What type of postprocessing gives the effect of people standing out












8















Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid










share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    yesterday








  • 10





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    yesterday






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    yesterday






  • 7





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    yesterday






  • 3





    The single-word answer: "Bad"

    – Michael C
    21 hours ago
















8















Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid










share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    yesterday








  • 10





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    yesterday






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    yesterday






  • 7





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    yesterday






  • 3





    The single-word answer: "Bad"

    – Michael C
    21 hours ago














8












8








8


1






Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid










share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Below are real photographs, I was present when they were shot. The photographs were taken between 12:00 to 14:00 on a slightly overcast day. The photographer may have taken many frames.



What postprocessing was likely done, such that the people stand out in the photographs?



Meirav in orchid



Cohen family in orchid







post-processing software






share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Tetsujin

8,01921948




8,01921948






New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Happy PhantomHappy Phantom

4315




4315




New contributor




Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Happy Phantom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    yesterday








  • 10





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    yesterday






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    yesterday






  • 7





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    yesterday






  • 3





    The single-word answer: "Bad"

    – Michael C
    21 hours ago














  • 3





    its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

    – Abdul Quraishi
    yesterday








  • 10





    It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

    – Mike Sowsun
    yesterday






  • 1





    There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

    – jdv
    yesterday






  • 7





    There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

    – Hueco
    yesterday






  • 3





    The single-word answer: "Bad"

    – Michael C
    21 hours ago








3




3





its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

– Abdul Quraishi
yesterday







its a shame that the photographer has not included the Metadata with his exports, so it is not possible to say precisely what he did, but at a guess, it seems that he has chosen a location that when coupled with a very shallow depth of field, gives an almost surreal effect. pretty much everything at subject level seems in focus and then gradually falls out of focus.

– Abdul Quraishi
yesterday






10




10





It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

– Mike Sowsun
yesterday





It looks like the people were just "photoshopped" onto a different background.

– Mike Sowsun
yesterday




1




1





There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

– jdv
yesterday





There seems to be halos and jaggies around the people, especially when the foreground/background colours are very different. Seems like creative cut and paste.

– jdv
yesterday




7




7





There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

– Hueco
yesterday





There’s a fine line between “stand out” and “appear green screen fake”...

– Hueco
yesterday




3




3





The single-word answer: "Bad"

– Michael C
21 hours ago





The single-word answer: "Bad"

– Michael C
21 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















22














I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



enter image description here



Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






share|improve this answer





















  • 8





    If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

    – Hueco
    yesterday











  • A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

    – Chris H
    8 hours ago






  • 2





    Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

    – chue x
    1 hour ago



















5














Didn't the photographer use flash?



A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

    – dotancohen
    yesterday



















4














There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



Combining these two methods would be even better.



What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






share|improve this answer































    0














    It's flash, very clearly. If the photographer says there "may have been" on camera flash used, then that's it.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "61"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105645%2fwhat-type-of-postprocessing-gives-the-effect-of-people-standing-out%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      22














      I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



      As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



      enter image description here



      Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



      The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



      I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

      I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

      The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

        – Hueco
        yesterday











      • A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

        – Chris H
        8 hours ago






      • 2





        Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

        – chue x
        1 hour ago
















      22














      I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



      As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



      enter image description here



      Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



      The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



      I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

      I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

      The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






      share|improve this answer





















      • 8





        If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

        – Hueco
        yesterday











      • A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

        – Chris H
        8 hours ago






      • 2





        Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

        – chue x
        1 hour ago














      22












      22








      22







      I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



      As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



      enter image description here



      Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



      The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



      I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

      I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

      The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.






      share|improve this answer















      I'd guess it's as simple as selecting the subject in Photoshop - with a tad more care & attention than I've used below, then leeching out the saturation in the background & tonally balancing towards a sepia effect.



      As a very quick demo I did the same thing but made it a pretty garish purple instead.



      enter image description here



      Once you have your mask you can treat inside & outside of it in totally different ways.



      The subjects have been left with realistic colouration, which I think is what is providing the majority of the visual separation - that & the physical separation from the ground, which pushes them into the unsharp area of the background. Note how the effect is less emphatic on the small boy, especially lower, where he's connected to the equally sharp ground at that distance.



      I don't think the focus has been played with. I think it was shot on a wide enough aperture that the background is blurred by simple distance. The ground underneath them is still reasonably sharp.

      I also don't think it would be compulsory to be using flash, so long as enough light was getting in, or set to a high-enough ISO, to use a short exposure.

      The light on the people & the trees seems to match - little to no shadow at all, which matches the OP's description & the almost 'white-out' cloud cover in the back of the shot.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered yesterday









      TetsujinTetsujin

      8,01921948




      8,01921948








      • 8





        If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

        – Hueco
        yesterday











      • A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

        – Chris H
        8 hours ago






      • 2





        Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

        – chue x
        1 hour ago














      • 8





        If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

        – Hueco
        yesterday











      • A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

        – Chris H
        8 hours ago






      • 2





        Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

        – chue x
        1 hour ago








      8




      8





      If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

      – Hueco
      yesterday





      If you’re going to go full fake, you may as well go full Disney child pop star album cover with it. +1

      – Hueco
      yesterday













      A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

      – Chris H
      8 hours ago





      A friend posted a similar image recently taken to a logical extreme: the background was B&W and fairly low contrast; the subject was in colour (and wearing bright clothes). I know this was processed from a single shot because I'm familiar with the setting. It seems to be in at the moment

      – Chris H
      8 hours ago




      2




      2





      Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

      – chue x
      1 hour ago





      Google automagically does the same thing with some photos that I take with my phone. In my images the subject is in full color, and everything else is black and white. Google calls it "color pop".

      – chue x
      1 hour ago













      5














      Didn't the photographer use flash?



      A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

        – dotancohen
        yesterday
















      5














      Didn't the photographer use flash?



      A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

        – dotancohen
        yesterday














      5












      5








      5







      Didn't the photographer use flash?



      A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.






      share|improve this answer













      Didn't the photographer use flash?



      A common practice to make subjects "stand out" is to use flash for proper subject exposure, and to use camera settings to slightly underexposure the background. That is my guess here, instead of post processing.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      WayneFWayneF

      10k1924




      10k1924








      • 1





        There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

        – dotancohen
        yesterday














      • 1





        There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

        – dotancohen
        yesterday








      1




      1





      There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

      – dotancohen
      yesterday





      There was another photographer who was using a flash, but the woman in this photograph insists that there was no external flash used for these images. There may have been a flash on the camera itself.

      – dotancohen
      yesterday











      4














      There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



      Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



      Combining these two methods would be even better.



      What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






      share|improve this answer




























        4














        There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



        Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



        Combining these two methods would be even better.



        What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






        share|improve this answer


























          4












          4








          4







          There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



          Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



          Combining these two methods would be even better.



          What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..






          share|improve this answer













          There area few ways of making such photographs. You could, for instance, use a large aperture to create a shallow depth of field whereby you blur out the background. The human eye doesn't like to look at things that out of focus. By creating a shallow DOF, you will put visual emphasis on your subject.



          Another way is by creating contrast between your subject and the background. One way to do this is by having your subject brighter than the background. You could use fill flash or simply place your subject in a scene where they have more light falling onto them than the background.



          Combining these two methods would be even better.



          What the photographer has done with the images that you've posted is to create a composite. The images are apparently a combination of a background and the people were placed over it. The photographer either took the background image out of focus, or used a blur filter (i.e. Gaussian blur)..







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 21 hours ago









          FrankFrank

          6447




          6447























              0














              It's flash, very clearly. If the photographer says there "may have been" on camera flash used, then that's it.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                0














                It's flash, very clearly. If the photographer says there "may have been" on camera flash used, then that's it.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  It's flash, very clearly. If the photographer says there "may have been" on camera flash used, then that's it.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  It's flash, very clearly. If the photographer says there "may have been" on camera flash used, then that's it.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 15 mins ago









                  h34jhw4jh34jhw4j

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  h34jhw4j is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                      Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Happy Phantom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105645%2fwhat-type-of-postprocessing-gives-the-effect-of-people-standing-out%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to label and detect the document text images

                      Vallis Paradisi

                      Tabula Rosettana