How long should an anagram be in order to be solvable by a human?
$begingroup$
I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:
fangos theorem
Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:
It is a famous book, consisting of three words.
If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?
Game of Thrones
So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.
puzzle-creation difficulty-rating
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:
fangos theorem
Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:
It is a famous book, consisting of three words.
If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?
Game of Thrones
So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.
puzzle-creation difficulty-rating
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:
fangos theorem
Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:
It is a famous book, consisting of three words.
If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?
Game of Thrones
So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.
puzzle-creation difficulty-rating
$endgroup$
I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:
fangos theorem
Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:
It is a famous book, consisting of three words.
If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?
Game of Thrones
So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.
puzzle-creation difficulty-rating
puzzle-creation difficulty-rating
asked 17 hours ago
ChaoticChaotic
483213
483213
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC
can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.
However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM
, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.
Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase
.
It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM
). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF
. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof
. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof
into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the
laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST
.
Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST
with the initial clue three word phrase
would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as
"Fantasy"
for your suggestion.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79844%2fhow-long-should-an-anagram-be-in-order-to-be-solvable-by-a-human%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC
can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.
However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM
, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.
Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase
.
It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM
). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF
. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof
. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof
into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the
laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST
.
Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST
with the initial clue three word phrase
would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC
can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.
However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM
, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.
Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase
.
It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM
). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF
. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof
. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof
into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the
laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST
.
Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST
with the initial clue three word phrase
would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC
can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.
However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM
, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.
Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase
.
It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM
). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF
. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof
. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof
into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the
laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST
.
Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST
with the initial clue three word phrase
would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.
$endgroup$
The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC
can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.
However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM
, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.
Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase
.
It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM
). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF
. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof
. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof
into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the
laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST
.
Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST
with the initial clue three word phrase
would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.
edited 15 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
ZanyGZanyG
789317
789317
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as
"Fantasy"
for your suggestion.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as
"Fantasy"
for your suggestion.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as
"Fantasy"
for your suggestion.
$endgroup$
On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as
"Fantasy"
for your suggestion.
answered 12 hours ago
AHKieranAHKieran
5,1261040
5,1261040
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79844%2fhow-long-should-an-anagram-be-in-order-to-be-solvable-by-a-human%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown