Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?












2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question

























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    yesterday






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    yesterday











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago
















2















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question

























  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    yesterday






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    yesterday











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago














2












2








2








Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch







share|improve this question
















Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.



In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):




הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן



The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].




Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?






shulchan-aruch




shulchan-aruch






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 19 hours ago









Al Berko

6,5141529




6,5141529










asked yesterday









DonielFDonielF

17k12689




17k12689













  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    yesterday






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    yesterday











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago



















  • I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

    – Dr. Shmuel
    yesterday






  • 2





    There are dozens of such examples

    – Double AA♦
    yesterday











  • In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago











  • Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

    – Al Berko
    19 hours ago

















I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday





I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin

– Dr. Shmuel
yesterday




2




2





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA♦
yesterday





There are dozens of such examples

– Double AA♦
yesterday













In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
19 hours ago





In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?

– Al Berko
19 hours ago













Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
19 hours ago





Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…

– Al Berko
19 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






share|improve this answer































    4














    Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




    הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







    share|improve this answer
























    • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

      – user6591
      yesterday













    • First thing to pop on my mind

      – sam
      yesterday











    • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

      – Double AA♦
      yesterday






    • 1





      @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

      – user6591
      yesterday



















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



    In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




    סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




    In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




    ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




    In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




    הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




    O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




    והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




    There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






    share|improve this answer




























      5














      It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



      In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




      סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




      In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




      ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




      In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




      הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




      O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




      והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




      There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






      share|improve this answer


























        5












        5








        5







        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.






        share|improve this answer













        It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:



        In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:




        סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם




        In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:




        ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך




        In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:




        הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר




        O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:




        והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג




        There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        AlexAlex

        23.4k157134




        23.4k157134























            4














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer
























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              yesterday













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              yesterday











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              yesterday
















            4














            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer
























            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              yesterday













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              yesterday











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              yesterday














            4












            4








            4







            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:







            share|improve this answer













            Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:




            הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            user6591user6591

            25.8k12758




            25.8k12758













            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              yesterday













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              yesterday











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              yesterday



















            • This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

              – user6591
              yesterday













            • First thing to pop on my mind

              – sam
              yesterday











            • There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

              – Double AA♦
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

              – user6591
              yesterday

















            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            yesterday







            This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.

            – user6591
            yesterday















            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            yesterday





            First thing to pop on my mind

            – sam
            yesterday













            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA♦
            yesterday





            There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested

            – Double AA♦
            yesterday




            1




            1





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            yesterday





            @Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.

            – user6591
            yesterday



            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Image
            1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
            Read more

            Vallis Paradisi

            Image
            Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
            Read more

            Tabula Rosettana

            Image
            Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
            Read more