How pairplot is constructed? Based on what rule? Why people use it?
$begingroup$
I am curious how pairplot in seaborn library is constructed. I have seen similar plot, such as Pearson Correlation plot. What is the difference between these two plots? What is exact the use case of them?
visualization plotting
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am curious how pairplot in seaborn library is constructed. I have seen similar plot, such as Pearson Correlation plot. What is the difference between these two plots? What is exact the use case of them?
visualization plotting
$endgroup$
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am curious how pairplot in seaborn library is constructed. I have seen similar plot, such as Pearson Correlation plot. What is the difference between these two plots? What is exact the use case of them?
visualization plotting
$endgroup$
I am curious how pairplot in seaborn library is constructed. I have seen similar plot, such as Pearson Correlation plot. What is the difference between these two plots? What is exact the use case of them?
visualization plotting
visualization plotting
edited May 29 '17 at 12:05
VividD
564518
564518
asked May 29 '17 at 5:55
Ryan DongRyan Dong
61
61
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I can advise only for the usage. For the construction, you can simply look into the source code.
Pairplot and Pearson are actually almost same. Both plot two variables on a 2-dimensional plot, usually referred as X and Y to observe the relationship.
However Person correlation plot is suited only for continuous variables (such as age, amount of money, height, weight etc) because it calculates the correlation coefficient (which is incorrect for non-continuous data).
On the other hand, pairplot is made when you only want to visualize the relationship between two variables, where the variables can be continous, categorical (product type or part of day for example) or booleans (yes/no - 1/0). Furthermore, pairplot is usually a grid of plots for each variable in your dataset. Hence you can quickly see how all the variables are related. This can help to infere which variables are useful, which have skewed distribution etc.
You usually do this as a first step of your analysis - to understand better your data so you can afterwards choose the right model.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Differences:
Pairplot
If you have m attributes in your dataset, it creates a figure with (m)x(m) subplots.
The main-diagonal subplots are the univariate histograms (distributions) for each attribute.
For a non diagonal subplot, assume a position (i,j). This plots all the samples of the dataset on a coordinate system with axes the attributes i and j. In other words, it projects the dataset on these two attributes only. This is particularly interesting to visually inspect how the samples are spread with respect to these two attributes ONLY. The "shape" of the spread can give you valuable insight on the relation between the two attributes. For example, if the samples are spread on a linear pattern, it means that the two attributes are linearly related in your dataset. But you can also visually recognize nonlinear relations, such as quadratic, etc.
Correlation (Pearson)
It is a mathematical measure of strictly LINEAR correlation between two attributes. The closer it is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relation. The closer it is to 0, the weaker the relation. If there is a value close to 1 or -1, then you can safely assume that these two variables are linearly connected. If it is close to 0, you can assume the absence of linear relation BUT you cannot infer anything about nonlinearities (they might exist even if correlation is very low).
The main-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix show the autocorrelation of each attribute, thus a measure of its normalized spread around its mean value.
The non diagonal elements (i,j) show the linear correlation between the attributes i and j. Usually, correlation matrix is plotted on a heatmap (seaborn) that helps with the visualization.
Note
If you use Pearson correlation and you find that for the selected attributes (i,j) the value is close to 1 or -1, you should expect the samples forming a straight line in the (i,j) and (j,i) subplots of your Pairplot.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19293%2fhow-pairplot-is-constructed-based-on-what-rule-why-people-use-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I can advise only for the usage. For the construction, you can simply look into the source code.
Pairplot and Pearson are actually almost same. Both plot two variables on a 2-dimensional plot, usually referred as X and Y to observe the relationship.
However Person correlation plot is suited only for continuous variables (such as age, amount of money, height, weight etc) because it calculates the correlation coefficient (which is incorrect for non-continuous data).
On the other hand, pairplot is made when you only want to visualize the relationship between two variables, where the variables can be continous, categorical (product type or part of day for example) or booleans (yes/no - 1/0). Furthermore, pairplot is usually a grid of plots for each variable in your dataset. Hence you can quickly see how all the variables are related. This can help to infere which variables are useful, which have skewed distribution etc.
You usually do this as a first step of your analysis - to understand better your data so you can afterwards choose the right model.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I can advise only for the usage. For the construction, you can simply look into the source code.
Pairplot and Pearson are actually almost same. Both plot two variables on a 2-dimensional plot, usually referred as X and Y to observe the relationship.
However Person correlation plot is suited only for continuous variables (such as age, amount of money, height, weight etc) because it calculates the correlation coefficient (which is incorrect for non-continuous data).
On the other hand, pairplot is made when you only want to visualize the relationship between two variables, where the variables can be continous, categorical (product type or part of day for example) or booleans (yes/no - 1/0). Furthermore, pairplot is usually a grid of plots for each variable in your dataset. Hence you can quickly see how all the variables are related. This can help to infere which variables are useful, which have skewed distribution etc.
You usually do this as a first step of your analysis - to understand better your data so you can afterwards choose the right model.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I can advise only for the usage. For the construction, you can simply look into the source code.
Pairplot and Pearson are actually almost same. Both plot two variables on a 2-dimensional plot, usually referred as X and Y to observe the relationship.
However Person correlation plot is suited only for continuous variables (such as age, amount of money, height, weight etc) because it calculates the correlation coefficient (which is incorrect for non-continuous data).
On the other hand, pairplot is made when you only want to visualize the relationship between two variables, where the variables can be continous, categorical (product type or part of day for example) or booleans (yes/no - 1/0). Furthermore, pairplot is usually a grid of plots for each variable in your dataset. Hence you can quickly see how all the variables are related. This can help to infere which variables are useful, which have skewed distribution etc.
You usually do this as a first step of your analysis - to understand better your data so you can afterwards choose the right model.
$endgroup$
I can advise only for the usage. For the construction, you can simply look into the source code.
Pairplot and Pearson are actually almost same. Both plot two variables on a 2-dimensional plot, usually referred as X and Y to observe the relationship.
However Person correlation plot is suited only for continuous variables (such as age, amount of money, height, weight etc) because it calculates the correlation coefficient (which is incorrect for non-continuous data).
On the other hand, pairplot is made when you only want to visualize the relationship between two variables, where the variables can be continous, categorical (product type or part of day for example) or booleans (yes/no - 1/0). Furthermore, pairplot is usually a grid of plots for each variable in your dataset. Hence you can quickly see how all the variables are related. This can help to infere which variables are useful, which have skewed distribution etc.
You usually do this as a first step of your analysis - to understand better your data so you can afterwards choose the right model.
edited May 30 '17 at 7:12
stmax
1,4081016
1,4081016
answered May 30 '17 at 6:25
HonzaBHonzaB
1,176514
1,176514
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Differences:
Pairplot
If you have m attributes in your dataset, it creates a figure with (m)x(m) subplots.
The main-diagonal subplots are the univariate histograms (distributions) for each attribute.
For a non diagonal subplot, assume a position (i,j). This plots all the samples of the dataset on a coordinate system with axes the attributes i and j. In other words, it projects the dataset on these two attributes only. This is particularly interesting to visually inspect how the samples are spread with respect to these two attributes ONLY. The "shape" of the spread can give you valuable insight on the relation between the two attributes. For example, if the samples are spread on a linear pattern, it means that the two attributes are linearly related in your dataset. But you can also visually recognize nonlinear relations, such as quadratic, etc.
Correlation (Pearson)
It is a mathematical measure of strictly LINEAR correlation between two attributes. The closer it is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relation. The closer it is to 0, the weaker the relation. If there is a value close to 1 or -1, then you can safely assume that these two variables are linearly connected. If it is close to 0, you can assume the absence of linear relation BUT you cannot infer anything about nonlinearities (they might exist even if correlation is very low).
The main-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix show the autocorrelation of each attribute, thus a measure of its normalized spread around its mean value.
The non diagonal elements (i,j) show the linear correlation between the attributes i and j. Usually, correlation matrix is plotted on a heatmap (seaborn) that helps with the visualization.
Note
If you use Pearson correlation and you find that for the selected attributes (i,j) the value is close to 1 or -1, you should expect the samples forming a straight line in the (i,j) and (j,i) subplots of your Pairplot.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Differences:
Pairplot
If you have m attributes in your dataset, it creates a figure with (m)x(m) subplots.
The main-diagonal subplots are the univariate histograms (distributions) for each attribute.
For a non diagonal subplot, assume a position (i,j). This plots all the samples of the dataset on a coordinate system with axes the attributes i and j. In other words, it projects the dataset on these two attributes only. This is particularly interesting to visually inspect how the samples are spread with respect to these two attributes ONLY. The "shape" of the spread can give you valuable insight on the relation between the two attributes. For example, if the samples are spread on a linear pattern, it means that the two attributes are linearly related in your dataset. But you can also visually recognize nonlinear relations, such as quadratic, etc.
Correlation (Pearson)
It is a mathematical measure of strictly LINEAR correlation between two attributes. The closer it is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relation. The closer it is to 0, the weaker the relation. If there is a value close to 1 or -1, then you can safely assume that these two variables are linearly connected. If it is close to 0, you can assume the absence of linear relation BUT you cannot infer anything about nonlinearities (they might exist even if correlation is very low).
The main-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix show the autocorrelation of each attribute, thus a measure of its normalized spread around its mean value.
The non diagonal elements (i,j) show the linear correlation between the attributes i and j. Usually, correlation matrix is plotted on a heatmap (seaborn) that helps with the visualization.
Note
If you use Pearson correlation and you find that for the selected attributes (i,j) the value is close to 1 or -1, you should expect the samples forming a straight line in the (i,j) and (j,i) subplots of your Pairplot.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Differences:
Pairplot
If you have m attributes in your dataset, it creates a figure with (m)x(m) subplots.
The main-diagonal subplots are the univariate histograms (distributions) for each attribute.
For a non diagonal subplot, assume a position (i,j). This plots all the samples of the dataset on a coordinate system with axes the attributes i and j. In other words, it projects the dataset on these two attributes only. This is particularly interesting to visually inspect how the samples are spread with respect to these two attributes ONLY. The "shape" of the spread can give you valuable insight on the relation between the two attributes. For example, if the samples are spread on a linear pattern, it means that the two attributes are linearly related in your dataset. But you can also visually recognize nonlinear relations, such as quadratic, etc.
Correlation (Pearson)
It is a mathematical measure of strictly LINEAR correlation between two attributes. The closer it is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relation. The closer it is to 0, the weaker the relation. If there is a value close to 1 or -1, then you can safely assume that these two variables are linearly connected. If it is close to 0, you can assume the absence of linear relation BUT you cannot infer anything about nonlinearities (they might exist even if correlation is very low).
The main-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix show the autocorrelation of each attribute, thus a measure of its normalized spread around its mean value.
The non diagonal elements (i,j) show the linear correlation between the attributes i and j. Usually, correlation matrix is plotted on a heatmap (seaborn) that helps with the visualization.
Note
If you use Pearson correlation and you find that for the selected attributes (i,j) the value is close to 1 or -1, you should expect the samples forming a straight line in the (i,j) and (j,i) subplots of your Pairplot.
$endgroup$
Differences:
Pairplot
If you have m attributes in your dataset, it creates a figure with (m)x(m) subplots.
The main-diagonal subplots are the univariate histograms (distributions) for each attribute.
For a non diagonal subplot, assume a position (i,j). This plots all the samples of the dataset on a coordinate system with axes the attributes i and j. In other words, it projects the dataset on these two attributes only. This is particularly interesting to visually inspect how the samples are spread with respect to these two attributes ONLY. The "shape" of the spread can give you valuable insight on the relation between the two attributes. For example, if the samples are spread on a linear pattern, it means that the two attributes are linearly related in your dataset. But you can also visually recognize nonlinear relations, such as quadratic, etc.
Correlation (Pearson)
It is a mathematical measure of strictly LINEAR correlation between two attributes. The closer it is to 1 or -1, the stronger the linear relation. The closer it is to 0, the weaker the relation. If there is a value close to 1 or -1, then you can safely assume that these two variables are linearly connected. If it is close to 0, you can assume the absence of linear relation BUT you cannot infer anything about nonlinearities (they might exist even if correlation is very low).
The main-diagonal elements of the correlation matrix show the autocorrelation of each attribute, thus a measure of its normalized spread around its mean value.
The non diagonal elements (i,j) show the linear correlation between the attributes i and j. Usually, correlation matrix is plotted on a heatmap (seaborn) that helps with the visualization.
Note
If you use Pearson correlation and you find that for the selected attributes (i,j) the value is close to 1 or -1, you should expect the samples forming a straight line in the (i,j) and (j,i) subplots of your Pairplot.
edited Jun 12 '18 at 23:10
answered Jun 12 '18 at 21:47
pcko1pcko1
1,671418
1,671418
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f19293%2fhow-pairplot-is-constructed-based-on-what-rule-why-people-use-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown