Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same tech developed for going to Mars be proportional to...












5












$begingroup$


I've read somewhere (I dont have right now the source and I dont know if it's trustworthy) that something that would take a significant amount of time for going to Mars would be the acceleration and deceleration process. If this is the case, a travel to a larger distance using the same technology could be not proportional to the distance . Is this so? Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same technology developed for going to Mars be proportional to the distance employed for going to Mars or not? If it isnt proportional what would it be, shorter or larger?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    I've read somewhere (I dont have right now the source and I dont know if it's trustworthy) that something that would take a significant amount of time for going to Mars would be the acceleration and deceleration process. If this is the case, a travel to a larger distance using the same technology could be not proportional to the distance . Is this so? Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same technology developed for going to Mars be proportional to the distance employed for going to Mars or not? If it isnt proportional what would it be, shorter or larger?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      I've read somewhere (I dont have right now the source and I dont know if it's trustworthy) that something that would take a significant amount of time for going to Mars would be the acceleration and deceleration process. If this is the case, a travel to a larger distance using the same technology could be not proportional to the distance . Is this so? Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same technology developed for going to Mars be proportional to the distance employed for going to Mars or not? If it isnt proportional what would it be, shorter or larger?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I've read somewhere (I dont have right now the source and I dont know if it's trustworthy) that something that would take a significant amount of time for going to Mars would be the acceleration and deceleration process. If this is the case, a travel to a larger distance using the same technology could be not proportional to the distance . Is this so? Will the duration of traveling to Ceres using the same technology developed for going to Mars be proportional to the distance employed for going to Mars or not? If it isnt proportional what would it be, shorter or larger?







      spacex mars ceres






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 18 hours ago









      PabloPablo

      1525




      1525




      New contributor




      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Pablo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          20












          $begingroup$

          Planning travel within the solar system doesn't work quite like you assume. A spacecraft typically uses its rockets for a few minutes at the start and end of the journey and coasts the rest of the way, but while it is coasting the gravity of the planets it leaving or approaching, and much more importantly the Sun act to change its direction and velocity.



          To go from Earth to Ceres, you need to initially travel faster than you do to get to Mars, otherwise you will not be going fast enough to get that far away from the Sun before the Sun's gravity slows you down and starts pulling you in.



          There are lots of possible times to depart and arrive, each of which needs a different amount of rocket propulsion. These are conveniently gathered in something called a "pork chop plot". You can calculate them online



          For instance for Mars you might get:



          enter image description here



          This shows departure dates on the x axis, flight times on the y axis and the fuel needed (for the departure from Earth at least, but you can aerobrake on arrival) by the colour.



          For Ceres you get:



          enter image description here



          So the most fuel efficient journeys need almost twice as much fuel (more because you can't aerobrake) and take about twice as long.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 5




            $begingroup$
            DV is delta v, I take it?
            $endgroup$
            – Acccumulation
            14 hours ago






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
            $endgroup$
            – Skyler
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
            $endgroup$
            – corsiKa
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
            $endgroup$
            – Mark
            5 hours ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
            $endgroup$
            – Ross Millikan
            5 hours ago



















          2












          $begingroup$

          In addition to Steve Linton's excellent answer there's a simple pattern:



          To get somewhere for the minimum fuel generally takes one half the orbital period of the slower of the launch and target orbits--and when you get into the realm where this breaks down you're also in the realm where you're going not going to be using a simple minimum-fuel trajectory anyway. (Not to say that you just pile on the engines, the normal approach is to use planetary flybys to gain or shed velocity. Nothing has been launched to a target beyond Jupiter without using Jupiter for a boost.)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "508"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34374%2fwill-the-duration-of-traveling-to-ceres-using-the-same-tech-developed-for-going%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            20












            $begingroup$

            Planning travel within the solar system doesn't work quite like you assume. A spacecraft typically uses its rockets for a few minutes at the start and end of the journey and coasts the rest of the way, but while it is coasting the gravity of the planets it leaving or approaching, and much more importantly the Sun act to change its direction and velocity.



            To go from Earth to Ceres, you need to initially travel faster than you do to get to Mars, otherwise you will not be going fast enough to get that far away from the Sun before the Sun's gravity slows you down and starts pulling you in.



            There are lots of possible times to depart and arrive, each of which needs a different amount of rocket propulsion. These are conveniently gathered in something called a "pork chop plot". You can calculate them online



            For instance for Mars you might get:



            enter image description here



            This shows departure dates on the x axis, flight times on the y axis and the fuel needed (for the departure from Earth at least, but you can aerobrake on arrival) by the colour.



            For Ceres you get:



            enter image description here



            So the most fuel efficient journeys need almost twice as much fuel (more because you can't aerobrake) and take about twice as long.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 5




              $begingroup$
              DV is delta v, I take it?
              $endgroup$
              – Acccumulation
              14 hours ago






            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
              $endgroup$
              – Skyler
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
              $endgroup$
              – corsiKa
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
              $endgroup$
              – Mark
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
              $endgroup$
              – Ross Millikan
              5 hours ago
















            20












            $begingroup$

            Planning travel within the solar system doesn't work quite like you assume. A spacecraft typically uses its rockets for a few minutes at the start and end of the journey and coasts the rest of the way, but while it is coasting the gravity of the planets it leaving or approaching, and much more importantly the Sun act to change its direction and velocity.



            To go from Earth to Ceres, you need to initially travel faster than you do to get to Mars, otherwise you will not be going fast enough to get that far away from the Sun before the Sun's gravity slows you down and starts pulling you in.



            There are lots of possible times to depart and arrive, each of which needs a different amount of rocket propulsion. These are conveniently gathered in something called a "pork chop plot". You can calculate them online



            For instance for Mars you might get:



            enter image description here



            This shows departure dates on the x axis, flight times on the y axis and the fuel needed (for the departure from Earth at least, but you can aerobrake on arrival) by the colour.



            For Ceres you get:



            enter image description here



            So the most fuel efficient journeys need almost twice as much fuel (more because you can't aerobrake) and take about twice as long.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 5




              $begingroup$
              DV is delta v, I take it?
              $endgroup$
              – Acccumulation
              14 hours ago






            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
              $endgroup$
              – Skyler
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
              $endgroup$
              – corsiKa
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
              $endgroup$
              – Mark
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
              $endgroup$
              – Ross Millikan
              5 hours ago














            20












            20








            20





            $begingroup$

            Planning travel within the solar system doesn't work quite like you assume. A spacecraft typically uses its rockets for a few minutes at the start and end of the journey and coasts the rest of the way, but while it is coasting the gravity of the planets it leaving or approaching, and much more importantly the Sun act to change its direction and velocity.



            To go from Earth to Ceres, you need to initially travel faster than you do to get to Mars, otherwise you will not be going fast enough to get that far away from the Sun before the Sun's gravity slows you down and starts pulling you in.



            There are lots of possible times to depart and arrive, each of which needs a different amount of rocket propulsion. These are conveniently gathered in something called a "pork chop plot". You can calculate them online



            For instance for Mars you might get:



            enter image description here



            This shows departure dates on the x axis, flight times on the y axis and the fuel needed (for the departure from Earth at least, but you can aerobrake on arrival) by the colour.



            For Ceres you get:



            enter image description here



            So the most fuel efficient journeys need almost twice as much fuel (more because you can't aerobrake) and take about twice as long.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Planning travel within the solar system doesn't work quite like you assume. A spacecraft typically uses its rockets for a few minutes at the start and end of the journey and coasts the rest of the way, but while it is coasting the gravity of the planets it leaving or approaching, and much more importantly the Sun act to change its direction and velocity.



            To go from Earth to Ceres, you need to initially travel faster than you do to get to Mars, otherwise you will not be going fast enough to get that far away from the Sun before the Sun's gravity slows you down and starts pulling you in.



            There are lots of possible times to depart and arrive, each of which needs a different amount of rocket propulsion. These are conveniently gathered in something called a "pork chop plot". You can calculate them online



            For instance for Mars you might get:



            enter image description here



            This shows departure dates on the x axis, flight times on the y axis and the fuel needed (for the departure from Earth at least, but you can aerobrake on arrival) by the colour.



            For Ceres you get:



            enter image description here



            So the most fuel efficient journeys need almost twice as much fuel (more because you can't aerobrake) and take about twice as long.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 17 hours ago









            Steve LintonSteve Linton

            7,76512044




            7,76512044








            • 5




              $begingroup$
              DV is delta v, I take it?
              $endgroup$
              – Acccumulation
              14 hours ago






            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
              $endgroup$
              – Skyler
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
              $endgroup$
              – corsiKa
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
              $endgroup$
              – Mark
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
              $endgroup$
              – Ross Millikan
              5 hours ago














            • 5




              $begingroup$
              DV is delta v, I take it?
              $endgroup$
              – Acccumulation
              14 hours ago






            • 4




              $begingroup$
              Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
              $endgroup$
              – Skyler
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
              $endgroup$
              – corsiKa
              6 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
              $endgroup$
              – Mark
              5 hours ago








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
              $endgroup$
              – Ross Millikan
              5 hours ago








            5




            5




            $begingroup$
            DV is delta v, I take it?
            $endgroup$
            – Acccumulation
            14 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            DV is delta v, I take it?
            $endgroup$
            – Acccumulation
            14 hours ago




            4




            4




            $begingroup$
            Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
            $endgroup$
            – Skyler
            12 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Yes. Note that delta V is not directly proportional to fuel; in a staged rocket the relationship is roughly exponential.
            $endgroup$
            – Skyler
            12 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
            $endgroup$
            – corsiKa
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Like I'm 5, can you explain why a longer flight time requires a higher dV?
            $endgroup$
            – corsiKa
            6 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
            $endgroup$
            – Mark
            5 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            @corsiKa, for an optimal trajectory, time of flight and dV are (mostly) unrelated. If you're going for a suboptimal trajectory, a shorter time of flight requires a greater dV because you're accelerating more at the start, and then you need to get rid of that excess speed when you arrive. A longer time of flight also requires a greater dV because you're deliberately going on a less-direct path than the optimal route (eg. if you're going to Mars, you'd go further out from the Sun than Mars's orbit, then come back in from the direction of the asteroid belt.)
            $endgroup$
            – Mark
            5 hours ago






            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
            $endgroup$
            – Ross Millikan
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @corsiKa: More delta V is required for Ceres because Ceres is farther from the sun, so we need to add more energy to the orbit to get there. Because Ceres is farther from the sun, its orbit has a longer period. As Loren Pechtel says, the optimal flight time is (about) half the slower orbital period, so the flight time is longer.
            $endgroup$
            – Ross Millikan
            5 hours ago











            2












            $begingroup$

            In addition to Steve Linton's excellent answer there's a simple pattern:



            To get somewhere for the minimum fuel generally takes one half the orbital period of the slower of the launch and target orbits--and when you get into the realm where this breaks down you're also in the realm where you're going not going to be using a simple minimum-fuel trajectory anyway. (Not to say that you just pile on the engines, the normal approach is to use planetary flybys to gain or shed velocity. Nothing has been launched to a target beyond Jupiter without using Jupiter for a boost.)






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              In addition to Steve Linton's excellent answer there's a simple pattern:



              To get somewhere for the minimum fuel generally takes one half the orbital period of the slower of the launch and target orbits--and when you get into the realm where this breaks down you're also in the realm where you're going not going to be using a simple minimum-fuel trajectory anyway. (Not to say that you just pile on the engines, the normal approach is to use planetary flybys to gain or shed velocity. Nothing has been launched to a target beyond Jupiter without using Jupiter for a boost.)






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                In addition to Steve Linton's excellent answer there's a simple pattern:



                To get somewhere for the minimum fuel generally takes one half the orbital period of the slower of the launch and target orbits--and when you get into the realm where this breaks down you're also in the realm where you're going not going to be using a simple minimum-fuel trajectory anyway. (Not to say that you just pile on the engines, the normal approach is to use planetary flybys to gain or shed velocity. Nothing has been launched to a target beyond Jupiter without using Jupiter for a boost.)






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In addition to Steve Linton's excellent answer there's a simple pattern:



                To get somewhere for the minimum fuel generally takes one half the orbital period of the slower of the launch and target orbits--and when you get into the realm where this breaks down you're also in the realm where you're going not going to be using a simple minimum-fuel trajectory anyway. (Not to say that you just pile on the engines, the normal approach is to use planetary flybys to gain or shed velocity. Nothing has been launched to a target beyond Jupiter without using Jupiter for a boost.)







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 9 hours ago









                Loren PechtelLoren Pechtel

                5,9411021




                5,9411021






















                    Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Pablo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34374%2fwill-the-duration-of-traveling-to-ceres-using-the-same-tech-developed-for-going%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to label and detect the document text images

                    Vallis Paradisi

                    Tabula Rosettana