Misplaced omit.multispan ->omit@multispan. I expect to see omit only after tab marks or the cr of an...












3















I made this table that after compiling works properly but I got the message above: can anyone please help me in order to understand what is wrong?



begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
bigskip
multicolumn{1}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • You can't use bigskip before a multicolumn.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    Off-topic(ish), but if each parameter only corresponds to one row, it might be better to not have the table at all. I feel like one of the main points of the table would be to allow you to compare different entries in the same column, and that isn't applicable if each column only has a single row.

    – Teepeemm
    13 hours ago
















3















I made this table that after compiling works properly but I got the message above: can anyone please help me in order to understand what is wrong?



begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
bigskip
multicolumn{1}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • You can't use bigskip before a multicolumn.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    Off-topic(ish), but if each parameter only corresponds to one row, it might be better to not have the table at all. I feel like one of the main points of the table would be to allow you to compare different entries in the same column, and that isn't applicable if each column only has a single row.

    – Teepeemm
    13 hours ago














3












3








3








I made this table that after compiling works properly but I got the message above: can anyone please help me in order to understand what is wrong?



begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
bigskip
multicolumn{1}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}









share|improve this question









New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I made this table that after compiling works properly but I got the message above: can anyone please help me in order to understand what is wrong?



begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
bigskip
multicolumn{1}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}






tables beamer






share|improve this question









New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago









JouleV

5,16511239




5,16511239






New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 18 hours ago









Andrea MazzoranAndrea Mazzoran

183




183




New contributor




Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • You can't use bigskip before a multicolumn.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    Off-topic(ish), but if each parameter only corresponds to one row, it might be better to not have the table at all. I feel like one of the main points of the table would be to allow you to compare different entries in the same column, and that isn't applicable if each column only has a single row.

    – Teepeemm
    13 hours ago



















  • You can't use bigskip before a multicolumn.

    – Ulrike Fischer
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    Off-topic(ish), but if each parameter only corresponds to one row, it might be better to not have the table at all. I feel like one of the main points of the table would be to allow you to compare different entries in the same column, and that isn't applicable if each column only has a single row.

    – Teepeemm
    13 hours ago

















You can't use bigskip before a multicolumn.

– Ulrike Fischer
17 hours ago





You can't use bigskip before a multicolumn.

– Ulrike Fischer
17 hours ago




1




1





Off-topic(ish), but if each parameter only corresponds to one row, it might be better to not have the table at all. I feel like one of the main points of the table would be to allow you to compare different entries in the same column, and that isn't applicable if each column only has a single row.

– Teepeemm
13 hours ago





Off-topic(ish), but if each parameter only corresponds to one row, it might be better to not have the table at all. I feel like one of the main points of the table would be to allow you to compare different entries in the same column, and that isn't applicable if each column only has a single row.

– Teepeemm
13 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Two problems:




  • your first row only has 1+4=5 columns, while your table has 6 columns


  • instead of trying to add skips, I suggest to use addlinespace from the booktabs package



Not strictly speaking a problem, but with 0,13 the spacing around the , will most likely be wrong. I suggest to have a look at the siunitx package





documentclass{beamer}


begin{document}

begin{frame}
begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
% bigskip
multicolumn{2}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
% medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}
end{frame}

end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago













  • @AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

    – samcarter
    11 hours ago



















4














Sorry, but medskip does not do what you expect to.



Consider the simple example



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
medskip
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}qquad
begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}

end{document}


and its output



enter image description here



As you see, the vertical space is added below the second row, not between the first and second row.



