Chess Massacre Variants-Play Find The Fastest Way?












4












$begingroup$


I have thought up several variations of massacre chess.




Massacre chess is a game where almost every single move is a capture.

The idea here is that only the chosen type of piece can capture. It can only be captured itself, by the kings of course, once all other possible captures have been done.




This idea for this has the following variations: Kings, Knights, Queens, Rooks, Bishops, Black Bishops, White Bishops, No-Promotion Pawns, and Yes-Promotion Pawns.



This a question to be answered by those of you who wish to do this for fun.





I shall now list my research, and the challenge is for you to beat my games for each variation by making a faster version.



You may choose to do one, two, or all of the. It is up to you. Good luck!




Rules




  1. Only the chosen type of piece may capture.

  2. The board must be cleared down to two kings.

  3. The kings may only take the chosen piece once every other capture possible with that piece has been done.

  4. It can only be done through legal moves - think FIDE.

  5. Have fun!




The variants (external links to https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/ )





  • Knights

  • Kings

  • Queens

  • Rooks

  • Bishops

  • Only Black Bishops

  • Only White Bishops

  • No-Promotion Pawns


  • Yes-Promotion Pawns

    Since if a promoted pawn counts as a piece or not is debatable, this
    is a variation to cover that. There is a special rule for this
    one-you may only promote after all possible piece and pawn captures
    have been done in whatever position/s arise in your game.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Regarding my edit: I wasn't 100% sure: Is it better to show the move-codes (as text) direclty as well? If so, I'd edit them back in.
    $endgroup$
    – BmyGuest
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Oh no, your edit was extremely helpful. And just keep the links as they are after your edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday


















4












$begingroup$


I have thought up several variations of massacre chess.




Massacre chess is a game where almost every single move is a capture.

The idea here is that only the chosen type of piece can capture. It can only be captured itself, by the kings of course, once all other possible captures have been done.




This idea for this has the following variations: Kings, Knights, Queens, Rooks, Bishops, Black Bishops, White Bishops, No-Promotion Pawns, and Yes-Promotion Pawns.



This a question to be answered by those of you who wish to do this for fun.





I shall now list my research, and the challenge is for you to beat my games for each variation by making a faster version.



You may choose to do one, two, or all of the. It is up to you. Good luck!




Rules




  1. Only the chosen type of piece may capture.

  2. The board must be cleared down to two kings.

  3. The kings may only take the chosen piece once every other capture possible with that piece has been done.

  4. It can only be done through legal moves - think FIDE.

  5. Have fun!




The variants (external links to https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/ )





  • Knights

  • Kings

  • Queens

  • Rooks

  • Bishops

  • Only Black Bishops

  • Only White Bishops

  • No-Promotion Pawns


  • Yes-Promotion Pawns

    Since if a promoted pawn counts as a piece or not is debatable, this
    is a variation to cover that. There is a special rule for this
    one-you may only promote after all possible piece and pawn captures
    have been done in whatever position/s arise in your game.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Regarding my edit: I wasn't 100% sure: Is it better to show the move-codes (as text) direclty as well? If so, I'd edit them back in.
    $endgroup$
    – BmyGuest
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Oh no, your edit was extremely helpful. And just keep the links as they are after your edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday
















4












4








4





$begingroup$


I have thought up several variations of massacre chess.




Massacre chess is a game where almost every single move is a capture.

The idea here is that only the chosen type of piece can capture. It can only be captured itself, by the kings of course, once all other possible captures have been done.




This idea for this has the following variations: Kings, Knights, Queens, Rooks, Bishops, Black Bishops, White Bishops, No-Promotion Pawns, and Yes-Promotion Pawns.



This a question to be answered by those of you who wish to do this for fun.





I shall now list my research, and the challenge is for you to beat my games for each variation by making a faster version.



You may choose to do one, two, or all of the. It is up to you. Good luck!




Rules




  1. Only the chosen type of piece may capture.

  2. The board must be cleared down to two kings.

  3. The kings may only take the chosen piece once every other capture possible with that piece has been done.

  4. It can only be done through legal moves - think FIDE.

  5. Have fun!




The variants (external links to https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/ )





  • Knights

  • Kings

  • Queens

  • Rooks

  • Bishops

  • Only Black Bishops

  • Only White Bishops

  • No-Promotion Pawns


  • Yes-Promotion Pawns

    Since if a promoted pawn counts as a piece or not is debatable, this
    is a variation to cover that. There is a special rule for this
    one-you may only promote after all possible piece and pawn captures
    have been done in whatever position/s arise in your game.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have thought up several variations of massacre chess.




Massacre chess is a game where almost every single move is a capture.

The idea here is that only the chosen type of piece can capture. It can only be captured itself, by the kings of course, once all other possible captures have been done.




This idea for this has the following variations: Kings, Knights, Queens, Rooks, Bishops, Black Bishops, White Bishops, No-Promotion Pawns, and Yes-Promotion Pawns.



This a question to be answered by those of you who wish to do this for fun.





I shall now list my research, and the challenge is for you to beat my games for each variation by making a faster version.



You may choose to do one, two, or all of the. It is up to you. Good luck!




Rules




  1. Only the chosen type of piece may capture.

  2. The board must be cleared down to two kings.

  3. The kings may only take the chosen piece once every other capture possible with that piece has been done.

  4. It can only be done through legal moves - think FIDE.

  5. Have fun!




The variants (external links to https://www.apronus.com/chess/pgnviewer/ )





  • Knights

  • Kings

  • Queens

  • Rooks

  • Bishops

  • Only Black Bishops

  • Only White Bishops

  • No-Promotion Pawns


  • Yes-Promotion Pawns

    Since if a promoted pawn counts as a piece or not is debatable, this
    is a variation to cover that. There is a special rule for this
    one-you may only promote after all possible piece and pawn captures
    have been done in whatever position/s arise in your game.







mathematics chess checkerboard game-theory speedsolving






share|improve this question









New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







Rewan Demontay













New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Rewan DemontayRewan Demontay

2209




2209




New contributor




Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Rewan Demontay is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Regarding my edit: I wasn't 100% sure: Is it better to show the move-codes (as text) direclty as well? If so, I'd edit them back in.
    $endgroup$
    – BmyGuest
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Oh no, your edit was extremely helpful. And just keep the links as they are after your edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday




















  • $begingroup$
    Regarding my edit: I wasn't 100% sure: Is it better to show the move-codes (as text) direclty as well? If so, I'd edit them back in.
    $endgroup$
    – BmyGuest
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Oh no, your edit was extremely helpful. And just keep the links as they are after your edit.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday


















$begingroup$
Regarding my edit: I wasn't 100% sure: Is it better to show the move-codes (as text) direclty as well? If so, I'd edit them back in.
$endgroup$
– BmyGuest
yesterday




$begingroup$
Regarding my edit: I wasn't 100% sure: Is it better to show the move-codes (as text) direclty as well? If so, I'd edit them back in.
$endgroup$
– BmyGuest
yesterday












$begingroup$
Oh no, your edit was extremely helpful. And just keep the links as they are after your edit.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday






$begingroup$
Oh no, your edit was extremely helpful. And just keep the links as they are after your edit.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Does this beat your rooks file? (24.5 moves)



And the Queens (21.5 moves)



The Bishops (23 moves)



NP pawns (35 moves)



YP pawns (33.5 moves)



Dark squared Bishops (26.5 moves) (with constraint added that Light squared Bishops can only be captured by a King)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Rewan Demontay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80286%2fchess-massacre-variants-play-find-the-fastest-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Does this beat your rooks file? (24.5 moves)



And the Queens (21.5 moves)



The Bishops (23 moves)



NP pawns (35 moves)



YP pawns (33.5 moves)



Dark squared Bishops (26.5 moves) (with constraint added that Light squared Bishops can only be captured by a King)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday
















4












$begingroup$

Does this beat your rooks file? (24.5 moves)



And the Queens (21.5 moves)



The Bishops (23 moves)



NP pawns (35 moves)



YP pawns (33.5 moves)



Dark squared Bishops (26.5 moves) (with constraint added that Light squared Bishops can only be captured by a King)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday














4












4








4





$begingroup$

Does this beat your rooks file? (24.5 moves)



And the Queens (21.5 moves)



The Bishops (23 moves)



NP pawns (35 moves)



YP pawns (33.5 moves)



Dark squared Bishops (26.5 moves) (with constraint added that Light squared Bishops can only be captured by a King)






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Does this beat your rooks file? (24.5 moves)



And the Queens (21.5 moves)



The Bishops (23 moves)



NP pawns (35 moves)



YP pawns (33.5 moves)



Dark squared Bishops (26.5 moves) (with constraint added that Light squared Bishops can only be captured by a King)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 18 hours ago

























answered yesterday









Arnaud MortierArnaud Mortier

944218




944218












  • $begingroup$
    Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
    $endgroup$
    – Arnaud Mortier
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
    $endgroup$
    – Rewan Demontay
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




$begingroup$
Rooks-Yes, Bishops-Yes, Queens-No, becuase one of the Queens is captured BEFORE all other captures of non-queen pieces are completed.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday












$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
yesterday






$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay Good spot! Edited, hopefully it's ok now. I've also added NP pawns. If I understand correctly, this NP-pawn variation is also valid as a YP-pawn?
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
yesterday














$begingroup$
Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




$begingroup$
Yes, your queens game is now good. NP is also good. YP is the same as NP, but with pawn promotions allowed.
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday












$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
yesterday






$begingroup$
@RewanDemontay It's surprisingly not easy to do better with promotion than without (here 1.5 moves better).
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
yesterday














$begingroup$
Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday




$begingroup$
Hm. Yep. So true. And YP is looking good!
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
yesterday










Rewan Demontay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Rewan Demontay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Rewan Demontay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Rewan Demontay is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80286%2fchess-massacre-variants-play-find-the-fastest-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Vallis Paradisi

Tabula Rosettana