How to write pow math?












6















I want to write math:



{i^{w}}^{anterior}


but this is the result:



enter image description here



I want this :



enter image description here






math-mode







share|improve this question





























    6















    I want to write math:



    {i^{w}}^{anterior}


    but this is the result:



    enter image description here



    I want this :



    enter image description here






    math-mode







    share|improve this question



























      6












      6








      6


      0






      I want to write math:



      {i^{w}}^{anterior}


      but this is the result:



      enter image description here



      I want this :



      enter image description here






      math-mode







      share|improve this question
















      I want to write math:



      {i^{w}}^{anterior}


      but this is the result:



      enter image description here



      I want this :



      enter image description here






      math-mode




      math-mode






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 6 hours ago









      AboAmmar

      34.1k32883




      34.1k32883










      asked 14 hours ago









      x-rwx-rw

      45617




      45617






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          12














          Embrace the {w^{mathrm{anterior}}} rather than the {i^{w}}. Also, mathrm for math-sized text.



          documentclass{article}
          
begin{document}
          
$i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}$
          
end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer





















          • 2





            You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

            – Henri Menke
            10 hours ago











          • @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            6 hours ago



















          9














          If I understood you correctly, you want the superscripts have normalsize plus an sf shape, you can use mbox. 



          documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
          
begin{document}
          

          
newcommand{mb}[1]{mbox{sffamily#1,}}
          
$mb{i}^{mb{w}^{mb{anterior}}}$
          

          
end{document}



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer





















          • 3





            It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

            – Steven B. Segletes
            14 hours ago













          • Yes, you've made a better guess!

            – AboAmmar
            13 hours ago



















          1














          In your version {i^{w}}^{anterior}, the i is effectively raised to two separate exponents, causing them to appear side-by-side, which is not what you intend: enter image description here



          If you nest the braces as {i^{w^{anterior}}} then the stack of exponents is preserved, resulting in what appears to be your desired form: enter image description here



          (This is assuming it's stacked exponents that you're concerned with, not plain text formatting for superscripts as your example image might suggest. In that case, use AboAmmar's version.)






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.




























            0














            Another good approach is operatorname{anterior} from amsmath, especially if you want two of these variables to appear consecutively.



            Personally, I would prefer to define newcommandanterior{operatorname{anterior}}, analogously to sin or log.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "85"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475687%2fhow-to-write-pow-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              12














              Embrace the {w^{mathrm{anterior}}} rather than the {i^{w}}. Also, mathrm for math-sized text.



              documentclass{article}
              
begin{document}
              
$i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}$
              
end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer





















              • 2





                You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

                – Henri Menke
                10 hours ago











              • @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

                – Steven B. Segletes
                6 hours ago
















              12














              Embrace the {w^{mathrm{anterior}}} rather than the {i^{w}}. Also, mathrm for math-sized text.



              documentclass{article}
              
begin{document}
              
$i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}$
              
end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer





















              • 2





                You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

                – Henri Menke
                10 hours ago











              • @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

                – Steven B. Segletes
                6 hours ago














              12












              12








              12







              Embrace the {w^{mathrm{anterior}}} rather than the {i^{w}}. Also, mathrm for math-sized text.



              documentclass{article}
              
begin{document}
              
$i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}$
              
end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer















              Embrace the {w^{mathrm{anterior}}} rather than the {i^{w}}. Also, mathrm for math-sized text.



              documentclass{article}
              
begin{document}
              
$i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}$
              
end{document}


              enter image description here







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 8 hours ago

























              answered 14 hours ago









              Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

              156k9201411




              156k9201411








              • 2





                You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

                – Henri Menke
                10 hours ago











              • @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

                – Steven B. Segletes
                6 hours ago














              • 2





                You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

                – Henri Menke
                10 hours ago











              • @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

                – Steven B. Segletes
                6 hours ago








              2




              2





              You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

              – Henri Menke
              10 hours ago





              You should also properly embrace arguments i^{w^{mathrm{anterior}}}

              – Henri Menke
              10 hours ago













              @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

              – Steven B. Segletes
              6 hours ago





              @HenriMenke Thank you for the reminder not to cut corners, especially on accepted answers.

              – Steven B. Segletes
              6 hours ago











              9














              If I understood you correctly, you want the superscripts have normalsize plus an sf shape, you can use mbox. 



              documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
              
begin{document}
              

              
newcommand{mb}[1]{mbox{sffamily#1,}}
              
$mb{i}^{mb{w}^{mb{anterior}}}$
              

              
end{document}



              enter image description here







              share|improve this answer





















              • 3





                It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

                – Steven B. Segletes
                14 hours ago













              • Yes, you've made a better guess!

                – AboAmmar
                13 hours ago
















              9














              If I understood you correctly, you want the superscripts have normalsize plus an sf shape, you can use mbox. 



              documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
              
begin{document}
              

              
newcommand{mb}[1]{mbox{sffamily#1,}}
              
$mb{i}^{mb{w}^{mb{anterior}}}$
              

              
end{document}



              enter image description here







              share|improve this answer





















              • 3





                It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

                – Steven B. Segletes
                14 hours ago













              • Yes, you've made a better guess!

                – AboAmmar
                13 hours ago














              9












              9








              9







              If I understood you correctly, you want the superscripts have normalsize plus an sf shape, you can use mbox. 



              documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
              
begin{document}
              

              
newcommand{mb}[1]{mbox{sffamily#1,}}
              
$mb{i}^{mb{w}^{mb{anterior}}}$
              

              
end{document}



              enter image description here







              share|improve this answer















              If I understood you correctly, you want the superscripts have normalsize plus an sf shape, you can use mbox. 



              documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
              
begin{document}
              

              
newcommand{mb}[1]{mbox{sffamily#1,}}
              
$mb{i}^{mb{w}^{mb{anterior}}}$
              

              
end{document}



              enter image description here








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 13 hours ago

























              answered 14 hours ago









              AboAmmarAboAmmar

              34.1k32883




              34.1k32883








              • 3





                It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

                – Steven B. Segletes
                14 hours ago













              • Yes, you've made a better guess!

                – AboAmmar
                13 hours ago














              • 3





                It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

                – Steven B. Segletes
                14 hours ago













              • Yes, you've made a better guess!

                – AboAmmar
                13 hours ago








              3




              3





              It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

              – Steven B. Segletes
              14 hours ago







              It's not always easy to tell when to take an OP literally. (+1)

              – Steven B. Segletes
              14 hours ago















              Yes, you've made a better guess!

              – AboAmmar
              13 hours ago





              Yes, you've made a better guess!

              – AboAmmar
              13 hours ago











              1














              In your version {i^{w}}^{anterior}, the i is effectively raised to two separate exponents, causing them to appear side-by-side, which is not what you intend: enter image description here



              If you nest the braces as {i^{w^{anterior}}} then the stack of exponents is preserved, resulting in what appears to be your desired form: enter image description here



              (This is assuming it's stacked exponents that you're concerned with, not plain text formatting for superscripts as your example image might suggest. In that case, use AboAmmar's version.)






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                1














                In your version {i^{w}}^{anterior}, the i is effectively raised to two separate exponents, causing them to appear side-by-side, which is not what you intend: enter image description here



                If you nest the braces as {i^{w^{anterior}}} then the stack of exponents is preserved, resulting in what appears to be your desired form: enter image description here



                (This is assuming it's stacked exponents that you're concerned with, not plain text formatting for superscripts as your example image might suggest. In that case, use AboAmmar's version.)






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  In your version {i^{w}}^{anterior}, the i is effectively raised to two separate exponents, causing them to appear side-by-side, which is not what you intend: enter image description here



                  If you nest the braces as {i^{w^{anterior}}} then the stack of exponents is preserved, resulting in what appears to be your desired form: enter image description here



                  (This is assuming it's stacked exponents that you're concerned with, not plain text formatting for superscripts as your example image might suggest. In that case, use AboAmmar's version.)






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  In your version {i^{w}}^{anterior}, the i is effectively raised to two separate exponents, causing them to appear side-by-side, which is not what you intend: enter image description here



                  If you nest the braces as {i^{w^{anterior}}} then the stack of exponents is preserved, resulting in what appears to be your desired form: enter image description here



                  (This is assuming it's stacked exponents that you're concerned with, not plain text formatting for superscripts as your example image might suggest. In that case, use AboAmmar's version.)







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 12 hours ago









                  BloodcinderBloodcinder

                  1112




                  1112




                  New contributor




                  Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Bloodcinder is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.























                      0














                      Another good approach is operatorname{anterior} from amsmath, especially if you want two of these variables to appear consecutively.



                      Personally, I would prefer to define newcommandanterior{operatorname{anterior}}, analogously to sin or log.






                      share|improve this answer




























                        0














                        Another good approach is operatorname{anterior} from amsmath, especially if you want two of these variables to appear consecutively.



                        Personally, I would prefer to define newcommandanterior{operatorname{anterior}}, analogously to sin or log.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Another good approach is operatorname{anterior} from amsmath, especially if you want two of these variables to appear consecutively.



                          Personally, I would prefer to define newcommandanterior{operatorname{anterior}}, analogously to sin or log.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Another good approach is operatorname{anterior} from amsmath, especially if you want two of these variables to appear consecutively.



                          Personally, I would prefer to define newcommandanterior{operatorname{anterior}}, analogously to sin or log.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 11 hours ago









                          DavislorDavislor

                          6,3911328




                          6,3911328






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid …



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475687%2fhow-to-write-pow-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              -

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to label and detect the document text images

                              Image
                              1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
                              Read more

                              Vallis Paradisi

                              Image
                              Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
                              Read more

                              Tabula Rosettana

                              Image
                              Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
                              Read more