Why do people specify date as an option for usepackage?












8















In LaTeX code written by other people, I sometimes see a date specified as an optional argument for usepackage:



usepackage{iftex}[2013/04/04]


Intuition tells me that this is some way to ensure that the package version meets a certain minimal requirement, but I would like to read about its usage in the official manual, as opposed to blindly paste it in my code based on guesswork.






packages optional-arguments package-options







share|improve this question





























    8















    In LaTeX code written by other people, I sometimes see a date specified as an optional argument for usepackage:



    usepackage{iftex}[2013/04/04]


    Intuition tells me that this is some way to ensure that the package version meets a certain minimal requirement, but I would like to read about its usage in the official manual, as opposed to blindly paste it in my code based on guesswork.






    packages optional-arguments package-options







    share|improve this question



























      8












      8








      8








      In LaTeX code written by other people, I sometimes see a date specified as an optional argument for usepackage:



      usepackage{iftex}[2013/04/04]


      Intuition tells me that this is some way to ensure that the package version meets a certain minimal requirement, but I would like to read about its usage in the official manual, as opposed to blindly paste it in my code based on guesswork.






      packages optional-arguments package-options







      share|improve this question
















      In LaTeX code written by other people, I sometimes see a date specified as an optional argument for usepackage:



      usepackage{iftex}[2013/04/04]


      Intuition tells me that this is some way to ensure that the package version meets a certain minimal requirement, but I would like to read about its usage in the official manual, as opposed to blindly paste it in my code based on guesswork.






      packages optional-arguments package-options




      packages optional-arguments package-options






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 33 mins ago









      Peter Mortensen

      55537




      55537










      asked 7 hours ago









      ScumCoderScumCoder

      511411




      511411






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10














          From source2e.pdf, page 479 (CTAN page or texdoc source2e in a terminal):




          <code>usepackage[<package-option-list>]{<package-list>}[<version>]</code>//There can be any number of these declarations. All packages in <code><package-list></code> are called with the same options.//Each <code><package></code> file defines new elements (or modifies those defined in the <code><class></code>), and thus extends the range of documents which can be processed. The <code><package-option-list></code> is a list of options which can modify the formatting of elements defined in the <code><package></code> file. The <code><version></code> is a version number, beginning with a date in the format <code>YYYY/MM/DD</code>. If an older version of the package is found, a warning is issued.







          share|improve this answer


























          • Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

            – ScumCoder
            7 hours ago













          • @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

            – Phelype Oleinik
            7 hours ago











          • @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

            – David Carlisle
            5 hours ago











          • @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

            – Phelype Oleinik
            5 hours ago



















          5














          Phelype Oleinik pointed you at the LaTeX sources but there is also a user guide called usrguide.pdf 



           texdoc usrguide


          will open the document in texlive. Section 3.2 on preamble commands has the syntax for usepackage.



          This argument was extended with new syntax last year so you may also want to look at LaTeX News 28 in texdoc ltnews which points you at this article from TUGBoat on the project website



          https://www.latex-project.org/publications/2018-FMi-TUB-tb122mitt-version-rollback.pdf






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "85"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474752%2fwhy-do-people-specify-date-as-an-option-for-usepackage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            10














            From source2e.pdf, page 479 (CTAN page or texdoc source2e in a terminal):




            <code>usepackage[<package-option-list>]{<package-list>}[<version>]</code>//There can be any number of these declarations. All packages in <code><package-list></code> are called with the same options.//Each <code><package></code> file defines new elements (or modifies those defined in the <code><class></code>), and thus extends the range of documents which can be processed. The <code><package-option-list></code> is a list of options which can modify the formatting of elements defined in the <code><package></code> file. The <code><version></code> is a version number, beginning with a date in the format <code>YYYY/MM/DD</code>. If an older version of the package is found, a warning is issued.







            share|improve this answer


























            • Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

              – ScumCoder
              7 hours ago













            • @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              7 hours ago











            • @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

              – David Carlisle
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              5 hours ago
















            10














            From source2e.pdf, page 479 (CTAN page or texdoc source2e in a terminal):




            <code>usepackage[<package-option-list>]{<package-list>}[<version>]</code>//There can be any number of these declarations. All packages in <code><package-list></code> are called with the same options.//Each <code><package></code> file defines new elements (or modifies those defined in the <code><class></code>), and thus extends the range of documents which can be processed. The <code><package-option-list></code> is a list of options which can modify the formatting of elements defined in the <code><package></code> file. The <code><version></code> is a version number, beginning with a date in the format <code>YYYY/MM/DD</code>. If an older version of the package is found, a warning is issued.







            share|improve this answer


























            • Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

              – ScumCoder
              7 hours ago













            • @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              7 hours ago











            • @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

              – David Carlisle
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              5 hours ago














            10












            10








            10







            From source2e.pdf, page 479 (CTAN page or texdoc source2e in a terminal):




            <code>usepackage[<package-option-list>]{<package-list>}[<version>]</code>//There can be any number of these declarations. All packages in <code><package-list></code> are called with the same options.//Each <code><package></code> file defines new elements (or modifies those defined in the <code><class></code>), and thus extends the range of documents which can be processed. The <code><package-option-list></code> is a list of options which can modify the formatting of elements defined in the <code><package></code> file. The <code><version></code> is a version number, beginning with a date in the format <code>YYYY/MM/DD</code>. If an older version of the package is found, a warning is issued.







            share|improve this answer















            From source2e.pdf, page 479 (CTAN page or texdoc source2e in a terminal):




            <code>usepackage[<package-option-list>]{<package-list>}[<version>]</code>//There can be any number of these declarations. All packages in <code><package-list></code> are called with the same options.//Each <code><package></code> file defines new elements (or modifies those defined in the <code><class></code>), and thus extends the range of documents which can be processed. The <code><package-option-list></code> is a list of options which can modify the formatting of elements defined in the <code><package></code> file. The <code><version></code> is a version number, beginning with a date in the format <code>YYYY/MM/DD</code>. If an older version of the package is found, a warning is issued.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago









            moewe

            90.7k10114343




            90.7k10114343










            answered 7 hours ago









            Phelype OleinikPhelype Oleinik

            23.1k54584




            23.1k54584













            • Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

              – ScumCoder
              7 hours ago













            • @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              7 hours ago











            • @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

              – David Carlisle
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              5 hours ago



















            • Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

              – ScumCoder
              7 hours ago













            • @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              7 hours ago











            • @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

              – David Carlisle
              5 hours ago











            • @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

              – Phelype Oleinik
              5 hours ago

















            Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

            – ScumCoder
            7 hours ago







            Perfect. (I guess I failed to find it myself because of the non-obvious name of the manual file).

            – ScumCoder
            7 hours ago















            @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

            – Phelype Oleinik
            7 hours ago





            @ScumCoder There are probably other documents saying this :) (sorry, but 7 what?)

            – Phelype Oleinik
            7 hours ago













            @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

            – David Carlisle
            5 hours ago





            @PhelypeOleinik we should update that documentation.....

            – David Carlisle
            5 hours ago













            @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

            – Phelype Oleinik
            5 hours ago





            @DavidCarlisle Ooh, Frank's format :)

            – Phelype Oleinik
            5 hours ago











            5














            Phelype Oleinik pointed you at the LaTeX sources but there is also a user guide called usrguide.pdf 



             texdoc usrguide


            will open the document in texlive. Section 3.2 on preamble commands has the syntax for usepackage.



            This argument was extended with new syntax last year so you may also want to look at LaTeX News 28 in texdoc ltnews which points you at this article from TUGBoat on the project website



            https://www.latex-project.org/publications/2018-FMi-TUB-tb122mitt-version-rollback.pdf






            share|improve this answer




























              5














              Phelype Oleinik pointed you at the LaTeX sources but there is also a user guide called usrguide.pdf 



               texdoc usrguide


              will open the document in texlive. Section 3.2 on preamble commands has the syntax for usepackage.



              This argument was extended with new syntax last year so you may also want to look at LaTeX News 28 in texdoc ltnews which points you at this article from TUGBoat on the project website



              https://www.latex-project.org/publications/2018-FMi-TUB-tb122mitt-version-rollback.pdf






              share|improve this answer


























                5












                5








                5







                Phelype Oleinik pointed you at the LaTeX sources but there is also a user guide called usrguide.pdf 



                 texdoc usrguide


                will open the document in texlive. Section 3.2 on preamble commands has the syntax for usepackage.



                This argument was extended with new syntax last year so you may also want to look at LaTeX News 28 in texdoc ltnews which points you at this article from TUGBoat on the project website



                https://www.latex-project.org/publications/2018-FMi-TUB-tb122mitt-version-rollback.pdf






                share|improve this answer













                Phelype Oleinik pointed you at the LaTeX sources but there is also a user guide called usrguide.pdf 



                 texdoc usrguide


                will open the document in texlive. Section 3.2 on preamble commands has the syntax for usepackage.



                This argument was extended with new syntax last year so you may also want to look at LaTeX News 28 in texdoc ltnews which points you at this article from TUGBoat on the project website



                https://www.latex-project.org/publications/2018-FMi-TUB-tb122mitt-version-rollback.pdf







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                David CarlisleDavid Carlisle

                490k4111321881




                490k4111321881






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474752%2fwhy-do-people-specify-date-as-an-option-for-usepackage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to label and detect the document text images

                    Image
                    1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
                    Read more

                    Vallis Paradisi

                    Image
                    Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
                    Read more

                    Tabula Rosettana

                    Image
                    Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
                    Read more