Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is
- Look at your watch and tell me what time is it.
- Look at your watch and tell me what time it is.
Is the second variant correct?
word-order
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
add a comment |
- Look at your watch and tell me what time is it.
- Look at your watch and tell me what time it is.
Is the second variant correct?
word-order
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
add a comment |
- Look at your watch and tell me what time is it.
- Look at your watch and tell me what time it is.
Is the second variant correct?
word-order
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
- Look at your watch and tell me what time is it.
- Look at your watch and tell me what time it is.
Is the second variant correct?
word-order
word-order
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
asked 7 hours ago
JaneJane
5891717
5891717
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Strictly speaking, only #2 is "correct".
You ask someone to tell you something = a noun phrase, as in the time [that] it is [now] is 10 o'clock. That's the standard / default English sequence subject + verb + object.
In English, we normally invert the subject + verb element when asking questions, as in What time is it? (but not in the statement / answer It's = It is 10 o'clock).
OP's example #1 is increasingly common among younger native speakers, so I wouldn't want to say it's "wrong". But historically it's long been associated with non-native speakers. So on the one hand you might want to use format #1 yourself - to appear more "with it", and in tune with those younger speakers. On the other hand, older or more pedantic people will tend to think you just don't know "proper" English. My advice is to stick with format #2 in your own constructions, but maybe it depends a bit on who you're talking to.
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
3
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
6
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
3
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
I would like to simplify the issue as to why there must not be an inversion of questioning attached to a command or for that matter with any other sentence type expressing an assertion (statement), an emotion (exclamation) or a wish(optative). Sentences are meaningless if they become an odd assortment of heterogeneous emotions put together. In a sentence the main clause (s) carries the spirit and other subordinate clauses add to that spirit only. Your sentence may contain a bunch of statements, a plethora of commands or a fusillade of questions, but never all in one. That's why grammarians prescribe that barring your main sentence (s) others would be muted to statements or to phrases.
FumbleFingers has rightly mentioned that only No.(2) is correct where the question has been muted to a subordinate statement to elicit the desired answer of the command/ request. There are two commands, alright! It would be meaningless if you add a question or an optative or exclamatory sentence.
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200711%2flook-at-your-watch-and-tell-me-what-time-is-it-vs-look-at-your-watch-and-tell-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Strictly speaking, only #2 is "correct".
You ask someone to tell you something = a noun phrase, as in the time [that] it is [now] is 10 o'clock. That's the standard / default English sequence subject + verb + object.
In English, we normally invert the subject + verb element when asking questions, as in What time is it? (but not in the statement / answer It's = It is 10 o'clock).
OP's example #1 is increasingly common among younger native speakers, so I wouldn't want to say it's "wrong". But historically it's long been associated with non-native speakers. So on the one hand you might want to use format #1 yourself - to appear more "with it", and in tune with those younger speakers. On the other hand, older or more pedantic people will tend to think you just don't know "proper" English. My advice is to stick with format #2 in your own constructions, but maybe it depends a bit on who you're talking to.
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
3
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
6
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
3
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Strictly speaking, only #2 is "correct".
You ask someone to tell you something = a noun phrase, as in the time [that] it is [now] is 10 o'clock. That's the standard / default English sequence subject + verb + object.
In English, we normally invert the subject + verb element when asking questions, as in What time is it? (but not in the statement / answer It's = It is 10 o'clock).
OP's example #1 is increasingly common among younger native speakers, so I wouldn't want to say it's "wrong". But historically it's long been associated with non-native speakers. So on the one hand you might want to use format #1 yourself - to appear more "with it", and in tune with those younger speakers. On the other hand, older or more pedantic people will tend to think you just don't know "proper" English. My advice is to stick with format #2 in your own constructions, but maybe it depends a bit on who you're talking to.
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
3
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
6
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
3
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Strictly speaking, only #2 is "correct".
You ask someone to tell you something = a noun phrase, as in the time [that] it is [now] is 10 o'clock. That's the standard / default English sequence subject + verb + object.
In English, we normally invert the subject + verb element when asking questions, as in What time is it? (but not in the statement / answer It's = It is 10 o'clock).
OP's example #1 is increasingly common among younger native speakers, so I wouldn't want to say it's "wrong". But historically it's long been associated with non-native speakers. So on the one hand you might want to use format #1 yourself - to appear more "with it", and in tune with those younger speakers. On the other hand, older or more pedantic people will tend to think you just don't know "proper" English. My advice is to stick with format #2 in your own constructions, but maybe it depends a bit on who you're talking to.
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
Strictly speaking, only #2 is "correct".
You ask someone to tell you something = a noun phrase, as in the time [that] it is [now] is 10 o'clock. That's the standard / default English sequence subject + verb + object.
In English, we normally invert the subject + verb element when asking questions, as in What time is it? (but not in the statement / answer It's = It is 10 o'clock).
OP's example #1 is increasingly common among younger native speakers, so I wouldn't want to say it's "wrong". But historically it's long been associated with non-native speakers. So on the one hand you might want to use format #1 yourself - to appear more "with it", and in tune with those younger speakers. On the other hand, older or more pedantic people will tend to think you just don't know "proper" English. My advice is to stick with format #2 in your own constructions, but maybe it depends a bit on who you're talking to.
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
answered 7 hours ago
FumbleFingersFumbleFingers
45.9k155122
45.9k155122
3
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
6
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
3
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
6
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
3
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
3
3
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
"What time is it?" is a question, so is it is "inverted" from standard it is. As in Question: How old is he?, Answer: He is 10. More definitively, in constructions involving tell as well as a wh- question word, Tell me who you are is "correct" (it's an imperative command, equivalent to the actual Question form Who are you?). And Tell me who are you is "badly-formed", but not uncommon today. The rule isn't all that complicated, and it would be better for you to apply it consistently even if not all native speakers always do.
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
1
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
Unless you massage the punctuation to make number one a question: Look at your watch and tell me: What time is it?
– Davo
6 hours ago
6
6
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
So "What time is it?" is correct as this is question, and "tell me what time it is" is correct as it's not a question but an imperative command. Have i got things right?
– eefar
6 hours ago
3
3
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
@eefar: Well done, yes. You have it exactly right!
– FumbleFingers
6 hours ago
1
1
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
@eefar: But note that it's not specifically "imperative". It's a matter of whether it's a straightforward wh- question or not. Thus I wonder what time it is isn't an imperative - nor is it actually a question, which is why it doesn't end with a question mark. And at least some people will think you're being "sloppy" if you say I wonder what time is it. Note that English questions always have rising intonation, and if you included that in my last example it wouldn't sound so bad (it's the spoken equivalent of punctuating Davo's example with quote / question marks).
– FumbleFingers
5 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
I would like to simplify the issue as to why there must not be an inversion of questioning attached to a command or for that matter with any other sentence type expressing an assertion (statement), an emotion (exclamation) or a wish(optative). Sentences are meaningless if they become an odd assortment of heterogeneous emotions put together. In a sentence the main clause (s) carries the spirit and other subordinate clauses add to that spirit only. Your sentence may contain a bunch of statements, a plethora of commands or a fusillade of questions, but never all in one. That's why grammarians prescribe that barring your main sentence (s) others would be muted to statements or to phrases.
FumbleFingers has rightly mentioned that only No.(2) is correct where the question has been muted to a subordinate statement to elicit the desired answer of the command/ request. There are two commands, alright! It would be meaningless if you add a question or an optative or exclamatory sentence.
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
add a comment |
I would like to simplify the issue as to why there must not be an inversion of questioning attached to a command or for that matter with any other sentence type expressing an assertion (statement), an emotion (exclamation) or a wish(optative). Sentences are meaningless if they become an odd assortment of heterogeneous emotions put together. In a sentence the main clause (s) carries the spirit and other subordinate clauses add to that spirit only. Your sentence may contain a bunch of statements, a plethora of commands or a fusillade of questions, but never all in one. That's why grammarians prescribe that barring your main sentence (s) others would be muted to statements or to phrases.
FumbleFingers has rightly mentioned that only No.(2) is correct where the question has been muted to a subordinate statement to elicit the desired answer of the command/ request. There are two commands, alright! It would be meaningless if you add a question or an optative or exclamatory sentence.
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
add a comment |
I would like to simplify the issue as to why there must not be an inversion of questioning attached to a command or for that matter with any other sentence type expressing an assertion (statement), an emotion (exclamation) or a wish(optative). Sentences are meaningless if they become an odd assortment of heterogeneous emotions put together. In a sentence the main clause (s) carries the spirit and other subordinate clauses add to that spirit only. Your sentence may contain a bunch of statements, a plethora of commands or a fusillade of questions, but never all in one. That's why grammarians prescribe that barring your main sentence (s) others would be muted to statements or to phrases.
FumbleFingers has rightly mentioned that only No.(2) is correct where the question has been muted to a subordinate statement to elicit the desired answer of the command/ request. There are two commands, alright! It would be meaningless if you add a question or an optative or exclamatory sentence.
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
I would like to simplify the issue as to why there must not be an inversion of questioning attached to a command or for that matter with any other sentence type expressing an assertion (statement), an emotion (exclamation) or a wish(optative). Sentences are meaningless if they become an odd assortment of heterogeneous emotions put together. In a sentence the main clause (s) carries the spirit and other subordinate clauses add to that spirit only. Your sentence may contain a bunch of statements, a plethora of commands or a fusillade of questions, but never all in one. That's why grammarians prescribe that barring your main sentence (s) others would be muted to statements or to phrases.
FumbleFingers has rightly mentioned that only No.(2) is correct where the question has been muted to a subordinate statement to elicit the desired answer of the command/ request. There are two commands, alright! It would be meaningless if you add a question or an optative or exclamatory sentence.
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
answered 4 hours ago
Barid Baran AcharyaBarid Baran Acharya
817512
817512
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f200711%2flook-at-your-watch-and-tell-me-what-time-is-it-vs-look-at-your-watch-and-tell-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
