scale_pos_weight Xgboost
$begingroup$
My question is rather simple what does the parameter scale_pos_weight in xgboost do? I know typically it should be $frac{sum(negative cases)}{sum(positive cases)}$.
Does it oversample the minority class by that ratio or does it undersample the majority class by inverse of that ratio? Or something else?
Also I would like to know if during cross validation in xgbcv, does the sampling happen on the test part of the cross-validation also or only the train part is affected by scale_pos_weight? Because i've heard that sampling should never be applied to test as it gives over-optimistic results.
classification xgboost unbalanced-classes
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question is rather simple what does the parameter scale_pos_weight in xgboost do? I know typically it should be $frac{sum(negative cases)}{sum(positive cases)}$.
Does it oversample the minority class by that ratio or does it undersample the majority class by inverse of that ratio? Or something else?
Also I would like to know if during cross validation in xgbcv, does the sampling happen on the test part of the cross-validation also or only the train part is affected by scale_pos_weight? Because i've heard that sampling should never be applied to test as it gives over-optimistic results.
classification xgboost unbalanced-classes
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question is rather simple what does the parameter scale_pos_weight in xgboost do? I know typically it should be $frac{sum(negative cases)}{sum(positive cases)}$.
Does it oversample the minority class by that ratio or does it undersample the majority class by inverse of that ratio? Or something else?
Also I would like to know if during cross validation in xgbcv, does the sampling happen on the test part of the cross-validation also or only the train part is affected by scale_pos_weight? Because i've heard that sampling should never be applied to test as it gives over-optimistic results.
classification xgboost unbalanced-classes
$endgroup$
My question is rather simple what does the parameter scale_pos_weight in xgboost do? I know typically it should be $frac{sum(negative cases)}{sum(positive cases)}$.
Does it oversample the minority class by that ratio or does it undersample the majority class by inverse of that ratio? Or something else?
Also I would like to know if during cross validation in xgbcv, does the sampling happen on the test part of the cross-validation also or only the train part is affected by scale_pos_weight? Because i've heard that sampling should never be applied to test as it gives over-optimistic results.
classification xgboost unbalanced-classes
classification xgboost unbalanced-classes
asked Jun 14 '17 at 10:32
Dhruv MahajanDhruv Mahajan
1788
1788
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 18 hours ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I guess while computing total error from errors of individual samples, if sample happens to be of a positive class, its error is multiplied by the scale_pos_weight factor. Therefore setting high scale_pos_weight urges optimizer to treat more important (mostly due to its rareness) class with more respect due its higher contribution to the total error value.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19697%2fscale-pos-weight-xgboost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I guess while computing total error from errors of individual samples, if sample happens to be of a positive class, its error is multiplied by the scale_pos_weight factor. Therefore setting high scale_pos_weight urges optimizer to treat more important (mostly due to its rareness) class with more respect due its higher contribution to the total error value.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess while computing total error from errors of individual samples, if sample happens to be of a positive class, its error is multiplied by the scale_pos_weight factor. Therefore setting high scale_pos_weight urges optimizer to treat more important (mostly due to its rareness) class with more respect due its higher contribution to the total error value.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I guess while computing total error from errors of individual samples, if sample happens to be of a positive class, its error is multiplied by the scale_pos_weight factor. Therefore setting high scale_pos_weight urges optimizer to treat more important (mostly due to its rareness) class with more respect due its higher contribution to the total error value.
$endgroup$
I guess while computing total error from errors of individual samples, if sample happens to be of a positive class, its error is multiplied by the scale_pos_weight factor. Therefore setting high scale_pos_weight urges optimizer to treat more important (mostly due to its rareness) class with more respect due its higher contribution to the total error value.
answered Jul 17 '18 at 22:02
Anatoly AlekseevAnatoly Alekseev
1011
1011
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19697%2fscale-pos-weight-xgboost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown