Q-Learning experience replay: how to feed the neural network?












0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to replicate the DQN Atari experiment. Actually my DQN isn't performing well; checking another one's codes, I saw something about experience replay which I don't understand. First, when you define your CNN, in the first layer you have to specify the size (I'm using Keras + Tensorflow so in my case it's something like (105, 80, 4), which corresponds to height, width and number of images I feed my CNN.). In the codes I revisited, when they get the minibatch from the memory, I see they usually fed the CNN without "packing" it on 4 batches. How it is possible? I mean for example if you get 32 random sampled experiences, don't you need to make batches of 4 before feeding it?
Here are an example of what I'm saying: https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/replay_buffer.py
https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/deep_Q.py
In this code, that's how he/she stores the experiences:



def add(self, s, a, r, d, s2):
"""Add an experience to the buffer"""
# S represents current state, a is action,
# r is reward, d is whether it is the end,
# and s2 is next state
experience = (s, a, r, d, s2)
if self.count < self.buffer_size:
self.buffer.append(experience)
self.count += 1
else:
self.buffer.popleft()
self.buffer.append(experience)


Then when you need to use them:



 def sample(self, batch_size):
"""Samples a total of elements equal to batch_size from buffer
if buffer contains enough elements. Otherwise return all elements"""

batch =

if self.count < batch_size:
batch = random.sample(self.buffer, self.count)
else:
batch = random.sample(self.buffer, batch_size)

# Maps each experience in batch in batches of states, actions, rewards
# and new states
s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch = list(map(np.array, list(zip(*batch))))

return s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch


Ok, so now you have a batch of 32 states, actions, rewards, done and next states.



This is how you feed the state batch (s_batch) and next state batch (s2_batch) to the CNN:



def train(self, s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch, observation_num):
"""Trains network to fit given parameters"""
batch_size = s_batch.shape[0]
targets = np.zeros((batch_size, NUM_ACTIONS))

for i in range(batch_size):
targets[i] = self.model.predict(s_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
fut_action = self.target_model.predict(s2_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
targets[i, a_batch[i]] = r_batch[i]
if d_batch[i] == False:
targets[i, a_batch[i]] += DECAY_RATE * np.max(fut_action)

loss = self.model.train_on_batch(s_batch, targets)

# Print the loss every 10 iterations.
if observation_num % 10 == 0:
print("We had a loss equal to ", loss)


In my code (https://bitbucket.org/jocapal/dqn_public/src/master/Deimos_v2_13.py) I get a batch of 32 experiences; then make small batches of 4 experiences and feed the CNN. My question is: am I doing it wrong? And if so, how can I feed 32 experiences when my CNN is waiting for 4 experiences?



Another example of what I'm saying: https://yanpanlau.github.io/2016/07/10/FlappyBird-Keras.html










share|improve this question









New contributor




Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to replicate the DQN Atari experiment. Actually my DQN isn't performing well; checking another one's codes, I saw something about experience replay which I don't understand. First, when you define your CNN, in the first layer you have to specify the size (I'm using Keras + Tensorflow so in my case it's something like (105, 80, 4), which corresponds to height, width and number of images I feed my CNN.). In the codes I revisited, when they get the minibatch from the memory, I see they usually fed the CNN without "packing" it on 4 batches. How it is possible? I mean for example if you get 32 random sampled experiences, don't you need to make batches of 4 before feeding it?
    Here are an example of what I'm saying: https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/replay_buffer.py
    https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/deep_Q.py
    In this code, that's how he/she stores the experiences:



    def add(self, s, a, r, d, s2):
    """Add an experience to the buffer"""
    # S represents current state, a is action,
    # r is reward, d is whether it is the end,
    # and s2 is next state
    experience = (s, a, r, d, s2)
    if self.count < self.buffer_size:
    self.buffer.append(experience)
    self.count += 1
    else:
    self.buffer.popleft()
    self.buffer.append(experience)


    Then when you need to use them:



     def sample(self, batch_size):
    """Samples a total of elements equal to batch_size from buffer
    if buffer contains enough elements. Otherwise return all elements"""

    batch =

    if self.count < batch_size:
    batch = random.sample(self.buffer, self.count)
    else:
    batch = random.sample(self.buffer, batch_size)

    # Maps each experience in batch in batches of states, actions, rewards
    # and new states
    s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch = list(map(np.array, list(zip(*batch))))

    return s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch


    Ok, so now you have a batch of 32 states, actions, rewards, done and next states.



    This is how you feed the state batch (s_batch) and next state batch (s2_batch) to the CNN:



    def train(self, s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch, observation_num):
    """Trains network to fit given parameters"""
    batch_size = s_batch.shape[0]
    targets = np.zeros((batch_size, NUM_ACTIONS))

    for i in range(batch_size):
    targets[i] = self.model.predict(s_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
    fut_action = self.target_model.predict(s2_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
    targets[i, a_batch[i]] = r_batch[i]
    if d_batch[i] == False:
    targets[i, a_batch[i]] += DECAY_RATE * np.max(fut_action)

    loss = self.model.train_on_batch(s_batch, targets)

    # Print the loss every 10 iterations.
    if observation_num % 10 == 0:
    print("We had a loss equal to ", loss)


    In my code (https://bitbucket.org/jocapal/dqn_public/src/master/Deimos_v2_13.py) I get a batch of 32 experiences; then make small batches of 4 experiences and feed the CNN. My question is: am I doing it wrong? And if so, how can I feed 32 experiences when my CNN is waiting for 4 experiences?



    Another example of what I'm saying: https://yanpanlau.github.io/2016/07/10/FlappyBird-Keras.html










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to replicate the DQN Atari experiment. Actually my DQN isn't performing well; checking another one's codes, I saw something about experience replay which I don't understand. First, when you define your CNN, in the first layer you have to specify the size (I'm using Keras + Tensorflow so in my case it's something like (105, 80, 4), which corresponds to height, width and number of images I feed my CNN.). In the codes I revisited, when they get the minibatch from the memory, I see they usually fed the CNN without "packing" it on 4 batches. How it is possible? I mean for example if you get 32 random sampled experiences, don't you need to make batches of 4 before feeding it?
      Here are an example of what I'm saying: https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/replay_buffer.py
      https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/deep_Q.py
      In this code, that's how he/she stores the experiences:



      def add(self, s, a, r, d, s2):
      """Add an experience to the buffer"""
      # S represents current state, a is action,
      # r is reward, d is whether it is the end,
      # and s2 is next state
      experience = (s, a, r, d, s2)
      if self.count < self.buffer_size:
      self.buffer.append(experience)
      self.count += 1
      else:
      self.buffer.popleft()
      self.buffer.append(experience)


      Then when you need to use them:



       def sample(self, batch_size):
      """Samples a total of elements equal to batch_size from buffer
      if buffer contains enough elements. Otherwise return all elements"""

      batch =

      if self.count < batch_size:
      batch = random.sample(self.buffer, self.count)
      else:
      batch = random.sample(self.buffer, batch_size)

      # Maps each experience in batch in batches of states, actions, rewards
      # and new states
      s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch = list(map(np.array, list(zip(*batch))))

      return s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch


      Ok, so now you have a batch of 32 states, actions, rewards, done and next states.



      This is how you feed the state batch (s_batch) and next state batch (s2_batch) to the CNN:



      def train(self, s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch, observation_num):
      """Trains network to fit given parameters"""
      batch_size = s_batch.shape[0]
      targets = np.zeros((batch_size, NUM_ACTIONS))

      for i in range(batch_size):
      targets[i] = self.model.predict(s_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
      fut_action = self.target_model.predict(s2_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
      targets[i, a_batch[i]] = r_batch[i]
      if d_batch[i] == False:
      targets[i, a_batch[i]] += DECAY_RATE * np.max(fut_action)

      loss = self.model.train_on_batch(s_batch, targets)

      # Print the loss every 10 iterations.
      if observation_num % 10 == 0:
      print("We had a loss equal to ", loss)


      In my code (https://bitbucket.org/jocapal/dqn_public/src/master/Deimos_v2_13.py) I get a batch of 32 experiences; then make small batches of 4 experiences and feed the CNN. My question is: am I doing it wrong? And if so, how can I feed 32 experiences when my CNN is waiting for 4 experiences?



      Another example of what I'm saying: https://yanpanlau.github.io/2016/07/10/FlappyBird-Keras.html










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to replicate the DQN Atari experiment. Actually my DQN isn't performing well; checking another one's codes, I saw something about experience replay which I don't understand. First, when you define your CNN, in the first layer you have to specify the size (I'm using Keras + Tensorflow so in my case it's something like (105, 80, 4), which corresponds to height, width and number of images I feed my CNN.). In the codes I revisited, when they get the minibatch from the memory, I see they usually fed the CNN without "packing" it on 4 batches. How it is possible? I mean for example if you get 32 random sampled experiences, don't you need to make batches of 4 before feeding it?
      Here are an example of what I'm saying: https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/replay_buffer.py
      https://github.com/yilundu/DQN-DDQN-on-Space-Invaders/blob/master/deep_Q.py
      In this code, that's how he/she stores the experiences:



      def add(self, s, a, r, d, s2):
      """Add an experience to the buffer"""
      # S represents current state, a is action,
      # r is reward, d is whether it is the end,
      # and s2 is next state
      experience = (s, a, r, d, s2)
      if self.count < self.buffer_size:
      self.buffer.append(experience)
      self.count += 1
      else:
      self.buffer.popleft()
      self.buffer.append(experience)


      Then when you need to use them:



       def sample(self, batch_size):
      """Samples a total of elements equal to batch_size from buffer
      if buffer contains enough elements. Otherwise return all elements"""

      batch =

      if self.count < batch_size:
      batch = random.sample(self.buffer, self.count)
      else:
      batch = random.sample(self.buffer, batch_size)

      # Maps each experience in batch in batches of states, actions, rewards
      # and new states
      s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch = list(map(np.array, list(zip(*batch))))

      return s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch


      Ok, so now you have a batch of 32 states, actions, rewards, done and next states.



      This is how you feed the state batch (s_batch) and next state batch (s2_batch) to the CNN:



      def train(self, s_batch, a_batch, r_batch, d_batch, s2_batch, observation_num):
      """Trains network to fit given parameters"""
      batch_size = s_batch.shape[0]
      targets = np.zeros((batch_size, NUM_ACTIONS))

      for i in range(batch_size):
      targets[i] = self.model.predict(s_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
      fut_action = self.target_model.predict(s2_batch[i].reshape(1, 84, 84, NUM_FRAMES), batch_size = 1)
      targets[i, a_batch[i]] = r_batch[i]
      if d_batch[i] == False:
      targets[i, a_batch[i]] += DECAY_RATE * np.max(fut_action)

      loss = self.model.train_on_batch(s_batch, targets)

      # Print the loss every 10 iterations.
      if observation_num % 10 == 0:
      print("We had a loss equal to ", loss)


      In my code (https://bitbucket.org/jocapal/dqn_public/src/master/Deimos_v2_13.py) I get a batch of 32 experiences; then make small batches of 4 experiences and feed the CNN. My question is: am I doing it wrong? And if so, how can I feed 32 experiences when my CNN is waiting for 4 experiences?



      Another example of what I'm saying: https://yanpanlau.github.io/2016/07/10/FlappyBird-Keras.html







      python reinforcement-learning q-learning dqn keras-rl






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday







      Joaquin













      New contributor




      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      JoaquinJoaquin

      12




      12




      New contributor




      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Joaquin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Input is a 4D tensor [batch_size, height, width, channels] . Single state is already 4 frames stacked together so when you sample a state from the experience replay you sample a 3D tensor [height, width, channels]. When you sample 32 states you actually sample 32 of those 3D tensors and feed them directly to the network. For more details on preprocessing refer to the page 6 of the original DQN paper found here.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            18 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            12 hours ago














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Joaquin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49128%2fq-learning-experience-replay-how-to-feed-the-neural-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Input is a 4D tensor [batch_size, height, width, channels] . Single state is already 4 frames stacked together so when you sample a state from the experience replay you sample a 3D tensor [height, width, channels]. When you sample 32 states you actually sample 32 of those 3D tensors and feed them directly to the network. For more details on preprocessing refer to the page 6 of the original DQN paper found here.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            18 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            12 hours ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Input is a 4D tensor [batch_size, height, width, channels] . Single state is already 4 frames stacked together so when you sample a state from the experience replay you sample a 3D tensor [height, width, channels]. When you sample 32 states you actually sample 32 of those 3D tensors and feed them directly to the network. For more details on preprocessing refer to the page 6 of the original DQN paper found here.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            18 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            12 hours ago
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Input is a 4D tensor [batch_size, height, width, channels] . Single state is already 4 frames stacked together so when you sample a state from the experience replay you sample a 3D tensor [height, width, channels]. When you sample 32 states you actually sample 32 of those 3D tensors and feed them directly to the network. For more details on preprocessing refer to the page 6 of the original DQN paper found here.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          $endgroup$



          Input is a 4D tensor [batch_size, height, width, channels] . Single state is already 4 frames stacked together so when you sample a state from the experience replay you sample a 3D tensor [height, width, channels]. When you sample 32 states you actually sample 32 of those 3D tensors and feed them directly to the network. For more details on preprocessing refer to the page 6 of the original DQN paper found here.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered yesterday









          Brale_Brale_

          1111




          1111




          New contributor




          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Brale_ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.












          • $begingroup$
            But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            18 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            12 hours ago




















          • $begingroup$
            But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            yesterday












          • $begingroup$
            Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Joaquin
            18 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
            $endgroup$
            – Brale_
            12 hours ago


















          $begingroup$
          But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
          $endgroup$
          – Joaquin
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          But what about breaking the correlations between samples? If I did that way there would be a strong correlation between images (as stated here: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/24921/…) and here, in pages 4-5: cs.toronto.edu/~vmnih/docs/dqn.pdf
          $endgroup$
          – Joaquin
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
          $endgroup$
          – Brale_
          yesterday






          $begingroup$
          Joaquin, you missunderstood. 4 frames stacked together are a single state. You need it because the environment is partially observable. For example, if you play Pong and you only have a single frame, you won't know if the ball goes right or left. You need few frames stacked together to get that information. Those few frames together are a single state. Correlation part applies between different states which are different frames stacked together. You would get "strong correlation" only if you keep giving state after state as the input, 4 frames together won't cause such correlation.
          $endgroup$
          – Brale_
          yesterday














          $begingroup$
          Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
          $endgroup$
          – Joaquin
          yesterday






          $begingroup$
          Thanks Brale_ for you clarification. I'll try that way and see if it works. Thanks for your time!
          $endgroup$
          – Joaquin
          yesterday














          $begingroup$
          Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
          $endgroup$
          – Joaquin
          18 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Just for clarify: when talking about the minibatches you pick randomly from the memory batch, it's referring to packs of 4 states, not to single states, right?
          $endgroup$
          – Joaquin
          18 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
          $endgroup$
          – Brale_
          12 hours ago






          $begingroup$
          Yes, you pick 32 packs of 4 states, of course those 4 states have to be in order they happened to have full information, the thing that I talked about with Pong.
          $endgroup$
          – Brale_
          12 hours ago












          Joaquin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Joaquin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Joaquin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Joaquin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f49128%2fq-learning-experience-replay-how-to-feed-the-neural-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Callistus I

          Tabula Rosettana

          How to label and detect the document text images