How to edit matrix
Is there a way to remove the right vertical line in this matrix:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ begin{vmatrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{vmatrix}$
end{document}
matrices
add a comment |
Is there a way to remove the right vertical line in this matrix:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ begin{vmatrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{vmatrix}$
end{document}
matrices
3
documentclass{article} usepackage{amsmath} begin{document} $ left| begin{matrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68 end{matrix}right.$ end{document}
?
– marmot
11 hours ago
Well that was scary fast. It works good.
– Simeon Simeonov
11 hours ago
3
Slow marmots get caught by the eagles. ;-)
– marmot
11 hours ago
1
@marmot it is better to run, dear marmot!! ^-^
– manooooh
11 hours ago
add a comment |
Is there a way to remove the right vertical line in this matrix:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ begin{vmatrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{vmatrix}$
end{document}
matrices
Is there a way to remove the right vertical line in this matrix:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ begin{vmatrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{vmatrix}$
end{document}
matrices
matrices
edited 11 hours ago
Simeon Simeonov
asked 11 hours ago
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3796
3796
3
documentclass{article} usepackage{amsmath} begin{document} $ left| begin{matrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68 end{matrix}right.$ end{document}
?
– marmot
11 hours ago
Well that was scary fast. It works good.
– Simeon Simeonov
11 hours ago
3
Slow marmots get caught by the eagles. ;-)
– marmot
11 hours ago
1
@marmot it is better to run, dear marmot!! ^-^
– manooooh
11 hours ago
add a comment |
3
documentclass{article} usepackage{amsmath} begin{document} $ left| begin{matrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68 end{matrix}right.$ end{document}
?
– marmot
11 hours ago
Well that was scary fast. It works good.
– Simeon Simeonov
11 hours ago
3
Slow marmots get caught by the eagles. ;-)
– marmot
11 hours ago
1
@marmot it is better to run, dear marmot!! ^-^
– manooooh
11 hours ago
3
3
documentclass{article} usepackage{amsmath} begin{document} $ left| begin{matrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68 end{matrix}right.$ end{document}
?– marmot
11 hours ago
documentclass{article} usepackage{amsmath} begin{document} $ left| begin{matrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68 end{matrix}right.$ end{document}
?– marmot
11 hours ago
Well that was scary fast. It works good.
– Simeon Simeonov
11 hours ago
Well that was scary fast. It works good.
– Simeon Simeonov
11 hours ago
3
3
Slow marmots get caught by the eagles. ;-)
– marmot
11 hours ago
Slow marmots get caught by the eagles. ;-)
– marmot
11 hours ago
1
1
@marmot it is better to run, dear marmot!! ^-^
– manooooh
11 hours ago
@marmot it is better to run, dear marmot!! ^-^
– manooooh
11 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You maybe want to use systeme
, rather than a matrix for that, which makes for even easier input:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{systeme}
begin{document}
[
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
sysdelim|.
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
syssubstitute{{a}{alpha}{b}{beta}}
systeme[alphabeta]{
3alpha - beta = 180,
alpha + 2beta = 68
}
]
end{document}
The traditional grouping is done with a brace, but you can also use a vertical bar as shown. If you want that all your systems have a vertical bar, type the sysdelim|.
command in the preamble.
Latin letters need not be declared as variables in the optional argument to systeme
.
Why notcases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us thesysteme
package!!
– manooooh
11 hours ago
1
@manooooh Becausesysteme
ensures good alignment.
– egreg
11 hours ago
1
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
add a comment |
It does work with matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
left| begin{matrix}
alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{matrix} right.
]
end{document}
add a comment |
I would do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ left| begin{array}{@{}*{4}{c@{,}}l}
alpha & -& beta &=&180\
alpha & +&beta &=&68
end{array}right.$
end{document}
This is more effort, but avoids potential headaches like here, here and here.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474088%2fhow-to-edit-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You maybe want to use systeme
, rather than a matrix for that, which makes for even easier input:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{systeme}
begin{document}
[
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
sysdelim|.
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
syssubstitute{{a}{alpha}{b}{beta}}
systeme[alphabeta]{
3alpha - beta = 180,
alpha + 2beta = 68
}
]
end{document}
The traditional grouping is done with a brace, but you can also use a vertical bar as shown. If you want that all your systems have a vertical bar, type the sysdelim|.
command in the preamble.
Latin letters need not be declared as variables in the optional argument to systeme
.
Why notcases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us thesysteme
package!!
– manooooh
11 hours ago
1
@manooooh Becausesysteme
ensures good alignment.
– egreg
11 hours ago
1
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You maybe want to use systeme
, rather than a matrix for that, which makes for even easier input:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{systeme}
begin{document}
[
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
sysdelim|.
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
syssubstitute{{a}{alpha}{b}{beta}}
systeme[alphabeta]{
3alpha - beta = 180,
alpha + 2beta = 68
}
]
end{document}
The traditional grouping is done with a brace, but you can also use a vertical bar as shown. If you want that all your systems have a vertical bar, type the sysdelim|.
command in the preamble.
Latin letters need not be declared as variables in the optional argument to systeme
.
Why notcases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us thesysteme
package!!
– manooooh
11 hours ago
1
@manooooh Becausesysteme
ensures good alignment.
– egreg
11 hours ago
1
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
add a comment |
You maybe want to use systeme
, rather than a matrix for that, which makes for even easier input:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{systeme}
begin{document}
[
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
sysdelim|.
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
syssubstitute{{a}{alpha}{b}{beta}}
systeme[alphabeta]{
3alpha - beta = 180,
alpha + 2beta = 68
}
]
end{document}
The traditional grouping is done with a brace, but you can also use a vertical bar as shown. If you want that all your systems have a vertical bar, type the sysdelim|.
command in the preamble.
Latin letters need not be declared as variables in the optional argument to systeme
.
You maybe want to use systeme
, rather than a matrix for that, which makes for even easier input:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
usepackage{systeme}
begin{document}
[
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
sysdelim|.
systeme[alphabeta]{
alpha-beta=180,
alpha+beta=68
}
]
[
syssubstitute{{a}{alpha}{b}{beta}}
systeme[alphabeta]{
3alpha - beta = 180,
alpha + 2beta = 68
}
]
end{document}
The traditional grouping is done with a brace, but you can also use a vertical bar as shown. If you want that all your systems have a vertical bar, type the sysdelim|.
command in the preamble.
Latin letters need not be declared as variables in the optional argument to systeme
.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
egregegreg
718k8719053202
718k8719053202
Why notcases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us thesysteme
package!!
– manooooh
11 hours ago
1
@manooooh Becausesysteme
ensures good alignment.
– egreg
11 hours ago
1
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Why notcases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us thesysteme
package!!
– manooooh
11 hours ago
1
@manooooh Becausesysteme
ensures good alignment.
– egreg
11 hours ago
1
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
Why not
cases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us the systeme
package!!– manooooh
11 hours ago
Why not
cases
environment? Btw thank you for showing us the systeme
package!!– manooooh
11 hours ago
1
1
@manooooh Because
systeme
ensures good alignment.– egreg
11 hours ago
@manooooh Because
systeme
ensures good alignment.– egreg
11 hours ago
1
1
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
@marmot Fixed..
– egreg
7 hours ago
add a comment |
It does work with matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
left| begin{matrix}
alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{matrix} right.
]
end{document}
add a comment |
It does work with matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
left| begin{matrix}
alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{matrix} right.
]
end{document}
add a comment |
It does work with matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
left| begin{matrix}
alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{matrix} right.
]
end{document}
It does work with matrix
:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
[
left| begin{matrix}
alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68
end{matrix} right.
]
end{document}
answered 11 hours ago
T. PluessT. Pluess
66828
66828
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ left| begin{array}{@{}*{4}{c@{,}}l}
alpha & -& beta &=&180\
alpha & +&beta &=&68
end{array}right.$
end{document}
This is more effort, but avoids potential headaches like here, here and here.
add a comment |
I would do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ left| begin{array}{@{}*{4}{c@{,}}l}
alpha & -& beta &=&180\
alpha & +&beta &=&68
end{array}right.$
end{document}
This is more effort, but avoids potential headaches like here, here and here.
add a comment |
I would do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ left| begin{array}{@{}*{4}{c@{,}}l}
alpha & -& beta &=&180\
alpha & +&beta &=&68
end{array}right.$
end{document}
This is more effort, but avoids potential headaches like here, here and here.
I would do
documentclass{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
$ left| begin{array}{@{}*{4}{c@{,}}l}
alpha & -& beta &=&180\
alpha & +&beta &=&68
end{array}right.$
end{document}
This is more effort, but avoids potential headaches like here, here and here.
answered 11 hours ago
marmotmarmot
98.7k4113219
98.7k4113219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474088%2fhow-to-edit-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
documentclass{article} usepackage{amsmath} begin{document} $ left| begin{matrix} alpha & -& beta =180\ alpha & +&beta =68 end{matrix}right.$ end{document}
?– marmot
11 hours ago
Well that was scary fast. It works good.
– Simeon Simeonov
11 hours ago
3
Slow marmots get caught by the eagles. ;-)
– marmot
11 hours ago
1
@marmot it is better to run, dear marmot!! ^-^
– manooooh
11 hours ago