What is the next number in the following sequence?












1












$begingroup$


1, 6, 5, 3, 4, 1, 2, 2, ?



Hint: the task is pattern recognition using basic mathematical operations.






pattern calculation-puzzle number-sequence







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    Oct 11 '17 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    s this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series? –
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:14
















1












$begingroup$


1, 6, 5, 3, 4, 1, 2, 2, ?



Hint: the task is pattern recognition using basic mathematical operations.






pattern calculation-puzzle number-sequence







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    Oct 11 '17 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    s this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series? –
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:14














1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


1, 6, 5, 3, 4, 1, 2, 2, ?



Hint: the task is pattern recognition using basic mathematical operations.






pattern calculation-puzzle number-sequence







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




1, 6, 5, 3, 4, 1, 2, 2, ?



Hint: the task is pattern recognition using basic mathematical operations.






pattern calculation-puzzle number-sequence




pattern calculation-puzzle number-sequence






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 5 '17 at 12:28









CharlieKKCharlieKK

13




13












  • $begingroup$
    Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    Oct 11 '17 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    s this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series? –
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:14


















  • $begingroup$
    Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
    $endgroup$
    – Rubio♦
    Oct 11 '17 at 14:32










  • $begingroup$
    s this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series? –
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:14
















$begingroup$
Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Oct 11 '17 at 14:32




$begingroup$
Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $color{green}{checkmark smalltext{Accept}}$ it :)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Oct 11 '17 at 14:32












$begingroup$
s this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series? –
$endgroup$
– Dr t
Oct 18 '17 at 18:14




$begingroup$
s this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series? –
$endgroup$
– Dr t
Oct 18 '17 at 18:14










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

I guess:




The answer is 0. Every third number is the difference between the previous 2 numbers.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason V
    Oct 5 '17 at 13:53










  • $begingroup$
    Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:13



















0












$begingroup$

If we can separate the unique sequence into three sequences of three numbers (165 341 22?), then perhaps the pattern can also be:



165



341 -



224






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why 224 specifically though?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – user58413
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    22 mins ago












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55671%2fwhat-is-the-next-number-in-the-following-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

I guess:




The answer is 0. Every third number is the difference between the previous 2 numbers.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason V
    Oct 5 '17 at 13:53










  • $begingroup$
    Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:13
















6












$begingroup$

I guess:




The answer is 0. Every third number is the difference between the previous 2 numbers.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason V
    Oct 5 '17 at 13:53










  • $begingroup$
    Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:13














6












6








6





$begingroup$

I guess:




The answer is 0. Every third number is the difference between the previous 2 numbers.







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



I guess:




The answer is 0. Every third number is the difference between the previous 2 numbers.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Oct 5 '17 at 12:52









SidSid

10.5k12781




10.5k12781








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason V
    Oct 5 '17 at 13:53










  • $begingroup$
    Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:13














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Jason V
    Oct 5 '17 at 13:53










  • $begingroup$
    Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr t
    Oct 18 '17 at 18:13








3




3




$begingroup$
the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
$endgroup$
– Jason V
Oct 5 '17 at 13:53




$begingroup$
the only issue i take with an answer like this is, it breaks up the single sequence into individual sequences of 3 entries. However, I like the answer as it answers the question.
$endgroup$
– Jason V
Oct 5 '17 at 13:53












$begingroup$
Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
$endgroup$
– Dr t
Oct 18 '17 at 18:13




$begingroup$
Is this pattern the result of a series based on a starting rule that is then used to construct the rest of the series? Like a Fibonacci series? Or is this a pattern that you arbitrarily dreamed up according to a rule that cannot start a series?
$endgroup$
– Dr t
Oct 18 '17 at 18:13











0












$begingroup$

If we can separate the unique sequence into three sequences of three numbers (165 341 22?), then perhaps the pattern can also be:



165



341 -



224






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why 224 specifically though?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – user58413
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    22 mins ago
















0












$begingroup$

If we can separate the unique sequence into three sequences of three numbers (165 341 22?), then perhaps the pattern can also be:



165



341 -



224






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why 224 specifically though?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – user58413
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    22 mins ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$

If we can separate the unique sequence into three sequences of three numbers (165 341 22?), then perhaps the pattern can also be:



165



341 -



224






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$



If we can separate the unique sequence into three sequences of three numbers (165 341 22?), then perhaps the pattern can also be:



165



341 -



224







share|improve this answer








New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 9 hours ago









user58413user58413

1




1




New contributor




user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user58413 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Why 224 specifically though?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – user58413
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    22 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Why 224 specifically though?
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – user58413
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    22 mins ago
















$begingroup$
Why 224 specifically though?
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Why 224 specifically though?
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
$endgroup$
– user58413
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Is a subtraction calculation between the first sequence of three numbers and the second one: 165 - 341 = 224. 4 would be the answer.
$endgroup$
– user58413
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
22 mins ago




$begingroup$
But 165 - 341 is -176, not 224 ...
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
22 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f55671%2fwhat-is-the-next-number-in-the-following-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Image
1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C
Read more

Vallis Paradisi

Image
Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para
Read more

Tabula Rosettana

Image
Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a
Read more