How long should an anagram be in order to be solvable by a human?












4












$begingroup$


I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:



fangos theorem



Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:




It is a famous book, consisting of three words.




If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?




Game of Thrones




So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:



    fangos theorem



    Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:




    It is a famous book, consisting of three words.




    If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?




    Game of Thrones




    So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:



      fangos theorem



      Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:




      It is a famous book, consisting of three words.




      If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?




      Game of Thrones




      So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm writing some puzzles for a bunch of smart friends, but I'm unsure if the puzzle is too easy or too hard. For instance, an anagram like this:



      fangos theorem



      Should be solvable by a human without any other hint? Or should I give a hint like:




      It is a famous book, consisting of three words.




      If it is still hard, how can one get to the answer below, without computers?




      Game of Thrones




      So how can I calibrate the difficulty of an anagram? I don't want my friends (and myself) to get frustrated.







      puzzle-creation difficulty-rating






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 17 hours ago









      ChaoticChaotic

      483213




      483213






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.



          However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.



          Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase.



          It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST.



          Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST with the initial clue three word phrase would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as




            "Fantasy"




            for your suggestion.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "559"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79844%2fhow-long-should-an-anagram-be-in-order-to-be-solvable-by-a-human%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.



              However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.



              Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase.



              It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST.



              Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST with the initial clue three word phrase would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.



                However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.



                Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase.



                It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST.



                Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST with the initial clue three word phrase would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.



                  However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.



                  Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase.



                  It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST.



                  Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST with the initial clue three word phrase would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  The interesting thing about anagrams is how their difficulty increases rapidly with the insertion of even a single new letter. For example, a short anagram like WROC can be solved within a glance. This is because of the number of ways of ordering the letters is the factorial of the number of letters: there are $4!=4*3*2*1=24$ possibilities to order the four characters before, easily enough to think about and rule out the wrong ones.



                  However, when given something like FANGOS THEOREM, there are some 2 billion possible orderings. The length you want should depend on the experience of the solvers with anagrams in the past. I find that most of my audience (a group of a dozen or so friends) can be expected to solve an 8-letter anagram with ease, but I doubt any of them would solve yours without a clue.



                  Given how most anagrams are traditionally a single word, listing the number of words is an important clue. After that, it would be reasonable to assume the three words form some sort of phrase, either a proverb or media title, so I would pose it as three word phrase.



                  It seems you are attempting to use English words when presenting the anagram (judging by your use of THEOREM). A subtle hint I would use would be to instead provide AMONGST HEREOF. Note that the second word of the solution is already contained within the clue, even enunciated by the standard pronunciation of hereof. When considering the anagram, solvers may toy with splitting hereof into two parts, and the most obvious would give one of the answer words. One issue with this, however, is the more common word the laying across the gap, so you could re-order the words to HEREOF AMONGST.



                  Overall, I'd say HEREOF AMONGST with the initial clue three word phrase would be a puzzle that, while difficult, I could expect people to solve before resorting to a computer solver.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 15 hours ago

























                  answered 17 hours ago









                  ZanyGZanyG

                  789317




                  789317























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as




                      "Fantasy"




                      for your suggestion.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as




                        "Fantasy"




                        for your suggestion.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as




                          "Fantasy"




                          for your suggestion.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          On the popular British TV gameshow, "Pointless", they often have a round that has a category and then a series of the words that fit that category in anagram form (presented as English words). In this case the anagrams are of varying difficulty, but with the presence of the given category, this gives clues to the players. The way I tend to attempt them is to think of words which I know fit the category, and then look to see if any of the presented words are anagrams of this. Therefore I believe that whilst some anagrams are very difficult, even the inclusion of a category that it fits into could be a massive help, such as




                          "Fantasy"




                          for your suggestion.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 12 hours ago









                          AHKieranAHKieran

                          5,1261040




                          5,1261040






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79844%2fhow-long-should-an-anagram-be-in-order-to-be-solvable-by-a-human%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to label and detect the document text images

                              Vallis Paradisi

                              Tabula Rosettana