Where do they get the Jaeger strength measurement from in “Pacific Rim”?
In the movie Pacific Rim, Crimson Typhoon is described as having "50 diesel engines per muscle strand" of strength.
Where did they get that from? Is that a complete fantasy measurement that they came up with to describe their strength? Something akin to Warp factor numbers in Star Trek?
pacific-rim
|
show 2 more comments
In the movie Pacific Rim, Crimson Typhoon is described as having "50 diesel engines per muscle strand" of strength.
Where did they get that from? Is that a complete fantasy measurement that they came up with to describe their strength? Something akin to Warp factor numbers in Star Trek?
pacific-rim
2
As a (multiple degree) engineer, you are barking up the wrong tree. Humanoid robots of this size are terrible designs for engines of war. Although a Bolo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo_%28tank%29) is still fantastical, it'd do a much better job and be a more realistic design for the job. Pacific Rim is more of a fantasy in a sciency like future setting.
– Jim2B
Mar 2 '15 at 16:51
1
I dearly hope it is from the Jaegermonsters from Girl Genius.
– Lexible
Mar 2 '15 at 17:11
Maybe try replacing the Bugatti Veyron motor with an actual diesel engine like the ones used in ships.
– Angrist
Mar 11 '15 at 14:30
I'm with Jim2B. We need Bolo movies, clearly. I can get behind this. I will happily prepurchase tickets to a Bolo movie.
– Broklynite
Mar 14 '15 at 9:43
Diesel engines come in such broad sizes and power ratings as to be meaningless. I would bet money the writer chose that deliberately to sound powerful without pinning themselves down to specifics.
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:43
|
show 2 more comments
In the movie Pacific Rim, Crimson Typhoon is described as having "50 diesel engines per muscle strand" of strength.
Where did they get that from? Is that a complete fantasy measurement that they came up with to describe their strength? Something akin to Warp factor numbers in Star Trek?
pacific-rim
In the movie Pacific Rim, Crimson Typhoon is described as having "50 diesel engines per muscle strand" of strength.
Where did they get that from? Is that a complete fantasy measurement that they came up with to describe their strength? Something akin to Warp factor numbers in Star Trek?
pacific-rim
pacific-rim
edited yesterday
Jenayah
18.6k494131
18.6k494131
asked Mar 2 '15 at 16:37
Destroyer73Destroyer73
1,2721825
1,2721825
2
As a (multiple degree) engineer, you are barking up the wrong tree. Humanoid robots of this size are terrible designs for engines of war. Although a Bolo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo_%28tank%29) is still fantastical, it'd do a much better job and be a more realistic design for the job. Pacific Rim is more of a fantasy in a sciency like future setting.
– Jim2B
Mar 2 '15 at 16:51
1
I dearly hope it is from the Jaegermonsters from Girl Genius.
– Lexible
Mar 2 '15 at 17:11
Maybe try replacing the Bugatti Veyron motor with an actual diesel engine like the ones used in ships.
– Angrist
Mar 11 '15 at 14:30
I'm with Jim2B. We need Bolo movies, clearly. I can get behind this. I will happily prepurchase tickets to a Bolo movie.
– Broklynite
Mar 14 '15 at 9:43
Diesel engines come in such broad sizes and power ratings as to be meaningless. I would bet money the writer chose that deliberately to sound powerful without pinning themselves down to specifics.
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:43
|
show 2 more comments
2
As a (multiple degree) engineer, you are barking up the wrong tree. Humanoid robots of this size are terrible designs for engines of war. Although a Bolo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo_%28tank%29) is still fantastical, it'd do a much better job and be a more realistic design for the job. Pacific Rim is more of a fantasy in a sciency like future setting.
– Jim2B
Mar 2 '15 at 16:51
1
I dearly hope it is from the Jaegermonsters from Girl Genius.
– Lexible
Mar 2 '15 at 17:11
Maybe try replacing the Bugatti Veyron motor with an actual diesel engine like the ones used in ships.
– Angrist
Mar 11 '15 at 14:30
I'm with Jim2B. We need Bolo movies, clearly. I can get behind this. I will happily prepurchase tickets to a Bolo movie.
– Broklynite
Mar 14 '15 at 9:43
Diesel engines come in such broad sizes and power ratings as to be meaningless. I would bet money the writer chose that deliberately to sound powerful without pinning themselves down to specifics.
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:43
2
2
As a (multiple degree) engineer, you are barking up the wrong tree. Humanoid robots of this size are terrible designs for engines of war. Although a Bolo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo_%28tank%29) is still fantastical, it'd do a much better job and be a more realistic design for the job. Pacific Rim is more of a fantasy in a sciency like future setting.
– Jim2B
Mar 2 '15 at 16:51
As a (multiple degree) engineer, you are barking up the wrong tree. Humanoid robots of this size are terrible designs for engines of war. Although a Bolo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo_%28tank%29) is still fantastical, it'd do a much better job and be a more realistic design for the job. Pacific Rim is more of a fantasy in a sciency like future setting.
– Jim2B
Mar 2 '15 at 16:51
1
1
I dearly hope it is from the Jaegermonsters from Girl Genius.
– Lexible
Mar 2 '15 at 17:11
I dearly hope it is from the Jaegermonsters from Girl Genius.
– Lexible
Mar 2 '15 at 17:11
Maybe try replacing the Bugatti Veyron motor with an actual diesel engine like the ones used in ships.
– Angrist
Mar 11 '15 at 14:30
Maybe try replacing the Bugatti Veyron motor with an actual diesel engine like the ones used in ships.
– Angrist
Mar 11 '15 at 14:30
I'm with Jim2B. We need Bolo movies, clearly. I can get behind this. I will happily prepurchase tickets to a Bolo movie.
– Broklynite
Mar 14 '15 at 9:43
I'm with Jim2B. We need Bolo movies, clearly. I can get behind this. I will happily prepurchase tickets to a Bolo movie.
– Broklynite
Mar 14 '15 at 9:43
Diesel engines come in such broad sizes and power ratings as to be meaningless. I would bet money the writer chose that deliberately to sound powerful without pinning themselves down to specifics.
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:43
Diesel engines come in such broad sizes and power ratings as to be meaningless. I would bet money the writer chose that deliberately to sound powerful without pinning themselves down to specifics.
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:43
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I just did a quick Google search about the biggest diesel engine.
Torque: 7,603,850 newton metres (5,608,310 lbf·ft) @ 102 rpm
and 5,600,000 lbf ft * 50 = 280,000,000 lbf ft making it seem possible to me that there might be smaller diesel engines with a torque of 1,631,232 lb ft = 2,211,653 Nm.
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82884%2fwhere-do-they-get-the-jaeger-strength-measurement-from-in-pacific-rim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I just did a quick Google search about the biggest diesel engine.
Torque: 7,603,850 newton metres (5,608,310 lbf·ft) @ 102 rpm
and 5,600,000 lbf ft * 50 = 280,000,000 lbf ft making it seem possible to me that there might be smaller diesel engines with a torque of 1,631,232 lb ft = 2,211,653 Nm.
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
add a comment |
I just did a quick Google search about the biggest diesel engine.
Torque: 7,603,850 newton metres (5,608,310 lbf·ft) @ 102 rpm
and 5,600,000 lbf ft * 50 = 280,000,000 lbf ft making it seem possible to me that there might be smaller diesel engines with a torque of 1,631,232 lb ft = 2,211,653 Nm.
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
add a comment |
I just did a quick Google search about the biggest diesel engine.
Torque: 7,603,850 newton metres (5,608,310 lbf·ft) @ 102 rpm
and 5,600,000 lbf ft * 50 = 280,000,000 lbf ft making it seem possible to me that there might be smaller diesel engines with a torque of 1,631,232 lb ft = 2,211,653 Nm.
I just did a quick Google search about the biggest diesel engine.
Torque: 7,603,850 newton metres (5,608,310 lbf·ft) @ 102 rpm
and 5,600,000 lbf ft * 50 = 280,000,000 lbf ft making it seem possible to me that there might be smaller diesel engines with a torque of 1,631,232 lb ft = 2,211,653 Nm.
edited yesterday
Jenayah
18.6k494131
18.6k494131
answered Mar 11 '15 at 14:38
AngristAngrist
26115
26115
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
add a comment |
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
In contrast, the Chevy Beat has a 1.0L 3 cylinder diesel with just 160 Nm of torque. That gives the writers a comfortable four orders of magnitude wiggle room by describing power in terms of "diesel engines".
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:45
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82884%2fwhere-do-they-get-the-jaeger-strength-measurement-from-in-pacific-rim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
As a (multiple degree) engineer, you are barking up the wrong tree. Humanoid robots of this size are terrible designs for engines of war. Although a Bolo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolo_%28tank%29) is still fantastical, it'd do a much better job and be a more realistic design for the job. Pacific Rim is more of a fantasy in a sciency like future setting.
– Jim2B
Mar 2 '15 at 16:51
1
I dearly hope it is from the Jaegermonsters from Girl Genius.
– Lexible
Mar 2 '15 at 17:11
Maybe try replacing the Bugatti Veyron motor with an actual diesel engine like the ones used in ships.
– Angrist
Mar 11 '15 at 14:30
I'm with Jim2B. We need Bolo movies, clearly. I can get behind this. I will happily prepurchase tickets to a Bolo movie.
– Broklynite
Mar 14 '15 at 9:43
Diesel engines come in such broad sizes and power ratings as to be meaningless. I would bet money the writer chose that deliberately to sound powerful without pinning themselves down to specifics.
– Schwern
Mar 17 '15 at 1:43