classification performance metric for high risk medical decisions












0












$begingroup$


What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?







      classification predictive-modeling performance






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jul 31 '18 at 1:24









      Amad ArianAmad Arian

      31




      31






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$


          1. Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.

          2. You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            This could be the concept you are looking for:



            Cost curves.



            The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.



            For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
              Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "557"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36231%2fclassification-performance-metric-for-high-risk-medical-decisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                0












                $begingroup$


                1. Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.

                2. You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$


                  1. Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.

                  2. You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$


                    1. Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.

                    2. You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$




                    1. Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.

                    2. You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jul 31 '18 at 3:20









                    hssayhssay

                    1,0931311




                    1,0931311























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        This could be the concept you are looking for:



                        Cost curves.



                        The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.



                        For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.






                        share|improve this answer










                        New contributor




                        Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          This could be the concept you are looking for:



                          Cost curves.



                          The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.



                          For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.






                          share|improve this answer










                          New contributor




                          Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            This could be the concept you are looking for:



                            Cost curves.



                            The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.



                            For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.






                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            $endgroup$



                            This could be the concept you are looking for:



                            Cost curves.



                            The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.



                            For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.







                            share|improve this answer










                            New contributor




                            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited yesterday









                            Stephen Rauch

                            1,52551330




                            1,52551330






                            New contributor




                            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered yesterday









                            Juan Esteban de la CalleJuan Esteban de la Calle

                            687




                            687




                            New contributor




                            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            Juan Esteban de la Calle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
                                Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
                                  Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
                                    Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
                                    Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered yesterday









                                    Cini09Cini09

                                    166




                                    166






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36231%2fclassification-performance-metric-for-high-risk-medical-decisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to label and detect the document text images

                                        Vallis Paradisi

                                        Tabula Rosettana