Is it possible for an event A to be independent from event B, but not the other way around?












1












$begingroup$


I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label{1}tag{1}$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label{2}tag{2}$$ but in $ref{1}$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref{2}$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?



Thank you






probability-theory independence







share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label{1}tag{1}$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label{2}tag{2}$$ but in $ref{1}$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref{2}$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?



    Thank you






    probability-theory independence







    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label{1}tag{1}$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label{2}tag{2}$$ but in $ref{1}$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref{2}$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?



      Thank you






      probability-theory independence







      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label{1}tag{1}$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label{2}tag{2}$$ but in $ref{1}$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref{2}$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?



      Thank you






      probability-theory independence




      probability-theory independence






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      MashpaMashpa

      273




      273




      New contributor




      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            $P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              2












              $begingroup$

              $P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$














                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });






                Mashpa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3195328%2fis-it-possible-for-an-event-a-to-be-independent-from-event-b-but-not-the-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    bitesizebobitesizebo

                    1,77828




                    1,77828























                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        $P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          $P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            $P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            $P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                            76.4k53370




                            76.4k53370























                                2












                                $begingroup$

                                $P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  2












                                  $begingroup$

                                  $P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    2












                                    2








                                    2





                                    $begingroup$

                                    $P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    $P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered 2 hours ago









                                    amdamd

                                    32k21053




                                    32k21053






















                                        Mashpa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded


















                                        Mashpa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                        Mashpa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                        Mashpa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid …



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3195328%2fis-it-possible-for-an-event-a-to-be-independent-from-event-b-but-not-the-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        -

                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to label and detect the document text images

                                        Image
                                        1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
                                        Read more

                                        Vallis Paradisi

                                        Image
                                        Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
                                        Read more

                                        Tabula Rosettana

                                        Image
                                        Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
                                        Read more