Another Number Sequence Riddle
$begingroup$
Here is another number sequence riddle for you all:
4, 2, 7, 6, 8, __, __, and so on. What numbers go in the blanks?
riddle number-sequence
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is another number sequence riddle for you all:
4, 2, 7, 6, 8, __, __, and so on. What numbers go in the blanks?
riddle number-sequence
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I mean, there's oeis.org/A245262, but I don't think that's it :P
$endgroup$
– Zimonze
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is another number sequence riddle for you all:
4, 2, 7, 6, 8, __, __, and so on. What numbers go in the blanks?
riddle number-sequence
$endgroup$
Here is another number sequence riddle for you all:
4, 2, 7, 6, 8, __, __, and so on. What numbers go in the blanks?
riddle number-sequence
riddle number-sequence
edited 2 hours ago
Dirge of Dreams
asked 3 hours ago
Dirge of DreamsDirge of Dreams
38017
38017
2
$begingroup$
I mean, there's oeis.org/A245262, but I don't think that's it :P
$endgroup$
– Zimonze
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I mean, there's oeis.org/A245262, but I don't think that's it :P
$endgroup$
– Zimonze
2 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I mean, there's oeis.org/A245262, but I don't think that's it :P
$endgroup$
– Zimonze
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I mean, there's oeis.org/A245262, but I don't think that's it :P
$endgroup$
– Zimonze
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The sequence continues
6,3,3,3
and terminates there because
the numbers are the lengths of the words in the question. (I have taken the view that the sequence stops where the numbers begin rather than, e.g., spelling the numbers out in words and using their lengths.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The blanks stand for
6, 6
because this is
the beginning of the decimal expansion of the absolute value of the Dawson integral at the
extremainflection points [many thanks to @GarethMcCaughan for noticing the error], ±0.4276866160179287974... (there are two of them, symmetric about the origin). See OEIS entry A245262.
Ah, aren't number sequence puzzles fun! ;-)
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79546%2fanother-number-sequence-riddle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The sequence continues
6,3,3,3
and terminates there because
the numbers are the lengths of the words in the question. (I have taken the view that the sequence stops where the numbers begin rather than, e.g., spelling the numbers out in words and using their lengths.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence continues
6,3,3,3
and terminates there because
the numbers are the lengths of the words in the question. (I have taken the view that the sequence stops where the numbers begin rather than, e.g., spelling the numbers out in words and using their lengths.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The sequence continues
6,3,3,3
and terminates there because
the numbers are the lengths of the words in the question. (I have taken the view that the sequence stops where the numbers begin rather than, e.g., spelling the numbers out in words and using their lengths.)
$endgroup$
The sequence continues
6,3,3,3
and terminates there because
the numbers are the lengths of the words in the question. (I have taken the view that the sequence stops where the numbers begin rather than, e.g., spelling the numbers out in words and using their lengths.)
answered 1 hour ago
Gareth McCaughan♦Gareth McCaughan
61.9k3153239
61.9k3153239
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
But it would certainly be fun to come up with a puzzle based on the same principle and also matching the A245262 to 15 digits or so... :-)
$endgroup$
– kkm
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The blanks stand for
6, 6
because this is
the beginning of the decimal expansion of the absolute value of the Dawson integral at the
extremainflection points [many thanks to @GarethMcCaughan for noticing the error], ±0.4276866160179287974... (there are two of them, symmetric about the origin). See OEIS entry A245262.
Ah, aren't number sequence puzzles fun! ;-)
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
The blanks stand for
6, 6
because this is
the beginning of the decimal expansion of the absolute value of the Dawson integral at the
extremainflection points [many thanks to @GarethMcCaughan for noticing the error], ±0.4276866160179287974... (there are two of them, symmetric about the origin). See OEIS entry A245262.
Ah, aren't number sequence puzzles fun! ;-)
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
The blanks stand for
6, 6
because this is
the beginning of the decimal expansion of the absolute value of the Dawson integral at the
extremainflection points [many thanks to @GarethMcCaughan for noticing the error], ±0.4276866160179287974... (there are two of them, symmetric about the origin). See OEIS entry A245262.
Ah, aren't number sequence puzzles fun! ;-)
New contributor
$endgroup$
The blanks stand for
6, 6
because this is
the beginning of the decimal expansion of the absolute value of the Dawson integral at the
extremainflection points [many thanks to @GarethMcCaughan for noticing the error], ±0.4276866160179287974... (there are two of them, symmetric about the origin). See OEIS entry A245262.
Ah, aren't number sequence puzzles fun! ;-)
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
New contributor
answered 2 hours ago
kkmkkm
1113
1113
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
You might want to credit @Zimonze in your answer.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course, my answer is tongue-in-check. Any "missing number" puzzle has an infinite number of solutions.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Didn't see that.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Brandon_J, ah, great minds do think alike!!! The timing is just a few seconds apart. I am not assuming you are accusing me of plagiarism? Solving puzzles was supposed to be fun, and that would be quite the opposite. I do indeed respect Zimonze addressing the OEIS, but I would be really surprised if anyone would not do the same upon reading the question... So the fairest credit indeed belongs do Dr. Sloane, I believe. Anyway, my answer was intended as a joke.
$endgroup$
– kkm
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
No, definitely not plagiarism, since he didn't actually invent the sequence. I was just saying that since he came in three minutes before you it might be nice to give him a shout-out, especially if you saw his answer/comment before posting yours (which it appears you did not). All good!
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
2 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79546%2fanother-number-sequence-riddle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
I mean, there's oeis.org/A245262, but I don't think that's it :P
$endgroup$
– Zimonze
2 hours ago