model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(Image_width, Image_height, 3))
fc_neuron_count = 1024
output = model.output
output = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(output)
output = Dense(fc_neuron_count, activation='relu')(output)
predictions = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(output)
model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)
model.compile(optimizer=opt.Adam(lr=learning_rate), loss=losses.categorical_crossentropy,
metrics=['accuracy'])
history_transfer_learning = model.fit_generator(
train_generator,
epochs=num_epoch,
steps_per_epoch=num_train_samples // batch_size,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=num_validate_samples // batch_size,
class_weight='auto',
callbacks=callbacks_list)
Am I doing something wrong? How can I achieve this result?
Should I change validation accuracy calculation, or should I give more photos per category?
machine-learning keras computer-vision
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have huge car photos.
I want to predict car's "brand-model-body type and production year"
First, I splitted data into train and validation, and I categorized them like this.
Every category has about 1000 train and 900 validation images.
My plan was: I train my keras model with these categories after training, model can predict labels like below:
audi a3 sedan 2008 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2009 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2010 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2011 => %25
And I can tell user that: "This car is Audi A3 Sedan 2008-2011"
My problem is, some of these categories have very similar photos. For example: audi a3 2009 and audi a3 2010 have same body type and there is not much difference between photos (No difference in reality).
Because of that, train accuracy has improved to about 0.9 but validation accuracy hasn't improved above 0.55
When I try some predictions, it usually gives same label, "Ford Focus sedan 2009" :)
Here is my output:
epoch, acc, loss, val_acc, val_loss
27, 0.7965514530544776, 0.56618134500483, 0.5192149643316993, 1.729015349846447
28, 0.8058803490480816, 0.5408204138258657, 0.5176764522193236, 1.778763979018732
29, 0.8167710489770164, 0.5116128672937693, 0.523258489762041, 1.7806432932022545
30, 0.8256544639818643, 0.4872381848016096, 0.5207534764479939, 1.8059904007678271
31, 0.8355546238309248, 0.4629556378035959, 0.5237253032663666, 1.8191414148756815
32, 0.8424464767701014, 0.4444190686917562, 0.5242512903147193, 1.8496954914466912
33, 0.8508739288802705, 0.422022156655134, 0.5303593149032422, 1.8565427863780883
34, 0.8576819265745635, 0.40545297008116027, 0.5262894901236571, 1.909881308499735
My train code is here:
Image_width, Image_height = 224, 224
num_epoch = 5000
batch_size = 16
learning_rate = 0.0001
model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(Image_width, Image_height, 3))
fc_neuron_count = 1024
output = model.output
output = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(output)
output = Dense(fc_neuron_count, activation='relu')(output)
predictions = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(output)
model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)
model.compile(optimizer=opt.Adam(lr=learning_rate), loss=losses.categorical_crossentropy,
metrics=['accuracy'])
history_transfer_learning = model.fit_generator(
train_generator,
epochs=num_epoch,
steps_per_epoch=num_train_samples // batch_size,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=num_validate_samples // batch_size,
class_weight='auto',
callbacks=callbacks_list)
Am I doing something wrong? How can I achieve this result?
Should I change validation accuracy calculation, or should I give more photos per category?
machine-learning keras computer-vision
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have huge car photos.
I want to predict car's "brand-model-body type and production year"
First, I splitted data into train and validation, and I categorized them like this.
Every category has about 1000 train and 900 validation images.
My plan was: I train my keras model with these categories after training, model can predict labels like below:
audi a3 sedan 2008 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2009 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2010 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2011 => %25
And I can tell user that: "This car is Audi A3 Sedan 2008-2011"
My problem is, some of these categories have very similar photos. For example: audi a3 2009 and audi a3 2010 have same body type and there is not much difference between photos (No difference in reality).
Because of that, train accuracy has improved to about 0.9 but validation accuracy hasn't improved above 0.55
When I try some predictions, it usually gives same label, "Ford Focus sedan 2009" :)
Here is my output:
epoch, acc, loss, val_acc, val_loss
27, 0.7965514530544776, 0.56618134500483, 0.5192149643316993, 1.729015349846447
28, 0.8058803490480816, 0.5408204138258657, 0.5176764522193236, 1.778763979018732
29, 0.8167710489770164, 0.5116128672937693, 0.523258489762041, 1.7806432932022545
30, 0.8256544639818643, 0.4872381848016096, 0.5207534764479939, 1.8059904007678271
31, 0.8355546238309248, 0.4629556378035959, 0.5237253032663666, 1.8191414148756815
32, 0.8424464767701014, 0.4444190686917562, 0.5242512903147193, 1.8496954914466912
33, 0.8508739288802705, 0.422022156655134, 0.5303593149032422, 1.8565427863780883
34, 0.8576819265745635, 0.40545297008116027, 0.5262894901236571, 1.909881308499735
My train code is here:
Image_width, Image_height = 224, 224
num_epoch = 5000
batch_size = 16
learning_rate = 0.0001
model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(Image_width, Image_height, 3))
fc_neuron_count = 1024
output = model.output
output = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(output)
output = Dense(fc_neuron_count, activation='relu')(output)
predictions = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(output)
model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)
model.compile(optimizer=opt.Adam(lr=learning_rate), loss=losses.categorical_crossentropy,
metrics=['accuracy'])
history_transfer_learning = model.fit_generator(
train_generator,
epochs=num_epoch,
steps_per_epoch=num_train_samples // batch_size,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=num_validate_samples // batch_size,
class_weight='auto',
callbacks=callbacks_list)
Am I doing something wrong? How can I achieve this result?
Should I change validation accuracy calculation, or should I give more photos per category?
machine-learning keras computer-vision
$endgroup$
I have huge car photos.
I want to predict car's "brand-model-body type and production year"
First, I splitted data into train and validation, and I categorized them like this.
Every category has about 1000 train and 900 validation images.
My plan was: I train my keras model with these categories after training, model can predict labels like below:
audi a3 sedan 2008 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2009 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2010 => %25
audi a3 sedan 2011 => %25
And I can tell user that: "This car is Audi A3 Sedan 2008-2011"
My problem is, some of these categories have very similar photos. For example: audi a3 2009 and audi a3 2010 have same body type and there is not much difference between photos (No difference in reality).
Because of that, train accuracy has improved to about 0.9 but validation accuracy hasn't improved above 0.55
When I try some predictions, it usually gives same label, "Ford Focus sedan 2009" :)
Here is my output:
epoch, acc, loss, val_acc, val_loss
27, 0.7965514530544776, 0.56618134500483, 0.5192149643316993, 1.729015349846447
28, 0.8058803490480816, 0.5408204138258657, 0.5176764522193236, 1.778763979018732
29, 0.8167710489770164, 0.5116128672937693, 0.523258489762041, 1.7806432932022545
30, 0.8256544639818643, 0.4872381848016096, 0.5207534764479939, 1.8059904007678271
31, 0.8355546238309248, 0.4629556378035959, 0.5237253032663666, 1.8191414148756815
32, 0.8424464767701014, 0.4444190686917562, 0.5242512903147193, 1.8496954914466912
33, 0.8508739288802705, 0.422022156655134, 0.5303593149032422, 1.8565427863780883
34, 0.8576819265745635, 0.40545297008116027, 0.5262894901236571, 1.909881308499735
My train code is here:
Image_width, Image_height = 224, 224
num_epoch = 5000
batch_size = 16
learning_rate = 0.0001
model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet', include_top=False, input_shape=(Image_width, Image_height, 3))
fc_neuron_count = 1024
output = model.output
output = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(output)
output = Dense(fc_neuron_count, activation='relu')(output)
predictions = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(output)
model = Model(inputs=model.input, outputs=predictions)
model.compile(optimizer=opt.Adam(lr=learning_rate), loss=losses.categorical_crossentropy,
metrics=['accuracy'])
history_transfer_learning = model.fit_generator(
train_generator,
epochs=num_epoch,
steps_per_epoch=num_train_samples // batch_size,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=num_validate_samples // batch_size,
class_weight='auto',
callbacks=callbacks_list)
Am I doing something wrong? How can I achieve this result?
Should I change validation accuracy calculation, or should I give more photos per category?
machine-learning keras computer-vision
machine-learning keras computer-vision
edited Sep 10 '18 at 11:56
ebrahimi
75521022
75521022
asked Sep 10 '18 at 11:28
ibrahimozgonibrahimozgon
1212
1212
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I want to say how I solved my problem for anyone who is looking for a similar question.
My categorization was a mistake. I realized later that, I gave the same photos to my model and waited for the different results. For example, I had nearly same photos in Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2009 and Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2010. When the model starts training, first it learns data. Then it predicts and validates output itself. If the output is wrong, it tries a different way to success. But wait a minute, there was no mistake. I gave you the same photos and waited for different results! My categorization failed here.
I categorized my cars by body changes like Audi A3 Hatchback 2008-2013. Except for categories that have the wrong photos, my results are great for now.
Now, we will work on better photos and better year categorization.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38042%2fclassifying-car-data-by-year%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I want to say how I solved my problem for anyone who is looking for a similar question.
My categorization was a mistake. I realized later that, I gave the same photos to my model and waited for the different results. For example, I had nearly same photos in Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2009 and Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2010. When the model starts training, first it learns data. Then it predicts and validates output itself. If the output is wrong, it tries a different way to success. But wait a minute, there was no mistake. I gave you the same photos and waited for different results! My categorization failed here.
I categorized my cars by body changes like Audi A3 Hatchback 2008-2013. Except for categories that have the wrong photos, my results are great for now.
Now, we will work on better photos and better year categorization.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to say how I solved my problem for anyone who is looking for a similar question.
My categorization was a mistake. I realized later that, I gave the same photos to my model and waited for the different results. For example, I had nearly same photos in Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2009 and Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2010. When the model starts training, first it learns data. Then it predicts and validates output itself. If the output is wrong, it tries a different way to success. But wait a minute, there was no mistake. I gave you the same photos and waited for different results! My categorization failed here.
I categorized my cars by body changes like Audi A3 Hatchback 2008-2013. Except for categories that have the wrong photos, my results are great for now.
Now, we will work on better photos and better year categorization.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to say how I solved my problem for anyone who is looking for a similar question.
My categorization was a mistake. I realized later that, I gave the same photos to my model and waited for the different results. For example, I had nearly same photos in Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2009 and Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2010. When the model starts training, first it learns data. Then it predicts and validates output itself. If the output is wrong, it tries a different way to success. But wait a minute, there was no mistake. I gave you the same photos and waited for different results! My categorization failed here.
I categorized my cars by body changes like Audi A3 Hatchback 2008-2013. Except for categories that have the wrong photos, my results are great for now.
Now, we will work on better photos and better year categorization.
$endgroup$
I want to say how I solved my problem for anyone who is looking for a similar question.
My categorization was a mistake. I realized later that, I gave the same photos to my model and waited for the different results. For example, I had nearly same photos in Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2009 and Audi A3 Hatchback/5 2010. When the model starts training, first it learns data. Then it predicts and validates output itself. If the output is wrong, it tries a different way to success. But wait a minute, there was no mistake. I gave you the same photos and waited for different results! My categorization failed here.
I categorized my cars by body changes like Audi A3 Hatchback 2008-2013. Except for categories that have the wrong photos, my results are great for now.
Now, we will work on better photos and better year categorization.
answered Oct 14 '18 at 17:25
ibrahimozgonibrahimozgon
1212
1212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38042%2fclassifying-car-data-by-year%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown