LWC and complex parameters
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
3
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople() {
let xxx = ;
xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});
getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
.then(result => {
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
})
.catch(error => {
//Error Handling goes here
});
}
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
try {
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
}
}
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
}
Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
add a comment |
3
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople() {
let xxx = ;
xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});
getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
.then(result => {
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
})
.catch(error => {
//Error Handling goes here
});
}
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
try {
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
}
}
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
}
Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
add a comment |
3
3
3
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople() {
let xxx = ;
xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});
getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
.then(result => {
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
})
.catch(error => {
//Error Handling goes here
});
}
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
try {
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
}
}
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
}
Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople() {
let xxx = ;
xxx.push({name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb'});
xxx.push({name : '111', email : '222'});
getPeople({peopleInfo: xxx})
.then(result => {
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
})
.catch(error => {
//Error Handling goes here
});
}
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo) {
try {
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
}
}
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
}
Note: I've tried @wire, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
apex lightning-web-components
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
asked yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
9,08862239
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
3
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String name {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String email {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
}
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>datatypes.
– tsalb
yesterday
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
3
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String name {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String email {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
}
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>datatypes.
– tsalb
yesterday
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String name {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String email {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
}
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>datatypes.
– tsalb
yesterday
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3
3
3
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String name {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String email {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
}
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add {get;set;} explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson {
@AuraEnabled
public Id id {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String name {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String email {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId {get;set;}
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName {get;set;}
}
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
answered yesterday
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
9,08862239
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>datatypes.
– tsalb
yesterday
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>datatypes.
– tsalb
yesterday
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
3
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
yesterday
1
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object> datatypes.– tsalb
yesterday
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object> datatypes.– tsalb
yesterday
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
20 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
10 hours ago
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
