How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?
$begingroup$
If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as
Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.
The relevant reactions are:
$$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
$$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$
They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.
Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?
For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
hline
end{array}
$$
and
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
hline
end{array}
$$
However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?
equilibrium
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as
Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.
The relevant reactions are:
$$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
$$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$
They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.
Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?
For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
hline
end{array}
$$
and
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
hline
end{array}
$$
However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?
equilibrium
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your "initial state" seems to be pH 7 so you do know the [H+] at the start.
$endgroup$
– Tan Yong Boon
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but the pH is adjusted externally, so we can't take the change in [H+] to deduce how much [HF] and [F-] are changing. For that reason, I left that box as N/A. I could have left the entire column out instead.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
42 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as
Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.
The relevant reactions are:
$$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
$$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$
They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.
Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?
For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
hline
end{array}
$$
and
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
hline
end{array}
$$
However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?
equilibrium
$endgroup$
If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as
Calcium fluoride, $ce{CaF2}$, has a molar solubility of $pu{2.1e−4 mol L−1}$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_{mathrm{a}}$ of $ce{HF}$ is 3.17.
The relevant reactions are:
$$ce{CaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)}$$ and
$$ce{HF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)}$$
They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.
Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?
For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ce{H+}$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x \
hline
end{array}
$$
and
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{HF}] & [ce{H+}] & [ce{F-}] \
hline
I & 0 & text{N/A} & pu{4.2e−4} \
hline
C & +x &text{N/A} & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^{-3.00} & pu{4.2e−4} - x\
hline
end{array}
$$
However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?
equilibrium
equilibrium
edited 3 hours ago
Mathew Mahindaratne
3,870318
3,870318
asked 6 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,705434
2,705434
$begingroup$
Your "initial state" seems to be pH 7 so you do know the [H+] at the start.
$endgroup$
– Tan Yong Boon
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but the pH is adjusted externally, so we can't take the change in [H+] to deduce how much [HF] and [F-] are changing. For that reason, I left that box as N/A. I could have left the entire column out instead.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
42 secs ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your "initial state" seems to be pH 7 so you do know the [H+] at the start.
$endgroup$
– Tan Yong Boon
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but the pH is adjusted externally, so we can't take the change in [H+] to deduce how much [HF] and [F-] are changing. For that reason, I left that box as N/A. I could have left the entire column out instead.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
42 secs ago
$begingroup$
Your "initial state" seems to be pH 7 so you do know the [H+] at the start.
$endgroup$
– Tan Yong Boon
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Your "initial state" seems to be pH 7 so you do know the [H+] at the start.
$endgroup$
– Tan Yong Boon
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but the pH is adjusted externally, so we can't take the change in [H+] to deduce how much [HF] and [F-] are changing. For that reason, I left that box as N/A. I could have left the entire column out instead.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
42 secs ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but the pH is adjusted externally, so we can't take the change in [H+] to deduce how much [HF] and [F-] are changing. For that reason, I left that box as N/A. I could have left the entire column out instead.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
42 secs ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.
Here is the combined ICE table:
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
hline
end{array}
$$
Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.
What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.
Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
hline
E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
hline
end{array}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.
Here is the combined ICE table:
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
hline
end{array}
$$
Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.
What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.
Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
hline
E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
hline
end{array}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.
Here is the combined ICE table:
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
hline
end{array}
$$
Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.
What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.
Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
hline
E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
hline
end{array}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.
Here is the combined ICE table:
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
hline
end{array}
$$
Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.
What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.
Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
hline
E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
hline
end{array}
$$
$endgroup$
The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.
Here is the combined ICE table:
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & pu{2.1e−4} & pu{4.2e−4} & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +x & +2x-y & text{N/A} & +y \
hline
E & pu{2.1e−4}+x & pu{4.2e−4}+2x-y & 10^{-3.00} & +y \
hline
end{array}
$$
Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.
What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.
Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):
$$
begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
hline
&[ce{Ca^2+}] & [ce{F-}] & [ce{H+}]&[ce{HF}] \
hline
I & 0 & 0 & text{N/A} & 0 \
hline
C & +p & +2p-q & text{N/A} & +q \
hline
E & +p & +2p-q & 10^{-3.00} & +q \
hline
end{array}
$$
edited 3 hours ago
Mathew Mahindaratne
3,870318
3,870318
answered 6 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,705434
2,705434
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your "initial state" seems to be pH 7 so you do know the [H+] at the start.
$endgroup$
– Tan Yong Boon
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Yes, but the pH is adjusted externally, so we can't take the change in [H+] to deduce how much [HF] and [F-] are changing. For that reason, I left that box as N/A. I could have left the entire column out instead.
$endgroup$
– Karsten Theis
42 secs ago