Why Do Vipers Land Like Aircraft?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
We are shown repetitively how maneuverable Vipers are, able to flip nose to tail in a third of a second, but when they land in the flight pods, they come in at high speeds and try to get ahold of the magnetic deck in what amounts to a controlled crash.
Discounting "combat landings" where time is of the essence, and "emergency" landings where combat damage would prevent safe landing, it would be a lot safer and less damaging to the spaceframe for the viper to approach, flip and use its engine to match momentum with Galactica before setting down. There's no need for the fighter to "maintain speed" to keep flying like an airplane.
I get that the whole battlestar carrier thing is based on naval carriers, and having approaches like that is exciting, it just makes no sense.
battlestar-galactica battlestar-galactica-2004
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
We are shown repetitively how maneuverable Vipers are, able to flip nose to tail in a third of a second, but when they land in the flight pods, they come in at high speeds and try to get ahold of the magnetic deck in what amounts to a controlled crash.
Discounting "combat landings" where time is of the essence, and "emergency" landings where combat damage would prevent safe landing, it would be a lot safer and less damaging to the spaceframe for the viper to approach, flip and use its engine to match momentum with Galactica before setting down. There's no need for the fighter to "maintain speed" to keep flying like an airplane.
I get that the whole battlestar carrier thing is based on naval carriers, and having approaches like that is exciting, it just makes no sense.
battlestar-galactica battlestar-galactica-2004
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Given that the show is not a documentary ... I am not sure what the question is here. Are you looking for an 'in universe' explanation of the details of Viper's flying properties?
– KorvinStarmast
6 hours ago
1
@KorvinStarmast an in universe explanation for why it isn't done would be nice
– Marshall Tigerus
6 hours ago
@KorvinStarmast Almost none of the shows relevant to this site are documentaries. Asking for in-universe explanations and details of things from fictional worlds is the reason we're all here.
– Alarion
48 mins ago
add a comment |
We are shown repetitively how maneuverable Vipers are, able to flip nose to tail in a third of a second, but when they land in the flight pods, they come in at high speeds and try to get ahold of the magnetic deck in what amounts to a controlled crash.
Discounting "combat landings" where time is of the essence, and "emergency" landings where combat damage would prevent safe landing, it would be a lot safer and less damaging to the spaceframe for the viper to approach, flip and use its engine to match momentum with Galactica before setting down. There's no need for the fighter to "maintain speed" to keep flying like an airplane.
I get that the whole battlestar carrier thing is based on naval carriers, and having approaches like that is exciting, it just makes no sense.
battlestar-galactica battlestar-galactica-2004
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
We are shown repetitively how maneuverable Vipers are, able to flip nose to tail in a third of a second, but when they land in the flight pods, they come in at high speeds and try to get ahold of the magnetic deck in what amounts to a controlled crash.
Discounting "combat landings" where time is of the essence, and "emergency" landings where combat damage would prevent safe landing, it would be a lot safer and less damaging to the spaceframe for the viper to approach, flip and use its engine to match momentum with Galactica before setting down. There's no need for the fighter to "maintain speed" to keep flying like an airplane.
I get that the whole battlestar carrier thing is based on naval carriers, and having approaches like that is exciting, it just makes no sense.
battlestar-galactica battlestar-galactica-2004
battlestar-galactica battlestar-galactica-2004
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 7 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
50.2k20273317
50.2k20273317
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 7 hours ago
Marshall TigerusMarshall Tigerus
1515
1515
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Given that the show is not a documentary ... I am not sure what the question is here. Are you looking for an 'in universe' explanation of the details of Viper's flying properties?
– KorvinStarmast
6 hours ago
1
@KorvinStarmast an in universe explanation for why it isn't done would be nice
– Marshall Tigerus
6 hours ago
@KorvinStarmast Almost none of the shows relevant to this site are documentaries. Asking for in-universe explanations and details of things from fictional worlds is the reason we're all here.
– Alarion
48 mins ago
add a comment |
Given that the show is not a documentary ... I am not sure what the question is here. Are you looking for an 'in universe' explanation of the details of Viper's flying properties?
– KorvinStarmast
6 hours ago
1
@KorvinStarmast an in universe explanation for why it isn't done would be nice
– Marshall Tigerus
6 hours ago
@KorvinStarmast Almost none of the shows relevant to this site are documentaries. Asking for in-universe explanations and details of things from fictional worlds is the reason we're all here.
– Alarion
48 mins ago
Given that the show is not a documentary ... I am not sure what the question is here. Are you looking for an 'in universe' explanation of the details of Viper's flying properties?
– KorvinStarmast
6 hours ago
Given that the show is not a documentary ... I am not sure what the question is here. Are you looking for an 'in universe' explanation of the details of Viper's flying properties?
– KorvinStarmast
6 hours ago
1
1
@KorvinStarmast an in universe explanation for why it isn't done would be nice
– Marshall Tigerus
6 hours ago
@KorvinStarmast an in universe explanation for why it isn't done would be nice
– Marshall Tigerus
6 hours ago
@KorvinStarmast Almost none of the shows relevant to this site are documentaries. Asking for in-universe explanations and details of things from fictional worlds is the reason we're all here.
– Alarion
48 mins ago
@KorvinStarmast Almost none of the shows relevant to this site are documentaries. Asking for in-universe explanations and details of things from fictional worlds is the reason we're all here.
– Alarion
48 mins ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
We need to look at this in the context of time, which is VERY precious in this scenario.
To come in for a landing trying to match your speed with the Galactica's hard-deck while she's under hard fire from an increasing number of base ships takes way too much time/fuel.
Doing a "hard-stop, vertical-down" landing where Vipers use their retro-thrusters to stop mid-flight inside the pods, then land vertically on the hard-deck still would take too much time/fuel.
The quickest scenario in this kind of combat situation is to come in and "crash" down onto the hard-deck (combat landings like described in the show), thus making it onboard Galactica quickly enough so she can retract her flight pods and jump with all pilots aboard. If she jumps with the pods extended, serious superstructure damage can occur. If you re-watch some of the episodes, the flight pods start to retract early as pilots are coming in, too, so again.......time. Get in, engage your magnetic clamps, and grab the deck for jump, then on the other end, you can hover again and maneuver in to the elevators for hangar entry.
The source for this little fact on the flight pods can be found here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Propulsion_in_the_Re-imagined_Series
The source for the displayed combat landings is here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Combat_landing
The rest is logic.
add a comment |
I think you've answered your own question as to why they need combat landings. At other, non-emergency times, we do see controlled and casual Viper landings, such as Apollo's first arrival in the pilot mini-series (although I can't find a suitable clip).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208498%2fwhy-do-vipers-land-like-aircraft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We need to look at this in the context of time, which is VERY precious in this scenario.
To come in for a landing trying to match your speed with the Galactica's hard-deck while she's under hard fire from an increasing number of base ships takes way too much time/fuel.
Doing a "hard-stop, vertical-down" landing where Vipers use their retro-thrusters to stop mid-flight inside the pods, then land vertically on the hard-deck still would take too much time/fuel.
The quickest scenario in this kind of combat situation is to come in and "crash" down onto the hard-deck (combat landings like described in the show), thus making it onboard Galactica quickly enough so she can retract her flight pods and jump with all pilots aboard. If she jumps with the pods extended, serious superstructure damage can occur. If you re-watch some of the episodes, the flight pods start to retract early as pilots are coming in, too, so again.......time. Get in, engage your magnetic clamps, and grab the deck for jump, then on the other end, you can hover again and maneuver in to the elevators for hangar entry.
The source for this little fact on the flight pods can be found here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Propulsion_in_the_Re-imagined_Series
The source for the displayed combat landings is here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Combat_landing
The rest is logic.
add a comment |
We need to look at this in the context of time, which is VERY precious in this scenario.
To come in for a landing trying to match your speed with the Galactica's hard-deck while she's under hard fire from an increasing number of base ships takes way too much time/fuel.
Doing a "hard-stop, vertical-down" landing where Vipers use their retro-thrusters to stop mid-flight inside the pods, then land vertically on the hard-deck still would take too much time/fuel.
The quickest scenario in this kind of combat situation is to come in and "crash" down onto the hard-deck (combat landings like described in the show), thus making it onboard Galactica quickly enough so she can retract her flight pods and jump with all pilots aboard. If she jumps with the pods extended, serious superstructure damage can occur. If you re-watch some of the episodes, the flight pods start to retract early as pilots are coming in, too, so again.......time. Get in, engage your magnetic clamps, and grab the deck for jump, then on the other end, you can hover again and maneuver in to the elevators for hangar entry.
The source for this little fact on the flight pods can be found here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Propulsion_in_the_Re-imagined_Series
The source for the displayed combat landings is here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Combat_landing
The rest is logic.
add a comment |
We need to look at this in the context of time, which is VERY precious in this scenario.
To come in for a landing trying to match your speed with the Galactica's hard-deck while she's under hard fire from an increasing number of base ships takes way too much time/fuel.
Doing a "hard-stop, vertical-down" landing where Vipers use their retro-thrusters to stop mid-flight inside the pods, then land vertically on the hard-deck still would take too much time/fuel.
The quickest scenario in this kind of combat situation is to come in and "crash" down onto the hard-deck (combat landings like described in the show), thus making it onboard Galactica quickly enough so she can retract her flight pods and jump with all pilots aboard. If she jumps with the pods extended, serious superstructure damage can occur. If you re-watch some of the episodes, the flight pods start to retract early as pilots are coming in, too, so again.......time. Get in, engage your magnetic clamps, and grab the deck for jump, then on the other end, you can hover again and maneuver in to the elevators for hangar entry.
The source for this little fact on the flight pods can be found here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Propulsion_in_the_Re-imagined_Series
The source for the displayed combat landings is here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Combat_landing
The rest is logic.
We need to look at this in the context of time, which is VERY precious in this scenario.
To come in for a landing trying to match your speed with the Galactica's hard-deck while she's under hard fire from an increasing number of base ships takes way too much time/fuel.
Doing a "hard-stop, vertical-down" landing where Vipers use their retro-thrusters to stop mid-flight inside the pods, then land vertically on the hard-deck still would take too much time/fuel.
The quickest scenario in this kind of combat situation is to come in and "crash" down onto the hard-deck (combat landings like described in the show), thus making it onboard Galactica quickly enough so she can retract her flight pods and jump with all pilots aboard. If she jumps with the pods extended, serious superstructure damage can occur. If you re-watch some of the episodes, the flight pods start to retract early as pilots are coming in, too, so again.......time. Get in, engage your magnetic clamps, and grab the deck for jump, then on the other end, you can hover again and maneuver in to the elevators for hangar entry.
The source for this little fact on the flight pods can be found here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Propulsion_in_the_Re-imagined_Series
The source for the displayed combat landings is here: https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/Combat_landing
The rest is logic.
edited 4 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
615112
615112
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think you've answered your own question as to why they need combat landings. At other, non-emergency times, we do see controlled and casual Viper landings, such as Apollo's first arrival in the pilot mini-series (although I can't find a suitable clip).
add a comment |
I think you've answered your own question as to why they need combat landings. At other, non-emergency times, we do see controlled and casual Viper landings, such as Apollo's first arrival in the pilot mini-series (although I can't find a suitable clip).
add a comment |
I think you've answered your own question as to why they need combat landings. At other, non-emergency times, we do see controlled and casual Viper landings, such as Apollo's first arrival in the pilot mini-series (although I can't find a suitable clip).
I think you've answered your own question as to why they need combat landings. At other, non-emergency times, we do see controlled and casual Viper landings, such as Apollo's first arrival in the pilot mini-series (although I can't find a suitable clip).
answered 7 hours ago
DarrenDarren
3,64131435
3,64131435
add a comment |
add a comment |
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marshall Tigerus is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208498%2fwhy-do-vipers-land-like-aircraft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Given that the show is not a documentary ... I am not sure what the question is here. Are you looking for an 'in universe' explanation of the details of Viper's flying properties?
– KorvinStarmast
6 hours ago
1
@KorvinStarmast an in universe explanation for why it isn't done would be nice
– Marshall Tigerus
6 hours ago
@KorvinStarmast Almost none of the shows relevant to this site are documentaries. Asking for in-universe explanations and details of things from fictional worlds is the reason we're all here.
– Alarion
48 mins ago