Can two planets in an empty universe meet/be pulled together?












3












$begingroup$


For this question assume that the entire universe is completely empty. The universe is not expanding or contracting, it is completely motionless.



Only two identical earths without moon are left in the entire universe and they are 5 billion light years apart. From their starting position the earths do not spin or move.



Would these planets ever meet/pulled together?
Or are the their respective gravities too small to have any meaningful effect?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For a good 5 billions ly they ignore each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I want to say that probably you consider the entire universe as to be the entire visible and/or observable universe. The accepted answer is indeed satisfactory only under several assumption. It is more to answer about two generic masses in a static enormous room. Else cosmology sets in
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I am familiar with the differences, but for this question to work i needed to be sure there where no outside factors affecting the two planets.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the universe expanding?
    $endgroup$
    – userLTK
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is not I'm sorry this was not mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    8 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


For this question assume that the entire universe is completely empty. The universe is not expanding or contracting, it is completely motionless.



Only two identical earths without moon are left in the entire universe and they are 5 billion light years apart. From their starting position the earths do not spin or move.



Would these planets ever meet/pulled together?
Or are the their respective gravities too small to have any meaningful effect?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For a good 5 billions ly they ignore each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I want to say that probably you consider the entire universe as to be the entire visible and/or observable universe. The accepted answer is indeed satisfactory only under several assumption. It is more to answer about two generic masses in a static enormous room. Else cosmology sets in
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I am familiar with the differences, but for this question to work i needed to be sure there where no outside factors affecting the two planets.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the universe expanding?
    $endgroup$
    – userLTK
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is not I'm sorry this was not mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    8 hours ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


For this question assume that the entire universe is completely empty. The universe is not expanding or contracting, it is completely motionless.



Only two identical earths without moon are left in the entire universe and they are 5 billion light years apart. From their starting position the earths do not spin or move.



Would these planets ever meet/pulled together?
Or are the their respective gravities too small to have any meaningful effect?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




For this question assume that the entire universe is completely empty. The universe is not expanding or contracting, it is completely motionless.



Only two identical earths without moon are left in the entire universe and they are 5 billion light years apart. From their starting position the earths do not spin or move.



Would these planets ever meet/pulled together?
Or are the their respective gravities too small to have any meaningful effect?







gravity universe observable-universe rogue-planet






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago







tom

















asked 13 hours ago









tomtom

466




466












  • $begingroup$
    For a good 5 billions ly they ignore each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I want to say that probably you consider the entire universe as to be the entire visible and/or observable universe. The accepted answer is indeed satisfactory only under several assumption. It is more to answer about two generic masses in a static enormous room. Else cosmology sets in
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I am familiar with the differences, but for this question to work i needed to be sure there where no outside factors affecting the two planets.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the universe expanding?
    $endgroup$
    – userLTK
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is not I'm sorry this was not mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    8 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    For a good 5 billions ly they ignore each other.
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I want to say that probably you consider the entire universe as to be the entire visible and/or observable universe. The accepted answer is indeed satisfactory only under several assumption. It is more to answer about two generic masses in a static enormous room. Else cosmology sets in
    $endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I am familiar with the differences, but for this question to work i needed to be sure there where no outside factors affecting the two planets.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    12 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is the universe expanding?
    $endgroup$
    – userLTK
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It is not I'm sorry this was not mentioned.
    $endgroup$
    – tom
    8 hours ago
















$begingroup$
For a good 5 billions ly they ignore each other.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
For a good 5 billions ly they ignore each other.
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
I want to say that probably you consider the entire universe as to be the entire visible and/or observable universe. The accepted answer is indeed satisfactory only under several assumption. It is more to answer about two generic masses in a static enormous room. Else cosmology sets in
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
I want to say that probably you consider the entire universe as to be the entire visible and/or observable universe. The accepted answer is indeed satisfactory only under several assumption. It is more to answer about two generic masses in a static enormous room. Else cosmology sets in
$endgroup$
– Alchimista
12 hours ago












$begingroup$
I am familiar with the differences, but for this question to work i needed to be sure there where no outside factors affecting the two planets.
$endgroup$
– tom
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
I am familiar with the differences, but for this question to work i needed to be sure there where no outside factors affecting the two planets.
$endgroup$
– tom
12 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Is the universe expanding?
$endgroup$
– userLTK
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Is the universe expanding?
$endgroup$
– userLTK
10 hours ago












$begingroup$
It is not I'm sorry this was not mentioned.
$endgroup$
– tom
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
It is not I'm sorry this was not mentioned.
$endgroup$
– tom
8 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Yes, they would experience gravitational attraction. It would take a long time for them to collide... the formula is



$$sqrt{frac{d^3}{2G(m_1+m_2)}}$$
where $d$ is the distance, m1 and m2 are the masses of the planets, and G is the Gravitational constant. This gives a time of about $10^{23}$ years, much much longer than the universe has existed. This assumes Newtonian mechanics. Relativity would not change the conclusion much.



There is no known upper limit to gravity, and plenty of indirect evidence that it has no upper limit.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you are right. I shall edit.
    $endgroup$
    – James K
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    5 hours ago



















-1












$begingroup$

I think Yes and No



Yes: Given that the universe isn't expanding at a faster rate than the speed of the gravity effect of those objects, then the gravity effect of them would be able to reach one another.



Even then it would take a very long time for the gravity effects of the objects to reach one another, so the objects would just stay there motionless for ages before starting to move towards eachother.



No: For the objects to reach one another it would mean that the universe would need to be expanding slower than the maximum speed that those objects can reach, any faster than that and they would never reach eachother even if they were moving towards eachother.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "514"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29519%2fcan-two-planets-in-an-empty-universe-meet-be-pulled-together%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, they would experience gravitational attraction. It would take a long time for them to collide... the formula is



    $$sqrt{frac{d^3}{2G(m_1+m_2)}}$$
    where $d$ is the distance, m1 and m2 are the masses of the planets, and G is the Gravitational constant. This gives a time of about $10^{23}$ years, much much longer than the universe has existed. This assumes Newtonian mechanics. Relativity would not change the conclusion much.



    There is no known upper limit to gravity, and plenty of indirect evidence that it has no upper limit.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 4




      $begingroup$
      "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think you are right. I shall edit.
      $endgroup$
      – James K
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      5 hours ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, they would experience gravitational attraction. It would take a long time for them to collide... the formula is



    $$sqrt{frac{d^3}{2G(m_1+m_2)}}$$
    where $d$ is the distance, m1 and m2 are the masses of the planets, and G is the Gravitational constant. This gives a time of about $10^{23}$ years, much much longer than the universe has existed. This assumes Newtonian mechanics. Relativity would not change the conclusion much.



    There is no known upper limit to gravity, and plenty of indirect evidence that it has no upper limit.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 4




      $begingroup$
      "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think you are right. I shall edit.
      $endgroup$
      – James K
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      5 hours ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Yes, they would experience gravitational attraction. It would take a long time for them to collide... the formula is



    $$sqrt{frac{d^3}{2G(m_1+m_2)}}$$
    where $d$ is the distance, m1 and m2 are the masses of the planets, and G is the Gravitational constant. This gives a time of about $10^{23}$ years, much much longer than the universe has existed. This assumes Newtonian mechanics. Relativity would not change the conclusion much.



    There is no known upper limit to gravity, and plenty of indirect evidence that it has no upper limit.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Yes, they would experience gravitational attraction. It would take a long time for them to collide... the formula is



    $$sqrt{frac{d^3}{2G(m_1+m_2)}}$$
    where $d$ is the distance, m1 and m2 are the masses of the planets, and G is the Gravitational constant. This gives a time of about $10^{23}$ years, much much longer than the universe has existed. This assumes Newtonian mechanics. Relativity would not change the conclusion much.



    There is no known upper limit to gravity, and plenty of indirect evidence that it has no upper limit.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 13 hours ago









    James KJames K

    33.8k254116




    33.8k254116








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think you are right. I shall edit.
      $endgroup$
      – James K
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      5 hours ago














    • 4




      $begingroup$
      "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
      $endgroup$
      – Tanner Swett
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I think you are right. I shall edit.
      $endgroup$
      – James K
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      5 hours ago








    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    "the planets would (after billions of billions of years) actually be travelling at relativistic speeds." - Would they, though? If the planets were originally motionless, that means that when they encounter each other, they must be traveling slower than escape speed, right?
    $endgroup$
    – Tanner Swett
    7 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I think you are right. I shall edit.
    $endgroup$
    – James K
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I think you are right. I shall edit.
    $endgroup$
    – James K
    6 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    The collision speed of a test particle falling to Earth from infinity is equal to the escape velocity, about 11 km/s. For 2 Earth-mass bodies, the speed will be similar, I think you can just multiply it by $sqrt 2$, but I'm too sleepy to do the algebra right now. ;)
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    5 hours ago











    -1












    $begingroup$

    I think Yes and No



    Yes: Given that the universe isn't expanding at a faster rate than the speed of the gravity effect of those objects, then the gravity effect of them would be able to reach one another.



    Even then it would take a very long time for the gravity effects of the objects to reach one another, so the objects would just stay there motionless for ages before starting to move towards eachother.



    No: For the objects to reach one another it would mean that the universe would need to be expanding slower than the maximum speed that those objects can reach, any faster than that and they would never reach eachother even if they were moving towards eachother.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      -1












      $begingroup$

      I think Yes and No



      Yes: Given that the universe isn't expanding at a faster rate than the speed of the gravity effect of those objects, then the gravity effect of them would be able to reach one another.



      Even then it would take a very long time for the gravity effects of the objects to reach one another, so the objects would just stay there motionless for ages before starting to move towards eachother.



      No: For the objects to reach one another it would mean that the universe would need to be expanding slower than the maximum speed that those objects can reach, any faster than that and they would never reach eachother even if they were moving towards eachother.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        -1












        -1








        -1





        $begingroup$

        I think Yes and No



        Yes: Given that the universe isn't expanding at a faster rate than the speed of the gravity effect of those objects, then the gravity effect of them would be able to reach one another.



        Even then it would take a very long time for the gravity effects of the objects to reach one another, so the objects would just stay there motionless for ages before starting to move towards eachother.



        No: For the objects to reach one another it would mean that the universe would need to be expanding slower than the maximum speed that those objects can reach, any faster than that and they would never reach eachother even if they were moving towards eachother.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I think Yes and No



        Yes: Given that the universe isn't expanding at a faster rate than the speed of the gravity effect of those objects, then the gravity effect of them would be able to reach one another.



        Even then it would take a very long time for the gravity effects of the objects to reach one another, so the objects would just stay there motionless for ages before starting to move towards eachother.



        No: For the objects to reach one another it would mean that the universe would need to be expanding slower than the maximum speed that those objects can reach, any faster than that and they would never reach eachother even if they were moving towards eachother.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 4 hours ago





















        New contributor




        Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 5 hours ago









        NoobNoob

        12




        12




        New contributor




        Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Noob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Astronomy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fastronomy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29519%2fcan-two-planets-in-an-empty-universe-meet-be-pulled-together%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Vallis Paradisi

            Tabula Rosettana