Unbalanced multiclass data with XGBoost
$begingroup$
I have 3 classes with this distribution:
Class 0: 0.1169
Class 1: 0.7668
Class 2: 0.1163
And I am using xgboost
for classification. I know that there is a parameter called scale_pos_weight
.
But how is it handled for 'multiclass' case, and how can I properly set it?
classification xgboost multiclass-classification unbalanced-classes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have 3 classes with this distribution:
Class 0: 0.1169
Class 1: 0.7668
Class 2: 0.1163
And I am using xgboost
for classification. I know that there is a parameter called scale_pos_weight
.
But how is it handled for 'multiclass' case, and how can I properly set it?
classification xgboost multiclass-classification unbalanced-classes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have 3 classes with this distribution:
Class 0: 0.1169
Class 1: 0.7668
Class 2: 0.1163
And I am using xgboost
for classification. I know that there is a parameter called scale_pos_weight
.
But how is it handled for 'multiclass' case, and how can I properly set it?
classification xgboost multiclass-classification unbalanced-classes
$endgroup$
I have 3 classes with this distribution:
Class 0: 0.1169
Class 1: 0.7668
Class 2: 0.1163
And I am using xgboost
for classification. I know that there is a parameter called scale_pos_weight
.
But how is it handled for 'multiclass' case, and how can I properly set it?
classification xgboost multiclass-classification unbalanced-classes
classification xgboost multiclass-classification unbalanced-classes
edited Dec 30 '18 at 14:29
рüффп
205415
205415
asked Jan 16 '17 at 12:53
shdashda
185210
185210
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
scale_pos_weight
is used for binary classification as you stated. It is a more generalized solution to handle imbalanced classes. A good approach when assigning a value to scale_pos_weight
is:
sum(negative instances) / sum(positive instances)
For your specific case, there is another option in order to weight individual data points and take their weights into account while working with the booster, and let the optimization happen regarding their weights so that each point is represented equally. You just need to simply use:
xgboost.DMatrix(..., weight = *weight array for individual weights*)
You can define the weights as you like and by doing so, you can even handle imbalances within classes as well as imbalances across different classes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everyone stumbles upon this question when dealing with unbalanced multiclass classification problem using XGBoost in R. I did too!
I was looking for an example to better understand how to apply it. Invested almost an hour to find the link mentioned below. For all those who are looking for an example, here goes -
https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/9493/37156
Thanks wacax
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer by @KeremT is correct. I provide an example for those who still have problems with the exact implementation.
weight
parameter in XGBoost is per instance not per class. Therefore, we need to assign the weight of each class to its instances, which is the same thing.
For example, if we have three imbalanced classes with ratios
class A = 10%
class B = 30%
class C = 60%
Their weights would be (dividing the smallest class by others)
class A = 1.000
class B = 0.333
class C = 0.167
Then, if training data is
index class
0 A
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 B
we build the weight
vector as follows:
index class weight
0 A 1.000
1 A 1.000
2 B 0.333
3 C 0.167
4 B 0.333
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16342%2funbalanced-multiclass-data-with-xgboost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
scale_pos_weight
is used for binary classification as you stated. It is a more generalized solution to handle imbalanced classes. A good approach when assigning a value to scale_pos_weight
is:
sum(negative instances) / sum(positive instances)
For your specific case, there is another option in order to weight individual data points and take their weights into account while working with the booster, and let the optimization happen regarding their weights so that each point is represented equally. You just need to simply use:
xgboost.DMatrix(..., weight = *weight array for individual weights*)
You can define the weights as you like and by doing so, you can even handle imbalances within classes as well as imbalances across different classes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
scale_pos_weight
is used for binary classification as you stated. It is a more generalized solution to handle imbalanced classes. A good approach when assigning a value to scale_pos_weight
is:
sum(negative instances) / sum(positive instances)
For your specific case, there is another option in order to weight individual data points and take their weights into account while working with the booster, and let the optimization happen regarding their weights so that each point is represented equally. You just need to simply use:
xgboost.DMatrix(..., weight = *weight array for individual weights*)
You can define the weights as you like and by doing so, you can even handle imbalances within classes as well as imbalances across different classes.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
scale_pos_weight
is used for binary classification as you stated. It is a more generalized solution to handle imbalanced classes. A good approach when assigning a value to scale_pos_weight
is:
sum(negative instances) / sum(positive instances)
For your specific case, there is another option in order to weight individual data points and take their weights into account while working with the booster, and let the optimization happen regarding their weights so that each point is represented equally. You just need to simply use:
xgboost.DMatrix(..., weight = *weight array for individual weights*)
You can define the weights as you like and by doing so, you can even handle imbalances within classes as well as imbalances across different classes.
