Asymptotics of orbits on graphs












3












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=#{ gin G: d(gx,x)le k},
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#{yin V(X):d(x,y)le k}.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^{-1}$? If so, what error term estimates are known?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    13 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=#{ gin G: d(gx,x)le k},
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#{yin V(X):d(x,y)le k}.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^{-1}$? If so, what error term estimates are known?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    13 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=#{ gin G: d(gx,x)le k},
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#{yin V(X):d(x,y)le k}.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^{-1}$? If so, what error term estimates are known?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=#{ gin G: d(gx,x)le k},
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#{yin V(X):d(x,y)le k}.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^{-1}$? If so, what error term estimates are known?







graph-theory asymptotics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 13 hours ago







Zero

















asked 15 hours ago









ZeroZero

2567




2567












  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    13 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    13 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
$endgroup$
– SeF
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
$endgroup$
– SeF
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
$endgroup$
– Zero
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
$endgroup$
– Zero
13 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_{2l+1} = a_{2l+2} = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_{2l} = a_{2l+1} = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
$$frac{N(k)}{A(k)} = frac{sum_{i leq k} a_i}{sum_{i leq k} a_i + b_i}$$
and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327119%2fasymptotics-of-orbits-on-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



    Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_{2l+1} = a_{2l+2} = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_{2l} = a_{2l+1} = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
    $$frac{N(k)}{A(k)} = frac{sum_{i leq k} a_i}{sum_{i leq k} a_i + b_i}$$
    and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



      Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_{2l+1} = a_{2l+2} = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_{2l} = a_{2l+1} = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
      $$frac{N(k)}{A(k)} = frac{sum_{i leq k} a_i}{sum_{i leq k} a_i + b_i}$$
      and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



        Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_{2l+1} = a_{2l+2} = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_{2l} = a_{2l+1} = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
        $$frac{N(k)}{A(k)} = frac{sum_{i leq k} a_i}{sum_{i leq k} a_i + b_i}$$
        and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



        Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_{2l+1} = a_{2l+2} = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_{2l} = a_{2l+1} = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
        $$frac{N(k)}{A(k)} = frac{sum_{i leq k} a_i}{sum_{i leq k} a_i + b_i}$$
        and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 11 hours ago









        Florian LehnerFlorian Lehner

        54138




        54138






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327119%2fasymptotics-of-orbits-on-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Callistus I

            Tabula Rosettana

            How to label and detect the document text images