Proving the angle sum and difference identities for sine and cosine without involving the functions'...












3












$begingroup$


For well known identities



$$
sin(alpha pm beta) = sinalphacosbeta pm cosalphasinbeta
$$

$$
cos(alpha pm beta) = cosalphacosbeta mp sinalphasinbeta
$$



is it possible to provide a proof which does not involve geometric meaning of sine and cosine functions (that is use of Ptolemy’s theorem)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then do you want to start with alternative definitions of these functions? Any algebraic definitions would reduce the proof to an easy calculation. For example, define them as the real and imaginary parts of $e^{ix}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aravind
    6 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


For well known identities



$$
sin(alpha pm beta) = sinalphacosbeta pm cosalphasinbeta
$$

$$
cos(alpha pm beta) = cosalphacosbeta mp sinalphasinbeta
$$



is it possible to provide a proof which does not involve geometric meaning of sine and cosine functions (that is use of Ptolemy’s theorem)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then do you want to start with alternative definitions of these functions? Any algebraic definitions would reduce the proof to an easy calculation. For example, define them as the real and imaginary parts of $e^{ix}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aravind
    6 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


For well known identities



$$
sin(alpha pm beta) = sinalphacosbeta pm cosalphasinbeta
$$

$$
cos(alpha pm beta) = cosalphacosbeta mp sinalphasinbeta
$$



is it possible to provide a proof which does not involve geometric meaning of sine and cosine functions (that is use of Ptolemy’s theorem)?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For well known identities



$$
sin(alpha pm beta) = sinalphacosbeta pm cosalphasinbeta
$$

$$
cos(alpha pm beta) = cosalphacosbeta mp sinalphasinbeta
$$



is it possible to provide a proof which does not involve geometric meaning of sine and cosine functions (that is use of Ptolemy’s theorem)?







trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









Blue

48.5k870154




48.5k870154










asked 7 hours ago









scrutariscrutari

1507




1507








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then do you want to start with alternative definitions of these functions? Any algebraic definitions would reduce the proof to an easy calculation. For example, define them as the real and imaginary parts of $e^{ix}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aravind
    6 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Then do you want to start with alternative definitions of these functions? Any algebraic definitions would reduce the proof to an easy calculation. For example, define them as the real and imaginary parts of $e^{ix}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aravind
    6 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Then do you want to start with alternative definitions of these functions? Any algebraic definitions would reduce the proof to an easy calculation. For example, define them as the real and imaginary parts of $e^{ix}$.
$endgroup$
– Aravind
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Then do you want to start with alternative definitions of these functions? Any algebraic definitions would reduce the proof to an easy calculation. For example, define them as the real and imaginary parts of $e^{ix}$.
$endgroup$
– Aravind
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The answer is that it depends how you define the sine and cosine functions; if they have a geometric definition then geometry has to come in somewhere. In fact, they relate closely to the concept of similarity in the Euclidean plane, and are useful in this context because similar triangles have equal angles.



Sine and cosine are also related to the exponential function in the complex plane through the identity $$e^{ia}=cos a +isin a,$$ and we can compute
begin{align}
e^{i(a+b)}&=e^{ia}e^{ib}\
cos (a+b)+isin (a+b)&=(cos a +isin a)(cos b +isin b)\
&=(cos acos b-sin a sin b)+i(sin a cos b+cos asin b).
end{align}



Equating real and imaginary parts then gives what we want, and this is applicable generally. Some geometric proofs and constructions apply only to a specific range of values or require considering various cases.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    could you please explain the third equality?
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Right, of course :) thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

Just to share my idea. I will not say that my proof doesn't involve geometry.



Let $A=(cosalpha,sinalpha)$ and $B=(cosbeta,sinbeta)$. Then



$$AB^2=(cosalpha-cosbeta)^2+(cosalpha-sinbeta)^2=2-cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$$



On the other hand,



$$AB^2=OA^2+OB^2-2(OA)(OB)cosangle AOB=1^2+1^2-2(1)(1)cos(alpha-beta)$$



This proves that $cos(alpha-beta)=cosalphacosbeta+sinalphasinbeta$. The proof holds for arbitrary $alpha$ and $beta$.



$cos(alpha+beta)=cosalphacos(-beta)+sinalphasin(-beta)=cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha+beta)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpha-betaright)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)cosbeta+sinleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)sinbeta=sinalphacosbeta+cosalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha-beta)=sinalphacos(-beta)+cosalphasin(-beta)=sinalphacosbeta-cosalphasinbeta$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    (+1) haven't seen you in a while!
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    2 hours ago



















2












$begingroup$

Here's an approach I recently assigned as homework that needs nothing more than simple calculus facts. No complex numbers, in particular.



Suppose you know only the following:
$$sin'=cos, quad cos'=-sin, quad sin 0 = 0, quad cos 0 = 1$$



As a warmup, prove the Pythagorean identity $sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1$. (Hint: let $f(x) = sin^2 x + cos^2 x$ and compute $f'$.) In particular, $|sin x|le 1$ and $|cos x| le 1$.



Now fix $a$ and consider the function
$$g(x) = sin(x+a) - sin x cos a - cos x sin a.$$
Compute $g'$ and $g''$, and note that $g'' = -g$. Verify that $g^{(n)}(0) = 0$ for every $n$, and that $|g^{(n)}(x)| le 3$ for every $n,x$. Now apply Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder (which is really just a consequence of the mean value theorem) to bound the difference $|g(x) - p_n(x)|$, where $p_n$ is the $n$th degree Taylor polynomial of $g$ centered at 0. But $p_n=0$. Letting $n to infty$ you can conclude $g equiv 0$.



For the identity involving $cos(x+a)$, consider $g'$. The minus versions may be done similarly via the function $h(x) = sin(a-x) - sin acos x + cos a sin x$, or by showing separately that $sin$ is an odd function and $cos$ is an even function.



Some variations:




  • If you know about real analytic functions, and you know that $sin x, cos x,sin(x+a)$ are all real analytic, then you are done as soon as you show that $g^{(n)}=0$ for every $n$.


  • If you know about uniqueness of solutions to ODEs, then just note that $g(0) = g'(0) = 0$ and $g'' = -g$.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    31 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3116284%2fproving-the-angle-sum-and-difference-identities-for-sine-and-cosine-without-invo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

The answer is that it depends how you define the sine and cosine functions; if they have a geometric definition then geometry has to come in somewhere. In fact, they relate closely to the concept of similarity in the Euclidean plane, and are useful in this context because similar triangles have equal angles.



Sine and cosine are also related to the exponential function in the complex plane through the identity $$e^{ia}=cos a +isin a,$$ and we can compute
begin{align}
e^{i(a+b)}&=e^{ia}e^{ib}\
cos (a+b)+isin (a+b)&=(cos a +isin a)(cos b +isin b)\
&=(cos acos b-sin a sin b)+i(sin a cos b+cos asin b).
end{align}



Equating real and imaginary parts then gives what we want, and this is applicable generally. Some geometric proofs and constructions apply only to a specific range of values or require considering various cases.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    could you please explain the third equality?
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Right, of course :) thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago
















10












$begingroup$

The answer is that it depends how you define the sine and cosine functions; if they have a geometric definition then geometry has to come in somewhere. In fact, they relate closely to the concept of similarity in the Euclidean plane, and are useful in this context because similar triangles have equal angles.



Sine and cosine are also related to the exponential function in the complex plane through the identity $$e^{ia}=cos a +isin a,$$ and we can compute
begin{align}
e^{i(a+b)}&=e^{ia}e^{ib}\
cos (a+b)+isin (a+b)&=(cos a +isin a)(cos b +isin b)\
&=(cos acos b-sin a sin b)+i(sin a cos b+cos asin b).
end{align}



Equating real and imaginary parts then gives what we want, and this is applicable generally. Some geometric proofs and constructions apply only to a specific range of values or require considering various cases.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    could you please explain the third equality?
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Right, of course :) thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago














10












10








10





$begingroup$

The answer is that it depends how you define the sine and cosine functions; if they have a geometric definition then geometry has to come in somewhere. In fact, they relate closely to the concept of similarity in the Euclidean plane, and are useful in this context because similar triangles have equal angles.



Sine and cosine are also related to the exponential function in the complex plane through the identity $$e^{ia}=cos a +isin a,$$ and we can compute
begin{align}
e^{i(a+b)}&=e^{ia}e^{ib}\
cos (a+b)+isin (a+b)&=(cos a +isin a)(cos b +isin b)\
&=(cos acos b-sin a sin b)+i(sin a cos b+cos asin b).
end{align}



Equating real and imaginary parts then gives what we want, and this is applicable generally. Some geometric proofs and constructions apply only to a specific range of values or require considering various cases.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The answer is that it depends how you define the sine and cosine functions; if they have a geometric definition then geometry has to come in somewhere. In fact, they relate closely to the concept of similarity in the Euclidean plane, and are useful in this context because similar triangles have equal angles.



Sine and cosine are also related to the exponential function in the complex plane through the identity $$e^{ia}=cos a +isin a,$$ and we can compute
begin{align}
e^{i(a+b)}&=e^{ia}e^{ib}\
cos (a+b)+isin (a+b)&=(cos a +isin a)(cos b +isin b)\
&=(cos acos b-sin a sin b)+i(sin a cos b+cos asin b).
end{align}



Equating real and imaginary parts then gives what we want, and this is applicable generally. Some geometric proofs and constructions apply only to a specific range of values or require considering various cases.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









YawarRaza7349

884




884










answered 6 hours ago









Mark BennetMark Bennet

81.3k983180




81.3k983180












  • $begingroup$
    could you please explain the third equality?
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Right, of course :) thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    could you please explain the third equality?
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    5 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Right, of course :) thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
could you please explain the third equality?
$endgroup$
– scrutari
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
could you please explain the third equality?
$endgroup$
– scrutari
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
@scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@scrutari That comes from expanding the product of brackets and using $i^2=-1$. There are two terms in each bracket, therefore four in the product, and these are gathered together in pairs. I've probably put the second pair in a confusing order.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
$endgroup$
– scrutari
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Apologies for the confusion, I meant transition from $cos(a + b) + i sin(a + b)$ to $(cos a + i sin a)(cos b + i sin b)$.
$endgroup$
– scrutari
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
5 hours ago






$begingroup$
@scrutari: That's saying $e^{i(a+b)}=e^{ia}e^{ib}$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
5 hours ago














$begingroup$
Right, of course :) thank you!
$endgroup$
– scrutari
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Right, of course :) thank you!
$endgroup$
– scrutari
5 hours ago











2












$begingroup$

Just to share my idea. I will not say that my proof doesn't involve geometry.



Let $A=(cosalpha,sinalpha)$ and $B=(cosbeta,sinbeta)$. Then



$$AB^2=(cosalpha-cosbeta)^2+(cosalpha-sinbeta)^2=2-cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$$



On the other hand,



$$AB^2=OA^2+OB^2-2(OA)(OB)cosangle AOB=1^2+1^2-2(1)(1)cos(alpha-beta)$$



This proves that $cos(alpha-beta)=cosalphacosbeta+sinalphasinbeta$. The proof holds for arbitrary $alpha$ and $beta$.



$cos(alpha+beta)=cosalphacos(-beta)+sinalphasin(-beta)=cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha+beta)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpha-betaright)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)cosbeta+sinleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)sinbeta=sinalphacosbeta+cosalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha-beta)=sinalphacos(-beta)+cosalphasin(-beta)=sinalphacosbeta-cosalphasinbeta$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    (+1) haven't seen you in a while!
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    2 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$

Just to share my idea. I will not say that my proof doesn't involve geometry.



Let $A=(cosalpha,sinalpha)$ and $B=(cosbeta,sinbeta)$. Then



$$AB^2=(cosalpha-cosbeta)^2+(cosalpha-sinbeta)^2=2-cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$$



On the other hand,



$$AB^2=OA^2+OB^2-2(OA)(OB)cosangle AOB=1^2+1^2-2(1)(1)cos(alpha-beta)$$



This proves that $cos(alpha-beta)=cosalphacosbeta+sinalphasinbeta$. The proof holds for arbitrary $alpha$ and $beta$.



$cos(alpha+beta)=cosalphacos(-beta)+sinalphasin(-beta)=cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha+beta)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpha-betaright)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)cosbeta+sinleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)sinbeta=sinalphacosbeta+cosalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha-beta)=sinalphacos(-beta)+cosalphasin(-beta)=sinalphacosbeta-cosalphasinbeta$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    (+1) haven't seen you in a while!
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    2 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Just to share my idea. I will not say that my proof doesn't involve geometry.



Let $A=(cosalpha,sinalpha)$ and $B=(cosbeta,sinbeta)$. Then



$$AB^2=(cosalpha-cosbeta)^2+(cosalpha-sinbeta)^2=2-cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$$



On the other hand,



$$AB^2=OA^2+OB^2-2(OA)(OB)cosangle AOB=1^2+1^2-2(1)(1)cos(alpha-beta)$$



This proves that $cos(alpha-beta)=cosalphacosbeta+sinalphasinbeta$. The proof holds for arbitrary $alpha$ and $beta$.



$cos(alpha+beta)=cosalphacos(-beta)+sinalphasin(-beta)=cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha+beta)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpha-betaright)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)cosbeta+sinleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)sinbeta=sinalphacosbeta+cosalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha-beta)=sinalphacos(-beta)+cosalphasin(-beta)=sinalphacosbeta-cosalphasinbeta$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Just to share my idea. I will not say that my proof doesn't involve geometry.



Let $A=(cosalpha,sinalpha)$ and $B=(cosbeta,sinbeta)$. Then



$$AB^2=(cosalpha-cosbeta)^2+(cosalpha-sinbeta)^2=2-cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$$



On the other hand,



$$AB^2=OA^2+OB^2-2(OA)(OB)cosangle AOB=1^2+1^2-2(1)(1)cos(alpha-beta)$$



This proves that $cos(alpha-beta)=cosalphacosbeta+sinalphasinbeta$. The proof holds for arbitrary $alpha$ and $beta$.



$cos(alpha+beta)=cosalphacos(-beta)+sinalphasin(-beta)=cosalphacosbeta-sinalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha+beta)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpha-betaright)=cosleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)cosbeta+sinleft(frac{pi}{2}-alpharight)sinbeta=sinalphacosbeta+cosalphasinbeta$



$sin(alpha-beta)=sinalphacos(-beta)+cosalphasin(-beta)=sinalphacosbeta-cosalphasinbeta$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









CY AriesCY Aries

16.7k11744




16.7k11744












  • $begingroup$
    (+1) haven't seen you in a while!
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    (+1) haven't seen you in a while!
    $endgroup$
    – TheSimpliFire
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
(+1) haven't seen you in a while!
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
(+1) haven't seen you in a while!
$endgroup$
– TheSimpliFire
2 hours ago











2












$begingroup$

Here's an approach I recently assigned as homework that needs nothing more than simple calculus facts. No complex numbers, in particular.



Suppose you know only the following:
$$sin'=cos, quad cos'=-sin, quad sin 0 = 0, quad cos 0 = 1$$



As a warmup, prove the Pythagorean identity $sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1$. (Hint: let $f(x) = sin^2 x + cos^2 x$ and compute $f'$.) In particular, $|sin x|le 1$ and $|cos x| le 1$.



Now fix $a$ and consider the function
$$g(x) = sin(x+a) - sin x cos a - cos x sin a.$$
Compute $g'$ and $g''$, and note that $g'' = -g$. Verify that $g^{(n)}(0) = 0$ for every $n$, and that $|g^{(n)}(x)| le 3$ for every $n,x$. Now apply Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder (which is really just a consequence of the mean value theorem) to bound the difference $|g(x) - p_n(x)|$, where $p_n$ is the $n$th degree Taylor polynomial of $g$ centered at 0. But $p_n=0$. Letting $n to infty$ you can conclude $g equiv 0$.



For the identity involving $cos(x+a)$, consider $g'$. The minus versions may be done similarly via the function $h(x) = sin(a-x) - sin acos x + cos a sin x$, or by showing separately that $sin$ is an odd function and $cos$ is an even function.



Some variations:




  • If you know about real analytic functions, and you know that $sin x, cos x,sin(x+a)$ are all real analytic, then you are done as soon as you show that $g^{(n)}=0$ for every $n$.


  • If you know about uniqueness of solutions to ODEs, then just note that $g(0) = g'(0) = 0$ and $g'' = -g$.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    31 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$

Here's an approach I recently assigned as homework that needs nothing more than simple calculus facts. No complex numbers, in particular.



Suppose you know only the following:
$$sin'=cos, quad cos'=-sin, quad sin 0 = 0, quad cos 0 = 1$$



As a warmup, prove the Pythagorean identity $sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1$. (Hint: let $f(x) = sin^2 x + cos^2 x$ and compute $f'$.) In particular, $|sin x|le 1$ and $|cos x| le 1$.



Now fix $a$ and consider the function
$$g(x) = sin(x+a) - sin x cos a - cos x sin a.$$
Compute $g'$ and $g''$, and note that $g'' = -g$. Verify that $g^{(n)}(0) = 0$ for every $n$, and that $|g^{(n)}(x)| le 3$ for every $n,x$. Now apply Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder (which is really just a consequence of the mean value theorem) to bound the difference $|g(x) - p_n(x)|$, where $p_n$ is the $n$th degree Taylor polynomial of $g$ centered at 0. But $p_n=0$. Letting $n to infty$ you can conclude $g equiv 0$.



For the identity involving $cos(x+a)$, consider $g'$. The minus versions may be done similarly via the function $h(x) = sin(a-x) - sin acos x + cos a sin x$, or by showing separately that $sin$ is an odd function and $cos$ is an even function.



Some variations:




  • If you know about real analytic functions, and you know that $sin x, cos x,sin(x+a)$ are all real analytic, then you are done as soon as you show that $g^{(n)}=0$ for every $n$.


  • If you know about uniqueness of solutions to ODEs, then just note that $g(0) = g'(0) = 0$ and $g'' = -g$.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    31 mins ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Here's an approach I recently assigned as homework that needs nothing more than simple calculus facts. No complex numbers, in particular.



Suppose you know only the following:
$$sin'=cos, quad cos'=-sin, quad sin 0 = 0, quad cos 0 = 1$$



As a warmup, prove the Pythagorean identity $sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1$. (Hint: let $f(x) = sin^2 x + cos^2 x$ and compute $f'$.) In particular, $|sin x|le 1$ and $|cos x| le 1$.



Now fix $a$ and consider the function
$$g(x) = sin(x+a) - sin x cos a - cos x sin a.$$
Compute $g'$ and $g''$, and note that $g'' = -g$. Verify that $g^{(n)}(0) = 0$ for every $n$, and that $|g^{(n)}(x)| le 3$ for every $n,x$. Now apply Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder (which is really just a consequence of the mean value theorem) to bound the difference $|g(x) - p_n(x)|$, where $p_n$ is the $n$th degree Taylor polynomial of $g$ centered at 0. But $p_n=0$. Letting $n to infty$ you can conclude $g equiv 0$.



For the identity involving $cos(x+a)$, consider $g'$. The minus versions may be done similarly via the function $h(x) = sin(a-x) - sin acos x + cos a sin x$, or by showing separately that $sin$ is an odd function and $cos$ is an even function.



Some variations:




  • If you know about real analytic functions, and you know that $sin x, cos x,sin(x+a)$ are all real analytic, then you are done as soon as you show that $g^{(n)}=0$ for every $n$.


  • If you know about uniqueness of solutions to ODEs, then just note that $g(0) = g'(0) = 0$ and $g'' = -g$.







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here's an approach I recently assigned as homework that needs nothing more than simple calculus facts. No complex numbers, in particular.



Suppose you know only the following:
$$sin'=cos, quad cos'=-sin, quad sin 0 = 0, quad cos 0 = 1$$



As a warmup, prove the Pythagorean identity $sin^2 x + cos^2 x = 1$. (Hint: let $f(x) = sin^2 x + cos^2 x$ and compute $f'$.) In particular, $|sin x|le 1$ and $|cos x| le 1$.



Now fix $a$ and consider the function
$$g(x) = sin(x+a) - sin x cos a - cos x sin a.$$
Compute $g'$ and $g''$, and note that $g'' = -g$. Verify that $g^{(n)}(0) = 0$ for every $n$, and that $|g^{(n)}(x)| le 3$ for every $n,x$. Now apply Taylor's theorem with Lagrange remainder (which is really just a consequence of the mean value theorem) to bound the difference $|g(x) - p_n(x)|$, where $p_n$ is the $n$th degree Taylor polynomial of $g$ centered at 0. But $p_n=0$. Letting $n to infty$ you can conclude $g equiv 0$.



For the identity involving $cos(x+a)$, consider $g'$. The minus versions may be done similarly via the function $h(x) = sin(a-x) - sin acos x + cos a sin x$, or by showing separately that $sin$ is an odd function and $cos$ is an even function.



Some variations:




  • If you know about real analytic functions, and you know that $sin x, cos x,sin(x+a)$ are all real analytic, then you are done as soon as you show that $g^{(n)}=0$ for every $n$.


  • If you know about uniqueness of solutions to ODEs, then just note that $g(0) = g'(0) = 0$ and $g'' = -g$.








share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









Nate EldredgeNate Eldredge

63.6k682171




63.6k682171












  • $begingroup$
    I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    31 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
    $endgroup$
    – scrutari
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    31 mins ago
















$begingroup$
I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
$endgroup$
– scrutari
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
I like this approach, quite intense in using theorems from various parts of Maths, though "No complex numbers" in fact means "but use the rest of Maths instead" :)
$endgroup$
– scrutari
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
31 mins ago




$begingroup$
I think if you look carefully, other than the variations, that this really doesn't use anything except basic facts about derivatives (product rule, chain rule, etc) and the mean value theorem. (Taylor's theorem is just a repeated application of the mean value theorem.)
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
31 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3116284%2fproving-the-angle-sum-and-difference-identities-for-sine-and-cosine-without-invo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to label and detect the document text images

Vallis Paradisi

Tabula Rosettana