Why can't I use data augmentation with a pretrained convnet?
$begingroup$
Reading Deep Learning with Python by François Chollet. In section 5.3.1, we've instantiated a pretrained convnet, VGG16, and are given two options to proceed:
A) Running the convolutional base over your dataset, recording its
output to a Numpy array on disk, and then using this data as input to
a standalone, densely connected classifier similar to those you saw in
part 1 of this book. This solution is fast and cheap to run, because
it only requires running the convolutional base once for every input
image, and the convolutional base is by far the most expensive part of
the pipeline. But for the same reason, this technique won’t allow you
to use data augmentation.
B) Extending the model you have (conv_base) by adding Dense layers on
top, and running the whole thing end to end on the input data. This
will allow you to use data augmentation, because every input image
goes through the convolutional base every time it’s seen by the model.
But for the same reason, this technique is far more expensive than the
first.
Why can't I use data augmentation to generate more training data from existing training samples then go with option A? Seems like I can run the VGG16 base over my augmented dataset and use the output as the input to a standalone densely connected classifier.
convnet beginner data-augmentation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Reading Deep Learning with Python by François Chollet. In section 5.3.1, we've instantiated a pretrained convnet, VGG16, and are given two options to proceed:
A) Running the convolutional base over your dataset, recording its
output to a Numpy array on disk, and then using this data as input to
a standalone, densely connected classifier similar to those you saw in
part 1 of this book. This solution is fast and cheap to run, because
it only requires running the convolutional base once for every input
image, and the convolutional base is by far the most expensive part of
the pipeline. But for the same reason, this technique won’t allow you
to use data augmentation.
B) Extending the model you have (conv_base) by adding Dense layers on
top, and running the whole thing end to end on the input data. This
will allow you to use data augmentation, because every input image
goes through the convolutional base every time it’s seen by the model.
But for the same reason, this technique is far more expensive than the
first.
Why can't I use data augmentation to generate more training data from existing training samples then go with option A? Seems like I can run the VGG16 base over my augmented dataset and use the output as the input to a standalone densely connected classifier.
convnet beginner data-augmentation
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Reading Deep Learning with Python by François Chollet. In section 5.3.1, we've instantiated a pretrained convnet, VGG16, and are given two options to proceed:
A) Running the convolutional base over your dataset, recording its
output to a Numpy array on disk, and then using this data as input to
a standalone, densely connected classifier similar to those you saw in
part 1 of this book. This solution is fast and cheap to run, because
it only requires running the convolutional base once for every input
image, and the convolutional base is by far the most expensive part of
the pipeline. But for the same reason, this technique won’t allow you
to use data augmentation.
B) Extending the model you have (conv_base) by adding Dense layers on
top, and running the whole thing end to end on the input data. This
will allow you to use data augmentation, because every input image
goes through the convolutional base every time it’s seen by the model.
But for the same reason, this technique is far more expensive than the
first.
Why can't I use data augmentation to generate more training data from existing training samples then go with option A? Seems like I can run the VGG16 base over my augmented dataset and use the output as the input to a standalone densely connected classifier.
convnet beginner data-augmentation
New contributor
$endgroup$
Reading Deep Learning with Python by François Chollet. In section 5.3.1, we've instantiated a pretrained convnet, VGG16, and are given two options to proceed:
A) Running the convolutional base over your dataset, recording its
output to a Numpy array on disk, and then using this data as input to
a standalone, densely connected classifier similar to those you saw in
part 1 of this book. This solution is fast and cheap to run, because
it only requires running the convolutional base once for every input
image, and the convolutional base is by far the most expensive part of
the pipeline. But for the same reason, this technique won’t allow you
to use data augmentation.
B) Extending the model you have (conv_base) by adding Dense layers on
top, and running the whole thing end to end on the input data. This
will allow you to use data augmentation, because every input image
goes through the convolutional base every time it’s seen by the model.
But for the same reason, this technique is far more expensive than the
first.
Why can't I use data augmentation to generate more training data from existing training samples then go with option A? Seems like I can run the VGG16 base over my augmented dataset and use the output as the input to a standalone densely connected classifier.
convnet beginner data-augmentation
convnet beginner data-augmentation
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
Ivan LeeIvan Lee
393
393
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Found the answer in stats.stackexchange.com. Hopefully this helps anyone else with the same question.
feature extraction: freezing convolutional base vs. training on extracted features
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Ivan Lee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49069%2fwhy-cant-i-use-data-augmentation-with-a-pretrained-convnet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Found the answer in stats.stackexchange.com. Hopefully this helps anyone else with the same question.
feature extraction: freezing convolutional base vs. training on extracted features
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Found the answer in stats.stackexchange.com. Hopefully this helps anyone else with the same question.
feature extraction: freezing convolutional base vs. training on extracted features
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Found the answer in stats.stackexchange.com. Hopefully this helps anyone else with the same question.
feature extraction: freezing convolutional base vs. training on extracted features
New contributor
$endgroup$
Found the answer in stats.stackexchange.com. Hopefully this helps anyone else with the same question.
feature extraction: freezing convolutional base vs. training on extracted features
New contributor
edited yesterday
Esmailian
3,031320
3,031320
New contributor
answered yesterday
Ivan LeeIvan Lee
393
393
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ivan Lee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ivan Lee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ivan Lee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ivan Lee is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49069%2fwhy-cant-i-use-data-augmentation-with-a-pretrained-convnet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown