Why don't wizards use more than one wand like when Harry uses three? [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
Why don't wizards always use multiple wands? [duplicate]
Why don't wizards use more than one wand in casting spells for battle? [duplicate]
1 answer
In the seventh book, when Harry is escaping from Malfoy Mansion he grabs three wands from Draco Malfoy and uses a spell against the snatcher Scabior. The effects are described as more powerful than a single wand spell.
What is the downside to this "strategy", for it to not be commonly used among wizards as one can seemingly create more powerful spells?
harry-potter wandlore
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by Rand al'Thor♦ 6 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Why don't wizards always use multiple wands? [duplicate]
Why don't wizards use more than one wand in casting spells for battle? [duplicate]
1 answer
In the seventh book, when Harry is escaping from Malfoy Mansion he grabs three wands from Draco Malfoy and uses a spell against the snatcher Scabior. The effects are described as more powerful than a single wand spell.
What is the downside to this "strategy", for it to not be commonly used among wizards as one can seemingly create more powerful spells?
harry-potter wandlore
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by Rand al'Thor♦ 6 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
@Rand al'Thor The duplicate chain on this is something fierce, and going to back to the questions that are not closed, they don't seem to answer this. I think something along on the chain needs to be reopened but I'm not sure what...
– Skooba
4 hours ago
@Skooba Perhaps this one could be reopened? The two later ones are pretty clear dupes of it, but the two earlier ones, even taken together, don't seem to resolve it properly.
– Rand al'Thor♦
4 hours ago
@Randal'Thor Yes, that one should not be a duplicate of the two it is closed based on, but the two questions closed based on it are indeed duplicates.
– Alex
37 mins ago
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Why don't wizards always use multiple wands? [duplicate]
Why don't wizards use more than one wand in casting spells for battle? [duplicate]
1 answer
In the seventh book, when Harry is escaping from Malfoy Mansion he grabs three wands from Draco Malfoy and uses a spell against the snatcher Scabior. The effects are described as more powerful than a single wand spell.
What is the downside to this "strategy", for it to not be commonly used among wizards as one can seemingly create more powerful spells?
harry-potter wandlore
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This question already has an answer here:
Why don't wizards always use multiple wands? [duplicate]
Why don't wizards use more than one wand in casting spells for battle? [duplicate]
1 answer
In the seventh book, when Harry is escaping from Malfoy Mansion he grabs three wands from Draco Malfoy and uses a spell against the snatcher Scabior. The effects are described as more powerful than a single wand spell.
What is the downside to this "strategy", for it to not be commonly used among wizards as one can seemingly create more powerful spells?
This question already has an answer here:
Why don't wizards always use multiple wands? [duplicate]
Why don't wizards use more than one wand in casting spells for battle? [duplicate]
1 answer
harry-potter wandlore
harry-potter wandlore
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
edited 3 hours ago
TheLethalCarrot
40.9k15219270
40.9k15219270
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
asked 6 hours ago
hurricane_drunkhurricane_drunk
211
211
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
hurricane_drunk is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
marked as duplicate by Rand al'Thor♦ 6 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Rand al'Thor♦ 6 hours ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
@Rand al'Thor The duplicate chain on this is something fierce, and going to back to the questions that are not closed, they don't seem to answer this. I think something along on the chain needs to be reopened but I'm not sure what...
– Skooba
4 hours ago
@Skooba Perhaps this one could be reopened? The two later ones are pretty clear dupes of it, but the two earlier ones, even taken together, don't seem to resolve it properly.
– Rand al'Thor♦
4 hours ago
@Randal'Thor Yes, that one should not be a duplicate of the two it is closed based on, but the two questions closed based on it are indeed duplicates.
– Alex
37 mins ago
add a comment |
@Rand al'Thor The duplicate chain on this is something fierce, and going to back to the questions that are not closed, they don't seem to answer this. I think something along on the chain needs to be reopened but I'm not sure what...
– Skooba
4 hours ago
@Skooba Perhaps this one could be reopened? The two later ones are pretty clear dupes of it, but the two earlier ones, even taken together, don't seem to resolve it properly.
– Rand al'Thor♦
4 hours ago
@Randal'Thor Yes, that one should not be a duplicate of the two it is closed based on, but the two questions closed based on it are indeed duplicates.
– Alex
37 mins ago
@Rand al'Thor The duplicate chain on this is something fierce, and going to back to the questions that are not closed, they don't seem to answer this. I think something along on the chain needs to be reopened but I'm not sure what...
– Skooba
4 hours ago
@Rand al'Thor The duplicate chain on this is something fierce, and going to back to the questions that are not closed, they don't seem to answer this. I think something along on the chain needs to be reopened but I'm not sure what...
– Skooba
4 hours ago
@Skooba Perhaps this one could be reopened? The two later ones are pretty clear dupes of it, but the two earlier ones, even taken together, don't seem to resolve it properly.
– Rand al'Thor♦
4 hours ago
@Skooba Perhaps this one could be reopened? The two later ones are pretty clear dupes of it, but the two earlier ones, even taken together, don't seem to resolve it properly.
– Rand al'Thor♦
4 hours ago
@Randal'Thor Yes, that one should not be a duplicate of the two it is closed based on, but the two questions closed based on it are indeed duplicates.
– Alex
37 mins ago
@Randal'Thor Yes, that one should not be a duplicate of the two it is closed based on, but the two questions closed based on it are indeed duplicates.
– Alex
37 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
@Rand al'Thor The duplicate chain on this is something fierce, and going to back to the questions that are not closed, they don't seem to answer this. I think something along on the chain needs to be reopened but I'm not sure what...
– Skooba
4 hours ago
@Skooba Perhaps this one could be reopened? The two later ones are pretty clear dupes of it, but the two earlier ones, even taken together, don't seem to resolve it properly.
– Rand al'Thor♦
4 hours ago
@Randal'Thor Yes, that one should not be a duplicate of the two it is closed based on, but the two questions closed based on it are indeed duplicates.
– Alex
37 mins ago