Two different GPUs for Keras (Python)?
$begingroup$
One question guys, someone knows if it should be ok to get one more GPU of type Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 (gaming version), given that now I have GTX 1070 Titanium? They don't have another Titanium card available here, so I have to get a different one, but closely similar, and I wonder if for using Keras (with TensorFlow backend), will it work fine? They are not exactly the same cards, but similar enough maybe. I want 2 GPUs for Keras.
python keras tensorflow gpu nvidia
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One question guys, someone knows if it should be ok to get one more GPU of type Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 (gaming version), given that now I have GTX 1070 Titanium? They don't have another Titanium card available here, so I have to get a different one, but closely similar, and I wonder if for using Keras (with TensorFlow backend), will it work fine? They are not exactly the same cards, but similar enough maybe. I want 2 GPUs for Keras.
python keras tensorflow gpu nvidia
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One question guys, someone knows if it should be ok to get one more GPU of type Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 (gaming version), given that now I have GTX 1070 Titanium? They don't have another Titanium card available here, so I have to get a different one, but closely similar, and I wonder if for using Keras (with TensorFlow backend), will it work fine? They are not exactly the same cards, but similar enough maybe. I want 2 GPUs for Keras.
python keras tensorflow gpu nvidia
New contributor
$endgroup$
One question guys, someone knows if it should be ok to get one more GPU of type Nvidia Geforce GTX 1070 (gaming version), given that now I have GTX 1070 Titanium? They don't have another Titanium card available here, so I have to get a different one, but closely similar, and I wonder if for using Keras (with TensorFlow backend), will it work fine? They are not exactly the same cards, but similar enough maybe. I want 2 GPUs for Keras.
python keras tensorflow gpu nvidia
python keras tensorflow gpu nvidia
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
MachineLearningGodMachineLearningGod
82
82
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I tried training with a 1080 and a 2080 ti and I found that I didn't get any speed up from multi-gpu training because the 1080 acted as a bottleneck. So I while I think this would work fine, you would be better served to run a different model on each GPU rather than trying to train across GPUs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
MachineLearningGod is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46633%2ftwo-different-gpus-for-keras-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I tried training with a 1080 and a 2080 ti and I found that I didn't get any speed up from multi-gpu training because the 1080 acted as a bottleneck. So I while I think this would work fine, you would be better served to run a different model on each GPU rather than trying to train across GPUs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I tried training with a 1080 and a 2080 ti and I found that I didn't get any speed up from multi-gpu training because the 1080 acted as a bottleneck. So I while I think this would work fine, you would be better served to run a different model on each GPU rather than trying to train across GPUs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I tried training with a 1080 and a 2080 ti and I found that I didn't get any speed up from multi-gpu training because the 1080 acted as a bottleneck. So I while I think this would work fine, you would be better served to run a different model on each GPU rather than trying to train across GPUs.
$endgroup$
I tried training with a 1080 and a 2080 ti and I found that I didn't get any speed up from multi-gpu training because the 1080 acted as a bottleneck. So I while I think this would work fine, you would be better served to run a different model on each GPU rather than trying to train across GPUs.
answered 2 days ago
LukeLuke
1183
1183
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you. So even in worst case scenario that my two different GPUs don't contribute to speedup together, I can train models separately on each, and get speedup that way, but either way I get speedup, it should not be the case that getting the second GPU is a total loss, agree? Just to make sure I understand you correctly.
$endgroup$
– MachineLearningGod
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
$begingroup$
That is correct. I think the best approach for you would be to train model separately. You may need to think about how many PCIe lanes you have though. Because if you don't have enough, you may bottleneck on data loading. Then again, according to Tim Dettmers PCIe lanes don't matter when you have 3 GPUs or less.
$endgroup$
– Luke
2 days ago
add a comment |
MachineLearningGod is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
MachineLearningGod is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
MachineLearningGod is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
MachineLearningGod is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f46633%2ftwo-different-gpus-for-keras-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown