Force a sum to be calculated












1












$begingroup$


I want to force this sum to be calculated to 1



Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}]


Only DiscretePlot3D gives the correct result showing all point to 1






summation







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For what values of $n$ and $m$?
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    5 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


I want to force this sum to be calculated to 1



Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}]


Only DiscretePlot3D gives the correct result showing all point to 1






summation







share|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For what values of $n$ and $m$?
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    5 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I want to force this sum to be calculated to 1



Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}]


Only DiscretePlot3D gives the correct result showing all point to 1






summation







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I want to force this sum to be calculated to 1



Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}]


Only DiscretePlot3D gives the correct result showing all point to 1






summation




summation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









NitraNitra

676




676












  • $begingroup$
    For what values of $n$ and $m$?
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    5 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    For what values of $n$ and $m$?
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    5 hours ago
















$begingroup$
For what values of $n$ and $m$?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
For what values of $n$ and $m$?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
5 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The following code might do what you want:



s0 = Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}] // Simplify;

s1 = s0 /. {Cos[X_] - Cos[Y_] -> 2 Sin[(X + Y)/2] Sin[(Y - X)/2]};

s2 = s1 /. {Sin[x_] :> Sin[Factor@x], 

            Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)]};

s3 = Simplify[s2, m [Element] Integers]


which evaluates to 1. The step to s1 was easy, but I had to do lots of experimentation to find the steps to s2 and s3. In particular the rule
Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)] assumes that m is an integer but I could not get Mathematica to do it automatically. There may be better ways to simplify the sum s0 but perhaps others can produce them.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "387"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191679%2fforce-a-sum-to-be-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The following code might do what you want:



    s0 = Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}] // Simplify;
    
s1 = s0 /. {Cos[X_] - Cos[Y_] -> 2 Sin[(X + Y)/2] Sin[(Y - X)/2]};
    
s2 = s1 /. {Sin[x_] :> Sin[Factor@x], 
    
            Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)]};
    
s3 = Simplify[s2, m [Element] Integers]


    which evaluates to 1. The step to s1 was easy, but I had to do lots of experimentation to find the steps to s2 and s3. In particular the rule
    Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)] assumes that m is an integer but I could not get Mathematica to do it automatically. There may be better ways to simplify the sum s0 but perhaps others can produce them.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The following code might do what you want:



      s0 = Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}] // Simplify;
      
s1 = s0 /. {Cos[X_] - Cos[Y_] -> 2 Sin[(X + Y)/2] Sin[(Y - X)/2]};
      
s2 = s1 /. {Sin[x_] :> Sin[Factor@x], 
      
            Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)]};
      
s3 = Simplify[s2, m [Element] Integers]


      which evaluates to 1. The step to s1 was easy, but I had to do lots of experimentation to find the steps to s2 and s3. In particular the rule
      Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)] assumes that m is an integer but I could not get Mathematica to do it automatically. There may be better ways to simplify the sum s0 but perhaps others can produce them.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The following code might do what you want:



        s0 = Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}] // Simplify;
        
s1 = s0 /. {Cos[X_] - Cos[Y_] -> 2 Sin[(X + Y)/2] Sin[(Y - X)/2]};
        
s2 = s1 /. {Sin[x_] :> Sin[Factor@x], 
        
            Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)]};
        
s3 = Simplify[s2, m [Element] Integers]


        which evaluates to 1. The step to s1 was easy, but I had to do lots of experimentation to find the steps to s2 and s3. In particular the rule
        Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)] assumes that m is an integer but I could not get Mathematica to do it automatically. There may be better ways to simplify the sum s0 but perhaps others can produce them.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The following code might do what you want:



        s0 = Sum[Cos[(Pi*l*(2*m + 1))/(n + 1)], {l, 0, n}] // Simplify;
        
s1 = s0 /. {Cos[X_] - Cos[Y_] -> 2 Sin[(X + Y)/2] Sin[(Y - X)/2]};
        
s2 = s1 /. {Sin[x_] :> Sin[Factor@x], 
        
            Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)]};
        
s3 = Simplify[s2, m [Element] Integers]


        which evaluates to 1. The step to s1 was easy, but I had to do lots of experimentation to find the steps to s2 and s3. In particular the rule
        Csc[x_] :> -Sin[(m + 1/2) Pi]/Sin[(m Pi - x)] assumes that m is an integer but I could not get Mathematica to do it automatically. There may be better ways to simplify the sum s0 but perhaps others can produce them.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 36 mins ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        SomosSomos

        1,07019




        1,07019






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f191679%2fforce-a-sum-to-be-calculated%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to label and detect the document text images

            Image
            1 $begingroup$ This is what I mean as document text image: I want to label the texts in image as separate blocks and my model should detect these labels as classes. NOTE: This is how the end result should be like: The labels like Block 1, Block 2, Block 3,.. should be Logo, Title, Date,.. Others, etc. Work done: First approach : I tried to implement this method via Object Detection, it didn't work. It didn't even detect any text. Second approach : Then I tried it using PixelLink. As this model is build for scene text detection, it detected each and every text in the image. But this method can detect multiple lines of text if the threshold values are increased. But I have no idea how do I add labels to the text blocks. PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones = 'PIXEL_CLS_WEIGHT_all_ones' PIXEL_C...
            Read more

            Vallis Paradisi

            Image
            Coordinata: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap} 33°03′S 71°37′W  /  33.05°S 71.617°W  / -33.05; -71.617 Vallis Paradisi Res apud Vicidata repertae: Civitas : Chilia Numerus incolarum : 296 655 Zona horaria : UTC-4 Situs interretialis Nomen officiale : Valparaíso Gubernium Consilium : municipal council of Valparaíso Geographia Superficies : 401 600 000 Metrum quadratum Coniunctiones urbium Urbes gemellae : Ovetum , Badalona , Santa Fe , Ora longa , Sciamhaevum , Quantunia , Callao , Bat Yam , Melaka , Novorossiysk , Busan , Corduba , Odessa , Rosario , Malacca , Barcino , Soteropolis , Franciscopolis (California) , Guanajuato, Silao Tabula aut despectus Despectus in portum sinumque et urbem Vallis Paradisi Vallis Para...
            Read more

            Tabula Rosettana

            Image
            Tabula multilinguis Rosettana in Museo Britannico ostenditur. Tabula Rosettana, [1] etiam titulo OGIS 90 agnita, est stela decreto de rebus sacris in Aegypto anno 196 a.C.n. lato inscripta. Tabula iuxta Rosettam Aegypti, urbem in delta Nili et ad oram maris Mediterranei iacentem, anno 1799 a milite Francico reperta est. Inventio stelae, linguis duabus scripturisque tribus inscriptae, eruditis Instituti Aegypti statim nuntiata est; ibi enim iussu imperatoris Napoleonis eruditi omnium scientiarum (sub aegide Commissionis Scientiarum et Artium) properaverant cum expeditione Francica. Qua a Britannis mox debellata, tabula Rosettana Londinium missa hodie apud Museum Britannicum iacet. Textus Graecus cito lectus interpretationi textuum Aegyptiorum (in formis hieroglyphica et demotica expressorum) gradatim adiuvit. Denique textum plene interpretatus est Ioannes Franciscus Champollion. Ab opere eruditorum cumulativo coepit hodiernus scripturae hieroglyphicae linguaeque Aegyptiae a...
            Read more