Why am I getting very different results between SVC, LinearSVC and Naive Bayes?
$begingroup$
I am doing classification by using bag-of-words model. The goal is to locate users based on their tweets. Splitted the data as 80% training and 20% test.
I did experiments with sklearn's SVC and Naives Bayes. The results 35% and 42% accuracy respectively. However, when I try the sklearn's LinearSVC algorithm, it gives me 80% which is shocking.
This is the part of the code:
text_clf = Pipeline([
('vect', CountVectorizer(stop_words='english')),
('tfidf', TfidfTransformer()),
('clf', LinearSVC()),
])
text_clf.fit(train_data, train_target)
What might be the reason for that? Why LinearSVC performs really good?
scikit-learn svm
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am doing classification by using bag-of-words model. The goal is to locate users based on their tweets. Splitted the data as 80% training and 20% test.
I did experiments with sklearn's SVC and Naives Bayes. The results 35% and 42% accuracy respectively. However, when I try the sklearn's LinearSVC algorithm, it gives me 80% which is shocking.
This is the part of the code:
text_clf = Pipeline([
('vect', CountVectorizer(stop_words='english')),
('tfidf', TfidfTransformer()),
('clf', LinearSVC()),
])
text_clf.fit(train_data, train_target)
What might be the reason for that? Why LinearSVC performs really good?
scikit-learn svm
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am doing classification by using bag-of-words model. The goal is to locate users based on their tweets. Splitted the data as 80% training and 20% test.
I did experiments with sklearn's SVC and Naives Bayes. The results 35% and 42% accuracy respectively. However, when I try the sklearn's LinearSVC algorithm, it gives me 80% which is shocking.
This is the part of the code:
text_clf = Pipeline([
('vect', CountVectorizer(stop_words='english')),
('tfidf', TfidfTransformer()),
('clf', LinearSVC()),
])
text_clf.fit(train_data, train_target)
What might be the reason for that? Why LinearSVC performs really good?
scikit-learn svm
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am doing classification by using bag-of-words model. The goal is to locate users based on their tweets. Splitted the data as 80% training and 20% test.
I did experiments with sklearn's SVC and Naives Bayes. The results 35% and 42% accuracy respectively. However, when I try the sklearn's LinearSVC algorithm, it gives me 80% which is shocking.
This is the part of the code:
text_clf = Pipeline([
('vect', CountVectorizer(stop_words='english')),
('tfidf', TfidfTransformer()),
('clf', LinearSVC()),
])
text_clf.fit(train_data, train_target)
What might be the reason for that? Why LinearSVC performs really good?
scikit-learn svm
scikit-learn svm
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 7 mins ago
Mert MetinMert Metin
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45552%2fwhy-am-i-getting-very-different-results-between-svc-linearsvc-and-naive-bayes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mert Metin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45552%2fwhy-am-i-getting-very-different-results-between-svc-linearsvc-and-naive-bayes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown