Why is a very small peak with larger m/z not considered to be the molecular ion?
$begingroup$
With regards to the following spectrum:
When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.
What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?
mass-spectrometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With regards to the following spectrum:
When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.
What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?
mass-spectrometry
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
With regards to the following spectrum:
When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.
What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?
mass-spectrometry
$endgroup$
With regards to the following spectrum:
When asked for the M/Z for the molecular ion, the peak at 58 was taken, not 59.
What causes the peak at 59, and why isn't it taken as the molecular ion?
mass-spectrometry
mass-spectrometry
edited 13 hours ago
orthocresol♦
39.4k7114241
39.4k7114241
asked 13 hours ago
George TianGeorge Tian
677217
677217
1
$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.
Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.
This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.
The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:
(source)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110752%2fwhy-is-a-very-small-peak-with-larger-m-z-not-considered-to-be-the-molecular-ion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.
Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.
This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.
Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.
This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.
Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.
This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.
$endgroup$
Without knowing more details, it is hard to guess, but at this $m/z$, it seems likely that the peak is the result of one $^{12}ce{C}$ being substituted by one $^{13}ce{C}$. It is more useful to assume a uniform mass of 12 for carbon when analyzing such a spectrum.
Note that with more carbons in a larger molecule, it becomes more likely that at least one of them is a $^{13}ce{C}$. Thus, the spectra become more complicated that way.
This whole analysis goes out the window if this is not an organic molecule, though similar patterns may arise for other molecules - it depends on the isotopes and their distribution.
answered 13 hours ago
TAR86TAR86
4,88911031
4,88911031
4
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
It looks like the mass spectrum of butane, so I think it's quite a safe assumption that it's organic ;)
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.
The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:
(source)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.
The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:
(source)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.
The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:
(source)
$endgroup$
The peak at $m/z = 59$ with lower intensity in respect to the one at $m / z =58$ (the molecular ion) is not overseen. Mass spectroscopy is capable to deliver information about the isotopic composition of your sample, too. Since -- accounting over all carbon atoms of your sample -- about 1.1% are of the non-radioactive isotope of $ce{^{13}C}$, you may use this information to determine the carbon atoms in total present.
The story indeed contiues further, as to establish by this "isotope fingerprint" if you have one or two chlorines per molecule present ($ce{^{35}Cl}$ and $ce{^{37}Cl}$), bromines, presence / absence of nitrogen, etc.:
(source)
answered 13 hours ago
ButtonwoodButtonwood
9,59211941
9,59211941
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f110752%2fwhy-is-a-very-small-peak-with-larger-m-z-not-considered-to-be-the-molecular-ion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The gist here is that nobody can just "know" what the various peaks are. Rather you look at the spectrum and start to look for clues to put together a consistent explanation. So you have a peak at 58 and 43, the difference is 15 where you also have a large peak. 15 is the mass of a methyl group so... and on the analysis goes.
$endgroup$
– MaxW
7 hours ago