classification performance metric for high risk medical decisions
$begingroup$
What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?
classification predictive-modeling performance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?
classification predictive-modeling performance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?
classification predictive-modeling performance
$endgroup$
What is the best classification performance metric for risky medical treatments like surgery? for example a patient should NOT suggest a surgery (negative) if he/she can be treated by medicine (positive). Does Negative predictive value (TN/TN+FN) works for this situation?
classification predictive-modeling performance
classification predictive-modeling performance
asked Jul 31 '18 at 1:24
Amad ArianAmad Arian
31
31
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
- Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.
- You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This could be the concept you are looking for:
Cost curves.
The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.
For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36231%2fclassification-performance-metric-for-high-risk-medical-decisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
- Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.
- You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.
- You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
- Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.
- You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.
$endgroup$
- Minimizing false negatives is definitely a good strategy.
- You can also generalize to using weighted f-measure. It allows you to give tunable weightage.
answered Jul 31 '18 at 3:20
hssayhssay
1,0931311
1,0931311
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This could be the concept you are looking for:
Cost curves.
The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.
For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This could be the concept you are looking for:
Cost curves.
The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.
For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This could be the concept you are looking for:
Cost curves.
The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.
For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.
New contributor
$endgroup$
This could be the concept you are looking for:
Cost curves.
The concept is ROC curve but with cost associated for every type of cost.
For example: False negatives have a cost of 100. False positives have a cost of 5. Using cost-associated ROC curves will help you punishing much more FN than FP or viceversa.
New contributor
edited yesterday
Stephen Rauch♦
1,52551330
1,52551330
New contributor
answered yesterday
Juan Esteban de la CalleJuan Esteban de la Calle
687
687
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.
$endgroup$
Check ROC curve, increase the threshold and measure PPV.
Also you can not use only one in isolation, you have to check sensitivity, specificity and PPV in order to understand the complete scenario.
answered yesterday
Cini09Cini09
166
166
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36231%2fclassification-performance-metric-for-high-risk-medical-decisions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown