Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?












4












$begingroup$


I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?






dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components







share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    6 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?






dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components







share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    6 hours ago














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?






dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components







share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I see that, for example:




A cleric or paladin can use a holy symbol as a spellcasting focus, as described in chapter 10. To use the symbol in this way, the caster must hold it in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.




Further, I see that the standard arcane focuses -- orbs, crystals, rods, etc. -- all have to be held in the hand. That makes sense to me.



What I'm not sure about is, for example, the Hat of Wizardry or the Dark Shard Amulet from XGTE. Both specify they can be used as a spellcasting focus (for wizards and warlocks respectively), but it does not make sense to me that e.g. a wizard would be required to hold their Hat of Wizardry in their hand to use it as a spellcasting focus, instead of wearing it. I can imagine a warlock having to grip their Dark Shard Amulet with a free hand, but that still seems like a bit of a stretch, especially when combined with somatic components.



Can these specific foci be used without holding them in hand?






dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components




dnd-5e warlock wizard spell-components






share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









T.J.L.

33.4k5116174




33.4k5116174






New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 6 hours ago









Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

2277




2277




New contributor




Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Louis Wasserman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    6 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Blake Steel
    6 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Maybe you have to tip the Hat of Wizardry like a fedora to use its power ;)
$endgroup$
– Blake Steel
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:




  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]





The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143251%2fdo-these-spellcasting-foci-from-xanathars-guide-to-everything-have-to-be-held-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:




  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]





The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:




  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]





The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:




  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]





The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The Hat of Wizardry says:




This antiquated, cone-shaped hat is adorned with gold crescent moons and stars. While you are wearing it, you gain the following benefits:




  • You can use the hat as a spellcasting focus for your wizard spells.


  • You can try to cast a cantrip that you don’t know. [...]





The text seems pretty clear to me - while you're wearing it, you can use it as a focus. It has a specific verbiage that overrides the general rules.



Furthermore, it seems relatively well balanced: It consumes a precious attunement slot and only works for wizard spells. If the character is multi-classed, they'll still need a different focus, even for classes that can use a more general arcane focus. Sure, it has a second property, but it's only once per long rest.



The Dark Shard Amulet has functionally similar text, except aimed at warlocks.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 56 mins ago









V2Blast

24.6k383155




24.6k383155










answered 6 hours ago









T.J.L.T.J.L.

33.4k5116174




33.4k5116174








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you saying you don't need a free hand to touch the focus?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
5 hours ago










Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Louis Wasserman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143251%2fdo-these-spellcasting-foci-from-xanathars-guide-to-everything-have-to-be-held-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Image
1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C
Read more

Vallis Paradisi

Image
Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para
Read more

Tabula Rosettana

Image
Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a
Read more