CMS Pricing - Convexity Adjustment by Replication
$begingroup$
I'm trying to learn CMS pricing, but didn't get the logic of this method. Previously cited articles about this method is pretty complex.
I'd be glad if you can provide me with simpler articles or spreadsheets to give an idea about replication of swaptions.
fixed-income interest-rates derivatives swaption cms
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to learn CMS pricing, but didn't get the logic of this method. Previously cited articles about this method is pretty complex.
I'd be glad if you can provide me with simpler articles or spreadsheets to give an idea about replication of swaptions.
fixed-income interest-rates derivatives swaption cms
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to learn CMS pricing, but didn't get the logic of this method. Previously cited articles about this method is pretty complex.
I'd be glad if you can provide me with simpler articles or spreadsheets to give an idea about replication of swaptions.
fixed-income interest-rates derivatives swaption cms
New contributor
$endgroup$
I'm trying to learn CMS pricing, but didn't get the logic of this method. Previously cited articles about this method is pretty complex.
I'd be glad if you can provide me with simpler articles or spreadsheets to give an idea about replication of swaptions.
fixed-income interest-rates derivatives swaption cms
fixed-income interest-rates derivatives swaption cms
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
user38753user38753
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The CMS represents the value of a swap rate for any point in time, i.e. we are interested in extrapolating the density of the swap rate in a similar way as the IBOR rate.
Let us start with the fair value of a swaption under the annuity measure $mathcal{A}$ with tenor at time $tau$:
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_t[(mathcal{S}(tau)-k)^+]$$
Instead of having it paid out as a annuity over time, we want to evaluate the flow for paying it out at any given time $T$. We are, thus, in a change of measure from the annuity to a $T$-forward measure.
Denoting the bond value value today maturing at $T$ by $B_{t,T}$, the CMS flow at time $t<T$ under the annuity measure is
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[frac{mathcal{S}(tau)}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}right]$$
whilst under the $T$-forward measure it is:
$$mathbb{E}_t^T[mathcal{S}(tau)]=mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[mathcal{S}(tau)frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}right]$$ with the Radon-Nykodim derivative $frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}=frac{mathcal{A}(t)B_{t,T}}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}$.
The CMS convexity adjustment is the difference between the expectations under these two measures. In order to compute this convexity adjustment, one has to find an approximation for $mathbb{E}^S_t[1/B_{S,T}|mathcal{S}_tau]$, which can be done following Cedervall and Piterbarg (2012) CMS: covering all bases either assuming a non-stochastic Libor-OIS basis spread or finding an explicit expression of T-bonds in terms of swap rates, which allows to obtain the swap density.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "204"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user38753 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43982%2fcms-pricing-convexity-adjustment-by-replication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The CMS represents the value of a swap rate for any point in time, i.e. we are interested in extrapolating the density of the swap rate in a similar way as the IBOR rate.
Let us start with the fair value of a swaption under the annuity measure $mathcal{A}$ with tenor at time $tau$:
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_t[(mathcal{S}(tau)-k)^+]$$
Instead of having it paid out as a annuity over time, we want to evaluate the flow for paying it out at any given time $T$. We are, thus, in a change of measure from the annuity to a $T$-forward measure.
Denoting the bond value value today maturing at $T$ by $B_{t,T}$, the CMS flow at time $t<T$ under the annuity measure is
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[frac{mathcal{S}(tau)}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}right]$$
whilst under the $T$-forward measure it is:
$$mathbb{E}_t^T[mathcal{S}(tau)]=mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[mathcal{S}(tau)frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}right]$$ with the Radon-Nykodim derivative $frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}=frac{mathcal{A}(t)B_{t,T}}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}$.
The CMS convexity adjustment is the difference between the expectations under these two measures. In order to compute this convexity adjustment, one has to find an approximation for $mathbb{E}^S_t[1/B_{S,T}|mathcal{S}_tau]$, which can be done following Cedervall and Piterbarg (2012) CMS: covering all bases either assuming a non-stochastic Libor-OIS basis spread or finding an explicit expression of T-bonds in terms of swap rates, which allows to obtain the swap density.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The CMS represents the value of a swap rate for any point in time, i.e. we are interested in extrapolating the density of the swap rate in a similar way as the IBOR rate.
Let us start with the fair value of a swaption under the annuity measure $mathcal{A}$ with tenor at time $tau$:
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_t[(mathcal{S}(tau)-k)^+]$$
Instead of having it paid out as a annuity over time, we want to evaluate the flow for paying it out at any given time $T$. We are, thus, in a change of measure from the annuity to a $T$-forward measure.
Denoting the bond value value today maturing at $T$ by $B_{t,T}$, the CMS flow at time $t<T$ under the annuity measure is
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[frac{mathcal{S}(tau)}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}right]$$
whilst under the $T$-forward measure it is:
$$mathbb{E}_t^T[mathcal{S}(tau)]=mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[mathcal{S}(tau)frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}right]$$ with the Radon-Nykodim derivative $frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}=frac{mathcal{A}(t)B_{t,T}}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}$.
The CMS convexity adjustment is the difference between the expectations under these two measures. In order to compute this convexity adjustment, one has to find an approximation for $mathbb{E}^S_t[1/B_{S,T}|mathcal{S}_tau]$, which can be done following Cedervall and Piterbarg (2012) CMS: covering all bases either assuming a non-stochastic Libor-OIS basis spread or finding an explicit expression of T-bonds in terms of swap rates, which allows to obtain the swap density.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The CMS represents the value of a swap rate for any point in time, i.e. we are interested in extrapolating the density of the swap rate in a similar way as the IBOR rate.
Let us start with the fair value of a swaption under the annuity measure $mathcal{A}$ with tenor at time $tau$:
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_t[(mathcal{S}(tau)-k)^+]$$
Instead of having it paid out as a annuity over time, we want to evaluate the flow for paying it out at any given time $T$. We are, thus, in a change of measure from the annuity to a $T$-forward measure.
Denoting the bond value value today maturing at $T$ by $B_{t,T}$, the CMS flow at time $t<T$ under the annuity measure is
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[frac{mathcal{S}(tau)}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}right]$$
whilst under the $T$-forward measure it is:
$$mathbb{E}_t^T[mathcal{S}(tau)]=mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[mathcal{S}(tau)frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}right]$$ with the Radon-Nykodim derivative $frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}=frac{mathcal{A}(t)B_{t,T}}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}$.
The CMS convexity adjustment is the difference between the expectations under these two measures. In order to compute this convexity adjustment, one has to find an approximation for $mathbb{E}^S_t[1/B_{S,T}|mathcal{S}_tau]$, which can be done following Cedervall and Piterbarg (2012) CMS: covering all bases either assuming a non-stochastic Libor-OIS basis spread or finding an explicit expression of T-bonds in terms of swap rates, which allows to obtain the swap density.
$endgroup$
The CMS represents the value of a swap rate for any point in time, i.e. we are interested in extrapolating the density of the swap rate in a similar way as the IBOR rate.
Let us start with the fair value of a swaption under the annuity measure $mathcal{A}$ with tenor at time $tau$:
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_t[(mathcal{S}(tau)-k)^+]$$
Instead of having it paid out as a annuity over time, we want to evaluate the flow for paying it out at any given time $T$. We are, thus, in a change of measure from the annuity to a $T$-forward measure.
Denoting the bond value value today maturing at $T$ by $B_{t,T}$, the CMS flow at time $t<T$ under the annuity measure is
$$mathcal{A}(t)mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[frac{mathcal{S}(tau)}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}right]$$
whilst under the $T$-forward measure it is:
$$mathbb{E}_t^T[mathcal{S}(tau)]=mathbb{E}^mathcal{A}_tleft[mathcal{S}(tau)frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}right]$$ with the Radon-Nykodim derivative $frac{dT}{dmathcal{A}}=frac{mathcal{A}(t)B_{t,T}}{B_{tau,T}mathcal{A}(tau)}$.
The CMS convexity adjustment is the difference between the expectations under these two measures. In order to compute this convexity adjustment, one has to find an approximation for $mathbb{E}^S_t[1/B_{S,T}|mathcal{S}_tau]$, which can be done following Cedervall and Piterbarg (2012) CMS: covering all bases either assuming a non-stochastic Libor-OIS basis spread or finding an explicit expression of T-bonds in terms of swap rates, which allows to obtain the swap density.
answered 6 hours ago
FunnyBuzerFunnyBuzer
3959
3959
add a comment |
add a comment |
user38753 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user38753 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user38753 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user38753 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43982%2fcms-pricing-convexity-adjustment-by-replication%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown