Possible answer to the Heaven Hell Door riddle
$begingroup$
There is a fairly common riddle
You're standing between the door to heaven and the door to hell. A guard stands by each door. One guard always tells the truth, and the other always lies. You don't know which guard is which. What one question can you ask a guard to find out which door leads to heaven?
I came up with
Are you capable of speaking the statement 'This is the door to heaven'
Does this work?
For reference the standard answer to this riddle is
Which door would the other guard say goes to heaven?
logical-deduction
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a fairly common riddle
You're standing between the door to heaven and the door to hell. A guard stands by each door. One guard always tells the truth, and the other always lies. You don't know which guard is which. What one question can you ask a guard to find out which door leads to heaven?
I came up with
Are you capable of speaking the statement 'This is the door to heaven'
Does this work?
For reference the standard answer to this riddle is
Which door would the other guard say goes to heaven?
logical-deduction
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a fairly common riddle
You're standing between the door to heaven and the door to hell. A guard stands by each door. One guard always tells the truth, and the other always lies. You don't know which guard is which. What one question can you ask a guard to find out which door leads to heaven?
I came up with
Are you capable of speaking the statement 'This is the door to heaven'
Does this work?
For reference the standard answer to this riddle is
Which door would the other guard say goes to heaven?
logical-deduction
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
There is a fairly common riddle
You're standing between the door to heaven and the door to hell. A guard stands by each door. One guard always tells the truth, and the other always lies. You don't know which guard is which. What one question can you ask a guard to find out which door leads to heaven?
I came up with
Are you capable of speaking the statement 'This is the door to heaven'
Does this work?
For reference the standard answer to this riddle is
Which door would the other guard say goes to heaven?
logical-deduction
logical-deduction
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
asked 14 hours ago
ManavMManavM
1164
1164
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
ManavM is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Seems like this depends on what "capable" is taken to mean. Suppose you're talking to the lying guard.
He might consider
that he isn't capable of saying "This is the door to heaven", because that's a true statement and he never tells the truth. So the truthful answer to your question would be no, and he'll say yes.
Or he might consider
that he is capable of saying that, even though he would never say it if you asked him about this particular door. So the truthful answer to your question would be yes, and he'll say no.
But it's not hard to patch this loophole and get something like
If I asked you whether this is the door to heaven, would you say yes?
and that is in fact another "standard" solution to the puzzle.
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
ManavM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80558%2fpossible-answer-to-the-heaven-hell-door-riddle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Seems like this depends on what "capable" is taken to mean. Suppose you're talking to the lying guard.
He might consider
that he isn't capable of saying "This is the door to heaven", because that's a true statement and he never tells the truth. So the truthful answer to your question would be no, and he'll say yes.
Or he might consider
that he is capable of saying that, even though he would never say it if you asked him about this particular door. So the truthful answer to your question would be yes, and he'll say no.
But it's not hard to patch this loophole and get something like
If I asked you whether this is the door to heaven, would you say yes?
and that is in fact another "standard" solution to the puzzle.
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Seems like this depends on what "capable" is taken to mean. Suppose you're talking to the lying guard.
He might consider
that he isn't capable of saying "This is the door to heaven", because that's a true statement and he never tells the truth. So the truthful answer to your question would be no, and he'll say yes.
Or he might consider
that he is capable of saying that, even though he would never say it if you asked him about this particular door. So the truthful answer to your question would be yes, and he'll say no.
But it's not hard to patch this loophole and get something like
If I asked you whether this is the door to heaven, would you say yes?
and that is in fact another "standard" solution to the puzzle.
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Seems like this depends on what "capable" is taken to mean. Suppose you're talking to the lying guard.
He might consider
that he isn't capable of saying "This is the door to heaven", because that's a true statement and he never tells the truth. So the truthful answer to your question would be no, and he'll say yes.
Or he might consider
that he is capable of saying that, even though he would never say it if you asked him about this particular door. So the truthful answer to your question would be yes, and he'll say no.
But it's not hard to patch this loophole and get something like
If I asked you whether this is the door to heaven, would you say yes?
and that is in fact another "standard" solution to the puzzle.
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
$endgroup$
Seems like this depends on what "capable" is taken to mean. Suppose you're talking to the lying guard.
He might consider
that he isn't capable of saying "This is the door to heaven", because that's a true statement and he never tells the truth. So the truthful answer to your question would be no, and he'll say yes.
Or he might consider
that he is capable of saying that, even though he would never say it if you asked him about this particular door. So the truthful answer to your question would be yes, and he'll say no.
But it's not hard to patch this loophole and get something like
If I asked you whether this is the door to heaven, would you say yes?
and that is in fact another "standard" solution to the puzzle.
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
answered 14 hours ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
64.5k3164253
64.5k3164253
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see, so the basic premise answer is fine but it does snag on what you consider to be the meaning of 'capable'. However, we can reduce that particular answer to the one you stated above, which is loophole free?
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's how it seems to me. (Well, nothing is ever completely loophole-free. But as loophole-free as it's reasonable to ask for.)
$endgroup$
– Gareth McCaughan♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I see...thanks a lot for the explanation :)
$endgroup$
– ManavM
13 hours ago
add a comment |
ManavM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ManavM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ManavM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
ManavM is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80558%2fpossible-answer-to-the-heaven-hell-door-riddle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
