It's just a little weight
$begingroup$
It's been a while since I've posed a riddle; so I'm back with a simple one! I hope you all enjoy, and as always, good luck!
Sally went to the farmer's market, with her daily $100,text{lbs}$ of potatoes. After sitting in the sun all day and no one showing interest, she decided to pack up and go home. But, she noticed something rather odd...
Sally only had $50,text{lbs}$ of potatoes left. But how? No one even glanced at her stand.
What happened? Make sure you explain the drastic difference.
knowledge mystery
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's been a while since I've posed a riddle; so I'm back with a simple one! I hope you all enjoy, and as always, good luck!
Sally went to the farmer's market, with her daily $100,text{lbs}$ of potatoes. After sitting in the sun all day and no one showing interest, she decided to pack up and go home. But, she noticed something rather odd...
Sally only had $50,text{lbs}$ of potatoes left. But how? No one even glanced at her stand.
What happened? Make sure you explain the drastic difference.
knowledge mystery
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's been a while since I've posed a riddle; so I'm back with a simple one! I hope you all enjoy, and as always, good luck!
Sally went to the farmer's market, with her daily $100,text{lbs}$ of potatoes. After sitting in the sun all day and no one showing interest, she decided to pack up and go home. But, she noticed something rather odd...
Sally only had $50,text{lbs}$ of potatoes left. But how? No one even glanced at her stand.
What happened? Make sure you explain the drastic difference.
knowledge mystery
$endgroup$
It's been a while since I've posed a riddle; so I'm back with a simple one! I hope you all enjoy, and as always, good luck!
Sally went to the farmer's market, with her daily $100,text{lbs}$ of potatoes. After sitting in the sun all day and no one showing interest, she decided to pack up and go home. But, she noticed something rather odd...
Sally only had $50,text{lbs}$ of potatoes left. But how? No one even glanced at her stand.
What happened? Make sure you explain the drastic difference.
knowledge mystery
knowledge mystery
edited 3 hours ago
miracle173
1558
1558
asked 6 hours ago
PerpetualJPerpetualJ
3,894544
3,894544
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is sort–of a "footnote" to mocarsha2019's answer, but I've decided to post my own answer instead.
As mocarsha noted, the potatoes probably dried out and lost some of their weight in water.
This question reminded me of this video by Vsauce2. The question they pose sounds awfully similar to the situation encountered here... but posed the other way.
Imagine you have a sack of potatoes which is $99$% water and $1$% "potato". Overnight (or during the day, in this case), the potatoes dry out a bit and now they're $98$% water and $2$% potato. How much weight have the potatoes lost?
The counterintuitive solution is that the potatoes have lost half of their weight (kinda like the scenario described above!
To show this, we can imagine that each potato is made of $100$ "bits", where $99$ of the bits are "water" and $1$ of the bits are "potato". That'll yield a potato which is $99$% water and $1$% potato. To reach the desired configuration of $98$% water and $2$% potato, $50$ of the "water" bits must evaporate. That sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense: after $50$ "water" bits evaporate, we'll have a potato with $49$ "water" bits and $1$ "potato" bit. That's a total of $50$ bits (so half the weight as before), which are $98$% water and $2$% potato.
This explains the drastic weight loss — $1$% of the water evaporating is equal to a $50$% weight loss! (which is technically an incorrect conclusion to draw, but it's more to increase the "paradoxiness" of the puzzle.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The potatoes were boiled and got dried in the sun, losing weight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The market is on a space ship. She flew up from a planet on which the potatoes weighed 100lbs. On the space ship there is a rotating whatzit that creates an artificial gravity equal to half that of the planet's surface. It's a dystopian world. They are still using pounds: had she been using the galactic standard units (GI) she'd be measuring in kg and her potatoes would be fine. Also no-one would have been able to take advantage of her. She got lucky this time not having any sales. "This would never happen in Europe. Or Japan. Or Australia. Or Kenya. Or really anywhere else in the free thinking world. Or even most of the various dictatorships." What kind of craziness have we gotten (using the archaic form) ourselves into? Her scientific literacy was not great, thanks to the recent tax cuts for the wealthy which had necessitated a cut in school funding. But the trillionaires will be fine which consoled her for some reason. One educational theme that still featured strongly was that this coddling of trillionaires was important for some reason. But never fear: when she gets back home her potatoes will be 100 pounds again. It's a sad day, though, when all her efforts getting to market on a rocket don't yield a single sale...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79483%2fits-just-a-little-weight%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is sort–of a "footnote" to mocarsha2019's answer, but I've decided to post my own answer instead.
As mocarsha noted, the potatoes probably dried out and lost some of their weight in water.
This question reminded me of this video by Vsauce2. The question they pose sounds awfully similar to the situation encountered here... but posed the other way.
Imagine you have a sack of potatoes which is $99$% water and $1$% "potato". Overnight (or during the day, in this case), the potatoes dry out a bit and now they're $98$% water and $2$% potato. How much weight have the potatoes lost?
The counterintuitive solution is that the potatoes have lost half of their weight (kinda like the scenario described above!
To show this, we can imagine that each potato is made of $100$ "bits", where $99$ of the bits are "water" and $1$ of the bits are "potato". That'll yield a potato which is $99$% water and $1$% potato. To reach the desired configuration of $98$% water and $2$% potato, $50$ of the "water" bits must evaporate. That sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense: after $50$ "water" bits evaporate, we'll have a potato with $49$ "water" bits and $1$ "potato" bit. That's a total of $50$ bits (so half the weight as before), which are $98$% water and $2$% potato.
This explains the drastic weight loss — $1$% of the water evaporating is equal to a $50$% weight loss! (which is technically an incorrect conclusion to draw, but it's more to increase the "paradoxiness" of the puzzle.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is sort–of a "footnote" to mocarsha2019's answer, but I've decided to post my own answer instead.
As mocarsha noted, the potatoes probably dried out and lost some of their weight in water.
This question reminded me of this video by Vsauce2. The question they pose sounds awfully similar to the situation encountered here... but posed the other way.
Imagine you have a sack of potatoes which is $99$% water and $1$% "potato". Overnight (or during the day, in this case), the potatoes dry out a bit and now they're $98$% water and $2$% potato. How much weight have the potatoes lost?
The counterintuitive solution is that the potatoes have lost half of their weight (kinda like the scenario described above!
To show this, we can imagine that each potato is made of $100$ "bits", where $99$ of the bits are "water" and $1$ of the bits are "potato". That'll yield a potato which is $99$% water and $1$% potato. To reach the desired configuration of $98$% water and $2$% potato, $50$ of the "water" bits must evaporate. That sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense: after $50$ "water" bits evaporate, we'll have a potato with $49$ "water" bits and $1$ "potato" bit. That's a total of $50$ bits (so half the weight as before), which are $98$% water and $2$% potato.
This explains the drastic weight loss — $1$% of the water evaporating is equal to a $50$% weight loss! (which is technically an incorrect conclusion to draw, but it's more to increase the "paradoxiness" of the puzzle.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is sort–of a "footnote" to mocarsha2019's answer, but I've decided to post my own answer instead.
As mocarsha noted, the potatoes probably dried out and lost some of their weight in water.
This question reminded me of this video by Vsauce2. The question they pose sounds awfully similar to the situation encountered here... but posed the other way.
Imagine you have a sack of potatoes which is $99$% water and $1$% "potato". Overnight (or during the day, in this case), the potatoes dry out a bit and now they're $98$% water and $2$% potato. How much weight have the potatoes lost?
The counterintuitive solution is that the potatoes have lost half of their weight (kinda like the scenario described above!
To show this, we can imagine that each potato is made of $100$ "bits", where $99$ of the bits are "water" and $1$ of the bits are "potato". That'll yield a potato which is $99$% water and $1$% potato. To reach the desired configuration of $98$% water and $2$% potato, $50$ of the "water" bits must evaporate. That sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense: after $50$ "water" bits evaporate, we'll have a potato with $49$ "water" bits and $1$ "potato" bit. That's a total of $50$ bits (so half the weight as before), which are $98$% water and $2$% potato.
This explains the drastic weight loss — $1$% of the water evaporating is equal to a $50$% weight loss! (which is technically an incorrect conclusion to draw, but it's more to increase the "paradoxiness" of the puzzle.
$endgroup$
This is sort–of a "footnote" to mocarsha2019's answer, but I've decided to post my own answer instead.
As mocarsha noted, the potatoes probably dried out and lost some of their weight in water.
This question reminded me of this video by Vsauce2. The question they pose sounds awfully similar to the situation encountered here... but posed the other way.
Imagine you have a sack of potatoes which is $99$% water and $1$% "potato". Overnight (or during the day, in this case), the potatoes dry out a bit and now they're $98$% water and $2$% potato. How much weight have the potatoes lost?
The counterintuitive solution is that the potatoes have lost half of their weight (kinda like the scenario described above!
To show this, we can imagine that each potato is made of $100$ "bits", where $99$ of the bits are "water" and $1$ of the bits are "potato". That'll yield a potato which is $99$% water and $1$% potato. To reach the desired configuration of $98$% water and $2$% potato, $50$ of the "water" bits must evaporate. That sounds counterintuitive, but it makes sense: after $50$ "water" bits evaporate, we'll have a potato with $49$ "water" bits and $1$ "potato" bit. That's a total of $50$ bits (so half the weight as before), which are $98$% water and $2$% potato.
