Why the color red for the Republican Party
The US Republican Party's official color is Red yet in general political circles that color has been used by Socialist groups and movements. Since the party publicly condemns Socialism why would they brand with Red?
united-states republican-party
New contributor
add a comment |
The US Republican Party's official color is Red yet in general political circles that color has been used by Socialist groups and movements. Since the party publicly condemns Socialism why would they brand with Red?
united-states republican-party
New contributor
4
The Wikipedia page on this subject states that, "The choice of colors in this divide may appear counter-intuitive to foreign observers, as in most countries, red is associated with socialist or social democratic parties, while blue is associated with conservative parties."
– Steve Melnikoff
15 hours ago
1
I heard it was because the Democrats didn’t want to never associated with socialism.
– Andrew Grimm
14 hours ago
5
yet another case where the US does something completely opposite to what's common in the rest of the world.
– SztupY
11 hours ago
1
@SztupY Jealous, eh? :D
– user22277
6 hours ago
@user22277 I know, this is just to confuse outsiders
– SztupY
16 mins ago
add a comment |
The US Republican Party's official color is Red yet in general political circles that color has been used by Socialist groups and movements. Since the party publicly condemns Socialism why would they brand with Red?
united-states republican-party
New contributor
The US Republican Party's official color is Red yet in general political circles that color has been used by Socialist groups and movements. Since the party publicly condemns Socialism why would they brand with Red?
united-states republican-party
united-states republican-party
New contributor
New contributor
edited 16 hours ago
Brythan
69.4k8144235
69.4k8144235
New contributor
asked 18 hours ago
Connor LonerganConnor Lonergan
20413
20413
New contributor
New contributor
4
The Wikipedia page on this subject states that, "The choice of colors in this divide may appear counter-intuitive to foreign observers, as in most countries, red is associated with socialist or social democratic parties, while blue is associated with conservative parties."
– Steve Melnikoff
15 hours ago
1
I heard it was because the Democrats didn’t want to never associated with socialism.
– Andrew Grimm
14 hours ago
5
yet another case where the US does something completely opposite to what's common in the rest of the world.
– SztupY
11 hours ago
1
@SztupY Jealous, eh? :D
– user22277
6 hours ago
@user22277 I know, this is just to confuse outsiders
– SztupY
16 mins ago
add a comment |
4
The Wikipedia page on this subject states that, "The choice of colors in this divide may appear counter-intuitive to foreign observers, as in most countries, red is associated with socialist or social democratic parties, while blue is associated with conservative parties."
– Steve Melnikoff
15 hours ago
1
I heard it was because the Democrats didn’t want to never associated with socialism.
– Andrew Grimm
14 hours ago
5
yet another case where the US does something completely opposite to what's common in the rest of the world.
– SztupY
11 hours ago
1
@SztupY Jealous, eh? :D
– user22277
6 hours ago
@user22277 I know, this is just to confuse outsiders
– SztupY
16 mins ago
4
4
The Wikipedia page on this subject states that, "The choice of colors in this divide may appear counter-intuitive to foreign observers, as in most countries, red is associated with socialist or social democratic parties, while blue is associated with conservative parties."
– Steve Melnikoff
15 hours ago
The Wikipedia page on this subject states that, "The choice of colors in this divide may appear counter-intuitive to foreign observers, as in most countries, red is associated with socialist or social democratic parties, while blue is associated with conservative parties."
– Steve Melnikoff
15 hours ago
1
1
I heard it was because the Democrats didn’t want to never associated with socialism.
– Andrew Grimm
14 hours ago
I heard it was because the Democrats didn’t want to never associated with socialism.
– Andrew Grimm
14 hours ago
5
5
yet another case where the US does something completely opposite to what's common in the rest of the world.
– SztupY
11 hours ago
yet another case where the US does something completely opposite to what's common in the rest of the world.
– SztupY
11 hours ago
1
1
@SztupY Jealous, eh? :D
– user22277
6 hours ago
@SztupY Jealous, eh? :D
– user22277
6 hours ago
@user22277 I know, this is just to confuse outsiders
– SztupY
16 mins ago
@user22277 I know, this is just to confuse outsiders
– SztupY
16 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
As Kevin Drum found (from the Washington Monthly), from 1976 to 2004, the incumbent party's coloring alternated. As it happened, from 1976 through 1996, this meant that the Republicans were the blue party five of six times (1988 was the exception). But no one particularly noticed.
In 2000 and 2004, the Republicans were the red party by that system. And in 2000, it mattered (Kevin Drum from another Washington Monthly article). Because in 2000, the race was close enough that the contested election in Florida mattered. So they spent weeks showing the states broken down under the 2000 color scheme. And because the challenger in 2000 (the Republicans) were the incumbents in 2004, they had the same color scheme even though it alternated. Then 2008 arrived and everyone was accustomed to Republicans being red, so it stuck even though it was the Democrats' turn.
It might not have stuck if it were not that red communism collapsed in the early 1990s. So thinking about red being a communist color was not particularly topical in any of 2000, 2004, or 2008. Bernie Sanders started a revival of socialism in 2016, which continued in 2018. In that context, it seems more important now (in 2019) than it did in 2008 or 2012.
TL;DR: Republicans did not choose red; it was chosen by a historical accident.
1
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
2
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
1
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
3
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
1
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
The usage of the color red for the Republican Party in the US is surprisingly recent. The current color scheme of red and blue didn't become common before the Presidential Elections of 2000. There is a good Washington Post article Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors.
For example, you can see that yellow was used by TV channel ABC for the Republican Party in 1976 (Ford against Carter).
Edit: About the political symbolism of the color red
Today the color red is associated with Communism. This was even more so during the Cold War.
The Soviet Union, (People's Republic of) China, Vietnam and other countries had or still have national flags, which are dominated by red. During the Cold War red was the color of the enemy. Western maps depicted NATO countries in blue and members of the Warsaw Pact in red. Nobody would want red as their color, if they didn't have a good reason (i.e., Socialist and Social Democrat parties - which had already used this color before the Bolshevist Revolution in 1917).
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War it became okay to be associated with the color red. Blue was claimed by the Democrats. Plenty other colors (green, brown, white, purple, ...) have also undesired connotations. Yellow is visually not so attrative - especially in front of a white paper background. So, why not red?
By the way, red is not only the color of Communists. It had been the color of the "flag of defiance". Cities under siege displayed a red flag to show their determination to resist.
During the French Revolution the first banner of the revolutionaries was not blue-white-red - but red. The modern French flag became popular as a symbol of reconciliation after French king Louis XVI acceded to the revolutionaries' demands. It merged the red and blue of the city of Paris with the white of the monarch.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Connor Lonergan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39325%2fwhy-the-color-red-for-the-republican-party%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As Kevin Drum found (from the Washington Monthly), from 1976 to 2004, the incumbent party's coloring alternated. As it happened, from 1976 through 1996, this meant that the Republicans were the blue party five of six times (1988 was the exception). But no one particularly noticed.
In 2000 and 2004, the Republicans were the red party by that system. And in 2000, it mattered (Kevin Drum from another Washington Monthly article). Because in 2000, the race was close enough that the contested election in Florida mattered. So they spent weeks showing the states broken down under the 2000 color scheme. And because the challenger in 2000 (the Republicans) were the incumbents in 2004, they had the same color scheme even though it alternated. Then 2008 arrived and everyone was accustomed to Republicans being red, so it stuck even though it was the Democrats' turn.
It might not have stuck if it were not that red communism collapsed in the early 1990s. So thinking about red being a communist color was not particularly topical in any of 2000, 2004, or 2008. Bernie Sanders started a revival of socialism in 2016, which continued in 2018. In that context, it seems more important now (in 2019) than it did in 2008 or 2012.
TL;DR: Republicans did not choose red; it was chosen by a historical accident.
1
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
2
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
1
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
3
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
1
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
As Kevin Drum found (from the Washington Monthly), from 1976 to 2004, the incumbent party's coloring alternated. As it happened, from 1976 through 1996, this meant that the Republicans were the blue party five of six times (1988 was the exception). But no one particularly noticed.
In 2000 and 2004, the Republicans were the red party by that system. And in 2000, it mattered (Kevin Drum from another Washington Monthly article). Because in 2000, the race was close enough that the contested election in Florida mattered. So they spent weeks showing the states broken down under the 2000 color scheme. And because the challenger in 2000 (the Republicans) were the incumbents in 2004, they had the same color scheme even though it alternated. Then 2008 arrived and everyone was accustomed to Republicans being red, so it stuck even though it was the Democrats' turn.
It might not have stuck if it were not that red communism collapsed in the early 1990s. So thinking about red being a communist color was not particularly topical in any of 2000, 2004, or 2008. Bernie Sanders started a revival of socialism in 2016, which continued in 2018. In that context, it seems more important now (in 2019) than it did in 2008 or 2012.
TL;DR: Republicans did not choose red; it was chosen by a historical accident.
1
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
2
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
1
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
3
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
1
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
As Kevin Drum found (from the Washington Monthly), from 1976 to 2004, the incumbent party's coloring alternated. As it happened, from 1976 through 1996, this meant that the Republicans were the blue party five of six times (1988 was the exception). But no one particularly noticed.
In 2000 and 2004, the Republicans were the red party by that system. And in 2000, it mattered (Kevin Drum from another Washington Monthly article). Because in 2000, the race was close enough that the contested election in Florida mattered. So they spent weeks showing the states broken down under the 2000 color scheme. And because the challenger in 2000 (the Republicans) were the incumbents in 2004, they had the same color scheme even though it alternated. Then 2008 arrived and everyone was accustomed to Republicans being red, so it stuck even though it was the Democrats' turn.
It might not have stuck if it were not that red communism collapsed in the early 1990s. So thinking about red being a communist color was not particularly topical in any of 2000, 2004, or 2008. Bernie Sanders started a revival of socialism in 2016, which continued in 2018. In that context, it seems more important now (in 2019) than it did in 2008 or 2012.
TL;DR: Republicans did not choose red; it was chosen by a historical accident.
As Kevin Drum found (from the Washington Monthly), from 1976 to 2004, the incumbent party's coloring alternated. As it happened, from 1976 through 1996, this meant that the Republicans were the blue party five of six times (1988 was the exception). But no one particularly noticed.
In 2000 and 2004, the Republicans were the red party by that system. And in 2000, it mattered (Kevin Drum from another Washington Monthly article). Because in 2000, the race was close enough that the contested election in Florida mattered. So they spent weeks showing the states broken down under the 2000 color scheme. And because the challenger in 2000 (the Republicans) were the incumbents in 2004, they had the same color scheme even though it alternated. Then 2008 arrived and everyone was accustomed to Republicans being red, so it stuck even though it was the Democrats' turn.
It might not have stuck if it were not that red communism collapsed in the early 1990s. So thinking about red being a communist color was not particularly topical in any of 2000, 2004, or 2008. Bernie Sanders started a revival of socialism in 2016, which continued in 2018. In that context, it seems more important now (in 2019) than it did in 2008 or 2012.
