What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


Imagine there's a random variable such as $ε$. Then we say that $ε$ is i.i.d and follows a normal distribution with mean $0$ and variance $σ^2$.



What does this mean? Is this not a variable anymore? Is this a function now? I see this in most books and such but I'm still unclear what exactly it means or what it does and etc.



In terms of regression, I know this variable is basically the random errors, but what does it mean if this vector of random errors follows a normal distribution?






regression distributions normal-distribution random-variable







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does this help stats.stackexchange.com/a/54894/35989? Or maybe this stats.stackexchange.com/questions/194558/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – Tim♦
    yesterday


















1












$begingroup$


Imagine there's a random variable such as $ε$. Then we say that $ε$ is i.i.d and follows a normal distribution with mean $0$ and variance $σ^2$.



What does this mean? Is this not a variable anymore? Is this a function now? I see this in most books and such but I'm still unclear what exactly it means or what it does and etc.



In terms of regression, I know this variable is basically the random errors, but what does it mean if this vector of random errors follows a normal distribution?






regression distributions normal-distribution random-variable







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does this help stats.stackexchange.com/a/54894/35989? Or maybe this stats.stackexchange.com/questions/194558/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – Tim♦
    yesterday














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Imagine there's a random variable such as $ε$. Then we say that $ε$ is i.i.d and follows a normal distribution with mean $0$ and variance $σ^2$.



What does this mean? Is this not a variable anymore? Is this a function now? I see this in most books and such but I'm still unclear what exactly it means or what it does and etc.



In terms of regression, I know this variable is basically the random errors, but what does it mean if this vector of random errors follows a normal distribution?






regression distributions normal-distribution random-variable







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Imagine there's a random variable such as $ε$. Then we say that $ε$ is i.i.d and follows a normal distribution with mean $0$ and variance $σ^2$.



What does this mean? Is this not a variable anymore? Is this a function now? I see this in most books and such but I'm still unclear what exactly it means or what it does and etc.



In terms of regression, I know this variable is basically the random errors, but what does it mean if this vector of random errors follows a normal distribution?






regression distributions normal-distribution random-variable




regression distributions normal-distribution random-variable






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Hello MellowHello Mellow

62




62




New contributor




Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Hello Mellow is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does this help stats.stackexchange.com/a/54894/35989? Or maybe this stats.stackexchange.com/questions/194558/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – Tim♦
    yesterday














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does this help stats.stackexchange.com/a/54894/35989? Or maybe this stats.stackexchange.com/questions/194558/… ?
    $endgroup$
    – Tim♦
    yesterday








2




2




$begingroup$
Does this help stats.stackexchange.com/a/54894/35989? Or maybe this stats.stackexchange.com/questions/194558/… ?
$endgroup$
– Tim♦
yesterday




$begingroup$
Does this help stats.stackexchange.com/a/54894/35989? Or maybe this stats.stackexchange.com/questions/194558/… ?
$endgroup$
– Tim♦
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I.I.D. means independent and identically distributed, so $epsilon$ is a vector of component random variables with the same distribution.



The meaning of "A follows an X distribution" is equivalent to saying that it "has a distribution," which is to say that it is a random quantity that can be determined only in probability.



In the example of regression that you refer to, $Y=f(X) + epsilon; epsilon stackrel{i.i.d.}{sim} N(0,sigma^2)$, so the response variable $Y$ is equal to some function of the independent $X$ on average, and errors are normally distributed with mean zero, i.e. the observed $Y$ is not exactly $f(X)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    A random variable $varepsilon sim mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ is not the kind of variable considered when thinking about function arguments or solving equations, but actually represents the outcome of a random experiment. (Mathematically rigorously, but not so important, one would say: it is a function mapping from a sample space into the space in which the random variable lives.)



    How can this be understood? A probability measure, like $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ assigns values to sets, so-called events. In this case, the probability of $varepsilon$ ending up in a set $A$ has probability
    $$
    mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A) = int_A frac{1}{sqrt{2pisigma^2}}expleft(-frac{1}{2sigma^2} |x |^2 right) mathrm{d}x.
    $$
    That means, if you repeatedly saw i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) $varepsilon$'s, they would (in the large data limit) on average end up in $A$, precisely $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A)cdot 100 %$ of the time.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
      $endgroup$
      – Tim♦
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas
      21 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      That is..? What do you mean by variable?
      $endgroup$
      – Tim♦
      21 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
      $endgroup$
      – Jonas
      20 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
      $endgroup$
      – Tim♦
      19 hours ago














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Hello Mellow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f401904%2fwhat-does-it-exactly-mean-if-a-random-variable-follows-a-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    I.I.D. means independent and identically distributed, so $epsilon$ is a vector of component random variables with the same distribution.



    The meaning of "A follows an X distribution" is equivalent to saying that it "has a distribution," which is to say that it is a random quantity that can be determined only in probability.



    In the example of regression that you refer to, $Y=f(X) + epsilon; epsilon stackrel{i.i.d.}{sim} N(0,sigma^2)$, so the response variable $Y$ is equal to some function of the independent $X$ on average, and errors are normally distributed with mean zero, i.e. the observed $Y$ is not exactly $f(X)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      I.I.D. means independent and identically distributed, so $epsilon$ is a vector of component random variables with the same distribution.



      The meaning of "A follows an X distribution" is equivalent to saying that it "has a distribution," which is to say that it is a random quantity that can be determined only in probability.



      In the example of regression that you refer to, $Y=f(X) + epsilon; epsilon stackrel{i.i.d.}{sim} N(0,sigma^2)$, so the response variable $Y$ is equal to some function of the independent $X$ on average, and errors are normally distributed with mean zero, i.e. the observed $Y$ is not exactly $f(X)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        I.I.D. means independent and identically distributed, so $epsilon$ is a vector of component random variables with the same distribution.



        The meaning of "A follows an X distribution" is equivalent to saying that it "has a distribution," which is to say that it is a random quantity that can be determined only in probability.



        In the example of regression that you refer to, $Y=f(X) + epsilon; epsilon stackrel{i.i.d.}{sim} N(0,sigma^2)$, so the response variable $Y$ is equal to some function of the independent $X$ on average, and errors are normally distributed with mean zero, i.e. the observed $Y$ is not exactly $f(X)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I.I.D. means independent and identically distributed, so $epsilon$ is a vector of component random variables with the same distribution.



        The meaning of "A follows an X distribution" is equivalent to saying that it "has a distribution," which is to say that it is a random quantity that can be determined only in probability.



        In the example of regression that you refer to, $Y=f(X) + epsilon; epsilon stackrel{i.i.d.}{sim} N(0,sigma^2)$, so the response variable $Y$ is equal to some function of the independent $X$ on average, and errors are normally distributed with mean zero, i.e. the observed $Y$ is not exactly $f(X)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        HStamperHStamper

        1,114612




        1,114612

























            2












            $begingroup$

            A random variable $varepsilon sim mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ is not the kind of variable considered when thinking about function arguments or solving equations, but actually represents the outcome of a random experiment. (Mathematically rigorously, but not so important, one would say: it is a function mapping from a sample space into the space in which the random variable lives.)



            How can this be understood? A probability measure, like $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ assigns values to sets, so-called events. In this case, the probability of $varepsilon$ ending up in a set $A$ has probability
            $$
            mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A) = int_A frac{1}{sqrt{2pisigma^2}}expleft(-frac{1}{2sigma^2} |x |^2 right) mathrm{d}x.
            $$
            That means, if you repeatedly saw i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) $varepsilon$'s, they would (in the large data limit) on average end up in $A$, precisely $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A)cdot 100 %$ of the time.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is..? What do you mean by variable?
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              20 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              19 hours ago


















            2












            $begingroup$

            A random variable $varepsilon sim mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ is not the kind of variable considered when thinking about function arguments or solving equations, but actually represents the outcome of a random experiment. (Mathematically rigorously, but not so important, one would say: it is a function mapping from a sample space into the space in which the random variable lives.)



            How can this be understood? A probability measure, like $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ assigns values to sets, so-called events. In this case, the probability of $varepsilon$ ending up in a set $A$ has probability
            $$
            mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A) = int_A frac{1}{sqrt{2pisigma^2}}expleft(-frac{1}{2sigma^2} |x |^2 right) mathrm{d}x.
            $$
            That means, if you repeatedly saw i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) $varepsilon$'s, they would (in the large data limit) on average end up in $A$, precisely $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A)cdot 100 %$ of the time.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is..? What do you mean by variable?
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              20 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              19 hours ago
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            A random variable $varepsilon sim mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ is not the kind of variable considered when thinking about function arguments or solving equations, but actually represents the outcome of a random experiment. (Mathematically rigorously, but not so important, one would say: it is a function mapping from a sample space into the space in which the random variable lives.)



            How can this be understood? A probability measure, like $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ assigns values to sets, so-called events. In this case, the probability of $varepsilon$ ending up in a set $A$ has probability
            $$
            mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A) = int_A frac{1}{sqrt{2pisigma^2}}expleft(-frac{1}{2sigma^2} |x |^2 right) mathrm{d}x.
            $$
            That means, if you repeatedly saw i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) $varepsilon$'s, they would (in the large data limit) on average end up in $A$, precisely $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A)cdot 100 %$ of the time.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            A random variable $varepsilon sim mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ is not the kind of variable considered when thinking about function arguments or solving equations, but actually represents the outcome of a random experiment. (Mathematically rigorously, but not so important, one would say: it is a function mapping from a sample space into the space in which the random variable lives.)



            How can this be understood? A probability measure, like $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)$ assigns values to sets, so-called events. In this case, the probability of $varepsilon$ ending up in a set $A$ has probability
            $$
            mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A) = int_A frac{1}{sqrt{2pisigma^2}}expleft(-frac{1}{2sigma^2} |x |^2 right) mathrm{d}x.
            $$
            That means, if you repeatedly saw i.i.d. (independent and identically distributed) $varepsilon$'s, they would (in the large data limit) on average end up in $A$, precisely $mathrm{N}(0,sigma^2)(A)cdot 100 %$ of the time.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 17 hours ago

























            answered yesterday









            JonasJonas

            51211




            51211












            • $begingroup$
              How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is..? What do you mean by variable?
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              20 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              19 hours ago




















            • $begingroup$
              How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              yesterday










            • $begingroup$
              It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              That is..? What do you mean by variable?
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              21 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonas
              20 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
              $endgroup$
              – Tim♦
              19 hours ago


















            $begingroup$
            How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
            $endgroup$
            – Tim♦
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            How is it not a random variable? It has a distribution, so it is a random variable.
            $endgroup$
            – Tim♦
            yesterday












            $begingroup$
            It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonas
            21 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            It is a random variable, but not a „variable“ how we typically understand it.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonas
            21 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            That is..? What do you mean by variable?
            $endgroup$
            – Tim♦
            21 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            That is..? What do you mean by variable?
            $endgroup$
            – Tim♦
            21 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonas
            20 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Like an unknown value with respect to which we want to solve an equation, or the argument of a function taking values in a given set. A random variable is a measurable function from a probability space to a measurable space. To me, those are completely different concepts; even if they appear similar.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonas
            20 hours ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
            $endgroup$
            – Tim♦
            19 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            When you see "variable" mentioned in probability theory text, they usually mean "random variable". Also "variable" in statistics means something else then in algebra. So it would be best if you could edit and make it more precise what kind of "variable" the random variable is not.
            $endgroup$
            – Tim♦
            19 hours ago












            Hello Mellow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Hello Mellow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Hello Mellow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Hello Mellow is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f401904%2fwhat-does-it-exactly-mean-if-a-random-variable-follows-a-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Image
            1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
            Read more

            Vallis Paradisi

            Image
            Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
            Read more

            Tabula Rosettana

            Image
            Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
            Read more