$endgroup$
scale_pos_weight
is used for binary classification as you stated. It is a more generalized solution to handle imbalanced classes. A good approach when assigning a value to scale_pos_weight
is:
sum(negative instances) / sum(positive instances)
For your specific case, there is another option in order to weight individual data points and take their weights into account while working with the booster, and let the optimization happen regarding their weights so that each point is represented equally. You just need to simply use:
xgboost.DMatrix(..., weight = *weight array for individual weights*)
You can define the weights as you like and by doing so, you can even handle imbalances within classes as well as imbalances across different classes.
edited Aug 26 '17 at 8:40
bstockton
1578
1578
answered May 8 '17 at 9:42
Kerem TKerem T
16123
16123
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everyone stumbles upon this question when dealing with unbalanced multiclass classification problem using XGBoost in R. I did too!
I was looking for an example to better understand how to apply it. Invested almost an hour to find the link mentioned below. For all those who are looking for an example, here goes -
https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/9493/37156
Thanks wacax
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everyone stumbles upon this question when dealing with unbalanced multiclass classification problem using XGBoost in R. I did too!
I was looking for an example to better understand how to apply it. Invested almost an hour to find the link mentioned below. For all those who are looking for an example, here goes -
https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/9493/37156
Thanks wacax
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everyone stumbles upon this question when dealing with unbalanced multiclass classification problem using XGBoost in R. I did too!
I was looking for an example to better understand how to apply it. Invested almost an hour to find the link mentioned below. For all those who are looking for an example, here goes -
https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/9493/37156
Thanks wacax
$endgroup$
Everyone stumbles upon this question when dealing with unbalanced multiclass classification problem using XGBoost in R. I did too!
I was looking for an example to better understand how to apply it. Invested almost an hour to find the link mentioned below. For all those who are looking for an example, here goes -
https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/9493/37156
Thanks wacax
answered Feb 25 '18 at 13:27
Krithi07Krithi07
4117
4117
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer by @KeremT is correct. I provide an example for those who still have problems with the exact implementation.
weight
parameter in XGBoost is per instance not per class. Therefore, we need to assign the weight of each class to its instances, which is the same thing.
For example, if we have three imbalanced classes with ratios
class A = 10%
class B = 30%
class C = 60%
Their weights would be (dividing the smallest class by others)
class A = 1.000
class B = 0.333
class C = 0.167
Then, if training data is
index class
0 A
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 B
we build the weight
vector as follows:
index class weight
0 A 1.000
1 A 1.000
2 B 0.333
3 C 0.167
4 B 0.333
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer by @KeremT is correct. I provide an example for those who still have problems with the exact implementation.
weight
parameter in XGBoost is per instance not per class. Therefore, we need to assign the weight of each class to its instances, which is the same thing.
For example, if we have three imbalanced classes with ratios
class A = 10%
class B = 30%
class C = 60%
Their weights would be (dividing the smallest class by others)
class A = 1.000
class B = 0.333
class C = 0.167
Then, if training data is
index class
0 A
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 B
we build the weight
vector as follows:
index class weight
0 A 1.000
1 A 1.000
2 B 0.333
3 C 0.167
4 B 0.333
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This answer by @KeremT is correct. I provide an example for those who still have problems with the exact implementation.
weight
parameter in XGBoost is per instance not per class. Therefore, we need to assign the weight of each class to its instances, which is the same thing.
For example, if we have three imbalanced classes with ratios
class A = 10%
class B = 30%
class C = 60%
Their weights would be (dividing the smallest class by others)
class A = 1.000
class B = 0.333
class C = 0.167
Then, if training data is
index class
0 A
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 B
we build the weight
vector as follows:
index class weight
0 A 1.000
1 A 1.000
2 B 0.333
3 C 0.167
4 B 0.333
$endgroup$
This answer by @KeremT is correct. I provide an example for those who still have problems with the exact implementation.
weight
parameter in XGBoost is per instance not per class. Therefore, we need to assign the weight of each class to its instances, which is the same thing.
For example, if we have three imbalanced classes with ratios
class A = 10%
class B = 30%
class C = 60%
Their weights would be (dividing the smallest class by others)
class A = 1.000
class B = 0.333
class C = 0.167
Then, if training data is
index class
0 A
1 A
2 B
3 C
4 B
we build the weight
vector as follows:
index class weight
0 A 1.000
1 A 1.000
2 B 0.333
3 C 0.167
4 B 0.333
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
EsmailianEsmailian
3,021320
3,021320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16342%2funbalanced-multiclass-data-with-xgboost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown