Linux Ubuntu 18.04 Full Backup [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
What's a good back-up strategy for 1 desktop PC?
5 answers
How can I backup my whole system and be able to restore perfectly to where I was? I have installed some nice themes and customized quite a few things (graphically) and wouldn't want to repeat this process if I need to re-install.
I guess my question is, do I have to only backup the home
folder or do I have to do the whole system root
folder. Many topics have advised not to backup the root
folder but has let me confused.
I have no problem installing Ubuntu from scratch again and importing my home folder, as long as it gives me everything back in terms of the UI and custom themes etc. I am not fussed about the actual data such as Documents, Videos etc. I have alternative methods for these via cloud based solutions. Also, I have some commands in fstab but not sure this is stored in the home
directory as well?
My idea was to use rsync
and use
sudo rsync -aAXv --delete --exclude=/dev/* --exclude=/proc/*
--exclude=/sys/* --exclude=/tmp/* --exclude=/run/* --exclude=/mnt/*
--exclude=/media/* --exclude="swapfile" --exclude="lost+found"
--exclude=".cache" --exclude="Downloads" --exclude=".VirtualBoxVMs"
--exclude=".ecryptfs"
Then setup a cron to schedule this.
Can you help?
backup rsync
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Martin Schröder, Pilot6, Braiam, karel, Eric Carvalho 3 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
What's a good back-up strategy for 1 desktop PC?
5 answers
How can I backup my whole system and be able to restore perfectly to where I was? I have installed some nice themes and customized quite a few things (graphically) and wouldn't want to repeat this process if I need to re-install.
I guess my question is, do I have to only backup the home
folder or do I have to do the whole system root
folder. Many topics have advised not to backup the root
folder but has let me confused.
I have no problem installing Ubuntu from scratch again and importing my home folder, as long as it gives me everything back in terms of the UI and custom themes etc. I am not fussed about the actual data such as Documents, Videos etc. I have alternative methods for these via cloud based solutions. Also, I have some commands in fstab but not sure this is stored in the home
directory as well?
My idea was to use rsync
and use
sudo rsync -aAXv --delete --exclude=/dev/* --exclude=/proc/*
--exclude=/sys/* --exclude=/tmp/* --exclude=/run/* --exclude=/mnt/*
--exclude=/media/* --exclude="swapfile" --exclude="lost+found"
--exclude=".cache" --exclude="Downloads" --exclude=".VirtualBoxVMs"
--exclude=".ecryptfs"
Then setup a cron to schedule this.
Can you help?
backup rsync
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Martin Schröder, Pilot6, Braiam, karel, Eric Carvalho 3 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Download Clonezilla. Make a bootable medium with Clonezilla Live. Boot into Clonezilla Live. Take full backup. To restore the backup, boot into Clonezilla Live and restore.
– AlexP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
What's a good back-up strategy for 1 desktop PC?
5 answers
How can I backup my whole system and be able to restore perfectly to where I was? I have installed some nice themes and customized quite a few things (graphically) and wouldn't want to repeat this process if I need to re-install.
I guess my question is, do I have to only backup the home
folder or do I have to do the whole system root
folder. Many topics have advised not to backup the root
folder but has let me confused.
I have no problem installing Ubuntu from scratch again and importing my home folder, as long as it gives me everything back in terms of the UI and custom themes etc. I am not fussed about the actual data such as Documents, Videos etc. I have alternative methods for these via cloud based solutions. Also, I have some commands in fstab but not sure this is stored in the home
directory as well?
My idea was to use rsync
and use
sudo rsync -aAXv --delete --exclude=/dev/* --exclude=/proc/*
--exclude=/sys/* --exclude=/tmp/* --exclude=/run/* --exclude=/mnt/*
--exclude=/media/* --exclude="swapfile" --exclude="lost+found"
--exclude=".cache" --exclude="Downloads" --exclude=".VirtualBoxVMs"
--exclude=".ecryptfs"
Then setup a cron to schedule this.
Can you help?
backup rsync
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
What's a good back-up strategy for 1 desktop PC?
5 answers
How can I backup my whole system and be able to restore perfectly to where I was? I have installed some nice themes and customized quite a few things (graphically) and wouldn't want to repeat this process if I need to re-install.
I guess my question is, do I have to only backup the home
folder or do I have to do the whole system root
folder. Many topics have advised not to backup the root
folder but has let me confused.
I have no problem installing Ubuntu from scratch again and importing my home folder, as long as it gives me everything back in terms of the UI and custom themes etc. I am not fussed about the actual data such as Documents, Videos etc. I have alternative methods for these via cloud based solutions. Also, I have some commands in fstab but not sure this is stored in the home
directory as well?
My idea was to use rsync
and use
sudo rsync -aAXv --delete --exclude=/dev/* --exclude=/proc/*
--exclude=/sys/* --exclude=/tmp/* --exclude=/run/* --exclude=/mnt/*
--exclude=/media/* --exclude="swapfile" --exclude="lost+found"
--exclude=".cache" --exclude="Downloads" --exclude=".VirtualBoxVMs"
--exclude=".ecryptfs"
Then setup a cron to schedule this.
Can you help?
This question already has an answer here:
What's a good back-up strategy for 1 desktop PC?
5 answers
backup rsync
backup rsync
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Braiam
52.3k20138223
52.3k20138223
New contributor
asked 15 hours ago
Maverick32Maverick32
512
512
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Martin Schröder, Pilot6, Braiam, karel, Eric Carvalho 3 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Martin Schröder, Pilot6, Braiam, karel, Eric Carvalho 3 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Download Clonezilla. Make a bootable medium with Clonezilla Live. Boot into Clonezilla Live. Take full backup. To restore the backup, boot into Clonezilla Live and restore.
– AlexP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
Download Clonezilla. Make a bootable medium with Clonezilla Live. Boot into Clonezilla Live. Take full backup. To restore the backup, boot into Clonezilla Live and restore.
– AlexP
13 hours ago
Download Clonezilla. Make a bootable medium with Clonezilla Live. Boot into Clonezilla Live. Take full backup. To restore the backup, boot into Clonezilla Live and restore.
– AlexP
13 hours ago
Download Clonezilla. Make a bootable medium with Clonezilla Live. Boot into Clonezilla Live. Take full backup. To restore the backup, boot into Clonezilla Live and restore.
– AlexP
13 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The reason of the advices to not backup the "/
" folder is this: typically, there are many virtual (and, sometimes, physical) filesystems attached to it. A virtual filesystem is like a /proc
: it doesn't have physical files on the hard disk, instead listing/reading/writing their file structure manipulates some data structures of the kernel. For example, writing 1 into /sys/bus/pci/rescan
doesn't write anything to anywhere on a hard disk, instead it re-scans the PCI bus for new devices.
Backing them up would be meaningless or they might be even harmful.
If your goal is to back up everything, then the best what you can do is that you back up everything. However, backing up /
might be problematic because of the problem above.
However, there is a simple trick to solve that. Linux knows the thing so-named bind mount: it means, that you can mount a filesystem multiple times.
For example, a
mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/root
will mount your root filesystem (considering if your root is, for example, sda7
) to the directory /mnt/root
. You will see everything in it, except any sub-mounts, including the virtual filesystems.
The trick is this: after that, you can safely backup /mnt/root
with any tool you wish to, including rsync
.
Note also, this is only a recursive file copy. You have no protection for possible file inconsistency issues what happen. Imagine if a database has two files, for example, /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13731
and /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13732
which refer to eachother. If the database engine writes something into the first and to the second, while your backup process runs, then it is possible that the first will be backed up and the second won't. Thus, your database will become crap after a restoration.
This is also a reason, why you will probably find contra-arguments (sometimes quite vehement ones) against backing up your system on this way. However, in practical, user-level use cases, a real problem such this exists only very rarely, maybe the most typical one is when you are playing with a database for some web development task. In a home environment, I simply ignore this problem. In a professional environment, it is practical to use another, different backup for your data which is sensitive for this.
New contributor
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I usersync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.
– peterh
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
Clonezilla to the rescue. Atrocious console interface but gets the job done reliably.
Download image and make a bootable USB drive from https://clonezilla.org/
Boot Clonezilla from USB drive and back up your drive and/or partitions to USB drives or sticks for easy restore. Don't let the UX scare you, it really works.
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
If you really want to have a backup of just your themes and customization, then you don't really need to make a backup of your whole system. You just need to make a backup of some of your dotfiles.
For example, the changes you made for your windows are in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini
file. Most of the programs that you install will have a configuration file in ~/.config
directory, you just need to make a backup of those configuration files.
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The reason of the advices to not backup the "/
" folder is this: typically, there are many virtual (and, sometimes, physical) filesystems attached to it. A virtual filesystem is like a /proc
: it doesn't have physical files on the hard disk, instead listing/reading/writing their file structure manipulates some data structures of the kernel. For example, writing 1 into /sys/bus/pci/rescan
doesn't write anything to anywhere on a hard disk, instead it re-scans the PCI bus for new devices.
Backing them up would be meaningless or they might be even harmful.
If your goal is to back up everything, then the best what you can do is that you back up everything. However, backing up /
might be problematic because of the problem above.
However, there is a simple trick to solve that. Linux knows the thing so-named bind mount: it means, that you can mount a filesystem multiple times.
For example, a
mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/root
will mount your root filesystem (considering if your root is, for example, sda7
) to the directory /mnt/root
. You will see everything in it, except any sub-mounts, including the virtual filesystems.
The trick is this: after that, you can safely backup /mnt/root
with any tool you wish to, including rsync
.
Note also, this is only a recursive file copy. You have no protection for possible file inconsistency issues what happen. Imagine if a database has two files, for example, /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13731
and /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13732
which refer to eachother. If the database engine writes something into the first and to the second, while your backup process runs, then it is possible that the first will be backed up and the second won't. Thus, your database will become crap after a restoration.
This is also a reason, why you will probably find contra-arguments (sometimes quite vehement ones) against backing up your system on this way. However, in practical, user-level use cases, a real problem such this exists only very rarely, maybe the most typical one is when you are playing with a database for some web development task. In a home environment, I simply ignore this problem. In a professional environment, it is practical to use another, different backup for your data which is sensitive for this.
New contributor
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I usersync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.
– peterh
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
The reason of the advices to not backup the "/
" folder is this: typically, there are many virtual (and, sometimes, physical) filesystems attached to it. A virtual filesystem is like a /proc
: it doesn't have physical files on the hard disk, instead listing/reading/writing their file structure manipulates some data structures of the kernel. For example, writing 1 into /sys/bus/pci/rescan
doesn't write anything to anywhere on a hard disk, instead it re-scans the PCI bus for new devices.
Backing them up would be meaningless or they might be even harmful.
If your goal is to back up everything, then the best what you can do is that you back up everything. However, backing up /
might be problematic because of the problem above.
However, there is a simple trick to solve that. Linux knows the thing so-named bind mount: it means, that you can mount a filesystem multiple times.
For example, a
mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/root
will mount your root filesystem (considering if your root is, for example, sda7
) to the directory /mnt/root
. You will see everything in it, except any sub-mounts, including the virtual filesystems.
The trick is this: after that, you can safely backup /mnt/root
with any tool you wish to, including rsync
.
Note also, this is only a recursive file copy. You have no protection for possible file inconsistency issues what happen. Imagine if a database has two files, for example, /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13731
and /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13732
which refer to eachother. If the database engine writes something into the first and to the second, while your backup process runs, then it is possible that the first will be backed up and the second won't. Thus, your database will become crap after a restoration.
This is also a reason, why you will probably find contra-arguments (sometimes quite vehement ones) against backing up your system on this way. However, in practical, user-level use cases, a real problem such this exists only very rarely, maybe the most typical one is when you are playing with a database for some web development task. In a home environment, I simply ignore this problem. In a professional environment, it is practical to use another, different backup for your data which is sensitive for this.
New contributor
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I usersync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.
– peterh
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
The reason of the advices to not backup the "/
" folder is this: typically, there are many virtual (and, sometimes, physical) filesystems attached to it. A virtual filesystem is like a /proc
: it doesn't have physical files on the hard disk, instead listing/reading/writing their file structure manipulates some data structures of the kernel. For example, writing 1 into /sys/bus/pci/rescan
doesn't write anything to anywhere on a hard disk, instead it re-scans the PCI bus for new devices.
Backing them up would be meaningless or they might be even harmful.
If your goal is to back up everything, then the best what you can do is that you back up everything. However, backing up /
might be problematic because of the problem above.
However, there is a simple trick to solve that. Linux knows the thing so-named bind mount: it means, that you can mount a filesystem multiple times.
For example, a
mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/root
will mount your root filesystem (considering if your root is, for example, sda7
) to the directory /mnt/root
. You will see everything in it, except any sub-mounts, including the virtual filesystems.
The trick is this: after that, you can safely backup /mnt/root
with any tool you wish to, including rsync
.
Note also, this is only a recursive file copy. You have no protection for possible file inconsistency issues what happen. Imagine if a database has two files, for example, /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13731
and /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13732
which refer to eachother. If the database engine writes something into the first and to the second, while your backup process runs, then it is possible that the first will be backed up and the second won't. Thus, your database will become crap after a restoration.
This is also a reason, why you will probably find contra-arguments (sometimes quite vehement ones) against backing up your system on this way. However, in practical, user-level use cases, a real problem such this exists only very rarely, maybe the most typical one is when you are playing with a database for some web development task. In a home environment, I simply ignore this problem. In a professional environment, it is practical to use another, different backup for your data which is sensitive for this.
New contributor
The reason of the advices to not backup the "/
" folder is this: typically, there are many virtual (and, sometimes, physical) filesystems attached to it. A virtual filesystem is like a /proc
: it doesn't have physical files on the hard disk, instead listing/reading/writing their file structure manipulates some data structures of the kernel. For example, writing 1 into /sys/bus/pci/rescan
doesn't write anything to anywhere on a hard disk, instead it re-scans the PCI bus for new devices.
Backing them up would be meaningless or they might be even harmful.
If your goal is to back up everything, then the best what you can do is that you back up everything. However, backing up /
might be problematic because of the problem above.
However, there is a simple trick to solve that. Linux knows the thing so-named bind mount: it means, that you can mount a filesystem multiple times.
For example, a
mount /dev/sda7 /mnt/root
will mount your root filesystem (considering if your root is, for example, sda7
) to the directory /mnt/root
. You will see everything in it, except any sub-mounts, including the virtual filesystems.
The trick is this: after that, you can safely backup /mnt/root
with any tool you wish to, including rsync
.
Note also, this is only a recursive file copy. You have no protection for possible file inconsistency issues what happen. Imagine if a database has two files, for example, /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13731
and /var/lib/postgresql/11/main/base/13732
which refer to eachother. If the database engine writes something into the first and to the second, while your backup process runs, then it is possible that the first will be backed up and the second won't. Thus, your database will become crap after a restoration.
This is also a reason, why you will probably find contra-arguments (sometimes quite vehement ones) against backing up your system on this way. However, in practical, user-level use cases, a real problem such this exists only very rarely, maybe the most typical one is when you are playing with a database for some web development task. In a home environment, I simply ignore this problem. In a professional environment, it is practical to use another, different backup for your data which is sensitive for this.
New contributor
edited 14 hours ago
New contributor
answered 15 hours ago
peterhpeterh
1635
1635
New contributor
New contributor
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I usersync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.
– peterh
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I usersync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.
– peterh
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Thank you for the much detailed response here!! I'm new to linux (from windows) and i'm not really looking to do any web dev or db work but value your response as it gives me a bigger scope on what could happen in the future. May i ask, what you would recommend for me? I really just want to keep my nice looking UI with the custom themes i have put on. Would backing up the whole home folder only suffice?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Just to add, I'm looking to back this up to my NAS which has a ext4 filesystem. Your suggestion seems ideal by mounting the root dir and then using rsync. I'll give that a go :)
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Don't worry, rsync is pretty okay! Run it from cron and it will work. I use rsync for pro environments, too (with a litte bonus scripting). The important thing is, that you don't need to play with sub-mounts and sub-mounts on this way. Insert this /mnt/root thing into your fstab, and run the rsync tool from cron. If you set up a local mailing system, you will get your daily (weekly?) backup report log into your mailbox. So it will near a pro system.
– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I use
rsync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.– peterh
13 hours ago
@Maverick32 Your NAS doesn't need to use ext4, any unix-compliant fs will be okay (samba on linux is usable for w$es, too, but it is still uni-compliant). Check also your rsync flags, it should also copy hard links. I use
rsync -vaH --delete src/ target/
which looks like an abbreviation of your rsync. If your NAS is Linux-based, it is using probably ext4.– peterh
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
Note for the postgres example, an inconsistent backup is solved with WAL archiving.
– OrangeDog
13 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
Clonezilla to the rescue. Atrocious console interface but gets the job done reliably.
Download image and make a bootable USB drive from https://clonezilla.org/
Boot Clonezilla from USB drive and back up your drive and/or partitions to USB drives or sticks for easy restore. Don't let the UX scare you, it really works.
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Clonezilla to the rescue. Atrocious console interface but gets the job done reliably.
Download image and make a bootable USB drive from https://clonezilla.org/
Boot Clonezilla from USB drive and back up your drive and/or partitions to USB drives or sticks for easy restore. Don't let the UX scare you, it really works.
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Clonezilla to the rescue. Atrocious console interface but gets the job done reliably.
Download image and make a bootable USB drive from https://clonezilla.org/
Boot Clonezilla from USB drive and back up your drive and/or partitions to USB drives or sticks for easy restore. Don't let the UX scare you, it really works.
Clonezilla to the rescue. Atrocious console interface but gets the job done reliably.
Download image and make a bootable USB drive from https://clonezilla.org/
Boot Clonezilla from USB drive and back up your drive and/or partitions to USB drives or sticks for easy restore. Don't let the UX scare you, it really works.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 14 hours ago
zx81roadkillzx81roadkill
513
513
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
Thank you, i' ve thought about this but i was thinking of a more automated way to backup to my NAS, possibly in an incremental way. However, i appreciate this very much.
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
If you really want to have a backup of just your themes and customization, then you don't really need to make a backup of your whole system. You just need to make a backup of some of your dotfiles.
For example, the changes you made for your windows are in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini
file. Most of the programs that you install will have a configuration file in ~/.config
directory, you just need to make a backup of those configuration files.
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
If you really want to have a backup of just your themes and customization, then you don't really need to make a backup of your whole system. You just need to make a backup of some of your dotfiles.
For example, the changes you made for your windows are in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini
file. Most of the programs that you install will have a configuration file in ~/.config
directory, you just need to make a backup of those configuration files.
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
If you really want to have a backup of just your themes and customization, then you don't really need to make a backup of your whole system. You just need to make a backup of some of your dotfiles.
For example, the changes you made for your windows are in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini
file. Most of the programs that you install will have a configuration file in ~/.config
directory, you just need to make a backup of those configuration files.
If you really want to have a backup of just your themes and customization, then you don't really need to make a backup of your whole system. You just need to make a backup of some of your dotfiles.
For example, the changes you made for your windows are in ~/.config/gtk-3.0/settings.ini
file. Most of the programs that you install will have a configuration file in ~/.config
directory, you just need to make a backup of those configuration files.
answered 15 hours ago
Nauman AfsarNauman Afsar
5017
5017
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
This sounds great, although i would have no idea on what particular files i should be backing up for this purpose?
– Maverick32
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Download Clonezilla. Make a bootable medium with Clonezilla Live. Boot into Clonezilla Live. Take full backup. To restore the backup, boot into Clonezilla Live and restore.
– AlexP
13 hours ago