TL;DR: Republicans did not choose red; it was chosen by a historical accident.
answered 15 hours ago
BrythanBrythan
69.4k8144235
69.4k8144235
1
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
2
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
1
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
3
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
1
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
1
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
2
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
1
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
3
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
1
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
1
1
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
I wouldn't say that the Red = Communism was not topical in the 90s. The USSR collapsed in 1992, just 8 years before the party colors solidified. Phrases like "Commie Pinko" or "Better Dead than Red" were still said often, and I do recall Obama (the only Post Soviet Union Democrat to be elected President... Clinton being elected a month before the USSR fell had to struggle with cold war elections) was called a Pinko and a Red socialist more than a few times.+
– hszmv
13 hours ago
2
2
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
+ I imagine that the color wasn't associated with Communism when used in this light because neither party was remotely socialist prior to 2000, and the two colors are in the Flag, so have a U.S. Association... White is also seen as the balancing color or neutral color in political color schemes, which is why it wasn't used. Just to verify this source, I do recall seeing a clip of news coverage of Election 1984 as the ballots came in, showing states called for Reagan (Incumbent) in Blue. In a similar story, the Elephant and Donkey were not chosen, but insults that were appropriated.
– hszmv
13 hours ago
1
1
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
I appreciate the reference, which too few answers provide as well as this one. However, I'm old enough that I remember it happening vividly, so it seems weird to read that some specific person "found" this like uncovered arcana hidden away in a cave for eons.
– T.E.D.
10 hours ago
3
3
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
It's particularly weird now hearing pundits talk about states historically being "reliably red" or "reliably blue" since those color associations are not historical.
– jeffronicus
10 hours ago
1
1
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
What do you mean by "the incumbent party's coloring alternated?" This answer seems to be implying that, before 2000, the incumbent party's color was always blue, but that's the opposite of it alternating.
– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
8 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
The usage of the color red for the Republican Party in the US is surprisingly recent. The current color scheme of red and blue didn't become common before the Presidential Elections of 2000. There is a good Washington Post article Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors.
For example, you can see that yellow was used by TV channel ABC for the Republican Party in 1976 (Ford against Carter).
Edit: About the political symbolism of the color red
Today the color red is associated with Communism. This was even more so during the Cold War.
The Soviet Union, (People's Republic of) China, Vietnam and other countries had or still have national flags, which are dominated by red. During the Cold War red was the color of the enemy. Western maps depicted NATO countries in blue and members of the Warsaw Pact in red. Nobody would want red as their color, if they didn't have a good reason (i.e., Socialist and Social Democrat parties - which had already used this color before the Bolshevist Revolution in 1917).
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War it became okay to be associated with the color red. Blue was claimed by the Democrats. Plenty other colors (green, brown, white, purple, ...) have also undesired connotations. Yellow is visually not so attrative - especially in front of a white paper background. So, why not red?
By the way, red is not only the color of Communists. It had been the color of the "flag of defiance". Cities under siege displayed a red flag to show their determination to resist.
During the French Revolution the first banner of the revolutionaries was not blue-white-red - but red. The modern French flag became popular as a symbol of reconciliation after French king Louis XVI acceded to the revolutionaries' demands. It merged the red and blue of the city of Paris with the white of the monarch.
add a comment |
The usage of the color red for the Republican Party in the US is surprisingly recent. The current color scheme of red and blue didn't become common before the Presidential Elections of 2000. There is a good Washington Post article Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors.
For example, you can see that yellow was used by TV channel ABC for the Republican Party in 1976 (Ford against Carter).
Edit: About the political symbolism of the color red
Today the color red is associated with Communism. This was even more so during the Cold War.
The Soviet Union, (People's Republic of) China, Vietnam and other countries had or still have national flags, which are dominated by red. During the Cold War red was the color of the enemy. Western maps depicted NATO countries in blue and members of the Warsaw Pact in red. Nobody would want red as their color, if they didn't have a good reason (i.e., Socialist and Social Democrat parties - which had already used this color before the Bolshevist Revolution in 1917).
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War it became okay to be associated with the color red. Blue was claimed by the Democrats. Plenty other colors (green, brown, white, purple, ...) have also undesired connotations. Yellow is visually not so attrative - especially in front of a white paper background. So, why not red?
By the way, red is not only the color of Communists. It had been the color of the "flag of defiance". Cities under siege displayed a red flag to show their determination to resist.
During the French Revolution the first banner of the revolutionaries was not blue-white-red - but red. The modern French flag became popular as a symbol of reconciliation after French king Louis XVI acceded to the revolutionaries' demands. It merged the red and blue of the city of Paris with the white of the monarch.
add a comment |
The usage of the color red for the Republican Party in the US is surprisingly recent. The current color scheme of red and blue didn't become common before the Presidential Elections of 2000. There is a good Washington Post article Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors.
For example, you can see that yellow was used by TV channel ABC for the Republican Party in 1976 (Ford against Carter).
Edit: About the political symbolism of the color red
Today the color red is associated with Communism. This was even more so during the Cold War.
The Soviet Union, (People's Republic of) China, Vietnam and other countries had or still have national flags, which are dominated by red. During the Cold War red was the color of the enemy. Western maps depicted NATO countries in blue and members of the Warsaw Pact in red. Nobody would want red as their color, if they didn't have a good reason (i.e., Socialist and Social Democrat parties - which had already used this color before the Bolshevist Revolution in 1917).
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War it became okay to be associated with the color red. Blue was claimed by the Democrats. Plenty other colors (green, brown, white, purple, ...) have also undesired connotations. Yellow is visually not so attrative - especially in front of a white paper background. So, why not red?
By the way, red is not only the color of Communists. It had been the color of the "flag of defiance". Cities under siege displayed a red flag to show their determination to resist.
During the French Revolution the first banner of the revolutionaries was not blue-white-red - but red. The modern French flag became popular as a symbol of reconciliation after French king Louis XVI acceded to the revolutionaries' demands. It merged the red and blue of the city of Paris with the white of the monarch.
The usage of the color red for the Republican Party in the US is surprisingly recent. The current color scheme of red and blue didn't become common before the Presidential Elections of 2000. There is a good Washington Post article Red vs. Blue: A history of how we use political colors.
For example, you can see that yellow was used by TV channel ABC for the Republican Party in 1976 (Ford against Carter).
Edit: About the political symbolism of the color red
Today the color red is associated with Communism. This was even more so during the Cold War.
The Soviet Union, (People's Republic of) China, Vietnam and other countries had or still have national flags, which are dominated by red. During the Cold War red was the color of the enemy. Western maps depicted NATO countries in blue and members of the Warsaw Pact in red. Nobody would want red as their color, if they didn't have a good reason (i.e., Socialist and Social Democrat parties - which had already used this color before the Bolshevist Revolution in 1917).
After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War it became okay to be associated with the color red. Blue was claimed by the Democrats. Plenty other colors (green, brown, white, purple, ...) have also undesired connotations. Yellow is visually not so attrative - especially in front of a white paper background. So, why not red?
By the way, red is not only the color of Communists. It had been the color of the "flag of defiance". Cities under siege displayed a red flag to show their determination to resist.
During the French Revolution the first banner of the revolutionaries was not blue-white-red - but red. The modern French flag became popular as a symbol of reconciliation after French king Louis XVI acceded to the revolutionaries' demands. It merged the red and blue of the city of Paris with the white of the monarch.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
Frank from FrankfurtFrank from Frankfurt
6335
6335
add a comment |
add a comment |
Connor Lonergan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Connor Lonergan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Connor Lonergan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Connor Lonergan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39325%2fwhy-the-color-red-for-the-republican-party%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
The Wikipedia page on this subject states that, "The choice of colors in this divide may appear counter-intuitive to foreign observers, as in most countries, red is associated with socialist or social democratic parties, while blue is associated with conservative parties."
– Steve Melnikoff
15 hours ago
1
I heard it was because the Democrats didn’t want to never associated with socialism.
– Andrew Grimm
14 hours ago
5
yet another case where the US does something completely opposite to what's common in the rest of the world.
– SztupY
11 hours ago
1
@SztupY Jealous, eh? :D
– user22277
6 hours ago
@user22277 I know, this is just to confuse outsiders
– SztupY
16 mins ago