Apollo Missions - Travel time to moon












3












$begingroup$


I must be missing something - escape velocity is about 25,000mph. The distance to the moon about 240,000 miles. That computes to about a 9 hour flight. Why did it take 3 days for Apollo missions to reach the moon?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Did Apollo's velocity slow down after TLI due to Earth's gravity?
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    slightly related: [What exactly turned on the light indicating Apollo 8 was starting to fall towards the Moon?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Throw a ball upwards, and what happens? It slows down, no? The harder you throw it, the higher it goes, but it always slows down. Same if you throw it at escape velocity: it slows down before escaping. Indeed, I think escape velocity could be mathematically defined as the velocity needed such that an object slows to zero velocity at infinite distance.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$


I must be missing something - escape velocity is about 25,000mph. The distance to the moon about 240,000 miles. That computes to about a 9 hour flight. Why did it take 3 days for Apollo missions to reach the moon?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Did Apollo's velocity slow down after TLI due to Earth's gravity?
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    slightly related: [What exactly turned on the light indicating Apollo 8 was starting to fall towards the Moon?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Throw a ball upwards, and what happens? It slows down, no? The harder you throw it, the higher it goes, but it always slows down. Same if you throw it at escape velocity: it slows down before escaping. Indeed, I think escape velocity could be mathematically defined as the velocity needed such that an object slows to zero velocity at infinite distance.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    1 hour ago
















3












3








3





$begingroup$


I must be missing something - escape velocity is about 25,000mph. The distance to the moon about 240,000 miles. That computes to about a 9 hour flight. Why did it take 3 days for Apollo missions to reach the moon?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I must be missing something - escape velocity is about 25,000mph. The distance to the moon about 240,000 miles. That computes to about a 9 hour flight. Why did it take 3 days for Apollo missions to reach the moon?







orbital-mechanics the-moon apollo-program time escape-velocity






share|improve this question









New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









Nathan Tuggy

3,83842638




3,83842638






New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









MarvinMarvin

261




261




New contributor




Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Marvin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Did Apollo's velocity slow down after TLI due to Earth's gravity?
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    slightly related: [What exactly turned on the light indicating Apollo 8 was starting to fall towards the Moon?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Throw a ball upwards, and what happens? It slows down, no? The harder you throw it, the higher it goes, but it always slows down. Same if you throw it at escape velocity: it slows down before escaping. Indeed, I think escape velocity could be mathematically defined as the velocity needed such that an object slows to zero velocity at infinite distance.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    1 hour ago
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Did Apollo's velocity slow down after TLI due to Earth's gravity?
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    slightly related: [What exactly turned on the light indicating Apollo 8 was starting to fall towards the Moon?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Throw a ball upwards, and what happens? It slows down, no? The harder you throw it, the higher it goes, but it always slows down. Same if you throw it at escape velocity: it slows down before escaping. Indeed, I think escape velocity could be mathematically defined as the velocity needed such that an object slows to zero velocity at infinite distance.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    1 hour ago










2




2




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Did Apollo's velocity slow down after TLI due to Earth's gravity?
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Did Apollo's velocity slow down after TLI due to Earth's gravity?
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
slightly related: [What exactly turned on the light indicating Apollo 8 was starting to fall towards the Moon?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
slightly related: [What exactly turned on the light indicating Apollo 8 was starting to fall towards the Moon?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Throw a ball upwards, and what happens? It slows down, no? The harder you throw it, the higher it goes, but it always slows down. Same if you throw it at escape velocity: it slows down before escaping. Indeed, I think escape velocity could be mathematically defined as the velocity needed such that an object slows to zero velocity at infinite distance.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Throw a ball upwards, and what happens? It slows down, no? The harder you throw it, the higher it goes, but it always slows down. Same if you throw it at escape velocity: it slows down before escaping. Indeed, I think escape velocity could be mathematically defined as the velocity needed such that an object slows to zero velocity at infinite distance.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

Escape velocity is the velocity at a given altitude (usually the surface) that is enough to leave the body's sphere of influence with a positive net velocity. But if you leave a body at exactly escape velocity, your velocity bleeds off as you climb in exchange for gaining gravitational potential energy, and your velocity tends to the limit of zero at sufficiently large distances. (That is, your $V_{inf}$ is 0.)



Apollo did not leave at escape velocity. Rather, the trans-lunar injection gave considerable extra speed in order to make the trip much faster, so the lowest velocity was reached a few tens of thousands of miles short of the moon (where the gravity from the moon and the earth are equal), in the low thousands of miles per hour.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    5












    $begingroup$

    Developing on Nathan's answer, let's do some math. For simplicity we suppose here that we are not really going to the Moon, that only Earth's gravity us relevant.



    We leave at escape velocity, 25,000 miles per hour from an altitude of 4000 miles above the Earth's center, and climb straight up. As we do so our velocity decreases against Earth's gravity but remains matched to escape velocity at that altitude above Earth's center. Thus at an altitude of 6250 miles (2250 miles above Earth's surface) Earth's gravity has slowed the rocket down to 20,000 miles per hour which is the escape velocity at that altitude.



    Escape velocity is proportional to the $-1/2$ power of altitude above the center, and for 25,000 mph at 4000 miles the proportionality constant is (to three significant figures) $1.58×10^6$ (miles)$^{3/2}$/hr. So to get from an altitude of 4000 miles to 250,000 miles, at escape velocity, we need this much time:



    $int_{4000}^{240000} dfrac{dz}{1.58×10^6z^{-1/2}}=49.5text{ hr}$



    This is roughly correct but misses the fact that at the Moon's altitude we would still be going several thousand miles per hour upwards and the Moon's gravity would not have been strong enough to catch us from such speed. Nathan correctly points out that we went off slower than escape velocity so that the Moon, which is still bound to Earth, could reel us in. Hence the extra day. Similarly, when taking off from the Moon we had to go slowly enough for Earth to pull us in rather than sending us off like a slingshot; technically blasting from the Moon was not up to its escape velocity either.



    So ultimately the reason Apollo missions had such long transit times between the Earth and Moon was not any limit on rocket power but by the limits of gravity within which a lunar mission has to work.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
      $endgroup$
      – Uwe
      4 hours ago






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      4 hours ago



















    1












    $begingroup$

    As already explained in other answers, essentially all of the distance is covered by unpowered flight - gaining altitude away from Earth while under the influence of Earth's gravity, the "upward" velocity will gradually diminish. At LEO distance this is about 10m/s-2, although this gravitational acceleration does fall off with square of distance.



    This is a good thing because the craft wants to arrive at the Moon at a speed which requires the least adjustment (least propellant) to enter lunar orbit - the Moon orbits the Earth at about 1km/s (round numbers) and a low altitude orbit around the Moon requires a speed of about 1.6km/s. To arrive in a retrograde orbit basically means the craft must end up at the far side of the Moon with zero radial velocity and about 600m/s retrograde to Earth. To accomplish this, it's a good thing that radial velocity away from Earth is being lost due to gravity almost the entire way out, but this means the trip will take much longer than the 9 hours suggested by simple arithmetic.



    Another factor is that the path from Earth to Moon is not traveled in a straight line. Departure from LEO is essentially tangential to Earth's surface; Earth's gravity pulls the trajectory into a curve. The lowest energy transfer occurs if the craft aims to enter lunar orbit retrograde (as I previously mentioned), so the overall path is actually somewhat S-shaped, making total path a bit longer.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "508"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Marvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34260%2fapollo-missions-travel-time-to-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      10












      $begingroup$

      Escape velocity is the velocity at a given altitude (usually the surface) that is enough to leave the body's sphere of influence with a positive net velocity. But if you leave a body at exactly escape velocity, your velocity bleeds off as you climb in exchange for gaining gravitational potential energy, and your velocity tends to the limit of zero at sufficiently large distances. (That is, your $V_{inf}$ is 0.)



      Apollo did not leave at escape velocity. Rather, the trans-lunar injection gave considerable extra speed in order to make the trip much faster, so the lowest velocity was reached a few tens of thousands of miles short of the moon (where the gravity from the moon and the earth are equal), in the low thousands of miles per hour.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        10












        $begingroup$

        Escape velocity is the velocity at a given altitude (usually the surface) that is enough to leave the body's sphere of influence with a positive net velocity. But if you leave a body at exactly escape velocity, your velocity bleeds off as you climb in exchange for gaining gravitational potential energy, and your velocity tends to the limit of zero at sufficiently large distances. (That is, your $V_{inf}$ is 0.)



        Apollo did not leave at escape velocity. Rather, the trans-lunar injection gave considerable extra speed in order to make the trip much faster, so the lowest velocity was reached a few tens of thousands of miles short of the moon (where the gravity from the moon and the earth are equal), in the low thousands of miles per hour.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          Escape velocity is the velocity at a given altitude (usually the surface) that is enough to leave the body's sphere of influence with a positive net velocity. But if you leave a body at exactly escape velocity, your velocity bleeds off as you climb in exchange for gaining gravitational potential energy, and your velocity tends to the limit of zero at sufficiently large distances. (That is, your $V_{inf}$ is 0.)



          Apollo did not leave at escape velocity. Rather, the trans-lunar injection gave considerable extra speed in order to make the trip much faster, so the lowest velocity was reached a few tens of thousands of miles short of the moon (where the gravity from the moon and the earth are equal), in the low thousands of miles per hour.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Escape velocity is the velocity at a given altitude (usually the surface) that is enough to leave the body's sphere of influence with a positive net velocity. But if you leave a body at exactly escape velocity, your velocity bleeds off as you climb in exchange for gaining gravitational potential energy, and your velocity tends to the limit of zero at sufficiently large distances. (That is, your $V_{inf}$ is 0.)



          Apollo did not leave at escape velocity. Rather, the trans-lunar injection gave considerable extra speed in order to make the trip much faster, so the lowest velocity was reached a few tens of thousands of miles short of the moon (where the gravity from the moon and the earth are equal), in the low thousands of miles per hour.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 9 hours ago









          Nathan TuggyNathan Tuggy

          3,83842638




          3,83842638























              5












              $begingroup$

              Developing on Nathan's answer, let's do some math. For simplicity we suppose here that we are not really going to the Moon, that only Earth's gravity us relevant.



              We leave at escape velocity, 25,000 miles per hour from an altitude of 4000 miles above the Earth's center, and climb straight up. As we do so our velocity decreases against Earth's gravity but remains matched to escape velocity at that altitude above Earth's center. Thus at an altitude of 6250 miles (2250 miles above Earth's surface) Earth's gravity has slowed the rocket down to 20,000 miles per hour which is the escape velocity at that altitude.



              Escape velocity is proportional to the $-1/2$ power of altitude above the center, and for 25,000 mph at 4000 miles the proportionality constant is (to three significant figures) $1.58×10^6$ (miles)$^{3/2}$/hr. So to get from an altitude of 4000 miles to 250,000 miles, at escape velocity, we need this much time:



              $int_{4000}^{240000} dfrac{dz}{1.58×10^6z^{-1/2}}=49.5text{ hr}$



              This is roughly correct but misses the fact that at the Moon's altitude we would still be going several thousand miles per hour upwards and the Moon's gravity would not have been strong enough to catch us from such speed. Nathan correctly points out that we went off slower than escape velocity so that the Moon, which is still bound to Earth, could reel us in. Hence the extra day. Similarly, when taking off from the Moon we had to go slowly enough for Earth to pull us in rather than sending us off like a slingshot; technically blasting from the Moon was not up to its escape velocity either.



              So ultimately the reason Apollo missions had such long transit times between the Earth and Moon was not any limit on rocket power but by the limits of gravity within which a lunar mission has to work.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 2




                $begingroup$
                But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
                $endgroup$
                – Uwe
                4 hours ago






              • 4




                $begingroup$
                The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
                $endgroup$
                – Mark
                4 hours ago
















              5












              $begingroup$

              Developing on Nathan's answer, let's do some math. For simplicity we suppose here that we are not really going to the Moon, that only Earth's gravity us relevant.



              We leave at escape velocity, 25,000 miles per hour from an altitude of 4000 miles above the Earth's center, and climb straight up. As we do so our velocity decreases against Earth's gravity but remains matched to escape velocity at that altitude above Earth's center. Thus at an altitude of 6250 miles (2250 miles above Earth's surface) Earth's gravity has slowed the rocket down to 20,000 miles per hour which is the escape velocity at that altitude.



              Escape velocity is proportional to the $-1/2$ power of altitude above the center, and for 25,000 mph at 4000 miles the proportionality constant is (to three significant figures) $1.58×10^6$ (miles)$^{3/2}$/hr. So to get from an altitude of 4000 miles to 250,000 miles, at escape velocity, we need this much time:



              $int_{4000}^{240000} dfrac{dz}{1.58×10^6z^{-1/2}}=49.5text{ hr}$



              This is roughly correct but misses the fact that at the Moon's altitude we would still be going several thousand miles per hour upwards and the Moon's gravity would not have been strong enough to catch us from such speed. Nathan correctly points out that we went off slower than escape velocity so that the Moon, which is still bound to Earth, could reel us in. Hence the extra day. Similarly, when taking off from the Moon we had to go slowly enough for Earth to pull us in rather than sending us off like a slingshot; technically blasting from the Moon was not up to its escape velocity either.



              So ultimately the reason Apollo missions had such long transit times between the Earth and Moon was not any limit on rocket power but by the limits of gravity within which a lunar mission has to work.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$









              • 2




                $begingroup$
                But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
                $endgroup$
                – Uwe
                4 hours ago






              • 4




                $begingroup$
                The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
                $endgroup$
                – Mark
                4 hours ago














              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              Developing on Nathan's answer, let's do some math. For simplicity we suppose here that we are not really going to the Moon, that only Earth's gravity us relevant.



              We leave at escape velocity, 25,000 miles per hour from an altitude of 4000 miles above the Earth's center, and climb straight up. As we do so our velocity decreases against Earth's gravity but remains matched to escape velocity at that altitude above Earth's center. Thus at an altitude of 6250 miles (2250 miles above Earth's surface) Earth's gravity has slowed the rocket down to 20,000 miles per hour which is the escape velocity at that altitude.



              Escape velocity is proportional to the $-1/2$ power of altitude above the center, and for 25,000 mph at 4000 miles the proportionality constant is (to three significant figures) $1.58×10^6$ (miles)$^{3/2}$/hr. So to get from an altitude of 4000 miles to 250,000 miles, at escape velocity, we need this much time:



              $int_{4000}^{240000} dfrac{dz}{1.58×10^6z^{-1/2}}=49.5text{ hr}$



              This is roughly correct but misses the fact that at the Moon's altitude we would still be going several thousand miles per hour upwards and the Moon's gravity would not have been strong enough to catch us from such speed. Nathan correctly points out that we went off slower than escape velocity so that the Moon, which is still bound to Earth, could reel us in. Hence the extra day. Similarly, when taking off from the Moon we had to go slowly enough for Earth to pull us in rather than sending us off like a slingshot; technically blasting from the Moon was not up to its escape velocity either.



              So ultimately the reason Apollo missions had such long transit times between the Earth and Moon was not any limit on rocket power but by the limits of gravity within which a lunar mission has to work.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Developing on Nathan's answer, let's do some math. For simplicity we suppose here that we are not really going to the Moon, that only Earth's gravity us relevant.



              We leave at escape velocity, 25,000 miles per hour from an altitude of 4000 miles above the Earth's center, and climb straight up. As we do so our velocity decreases against Earth's gravity but remains matched to escape velocity at that altitude above Earth's center. Thus at an altitude of 6250 miles (2250 miles above Earth's surface) Earth's gravity has slowed the rocket down to 20,000 miles per hour which is the escape velocity at that altitude.



              Escape velocity is proportional to the $-1/2$ power of altitude above the center, and for 25,000 mph at 4000 miles the proportionality constant is (to three significant figures) $1.58×10^6$ (miles)$^{3/2}$/hr. So to get from an altitude of 4000 miles to 250,000 miles, at escape velocity, we need this much time:



              $int_{4000}^{240000} dfrac{dz}{1.58×10^6z^{-1/2}}=49.5text{ hr}$



              This is roughly correct but misses the fact that at the Moon's altitude we would still be going several thousand miles per hour upwards and the Moon's gravity would not have been strong enough to catch us from such speed. Nathan correctly points out that we went off slower than escape velocity so that the Moon, which is still bound to Earth, could reel us in. Hence the extra day. Similarly, when taking off from the Moon we had to go slowly enough for Earth to pull us in rather than sending us off like a slingshot; technically blasting from the Moon was not up to its escape velocity either.



              So ultimately the reason Apollo missions had such long transit times between the Earth and Moon was not any limit on rocket power but by the limits of gravity within which a lunar mission has to work.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 4 hours ago

























              answered 5 hours ago









              Oscar LanziOscar Lanzi

              3135




              3135








              • 2




                $begingroup$
                But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
                $endgroup$
                – Uwe
                4 hours ago






              • 4




                $begingroup$
                The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
                $endgroup$
                – Mark
                4 hours ago














              • 2




                $begingroup$
                But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
                $endgroup$
                – Uwe
                4 hours ago






              • 4




                $begingroup$
                The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
                $endgroup$
                – Mark
                4 hours ago








              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
              $endgroup$
              – Uwe
              4 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              But the Apollo 13 astronauts were lucky that it was possible to shorten the time for return by using the the rocket power of the Lunar Module's descent stage. Using the remaining fuel even more time may have been saved, but the landing would have been at the wrong location.
              $endgroup$
              – Uwe
              4 hours ago




              4




              4




              $begingroup$
              The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
              $endgroup$
              – Mark
              4 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              The return time can be faster than the outbound time -- you just need to be on a trajectory that intersects the Earth's atmosphere, going slow enough for your heatshield to handle. Apollo used a minimum-energy trajectory to keep the launch mass down.
              $endgroup$
              – Mark
              4 hours ago











              1












              $begingroup$

              As already explained in other answers, essentially all of the distance is covered by unpowered flight - gaining altitude away from Earth while under the influence of Earth's gravity, the "upward" velocity will gradually diminish. At LEO distance this is about 10m/s-2, although this gravitational acceleration does fall off with square of distance.



              This is a good thing because the craft wants to arrive at the Moon at a speed which requires the least adjustment (least propellant) to enter lunar orbit - the Moon orbits the Earth at about 1km/s (round numbers) and a low altitude orbit around the Moon requires a speed of about 1.6km/s. To arrive in a retrograde orbit basically means the craft must end up at the far side of the Moon with zero radial velocity and about 600m/s retrograde to Earth. To accomplish this, it's a good thing that radial velocity away from Earth is being lost due to gravity almost the entire way out, but this means the trip will take much longer than the 9 hours suggested by simple arithmetic.



              Another factor is that the path from Earth to Moon is not traveled in a straight line. Departure from LEO is essentially tangential to Earth's surface; Earth's gravity pulls the trajectory into a curve. The lowest energy transfer occurs if the craft aims to enter lunar orbit retrograde (as I previously mentioned), so the overall path is actually somewhat S-shaped, making total path a bit longer.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                As already explained in other answers, essentially all of the distance is covered by unpowered flight - gaining altitude away from Earth while under the influence of Earth's gravity, the "upward" velocity will gradually diminish. At LEO distance this is about 10m/s-2, although this gravitational acceleration does fall off with square of distance.



                This is a good thing because the craft wants to arrive at the Moon at a speed which requires the least adjustment (least propellant) to enter lunar orbit - the Moon orbits the Earth at about 1km/s (round numbers) and a low altitude orbit around the Moon requires a speed of about 1.6km/s. To arrive in a retrograde orbit basically means the craft must end up at the far side of the Moon with zero radial velocity and about 600m/s retrograde to Earth. To accomplish this, it's a good thing that radial velocity away from Earth is being lost due to gravity almost the entire way out, but this means the trip will take much longer than the 9 hours suggested by simple arithmetic.



                Another factor is that the path from Earth to Moon is not traveled in a straight line. Departure from LEO is essentially tangential to Earth's surface; Earth's gravity pulls the trajectory into a curve. The lowest energy transfer occurs if the craft aims to enter lunar orbit retrograde (as I previously mentioned), so the overall path is actually somewhat S-shaped, making total path a bit longer.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  As already explained in other answers, essentially all of the distance is covered by unpowered flight - gaining altitude away from Earth while under the influence of Earth's gravity, the "upward" velocity will gradually diminish. At LEO distance this is about 10m/s-2, although this gravitational acceleration does fall off with square of distance.



                  This is a good thing because the craft wants to arrive at the Moon at a speed which requires the least adjustment (least propellant) to enter lunar orbit - the Moon orbits the Earth at about 1km/s (round numbers) and a low altitude orbit around the Moon requires a speed of about 1.6km/s. To arrive in a retrograde orbit basically means the craft must end up at the far side of the Moon with zero radial velocity and about 600m/s retrograde to Earth. To accomplish this, it's a good thing that radial velocity away from Earth is being lost due to gravity almost the entire way out, but this means the trip will take much longer than the 9 hours suggested by simple arithmetic.



                  Another factor is that the path from Earth to Moon is not traveled in a straight line. Departure from LEO is essentially tangential to Earth's surface; Earth's gravity pulls the trajectory into a curve. The lowest energy transfer occurs if the craft aims to enter lunar orbit retrograde (as I previously mentioned), so the overall path is actually somewhat S-shaped, making total path a bit longer.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  As already explained in other answers, essentially all of the distance is covered by unpowered flight - gaining altitude away from Earth while under the influence of Earth's gravity, the "upward" velocity will gradually diminish. At LEO distance this is about 10m/s-2, although this gravitational acceleration does fall off with square of distance.



                  This is a good thing because the craft wants to arrive at the Moon at a speed which requires the least adjustment (least propellant) to enter lunar orbit - the Moon orbits the Earth at about 1km/s (round numbers) and a low altitude orbit around the Moon requires a speed of about 1.6km/s. To arrive in a retrograde orbit basically means the craft must end up at the far side of the Moon with zero radial velocity and about 600m/s retrograde to Earth. To accomplish this, it's a good thing that radial velocity away from Earth is being lost due to gravity almost the entire way out, but this means the trip will take much longer than the 9 hours suggested by simple arithmetic.



                  Another factor is that the path from Earth to Moon is not traveled in a straight line. Departure from LEO is essentially tangential to Earth's surface; Earth's gravity pulls the trajectory into a curve. The lowest energy transfer occurs if the craft aims to enter lunar orbit retrograde (as I previously mentioned), so the overall path is actually somewhat S-shaped, making total path a bit longer.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Anthony XAnthony X

                  9,25013678




                  9,25013678






















                      Marvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Marvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Marvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Marvin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34260%2fapollo-missions-travel-time-to-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to label and detect the document text images

                      Vallis Paradisi

                      Tabula Rosettana