You want, instead, to use siunitx and booktabs:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx,booktabs,array}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
midrule
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
midrule
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

bigskip

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


I'd prefer to avoid as many horizontal rules as I can, so I showed also the table without the unnecessary ones.



enter image description here



The second table, with some added vertical space and no boldface:



begin{tabular}{
l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{Model} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Parameters}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
addlinespace
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
addlinespace
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}


enter image description here



Removing boldface is good, the additional vertical space is not really important.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago











  • @AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

    – egreg
    10 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478868%2fmisplaced-omit-multispan-omit-multispan-i-expect-to-see-omit-only-after%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Two problems:




  • your first row only has 1+4=5 columns, while your table has 6 columns


  • instead of trying to add skips, I suggest to use addlinespace from the booktabs package



Not strictly speaking a problem, but with 0,13 the spacing around the , will most likely be wrong. I suggest to have a look at the siunitx package





documentclass{beamer}


begin{document}

begin{frame}
begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
% bigskip
multicolumn{2}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
% medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}
end{frame}

end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago













  • @AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

    – samcarter
    11 hours ago
















2














Two problems:




  • your first row only has 1+4=5 columns, while your table has 6 columns


  • instead of trying to add skips, I suggest to use addlinespace from the booktabs package



Not strictly speaking a problem, but with 0,13 the spacing around the , will most likely be wrong. I suggest to have a look at the siunitx package





documentclass{beamer}


begin{document}

begin{frame}
begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
% bigskip
multicolumn{2}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
% medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}
end{frame}

end{document}





share|improve this answer


























  • Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago













  • @AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

    – samcarter
    11 hours ago














2












2








2







Two problems:




  • your first row only has 1+4=5 columns, while your table has 6 columns


  • instead of trying to add skips, I suggest to use addlinespace from the booktabs package



Not strictly speaking a problem, but with 0,13 the spacing around the , will most likely be wrong. I suggest to have a look at the siunitx package





documentclass{beamer}


begin{document}

begin{frame}
begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
% bigskip
multicolumn{2}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
% medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}
end{frame}

end{document}





share|improve this answer















Two problems:




  • your first row only has 1+4=5 columns, while your table has 6 columns


  • instead of trying to add skips, I suggest to use addlinespace from the booktabs package



Not strictly speaking a problem, but with 0,13 the spacing around the , will most likely be wrong. I suggest to have a look at the siunitx package





documentclass{beamer}


begin{document}

begin{frame}
begin{tabular}{cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}}
% bigskip
multicolumn{2}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Model}}}&multicolumn{4}{c}{largetextbf{underline{Parameters}}}\
% medskip
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \ hline
medskip
textbf{Poisson} & - & - & - & $2,66times10^{-2}$ & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{ Hawkes} & close to 0 & 3.53 & 3.97 & - & - \ hline
medskip
textbf{Branching} & - & - & - & - & $0,13times10^{-2}$ \ hline
end{tabular}
end{frame}

end{document}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 17 hours ago

























answered 17 hours ago









samcartersamcarter

90.9k7104294




90.9k7104294













  • Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago













  • @AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

    – samcarter
    11 hours ago



















  • Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago













  • @AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

    – samcarter
    11 hours ago

















Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

– Andrea Mazzoran
11 hours ago







Thanks for the info, now it works properly. Last things: if I want to preserve this setting but putting the data centering with respect to the column, what should I do? I try to change something in cp{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm}p{1.5cm} but it doesn't work...

– Andrea Mazzoran
11 hours ago















@AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

– samcarter
11 hours ago





@AndreaMazzoran Not sure if I understand your comment correctly, but if you are looking for centred p columns, this answer will help: tex.stackexchange.com/a/157400/36296

– samcarter
11 hours ago











4














Sorry, but medskip does not do what you expect to.



Consider the simple example



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
medskip
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}qquad
begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}

end{document}


and its output



enter image description here



As you see, the vertical space is added below the second row, not between the first and second row.



You want, instead, to use siunitx and booktabs:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx,booktabs,array}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
midrule
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
midrule
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

bigskip

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


I'd prefer to avoid as many horizontal rules as I can, so I showed also the table without the unnecessary ones.



enter image description here



The second table, with some added vertical space and no boldface:



begin{tabular}{
l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{Model} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Parameters}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
addlinespace
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
addlinespace
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}


enter image description here



Removing boldface is good, the additional vertical space is not really important.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago











  • @AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

    – egreg
    10 hours ago
















4














Sorry, but medskip does not do what you expect to.



Consider the simple example



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
medskip
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}qquad
begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}

end{document}


and its output



enter image description here



As you see, the vertical space is added below the second row, not between the first and second row.



You want, instead, to use siunitx and booktabs:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx,booktabs,array}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
midrule
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
midrule
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

bigskip

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


I'd prefer to avoid as many horizontal rules as I can, so I showed also the table without the unnecessary ones.



enter image description here



The second table, with some added vertical space and no boldface:



begin{tabular}{
l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{Model} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Parameters}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
addlinespace
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
addlinespace
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}


enter image description here



Removing boldface is good, the additional vertical space is not really important.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago











  • @AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

    – egreg
    10 hours ago














4












4








4







Sorry, but medskip does not do what you expect to.



Consider the simple example



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
medskip
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}qquad
begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}

end{document}


and its output



enter image description here



As you see, the vertical space is added below the second row, not between the first and second row.



You want, instead, to use siunitx and booktabs:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx,booktabs,array}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
midrule
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
midrule
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

bigskip

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


I'd prefer to avoid as many horizontal rules as I can, so I showed also the table without the unnecessary ones.



enter image description here



The second table, with some added vertical space and no boldface:



begin{tabular}{
l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{Model} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Parameters}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
addlinespace
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
addlinespace
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}


enter image description here



Removing boldface is good, the additional vertical space is not really important.






share|improve this answer













Sorry, but medskip does not do what you expect to.



Consider the simple example



documentclass{article}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
medskip
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}qquad
begin{tabular}{cc}
hline
a & b \
hline
c & d \
hline
end{tabular}

end{document}


and its output



enter image description here



As you see, the vertical space is added below the second row, not between the first and second row.



You want, instead, to use siunitx and booktabs:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx,booktabs,array}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
midrule
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
midrule
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

bigskip

begin{tabular}{
>{bfseries}l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{textbf{Model}} & multicolumn{5}{c}{textbf{Parameters}}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


I'd prefer to avoid as many horizontal rules as I can, so I showed also the table without the unnecessary ones.



enter image description here



The second table, with some added vertical space and no boldface:



begin{tabular}{
l
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
S[table-format=1.2e-1]
}
toprule
multicolumn{1}{c}{Model} & multicolumn{5}{c}{Parameters}\
cmidrule(r){1-1} cmidrule(l){2-6}
& $mu$ & $alpha$ & $beta$ & $lambda_p$ & $lambda_b$ \
midrule
Poisson & {--} & {--} & {--} & 2,66e-2 & {--} \
addlinespace
Hawkes & {close to 0} & 3.53 & 3.97 & {--} & {--} \
addlinespace
Branching & {--} & {--} & {--} & {--} & 0,13e-2 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}


enter image description here



Removing boldface is good, the additional vertical space is not really important.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 16 hours ago









egregegreg

725k8819193226




725k8819193226













  • Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago











  • @AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

    – egreg
    10 hours ago



















  • Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

    – Andrea Mazzoran
    11 hours ago











  • @AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

    – egreg
    10 hours ago

















Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

– Andrea Mazzoran
11 hours ago





Thanks, this is far better looking than mine. Last thing: if I want my table to be a little be wider (i.e. more space between mu alpha beta ecc.) without messing up all the centering what do I have to change in the second code?

– Andrea Mazzoran
11 hours ago













@AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

– egreg
10 hours ago





@AndreaMazzoran Are you sure this doesn't hinder readability?

– egreg
10 hours ago










Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Andrea Mazzoran is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478868%2fmisplaced-omit-multispan-omit-multispan-i-expect-to-see-omit-only-after%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Vallis Paradisi

Tabula Rosettana