Do the minifigures have any control of their actions within the LEGO world?












14















Spoilers for The LEGO Movie below.



In The LEGO Movie we eventually learn that




all of the LEGO world is just a man's basement toy collection. However, the minifigures are sentient and capable of limited movement within the real world.




Within the LEGO World, are all the minifigures' actions manipulated by humans, or do they control themselves to any degree?



As an extension, are their personalities and emotions their own, or are they simply mandated by their controllers?










share|improve this question




















  • 6





    Maybe they do in the movie, but in real life I dominate and abuse my minifigs as I see fit. It's not a democracy.

    – Major Stackings
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:56
















14















Spoilers for The LEGO Movie below.



In The LEGO Movie we eventually learn that




all of the LEGO world is just a man's basement toy collection. However, the minifigures are sentient and capable of limited movement within the real world.




Within the LEGO World, are all the minifigures' actions manipulated by humans, or do they control themselves to any degree?



As an extension, are their personalities and emotions their own, or are they simply mandated by their controllers?










share|improve this question




















  • 6





    Maybe they do in the movie, but in real life I dominate and abuse my minifigs as I see fit. It's not a democracy.

    – Major Stackings
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:56














14












14








14


1






Spoilers for The LEGO Movie below.



In The LEGO Movie we eventually learn that




all of the LEGO world is just a man's basement toy collection. However, the minifigures are sentient and capable of limited movement within the real world.




Within the LEGO World, are all the minifigures' actions manipulated by humans, or do they control themselves to any degree?



As an extension, are their personalities and emotions their own, or are they simply mandated by their controllers?










share|improve this question
















Spoilers for The LEGO Movie below.



In The LEGO Movie we eventually learn that




all of the LEGO world is just a man's basement toy collection. However, the minifigures are sentient and capable of limited movement within the real world.




Within the LEGO World, are all the minifigures' actions manipulated by humans, or do they control themselves to any degree?



As an extension, are their personalities and emotions their own, or are they simply mandated by their controllers?







sentience lego the-lego-movie






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 10 '16 at 11:08







Rogue Jedi

















asked Jul 10 '16 at 0:24









Rogue JediRogue Jedi

43.5k18224398




43.5k18224398








  • 6





    Maybe they do in the movie, but in real life I dominate and abuse my minifigs as I see fit. It's not a democracy.

    – Major Stackings
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:56














  • 6





    Maybe they do in the movie, but in real life I dominate and abuse my minifigs as I see fit. It's not a democracy.

    – Major Stackings
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:56








6




6





Maybe they do in the movie, but in real life I dominate and abuse my minifigs as I see fit. It's not a democracy.

– Major Stackings
Jul 10 '16 at 3:56





Maybe they do in the movie, but in real life I dominate and abuse my minifigs as I see fit. It's not a democracy.

– Major Stackings
Jul 10 '16 at 3:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15














The story of the Lego Movie is told as a story within a story. Emmet, the archetypal everyman hero is literally a randomly chosen minifigure that the child (Finn) manipulates in the overarching story that takes place within his imagination.



The events of the film are shown, at the end of the film to be set-pieces that the boy has made from Lego and is peopling from his own imagination. There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency.




Miller: They both were there from the beginning. You know, we wanted to do a real classic hero’s journey but then turn it on its
head. Where we wanted to have a chosen one who was chosen at random
and doesn’t actually have any skills whatsoever. So we thought that
was something interesting about everyone. And we also wanted to do
this other aspect of the story, which was really intrinsic to our
original concept of the movie.
And so we knew the storylines had to
talk to each other. It all had to be one and the same thematically.
And each one definitely informed the other.



Lord: I don’t think we knew how it was gonna work. I don’t think we were like “Yeah, we’re gonna figure out some way where these all
belong together.”



Miller: And it didn’t work for like well over a year of developing it, it just didn’t come together. And then…



Lord: There was a lot of pressure to drop the more meta story because, you know, the other story was working well. But then you
don’t really need that. We just sort of thought it was such a nice,
special thing and it seems like people are more or less, I don’t wanna
say surprised, but they’re sort of feel like in the end that’s the
thing that has to happen. And I’m glad that we persevered, finally.
Because sometimes you don’t know where else the movie could go. And
you’re hoping that it has one more move, you know?



/Film Interview: Phil Lord and Chris Miller Discuss ‘The Lego Movie’ Spoilers




Obviously it wouldn't be much of a fantasy film if Emmett wasn't just a little bit magical, but only enough to make the movie a treat for all rather than a straight-up moral play.






share|improve this answer



















  • 11





    "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

    – RedCaio
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:11








  • 1





    @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

    – Valorum
    Jul 10 '16 at 8:05






  • 1





    This answer is awesome!

    – Accio_Answer
    Jul 10 '16 at 11:25






  • 2





    @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

    – Valorum
    Jul 10 '16 at 11:33



















0














The end of The Lego Movie 2 heavily implies they do have control:




at the end of the movie, Rex and Emmet have a fight under a dryer which (based on the camera anyways) it appears impossible for a kid to have reached if he was playing with the pieces.






share























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134216%2fdo-the-minifigures-have-any-control-of-their-actions-within-the-lego-world%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15














    The story of the Lego Movie is told as a story within a story. Emmet, the archetypal everyman hero is literally a randomly chosen minifigure that the child (Finn) manipulates in the overarching story that takes place within his imagination.



    The events of the film are shown, at the end of the film to be set-pieces that the boy has made from Lego and is peopling from his own imagination. There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency.




    Miller: They both were there from the beginning. You know, we wanted to do a real classic hero’s journey but then turn it on its
    head. Where we wanted to have a chosen one who was chosen at random
    and doesn’t actually have any skills whatsoever. So we thought that
    was something interesting about everyone. And we also wanted to do
    this other aspect of the story, which was really intrinsic to our
    original concept of the movie.
    And so we knew the storylines had to
    talk to each other. It all had to be one and the same thematically.
    And each one definitely informed the other.



    Lord: I don’t think we knew how it was gonna work. I don’t think we were like “Yeah, we’re gonna figure out some way where these all
    belong together.”



    Miller: And it didn’t work for like well over a year of developing it, it just didn’t come together. And then…



    Lord: There was a lot of pressure to drop the more meta story because, you know, the other story was working well. But then you
    don’t really need that. We just sort of thought it was such a nice,
    special thing and it seems like people are more or less, I don’t wanna
    say surprised, but they’re sort of feel like in the end that’s the
    thing that has to happen. And I’m glad that we persevered, finally.
    Because sometimes you don’t know where else the movie could go. And
    you’re hoping that it has one more move, you know?



    /Film Interview: Phil Lord and Chris Miller Discuss ‘The Lego Movie’ Spoilers




    Obviously it wouldn't be much of a fantasy film if Emmett wasn't just a little bit magical, but only enough to make the movie a treat for all rather than a straight-up moral play.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 11





      "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

      – RedCaio
      Jul 10 '16 at 3:11








    • 1





      @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 8:05






    • 1





      This answer is awesome!

      – Accio_Answer
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:25






    • 2





      @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:33
















    15














    The story of the Lego Movie is told as a story within a story. Emmet, the archetypal everyman hero is literally a randomly chosen minifigure that the child (Finn) manipulates in the overarching story that takes place within his imagination.



    The events of the film are shown, at the end of the film to be set-pieces that the boy has made from Lego and is peopling from his own imagination. There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency.




    Miller: They both were there from the beginning. You know, we wanted to do a real classic hero’s journey but then turn it on its
    head. Where we wanted to have a chosen one who was chosen at random
    and doesn’t actually have any skills whatsoever. So we thought that
    was something interesting about everyone. And we also wanted to do
    this other aspect of the story, which was really intrinsic to our
    original concept of the movie.
    And so we knew the storylines had to
    talk to each other. It all had to be one and the same thematically.
    And each one definitely informed the other.



    Lord: I don’t think we knew how it was gonna work. I don’t think we were like “Yeah, we’re gonna figure out some way where these all
    belong together.”



    Miller: And it didn’t work for like well over a year of developing it, it just didn’t come together. And then…



    Lord: There was a lot of pressure to drop the more meta story because, you know, the other story was working well. But then you
    don’t really need that. We just sort of thought it was such a nice,
    special thing and it seems like people are more or less, I don’t wanna
    say surprised, but they’re sort of feel like in the end that’s the
    thing that has to happen. And I’m glad that we persevered, finally.
    Because sometimes you don’t know where else the movie could go. And
    you’re hoping that it has one more move, you know?



    /Film Interview: Phil Lord and Chris Miller Discuss ‘The Lego Movie’ Spoilers




    Obviously it wouldn't be much of a fantasy film if Emmett wasn't just a little bit magical, but only enough to make the movie a treat for all rather than a straight-up moral play.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 11





      "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

      – RedCaio
      Jul 10 '16 at 3:11








    • 1





      @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 8:05






    • 1





      This answer is awesome!

      – Accio_Answer
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:25






    • 2





      @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:33














    15












    15








    15







    The story of the Lego Movie is told as a story within a story. Emmet, the archetypal everyman hero is literally a randomly chosen minifigure that the child (Finn) manipulates in the overarching story that takes place within his imagination.



    The events of the film are shown, at the end of the film to be set-pieces that the boy has made from Lego and is peopling from his own imagination. There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency.




    Miller: They both were there from the beginning. You know, we wanted to do a real classic hero’s journey but then turn it on its
    head. Where we wanted to have a chosen one who was chosen at random
    and doesn’t actually have any skills whatsoever. So we thought that
    was something interesting about everyone. And we also wanted to do
    this other aspect of the story, which was really intrinsic to our
    original concept of the movie.
    And so we knew the storylines had to
    talk to each other. It all had to be one and the same thematically.
    And each one definitely informed the other.



    Lord: I don’t think we knew how it was gonna work. I don’t think we were like “Yeah, we’re gonna figure out some way where these all
    belong together.”



    Miller: And it didn’t work for like well over a year of developing it, it just didn’t come together. And then…



    Lord: There was a lot of pressure to drop the more meta story because, you know, the other story was working well. But then you
    don’t really need that. We just sort of thought it was such a nice,
    special thing and it seems like people are more or less, I don’t wanna
    say surprised, but they’re sort of feel like in the end that’s the
    thing that has to happen. And I’m glad that we persevered, finally.
    Because sometimes you don’t know where else the movie could go. And
    you’re hoping that it has one more move, you know?



    /Film Interview: Phil Lord and Chris Miller Discuss ‘The Lego Movie’ Spoilers




    Obviously it wouldn't be much of a fantasy film if Emmett wasn't just a little bit magical, but only enough to make the movie a treat for all rather than a straight-up moral play.






    share|improve this answer













    The story of the Lego Movie is told as a story within a story. Emmet, the archetypal everyman hero is literally a randomly chosen minifigure that the child (Finn) manipulates in the overarching story that takes place within his imagination.



    The events of the film are shown, at the end of the film to be set-pieces that the boy has made from Lego and is peopling from his own imagination. There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency.




    Miller: They both were there from the beginning. You know, we wanted to do a real classic hero’s journey but then turn it on its
    head. Where we wanted to have a chosen one who was chosen at random
    and doesn’t actually have any skills whatsoever. So we thought that
    was something interesting about everyone. And we also wanted to do
    this other aspect of the story, which was really intrinsic to our
    original concept of the movie.
    And so we knew the storylines had to
    talk to each other. It all had to be one and the same thematically.
    And each one definitely informed the other.



    Lord: I don’t think we knew how it was gonna work. I don’t think we were like “Yeah, we’re gonna figure out some way where these all
    belong together.”



    Miller: And it didn’t work for like well over a year of developing it, it just didn’t come together. And then…



    Lord: There was a lot of pressure to drop the more meta story because, you know, the other story was working well. But then you
    don’t really need that. We just sort of thought it was such a nice,
    special thing and it seems like people are more or less, I don’t wanna
    say surprised, but they’re sort of feel like in the end that’s the
    thing that has to happen. And I’m glad that we persevered, finally.
    Because sometimes you don’t know where else the movie could go. And
    you’re hoping that it has one more move, you know?



    /Film Interview: Phil Lord and Chris Miller Discuss ‘The Lego Movie’ Spoilers




    Obviously it wouldn't be much of a fantasy film if Emmett wasn't just a little bit magical, but only enough to make the movie a treat for all rather than a straight-up moral play.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jul 10 '16 at 0:40









    ValorumValorum

    403k10629373162




    403k10629373162








    • 11





      "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

      – RedCaio
      Jul 10 '16 at 3:11








    • 1





      @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 8:05






    • 1





      This answer is awesome!

      – Accio_Answer
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:25






    • 2





      @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:33














    • 11





      "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

      – RedCaio
      Jul 10 '16 at 3:11








    • 1





      @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 8:05






    • 1





      This answer is awesome!

      – Accio_Answer
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:25






    • 2





      @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

      – Valorum
      Jul 10 '16 at 11:33








    11




    11





    "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

    – RedCaio
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:11







    "There's no indication that they're really moving, nor have any personal agency." what about when Emmett manages to fall off the table and wiggle around for a bit?

    – RedCaio
    Jul 10 '16 at 3:11






    1




    1





    @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

    – Valorum
    Jul 10 '16 at 8:05





    @redcaio - Hence "a little bit magical"

    – Valorum
    Jul 10 '16 at 8:05




    1




    1





    This answer is awesome!

    – Accio_Answer
    Jul 10 '16 at 11:25





    This answer is awesome!

    – Accio_Answer
    Jul 10 '16 at 11:25




    2




    2





    @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

    – Valorum
    Jul 10 '16 at 11:33





    @Accio_Answer - Everything is awesome!!!!.

    – Valorum
    Jul 10 '16 at 11:33













    0














    The end of The Lego Movie 2 heavily implies they do have control:




    at the end of the movie, Rex and Emmet have a fight under a dryer which (based on the camera anyways) it appears impossible for a kid to have reached if he was playing with the pieces.






    share




























      0














      The end of The Lego Movie 2 heavily implies they do have control:




      at the end of the movie, Rex and Emmet have a fight under a dryer which (based on the camera anyways) it appears impossible for a kid to have reached if he was playing with the pieces.






      share


























        0












        0








        0







        The end of The Lego Movie 2 heavily implies they do have control:




        at the end of the movie, Rex and Emmet have a fight under a dryer which (based on the camera anyways) it appears impossible for a kid to have reached if he was playing with the pieces.






        share













        The end of The Lego Movie 2 heavily implies they do have control:




        at the end of the movie, Rex and Emmet have a fight under a dryer which (based on the camera anyways) it appears impossible for a kid to have reached if he was playing with the pieces.







        share











        share


        share










        answered 6 mins ago









        TheAshTheAsh

        9,708549124




        9,708549124






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134216%2fdo-the-minifigures-have-any-control-of-their-actions-within-the-lego-world%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Callistus I

            Tabula Rosettana

            How to label and detect the document text images