What does “they got their money” mean?












3
















...corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
they all got their money.




There's some defenitions for the phrase get your money's worth in online dictionaries but I couldn't find any defenition or meaning for "they got their money".



So could you please explain it to me?




Does it mean the shares of corporations whose principals told exciting
stories were traded better on Wall Street?




The full text is here:




When people ask me to help them turn their presentations into stories,
I begin by asking questions. I kind of psychoanalyze their companies,
and amazing dramas pour out. But most companies and executives sweep
the dirty laundry, the diffi culties, the antagonists, and the
struggle under the carpet. They prefer to present a rosy—and boring—
picture to the world. But as a storyteller, you want to position the
problems in the foreground and then show how you’ve overcome them.
When you tell the story of your struggles against real antagonists,
your audience sees you as an exciting, dynamic person. And I know that
the storytelling method works, because after I consulted with a dozen
corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
they all got their money.




https://hbr.org/2003/06/storytelling-that-moves-people










share|improve this question





























    3
















    ...corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
    they all got their money.




    There's some defenitions for the phrase get your money's worth in online dictionaries but I couldn't find any defenition or meaning for "they got their money".



    So could you please explain it to me?




    Does it mean the shares of corporations whose principals told exciting
    stories were traded better on Wall Street?




    The full text is here:




    When people ask me to help them turn their presentations into stories,
    I begin by asking questions. I kind of psychoanalyze their companies,
    and amazing dramas pour out. But most companies and executives sweep
    the dirty laundry, the diffi culties, the antagonists, and the
    struggle under the carpet. They prefer to present a rosy—and boring—
    picture to the world. But as a storyteller, you want to position the
    problems in the foreground and then show how you’ve overcome them.
    When you tell the story of your struggles against real antagonists,
    your audience sees you as an exciting, dynamic person. And I know that
    the storytelling method works, because after I consulted with a dozen
    corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
    they all got their money.




    https://hbr.org/2003/06/storytelling-that-moves-people










    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3


      1







      ...corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
      they all got their money.




      There's some defenitions for the phrase get your money's worth in online dictionaries but I couldn't find any defenition or meaning for "they got their money".



      So could you please explain it to me?




      Does it mean the shares of corporations whose principals told exciting
      stories were traded better on Wall Street?




      The full text is here:




      When people ask me to help them turn their presentations into stories,
      I begin by asking questions. I kind of psychoanalyze their companies,
      and amazing dramas pour out. But most companies and executives sweep
      the dirty laundry, the diffi culties, the antagonists, and the
      struggle under the carpet. They prefer to present a rosy—and boring—
      picture to the world. But as a storyteller, you want to position the
      problems in the foreground and then show how you’ve overcome them.
      When you tell the story of your struggles against real antagonists,
      your audience sees you as an exciting, dynamic person. And I know that
      the storytelling method works, because after I consulted with a dozen
      corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
      they all got their money.




      https://hbr.org/2003/06/storytelling-that-moves-people










      share|improve this question

















      ...corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
      they all got their money.




      There's some defenitions for the phrase get your money's worth in online dictionaries but I couldn't find any defenition or meaning for "they got their money".



      So could you please explain it to me?




      Does it mean the shares of corporations whose principals told exciting
      stories were traded better on Wall Street?




      The full text is here:




      When people ask me to help them turn their presentations into stories,
      I begin by asking questions. I kind of psychoanalyze their companies,
      and amazing dramas pour out. But most companies and executives sweep
      the dirty laundry, the diffi culties, the antagonists, and the
      struggle under the carpet. They prefer to present a rosy—and boring—
      picture to the world. But as a storyteller, you want to position the
      problems in the foreground and then show how you’ve overcome them.
      When you tell the story of your struggles against real antagonists,
      your audience sees you as an exciting, dynamic person. And I know that
      the storytelling method works, because after I consulted with a dozen
      corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street,
      they all got their money.




      https://hbr.org/2003/06/storytelling-that-moves-people







      meaning-in-context






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 17 hours ago







      Peace

















      asked 17 hours ago









      PeacePeace

      2,34831842




      2,34831842






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4















          They got their money and there was nothing I could do about it.



          The brothers didn't want anyone finding how they got their money because they didn't want anyone looking into their past.



          As long as they got their money they wouldn't care whether I was crazy or not.




          I would venture to say that they got their money simply means they made/earned some money. Also, I am inclined to think that the expression has a negative connotation: the way they got their money is either dishonest or illegal.






          share|improve this answer































            0














            Yes, I think your conclusion is correct. By storytelling, they connected well with their target consumers/buyers because it showed they had the character and determination with which consumers can relate to.Andbin this way all of them earned their money more easily( company by selling its shares and wall street brokers by their cut or commission). It is a clever use of pathos and ethos too to some extent.






            share|improve this answer

































              0














              The trouble is that the passage quoted is written by someone who can't use English properly.




              after I consulted with a dozen corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street, they all got their money.




              This is almost certainly not true. What the statement (as written) means is:




              1. There was a corporation whose principals told an exciting story to Wall Street.

              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

              3. That corporation got money from Wall Street.

              4. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


              This is nonsense, and pointless. What the writer meant to say was:




              1. There was a corporation which wanted to get money from Wall Street.

              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

              3. As a result of my advice, the principals of that corporation told an exciting story to Wall Street.

              4. As a result of the exciting story, the corporation got from Wall Street the money it was asking for. ("got their money").

              5. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


              In other words, at the time that the writer gave the consultancy, the corporation was not "a corporation whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street". It was just a corporation which wanted money from Wall Street. Unfortunately this writer, as happens all too often in business writing, was too lazy to make his meaning clear or too stupid to notice that what he had written was telling the story backwards and made it nonsense.






              share|improve this answer
























              • Or has poor English skills

                – jmoreno
                10 hours ago











              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199955%2fwhat-does-they-got-their-money-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4















              They got their money and there was nothing I could do about it.



              The brothers didn't want anyone finding how they got their money because they didn't want anyone looking into their past.



              As long as they got their money they wouldn't care whether I was crazy or not.




              I would venture to say that they got their money simply means they made/earned some money. Also, I am inclined to think that the expression has a negative connotation: the way they got their money is either dishonest or illegal.






              share|improve this answer




























                4















                They got their money and there was nothing I could do about it.



                The brothers didn't want anyone finding how they got their money because they didn't want anyone looking into their past.



                As long as they got their money they wouldn't care whether I was crazy or not.




                I would venture to say that they got their money simply means they made/earned some money. Also, I am inclined to think that the expression has a negative connotation: the way they got their money is either dishonest or illegal.






                share|improve this answer


























                  4












                  4








                  4








                  They got their money and there was nothing I could do about it.



                  The brothers didn't want anyone finding how they got their money because they didn't want anyone looking into their past.



                  As long as they got their money they wouldn't care whether I was crazy or not.




                  I would venture to say that they got their money simply means they made/earned some money. Also, I am inclined to think that the expression has a negative connotation: the way they got their money is either dishonest or illegal.






                  share|improve this answer














                  They got their money and there was nothing I could do about it.



                  The brothers didn't want anyone finding how they got their money because they didn't want anyone looking into their past.



                  As long as they got their money they wouldn't care whether I was crazy or not.




                  I would venture to say that they got their money simply means they made/earned some money. Also, I am inclined to think that the expression has a negative connotation: the way they got their money is either dishonest or illegal.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 16 hours ago









                  Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

                  1,076520




                  1,076520

























                      0














                      Yes, I think your conclusion is correct. By storytelling, they connected well with their target consumers/buyers because it showed they had the character and determination with which consumers can relate to.Andbin this way all of them earned their money more easily( company by selling its shares and wall street brokers by their cut or commission). It is a clever use of pathos and ethos too to some extent.






                      share|improve this answer






























                        0














                        Yes, I think your conclusion is correct. By storytelling, they connected well with their target consumers/buyers because it showed they had the character and determination with which consumers can relate to.Andbin this way all of them earned their money more easily( company by selling its shares and wall street brokers by their cut or commission). It is a clever use of pathos and ethos too to some extent.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Yes, I think your conclusion is correct. By storytelling, they connected well with their target consumers/buyers because it showed they had the character and determination with which consumers can relate to.Andbin this way all of them earned their money more easily( company by selling its shares and wall street brokers by their cut or commission). It is a clever use of pathos and ethos too to some extent.






                          share|improve this answer















                          Yes, I think your conclusion is correct. By storytelling, they connected well with their target consumers/buyers because it showed they had the character and determination with which consumers can relate to.Andbin this way all of them earned their money more easily( company by selling its shares and wall street brokers by their cut or commission). It is a clever use of pathos and ethos too to some extent.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 17 hours ago

























                          answered 17 hours ago









                          Manish Kumar BalayanManish Kumar Balayan

                          796




                          796























                              0














                              The trouble is that the passage quoted is written by someone who can't use English properly.




                              after I consulted with a dozen corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street, they all got their money.




                              This is almost certainly not true. What the statement (as written) means is:




                              1. There was a corporation whose principals told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. That corporation got money from Wall Street.

                              4. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              This is nonsense, and pointless. What the writer meant to say was:




                              1. There was a corporation which wanted to get money from Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. As a result of my advice, the principals of that corporation told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              4. As a result of the exciting story, the corporation got from Wall Street the money it was asking for. ("got their money").

                              5. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              In other words, at the time that the writer gave the consultancy, the corporation was not "a corporation whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street". It was just a corporation which wanted money from Wall Street. Unfortunately this writer, as happens all too often in business writing, was too lazy to make his meaning clear or too stupid to notice that what he had written was telling the story backwards and made it nonsense.






                              share|improve this answer
























                              • Or has poor English skills

                                – jmoreno
                                10 hours ago
















                              0














                              The trouble is that the passage quoted is written by someone who can't use English properly.




                              after I consulted with a dozen corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street, they all got their money.




                              This is almost certainly not true. What the statement (as written) means is:




                              1. There was a corporation whose principals told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. That corporation got money from Wall Street.

                              4. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              This is nonsense, and pointless. What the writer meant to say was:




                              1. There was a corporation which wanted to get money from Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. As a result of my advice, the principals of that corporation told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              4. As a result of the exciting story, the corporation got from Wall Street the money it was asking for. ("got their money").

                              5. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              In other words, at the time that the writer gave the consultancy, the corporation was not "a corporation whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street". It was just a corporation which wanted money from Wall Street. Unfortunately this writer, as happens all too often in business writing, was too lazy to make his meaning clear or too stupid to notice that what he had written was telling the story backwards and made it nonsense.






                              share|improve this answer
























                              • Or has poor English skills

                                – jmoreno
                                10 hours ago














                              0












                              0








                              0







                              The trouble is that the passage quoted is written by someone who can't use English properly.




                              after I consulted with a dozen corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street, they all got their money.




                              This is almost certainly not true. What the statement (as written) means is:




                              1. There was a corporation whose principals told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. That corporation got money from Wall Street.

                              4. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              This is nonsense, and pointless. What the writer meant to say was:




                              1. There was a corporation which wanted to get money from Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. As a result of my advice, the principals of that corporation told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              4. As a result of the exciting story, the corporation got from Wall Street the money it was asking for. ("got their money").

                              5. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              In other words, at the time that the writer gave the consultancy, the corporation was not "a corporation whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street". It was just a corporation which wanted money from Wall Street. Unfortunately this writer, as happens all too often in business writing, was too lazy to make his meaning clear or too stupid to notice that what he had written was telling the story backwards and made it nonsense.






                              share|improve this answer













                              The trouble is that the passage quoted is written by someone who can't use English properly.




                              after I consulted with a dozen corporations whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street, they all got their money.




                              This is almost certainly not true. What the statement (as written) means is:




                              1. There was a corporation whose principals told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. That corporation got money from Wall Street.

                              4. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              This is nonsense, and pointless. What the writer meant to say was:




                              1. There was a corporation which wanted to get money from Wall Street.

                              2. I gave consultancy services to that corporation.

                              3. As a result of my advice, the principals of that corporation told an exciting story to Wall Street.

                              4. As a result of the exciting story, the corporation got from Wall Street the money it was asking for. ("got their money").

                              5. (This happened with a dozen corporations on a dozen different occasions).


                              In other words, at the time that the writer gave the consultancy, the corporation was not "a corporation whose principals told exciting stories to Wall Street". It was just a corporation which wanted money from Wall Street. Unfortunately this writer, as happens all too often in business writing, was too lazy to make his meaning clear or too stupid to notice that what he had written was telling the story backwards and made it nonsense.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 12 hours ago









                              Martin KochanskiMartin Kochanski

                              1411




                              1411













                              • Or has poor English skills

                                – jmoreno
                                10 hours ago



















                              • Or has poor English skills

                                – jmoreno
                                10 hours ago

















                              Or has poor English skills

                              – jmoreno
                              10 hours ago





                              Or has poor English skills

                              – jmoreno
                              10 hours ago


















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199955%2fwhat-does-they-got-their-money-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to label and detect the document text images

                              Vallis Paradisi

                              Tabula Rosettana