This explains the drastic weight loss — $1$% of the water evaporating is equal to a $50$% weight loss! (which is technically an incorrect conclusion to draw, but it's more to increase the "paradoxiness" of the puzzle.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
HughHugh
1,6471720
1,6471720
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
So after watching the video, you’re right! It does sound oddly familiar haha I was actually reading this and decided to pose the question here.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PerpetualJ Pretty much the same thing, I'd say. The "Potato Paradox" is such an interesting concept!
$endgroup$
– Hugh
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
It is indeed! I stumbled across it while researching a topic for a paper.
$endgroup$
– PerpetualJ
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The potatoes were boiled and got dried in the sun, losing weight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The potatoes were boiled and got dried in the sun, losing weight.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The potatoes were boiled and got dried in the sun, losing weight.
$endgroup$
The potatoes were boiled and got dried in the sun, losing weight.
answered 6 hours ago
mocarsha2019mocarsha2019
1714
1714
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The market is on a space ship. She flew up from a planet on which the potatoes weighed 100lbs. On the space ship there is a rotating whatzit that creates an artificial gravity equal to half that of the planet's surface. It's a dystopian world. They are still using pounds: had she been using the galactic standard units (GI) she'd be measuring in kg and her potatoes would be fine. Also no-one would have been able to take advantage of her. She got lucky this time not having any sales. "This would never happen in Europe. Or Japan. Or Australia. Or Kenya. Or really anywhere else in the free thinking world. Or even most of the various dictatorships." What kind of craziness have we gotten (using the archaic form) ourselves into? Her scientific literacy was not great, thanks to the recent tax cuts for the wealthy which had necessitated a cut in school funding. But the trillionaires will be fine which consoled her for some reason. One educational theme that still featured strongly was that this coddling of trillionaires was important for some reason. But never fear: when she gets back home her potatoes will be 100 pounds again. It's a sad day, though, when all her efforts getting to market on a rocket don't yield a single sale...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The market is on a space ship. She flew up from a planet on which the potatoes weighed 100lbs. On the space ship there is a rotating whatzit that creates an artificial gravity equal to half that of the planet's surface. It's a dystopian world. They are still using pounds: had she been using the galactic standard units (GI) she'd be measuring in kg and her potatoes would be fine. Also no-one would have been able to take advantage of her. She got lucky this time not having any sales. "This would never happen in Europe. Or Japan. Or Australia. Or Kenya. Or really anywhere else in the free thinking world. Or even most of the various dictatorships." What kind of craziness have we gotten (using the archaic form) ourselves into? Her scientific literacy was not great, thanks to the recent tax cuts for the wealthy which had necessitated a cut in school funding. But the trillionaires will be fine which consoled her for some reason. One educational theme that still featured strongly was that this coddling of trillionaires was important for some reason. But never fear: when she gets back home her potatoes will be 100 pounds again. It's a sad day, though, when all her efforts getting to market on a rocket don't yield a single sale...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The market is on a space ship. She flew up from a planet on which the potatoes weighed 100lbs. On the space ship there is a rotating whatzit that creates an artificial gravity equal to half that of the planet's surface. It's a dystopian world. They are still using pounds: had she been using the galactic standard units (GI) she'd be measuring in kg and her potatoes would be fine. Also no-one would have been able to take advantage of her. She got lucky this time not having any sales. "This would never happen in Europe. Or Japan. Or Australia. Or Kenya. Or really anywhere else in the free thinking world. Or even most of the various dictatorships." What kind of craziness have we gotten (using the archaic form) ourselves into? Her scientific literacy was not great, thanks to the recent tax cuts for the wealthy which had necessitated a cut in school funding. But the trillionaires will be fine which consoled her for some reason. One educational theme that still featured strongly was that this coddling of trillionaires was important for some reason. But never fear: when she gets back home her potatoes will be 100 pounds again. It's a sad day, though, when all her efforts getting to market on a rocket don't yield a single sale...
$endgroup$
The market is on a space ship. She flew up from a planet on which the potatoes weighed 100lbs. On the space ship there is a rotating whatzit that creates an artificial gravity equal to half that of the planet's surface. It's a dystopian world. They are still using pounds: had she been using the galactic standard units (GI) she'd be measuring in kg and her potatoes would be fine. Also no-one would have been able to take advantage of her. She got lucky this time not having any sales. "This would never happen in Europe. Or Japan. Or Australia. Or Kenya. Or really anywhere else in the free thinking world. Or even most of the various dictatorships." What kind of craziness have we gotten (using the archaic form) ourselves into? Her scientific literacy was not great, thanks to the recent tax cuts for the wealthy which had necessitated a cut in school funding. But the trillionaires will be fine which consoled her for some reason. One educational theme that still featured strongly was that this coddling of trillionaires was important for some reason. But never fear: when she gets back home her potatoes will be 100 pounds again. It's a sad day, though, when all her efforts getting to market on a rocket don't yield a single sale...
answered 5 hours ago
Dr XorileDr Xorile
12k22567
12k22567
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f79483%2fits-just-a-little-weight%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown